DOCSLIB.ORG

Diversity and Risk Patterns of Freshwater Megafauna: a Global Perspective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diversity and Risk Patterns of Freshwater Megafauna: a Global Perspective Diversity and risk patterns of freshwater megafauna: A global perspective Inaugural-Dissertation to obtain the academic degree Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in River Science Submitted to the Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy of Freie Universität Berlin By FENGZHI HE 2019 This thesis work was conducted between October 2015 and April 2019, under the supervision of Dr. Sonja C. Jähnig (Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries), Jun.-Prof. Dr. Christiane Zarfl (Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen), Dr. Alex Henshaw (Queen Mary University of London) and Prof. Dr. Klement Tockner (Freie Universität Berlin and Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries). The work was carried out at Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Germany, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany and Queen Mary University of London, UK. 1st Reviewer: Dr. Sonja C. Jähnig 2nd Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Klement Tockner Date of defense: 27.06. 2019 The SMART Joint Doctorate Programme Research for this thesis was conducted with the support of the Erasmus Mundus Programme, within the framework of the Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate (EMJD) SMART (Science for MAnagement of Rivers and their Tidal systems). EMJDs aim to foster cooperation between higher education institutions and academic staff in Europe and third countries with a view to creating centres of excellence and providing a highly skilled 21st century workforce enabled to lead social, cultural and economic developments. All EMJDs involve mandatory mobility between the universities in the consortia and lead to the award of recognised joint, double or multiple degrees. The SMART programme represents a collaboration among the University of Trento, Queen Mary University of London and Freie Universität Berlin. Each doctoral candidate within the SMART programme has conformed to the following during their 3 years of study: (i) Supervision by a minimum of two supervisors in two institutions (their primary and secondary institutions). (ii) Study for a minimum period of 6 months at their secondary institution (iii) Successful completion of a minimum of 30 ECTS of taught courses (iv) Collaboration with an associate partner to develop a particular component / application of their research that is of mutual interest. (v) Submission of a thesis within 3 years of commencing the programme. This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Table of contents Table of contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................ I Zusammenfassung.............................................................................................................................. III Thesis outline .......................................................................................................................................VI List of figures .......................................................................................................................................IX List of tables...................................................................................................................................... XIV 1. General introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Freshwater biodiversity crisis ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Overlooked freshwater biodiversity in current conservation schemes .................................... 3 1.3 Megafauna: ecological roles, extinction risks and their potential in advancing biodiversity conservation .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Research gaps, aims and thesis structure ................................................................................ 9 1.5 References (Chapter 1).......................................................................................................... 12 2. Freshwater megafauna diversity: Patterns, status, and threats ................................................. 23 2.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 24 2.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 25 2.3 Methods ................................................................................................................................... 26 2.3.1 Species distribution mapping ............................................................................................... 26 2.3.2 Population trends and conservation status ........................................................................... 27 2.3.3 Human pressure on freshwater megafauna .......................................................................... 28 2.4 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 29 2.4.1 Distribution and status of freshwater megafauna ................................................................. 29 2.4.2 Human pressure on freshwater megafauna .......................................................................... 30 2.5 Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 33 2.5.1 Current status of freshwater megafauna ............................................................................... 33 2.5.2 Human pressure throughout distribution ranges of freshwater megafauna .......................... 34 2.5.3 Future challenges for freshwater megafauna conservation .................................................. 36 2.6 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. 38 2.7 References (Chapter 2)............................................................................................................ 39 Table of contents 3 Disappearing giants: A review of threats to freshwater megafauna ........................................... 46 3.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 47 3.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 47 3.3 Threats to freshwater megafauna ............................................................................................ 51 3.3.1 Overexploitation................................................................................................................... 53 3.3.2 Dam construction ................................................................................................................. 55 3.3.3 Habitat degradation .............................................................................................................. 57 3.3.4 Pollution ............................................................................................................................... 59 3.3.5 Species invasion ................................................................................................................... 60 3.4 Outlook: Filling the freshwater megafauna information gap .................................................. 62 3.5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. 63 3.6 References (Chapter 3)............................................................................................................ 64 4. The global decline of freshwater megafauna ................................................................................ 79 4.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 80 4.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 80 4.3 Methods ................................................................................................................................... 83 4.3.1 Population abundance .......................................................................................................... 83 4.3.2 Distribution range ................................................................................................................ 84 4.4 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 85 4.5 Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 89 4.5.1 The loss of freshwater megafauna........................................................................................ 89 4.5.2 Uncertainty in population data of freshwater megafauna .................................................... 90 4.5.3 Implications for freshwater biodiversity conservation. .......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capturing and Maintaining Genetic Diversity for the Establishment of a Long
    Capturing and maintaining genetic diversity for the establishment of a long- term breeding program for barramundi (Lates calcarifer) aquaculture Shannon Loughnan Bachelor of Science with Honours A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering Flinders University October 2013 ISBN: 978-1-925982-92-3 Contents List of Tables 7 List of Figures 8 List of Appendices 10 Declaration 11 Acknowledgements 12 Statement of Authorship 14 Thesis summary 15 Summary of chapters 19 1 General Introduction 25 1.1 Genetic improvement programs 25 1.2 Barramundi (Lates calcarifer) 28 1.3 Thesis scope and objectives 32 2 Broodstock contribution after mass spawning and size grading in barramundi (Lates calcarifer, Bloch) 34 2.1 Abstract 35 2.2 Introduction 36 2.3 Materials and methods 40 2.3.1 Mass spawning of broodstock 40 2.3.2 Size grading and sampling 42 2.3.3 DNA extraction 43 2.3.4 Batch sampling to discriminate non-contributors from low frequency contributors 44 2.3.5 PCR amplification 45 2.3.6 Statistical analysis 46 2.4 Results 48 2.4.1 Broodstock contribution 48 2.4.2 The production of half and full-sibling families 50 2.4.3 Genetic diversity 51 2.5 Discussion 53 2.6 Conclusion 58 3 Genetic diversity and relatedness estimates for captive barramundi (Lates calcarifer) broodstock populations, informs efforts to form a base population for selective breeding 67 3.1 Abstract 68 3.2 Introduction 69 3.3 Materials and methods 72 3.3.1 Sampling, DNA extraction
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of the Myxobolus Fauna of Common Barbel from Hungary and Iberian Barbel from Portugal
    Vol. 100: 231–248, 2012 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published September 12 doi: 10.3354/dao02469 Dis Aquat Org Comparison of the Myxobolus fauna of common barbel from Hungary and Iberian barbel from Portugal K. Molnár1,*, E. Eszterbauer1, Sz. Marton1, Cs. Székely1, J. C. Eiras2 1Institute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, HAS, POB 18, 1581 Budapest, Hungary 2Departamento de Biologia, e CIIMAR, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, Edifício FC4, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal ABSTRACT: We compared Myxobolus infection of common barbel Barbus barbus from the Danube River in Hungary with that in Iberian barbel Luciobarbus bocagei from the Este River in Portugal. In Hungary, we recorded 5 known Myxobolus species (M. branchialis, M. caudatus, M. musculi, M. squamae, and M. tauricus) and described M. branchilateralis sp. n. In Portugal we recorded 6 Myxobolus species (M. branchialis, M. branchilateralis sp. n., M. cutanei, M. musculi, M. pfeifferi, and M. tauricus). Species found in the 2 habitats had similar spore morphology and only slight differences were observed in spore shape or measurements. All species showed a spe- cific tissue tropism and had a definite site selection. M. branchialis was recorded from the lamellae of the gills, large plasmodia of M. branchilateralis sp. n. developed at both sides of hemibranchia, M. squamae infected the scales, plasmodia of M. caudatus infected the scales and the fins, and M. tauricus were found in the fins and pin bones. In the muscle, 3 species, M. musculi, M. pfeifferi and M. tauricus were found; however they were found in distinct locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Database of Living/Fossil Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the Year 2016
    www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the year 2016 published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany and Nicolas Straube, Munich, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 copyright by the authors 1 please inform us about missing papers: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Abstract: This paper contains a collection of 803 citations (no conference abstracts) on topics related to extant and extinct Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) as well as a list of Chondrichthyan species and hosted parasites newly described in 2016. The list is the result of regular queries in numerous journals, books and online publications. It provides a complete list of publication citations as well as a database report containing rearranged subsets of the list sorted by the keyword statistics, extant and extinct genera and species descriptions from the years 2000 to 2016, list of descriptions of extinct and extant species from 2016, parasitology, reproduction, distribution, diet, conservation, and taxonomy. The paper is intended to be consulted for information. In addition, we provide information on the geographic and depth distribution of newly described species, i.e. the type specimens from the year 1990- 2016 in a hot spot analysis. Please note that the content of this paper has been compiled to the best of our abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however,
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Birds of California Now Available! Price $54.00 for WFO Members, $59.99 for Nonmembers
    Volume 40, Number 3, 2009 The 33rd Report of the California Bird Records Committee: 2007 Records Daniel S. Singer and Scott B. Terrill .........................158 Distribution, Abundance, and Survival of Nesting American Dippers Near Juneau, Alaska Mary F. Willson, Grey W. Pendleton, and Katherine M. Hocker ........................................................191 Changes in the Winter Distribution of the Rough-legged Hawk in North America Edward R. Pandolfino and Kimberly Suedkamp Wells .....................................................210 Nesting Success of California Least Terns at the Guerrero Negro Saltworks, Baja California Sur, Mexico, 2005 Antonio Gutiérrez-Aguilar, Roberto Carmona, and Andrea Cuellar ..................................... 225 NOTES Sandwich Terns on Isla Rasa, Gulf of California, Mexico Enriqueta Velarde and Marisol Tordesillas ...............................230 Curve-billed Thrasher Reproductive Success after a Wet Winter in the Sonoran Desert of Arizona Carroll D. Littlefield ............234 First North American Records of the Rufous-tailed Robin (Luscinia sibilans) Lucas H. DeCicco, Steven C. Heinl, and David W. Sonneborn ........................................................237 Book Reviews Rich Hoyer and Alan Contreras ...........................242 Featured Photo: Juvenal Plumage of the Aztec Thrush Kurt A. Radamaker .................................................................247 Front cover photo by © Bob Lewis of Berkeley, California: Dusky Warbler (Phylloscopus fuscatus), Richmond, Contra Costa County, California, 9 October 2008, discovered by Emilie Strauss. Known in North America including Alaska from over 30 records, the Dusky is the Old World Warbler most frequent in western North America south of Alaska, with 13 records from California and 2 from Baja California. Back cover “Featured Photos” by © Kurt A. Radamaker of Fountain Hills, Arizona: Aztec Thrush (Ridgwayia pinicola), re- cently fledged juvenile, Mesa del Campanero, about 20 km west of Yecora, Sonora, Mexico, 1 September 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 1 LIST of BIRD SPECIES THAT BELONG to the FAMILIES
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.11.3.2/Attachment 1 Attachment 1 LIST OF BIRD SPECIES THAT BELONG TO THE FAMILIES AND GENERA CURRENTLY AGGREGATED UNDER APPENDIX II, MEET THE CMS CRITERIA AND HAVE AN UNFAVOURABLE CONSERVATION STATUS 2018 IUCN Red Common List Family name Scientific name Notes for Appendix II (Sheets 1 or 2) Category Anatidae Emperor Anser canagicus A member of a disaggregated family from NT Goose Appendix II. (Anatidae). IUCN Red List Status: Near Threatened; Movements characterised as: Full migrant: both breeding and non-breeding locations reliably occupied every season; individuals commonly travel >1,000 km north-south. Meets CMS movement criteria. Anatidae Long-tailed Clangula A member of a disaggregated family from VU Duck hyemalis CMS Appendix II. (Anatidae). Although currently listed on Appendix II database as a species, not officially inscribed. IUCN Red List Status: Vulnerable; Movements characterised as: Full migrant: both breeding and non-breeding locations reliably occupied every season; individuals commonly travel >1,000 km north-south. Meets CMS movement criteria. Anatidae Spectacled Somateria A member of a disaggregated family from NT Eider fischeri Appendix II. (Anatidae). IUCN Red List Status: Near Threatened; Movements characterised as: Full migrant: both breeding and non-breeding locations reliably occupied every season; individuals commonly travel >1,000 km north-south. Meets CMS movement criteria. Anatidae Common Somateria A member of a disaggregated family from NT Eider mollissima CMS Appendix II. (Anatidae). Although currently listed on Appendix II database as a species, not officially inscribed. IUCN Red List Status: Near Threatened; Movements characterised as: Partial migrant: substantial post-breeding range shift with both breeding and non-breeding locations reliably occupied every season; individuals commonly travel >1,000 km north-south.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Bathytoshia Brevicaudata (Hutton, 1875)
    FAMILY Dasyatidae Jordan & Gilbert, 1879 - stingrays SUBFAMILY Dasyatinae Jordan & Gilbert, 1879 - stingrays [=Trygonini, Dasybatidae, Dasybatidae G, Brachiopteridae] GENUS Bathytoshia Whitley, 1933 - stingrays Species Bathytoshia brevicaudata (Hutton, 1875) - shorttail stingray, smooth stingray Species Bathytoshia centroura (Mitchill, 1815) - roughtail stingray Species Bathytoshia lata (Garman, 1880) - brown stingray Species Bathytoshia multispinosa (Tokarev, in Linbergh & Legheza, 1959) - Japanese bathytoshia ray GENUS Dasyatis Rafinesque, 1810 - stingrays Species Dasyatis chrysonota (Smith, 1828) - blue stingray Species Dasyatis hastata (DeKay, 1842) - roughtail stingray Species Dasyatis hypostigma Santos & Carvalho, 2004 - groovebelly stingray Species Dasyatis marmorata (Steindachner, 1892) - marbled stingray Species Dasyatis pastinaca (Linnaeus, 1758) - common stingray Species Dasyatis tortonesei Capapé, 1975 - Tortonese's stingray GENUS Hemitrygon Muller & Henle, 1838 - stingrays Species Hemitrygon akajei (Muller & Henle, 1841) - red stingray Species Hemitrygon bennettii (Muller & Henle, 1841) - Bennett's stingray Species Hemitrygon fluviorum (Ogilby, 1908) - estuary stingray Species Hemitrygon izuensis (Nishida & Nakaya, 1988) - Izu stingray Species Hemitrygon laevigata (Chu, 1960) - Yantai stingray Species Hemitrygon laosensis (Roberts & Karnasuta, 1987) - Mekong freshwater stingray Species Hemitrygon longicauda (Last & White, 2013) - Merauke stingray Species Hemitrygon navarrae (Steindachner, 1892) - blackish stingray Species
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Linnaeus at Home
    NATURE-BASED ACTIVITIES FOR PARENTS LINNAEUS 1 AT HOME A GuiDE TO EXPLORING NATURE WITH CHILDREN Acknowledgements Written by Joe Burton Inspired by Carl Linnaeus With thanks to editors and reviewers: LINNAEUS Lyn Baber, Melissa Balzano, Jane Banham, Sarah Black, Isabelle Charmantier, Mark Chase, Maarten Christenhusz, Alex Davey, Gareth Dauley, AT HOME Zia Forrai, Jon Hale, Simon Hiscock, Alice ter Meulen, Lynn Parker, Elizabeth Rollinson, James Rosindell, Daryl Stenvoll-Wells, Ross Ziegelmeier Share your explorations @LinneanLearning #LinnaeusAtHome Facing page: Carl Linnaeus paper doll, illustrated in 1953. © Linnean Society of London 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrival system or trasmitted in any form or by any means without the prior consent of the copyright owner. www.linnean.org/learning “If you do not know Introduction the names of things, the knowledge of them is Who was Carl Linnaeus? Contents Pitfall traps 5 lost too” Carl Linnaeus was one of the most influential scientists in the world, - Carl Linnaeus A bust of ‘The Young Linnaeus’ by but you might not know a lot about him. Thanks to Linnaeus, we Bug hunting 9 Anthony Smith (2007). have a naming system for all species so that we can understand how different species are related and can start to learn about the origins Plant hunting 13 of life on Earth. Pond dipping 17 As a young man, Linnaeus would study the animals, plants, Bird feeders 21 minerals and habitats around him. By watching the natural world, he began to understand that all living things are adapted to their Squirrel feeders 25 environments and that they can be grouped together by their characteristics (like animals with backbones, or plants that produce Friendly spaces 29 spores).
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 Version
    Designation date: 23/06/99 Ramsar Site no. 999 Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 14, 3rd edition). A 4th edition of the Handbook is in preparation and will be available in 2009. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. Dr. Srey Sunleang, DD MM YY Director, Department of Wetlands and Coastal Zones, Ministry of Environment, #48 Preah Sihanouk Blvd., Tonle Bassac, Designation date Site Reference Number Chamkar Morn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia Tel: (855) 77-333-456 Fax: (855)-23-721-073 E-mail: [email protected] 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Freshwater Fishes of the Genus Capoeta (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) in Iran
    Received: 3 May 2016 | Revised: 8 August 2016 | Accepted: 9 August 2016 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2411 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Phylogenetic relationships of freshwater fishes of the genus Capoeta (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae) in Iran Hamid Reza Ghanavi | Elena G. Gonzalez | Ignacio Doadrio Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Biodiversity and Evolutionary Abstract Biology Department, CSIC, Madrid, Spain The Middle East contains a great diversity of Capoeta species, but their taxonomy re- Correspondence mains poorly described. We used mitochondrial history to examine diversity of the Hamid Reza Ghanavi, Department of algae- scraping cyprinid Capoeta in Iran, applying the species- delimiting approaches Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Email: [email protected] General Mixed Yule- Coalescent (GMYC) and Poisson Tree Process (PTP) as well as haplotype network analyses. Using the BEAST program, we also examined temporal divergence patterns of Capoeta. The monophyly of the genus and the existence of three previously described main clades (Mesopotamian, Anatolian- Iranian, and Aralo- Caspian) were confirmed. However, the phylogeny proposed novel taxonomic findings within Capoeta. Results of GMYC, bPTP, and phylogenetic analyses were similar and suggested that species diversity in Iran is currently underestimated. At least four can- didate species, Capoeta sp4, Capoeta sp5, Capoeta sp6, and Capoeta sp7, are awaiting description. Capoeta capoeta comprises a species complex with distinct genetic line- ages. The divergence times of the three main Capoeta clades are estimated to have occurred around 15.6–12.4 Mya, consistent with a Mio- Pleistocene origin of the di- versity of Capoeta in Iran. The changes in Caspian Sea levels associated with climate fluctuations and geomorphological events such as the uplift of the Zagros and Alborz Mountains may account for the complex speciation patterns in Capoeta in Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Key Fish Species and Their Biology in Himalayan Rivers in Nepal Tek Bahadur Gurung, Arun Baidya, Gopal Lamsal, Nita Pradhan
    Overview of the key fish species and their biology in Himalayan Rivers in Nepal Tek Bahadur Gurung, Arun Baidya, Gopal Lamsal, Nita Pradhan Regional Meeting of Fish Experts 29-30 April, 2018, Hotel Yak and Yeti Organized by Kathmandu, Nepal 1 Nepal is endowed with 232 fish species, 217 indigenous in 6000 rivers, the river basins extending to China, Nepal & India in 3 river basins & 1 river system 2 Species Richness Low High mount Moderate Mid hills Flood plains Rich Cool water fish (not permanently in cold or warm waters), most life history strategies (12 to 29oC), Cold water species (7-20oC) Warm water (15 to 32oC) 3 The Key Fish Species of Himalayan Rivers Key fish species are those : • Rare, endangered, threatened RET Species in Nepal Himalaya species as per IUCN criteria • Endemic species Endemic species reported • Exhibiting Habitat Diversity Number of species at altitudinal and migratory Pathways basis and migratory pathways • Spawning Biology Ex-situ conservation • Conservation Biology In-situ co-managing conservation Most important biotic and abiotic factors of a river • Water flow • Substrate 210 cross dam projects in different rivers • Light (NEA 2013): • Temperature • 84 in operation, • Water chemistry • 34 under construction, • Bacteria • 92 proposed • Underwater plants • Invertebrates • Fish • Birds ….. and the communities Location of Cross Dams Source: ADB 2014 Flows, Fish Species & Livelihood : Generalised Scenario et al 2016al et Gurung Source : Source 6 General features of the Himalayan Rivers • Himalayan rivers have
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Wetland and Aquatic Ecosystem in the Lower Mekong River Basin of Cambodia
    FINAL REPORT Review of Wetland and Aquatic Ecosystem in the Lower Mekong River Basin of Cambodia By Kol Vathana Department of Nature Conservation and Protection Ministry of Environment Phnom Penh, Kingdom of Cambodia Submitted to The Cambodian National Mekong Committee Secretariat (CNMCS) and THE MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION SECRETARIAT (MRCS) August 2003 1 TABLE OF CONTENT I. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................6 II. WETLAND BIODIVERSITY ..............................................................................................9 2.1 Current Status...................................................................................................................9 2.2 Ecosystem Diversity ........................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Freshwater Ecosystem ..............................................................................................9 2.2.2 Coastal and Marine Ecosystem...............................................................................12 2.3 Species Diversity ...........................................................................................................15 2.3.1 Fauna.......................................................................................................................15 2.3.2 Flora ........................................................................................................................19 2.4 Genetic Diversity ...........................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]