Maniema Janvier 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maniema Janvier 2015 © Gemma Cortes/OCHA – Mai 2013 Qui Fait Quoi Où ? L’Action Humanitaire par Territoire i Province de Maniema Janvier 2015 Janvier 2015 - Prochaine mise à jour : Juin 2015 Conception et réalisation : Bureau des Nations Unies pour la Coordination des Affaires Humanitaires - OCHA IMU 46, Avenue de l’Aéroport - Quartier 3z - Commune de Kasuku - Ville de Kindu - Province du Maniema – RDC Pour toute erreur ou omission dans le présent document, veuillez nous le faire savoir en retour aux adresses suivantes : ii [email protected] , [email protected] ou appeler au +243 81 706 12 15, +243 81 706 13 74 SOMMAIRE SOMMAIRE ................................................................................................................................................................... i INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 QUI FAIT QUOI OU – Infographie ................................................................................................................................ 2 QUI EST OU – infographie ........................................................................................................................................... 4 ABREVIATIONS ET ACRONYMES ............................................................................................................................. 5 PROJETS PAR TERRITOIRE/SECTEUR (Cluster) ..................................................................................................... 7 Territoire de Kabambare ....................................................................................................................................... 9 EAU, HYGIENE ET ASSAINISSEMENT ......................................................................................................... 9 EDUCATION .................................................................................................................................................... 9 LOGISTIQUE ................................................................................................................................................... 9 MULTISECTORIEL .......................................................................................................................................... 9 PROTECTION................................................................................................................................................ 10 SANTE ........................................................................................................................................................... 11 SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE ............................................................................................................................ 12 Territoire de Kailo ................................................................................................................................................ 13 EAU, HYGIENE ET ASSAINISSEMENT ....................................................................................................... 13 EDUCATION .................................................................................................................................................. 14 LOGISTIQUE ................................................................................................................................................. 15 MULTISECTORIEL ........................................................................................................................................ 15 NUTRITION.................................................................................................................................................... 15 PROTECTION................................................................................................................................................ 16 SANTE ........................................................................................................................................................... 17 SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE ............................................................................................................................ 18 Territoire de Kasongo ......................................................................................................................................... 19 AME ET ABRI D’URGENCE .......................................................................................................................... 19 EAU, HYGIENE ET ASSAINISSEMENT ....................................................................................................... 19 EDUCATION .................................................................................................................................................. 20 MULTISECTORIEL ........................................................................................................................................ 20 PROTECTION................................................................................................................................................ 21 SANTE ........................................................................................................................................................... 22 SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE ............................................................................................................................ 24 Territoire de Kibombo ......................................................................................................................................... 25 EAU, HYGIENE ET ASSAINISSEMENT ....................................................................................................... 25 EDUCATION .................................................................................................................................................. 25 LOGISTIQUE ................................................................................................................................................. 26 MULTISECTORIEL ........................................................................................................................................ 26 PROTECTION................................................................................................................................................ 26 SANTE ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE ............................................................................................................................ 29 i Territoire de Lubutu............................................................................................................................................. 30 EAU, HYGIENE ET ASSAINISSEMENT ....................................................................................................... 30 EDUCATION .................................................................................................................................................. 30 LOGISTIQUE ................................................................................................................................................. 30 MULTISECTORIEL ........................................................................................................................................ 31 PROTECTION................................................................................................................................................ 31 SANTE ........................................................................................................................................................... 33 SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE ............................................................................................................................ 34 Territoire de Pangi ............................................................................................................................................... 35 EAU, HYGIENE ET ASSAINISSEMENT ....................................................................................................... 35 EDUCATION .................................................................................................................................................. 37 LOGISTIQUE ................................................................................................................................................. 38 MULTISECTORIEL ........................................................................................................................................ 38 NUTRITION.................................................................................................................................................... 38 PROTECTION................................................................................................................................................ 39 SANTE ........................................................................................................................................................... 40 SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE ............................................................................................................................ 42 Territoire de Punia ............................................................................................................................................... 44 EAU, HYGIENE ET ASSAINISSEMENT ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Humanitarian Action in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) Weekly Report, 13 November 2009
    Humanitarian Action in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) Weekly Report, 13 November 2009 Headlines • Approximately 22,000 people flee the Equateur Province due to intercommunal clashes • Humanitarian access hampered in Baraka area, South Kivu, due to the unstable security situation • Approximately 18,000 new households displaced in Geti, Province Orientale, due to abuses by armed groups • Humanitarian activities temporarily suspended in Lubero, North Kivu Overall Developments Protection of Civilians • Protection of civilians remains a high concern in many areas of North Kivu. Armed groups continue to loot villages and to destroy crops, and cases of amputations of limbs have also been reported. This particularly effects the Territories of Masisi and Rutshuru. • In Province Orientale, attacks and human rights abuses against civilians also continue to cause displacement. At the present time, an estimated 456,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs) are present in the province, this figure being 7,500 higher than that recorded at the end of August. Humanitarian Access • During a demonstration organised by members of the local population on 31 October in Lubero, North Kivu, stones have been thrown against offices and vehicles of some humanitarian organizations. This has led to the transfer of humanitarian staff to Beni, as a precautionary measure. • In North Kivu, two vehicles of the NGO Save the Children – UK have been unable to reach the area of Vitshumbi, in the Rutshuru Territory. They had been blocked by armed elements, who have demanded the transport of their dependants. • Following a deterioration of the security situation in the areas of Baraka and Fizi, in South Kivu, caused by clashes between armed groups, some international NGOs have decided to relocate their staff to Uvira.
    [Show full text]
  • CWG-R) 25 Juin 2020
    CWG Sud-Kivu et Maniema 25/06/2020 Cash Working Group Régional (CWG-r) 25 Juin 2020 COMPTE-RENDU Lieu Réunion virtuelle, via MS Teams Facilitation Delphin Subea, OCHA Secrétariat Yves Byamungu, NRC Grand Sud HCR, NRC, AIDES, People In Need, Caritas Bukavu, Oasis de la Culture, ACTED, PAM, CICR, ARPS, OCHA Bukavu, Participants OCHA Kindu, OCHA Shabunda, UNICEF/CashCap Invité: Elan RDC 1. Suivi des points d’action et adoption du CR de la réunion du 28 mai 2020 ; 2. Rapport ELAN RDC sur c procédures et des contraintes en matière de passation de marchés ; 3. Interventions Cash réalisées et planifiées : échange d’expériences et des difficultés rencontrées ; Agenda 4. Divers ✓ Processus de mise à jour des TdR CWG-régional ; ✓ Rappel sur le 4W pour les interventions en espèces i) Collecter (partager avec OCHA) les expériences et les leçons apprises lors des interventions Cash sur les inondations dans la ville d’Uvira, en guise de capitalisation pour les acteurs TM de la région Sud-Kivu et Maniema ii) Partager les analyses du monitoring post-distribution dans le cadre des interventions Abris dans le Territoire de Points Fizi/secteur de Kimbi-Lulenge ; d’action iii) Partager les analyses de marchés en amont des interventions Cash dans le Maniema (Ville de Kindu) et dans le Territoire de Kalehe/Groupement de Bitale ; iv) Partager avec le CICR l’analyse des marchés conduite par la CARITAS-Kasongo et Actionaid en amont de leurs interventions Cash à Salamabila/Kabambare, Maniema ; Site web CWG DRC: https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/fr/operations/democratic-republic-congo/cash-working-group CWG Sud-Kivu et Maniema 25/06/2020 v) Apporter des observations sur le draft des Termes de Référence du Cash Working Group-Régional, en guise d’alignement aux TdR des autres CWG-r ; vi) Mettre à jour la matrice 4W Mapping sur les interventions monétaires en espèces https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sU4fietZ2IN6yuqb6azNggp8hQK09GCdmdq108lTGy8/edit?usp=sharing 1.
    [Show full text]
  • REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO Ministère De La Santé Publique
    REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO Ministère de la Santé Publique PROGRAMME NATIONAL DE NUTRITION (PRONANUT) ENQUETES NUTRITIONNELLES TERRITORIALES PROVINCE DU MANIEMA Août-Septembre 2014 Avec appui de Octobre 2014 TABLE DES MATIERES Table des matières………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Avant-propos………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... 3 Sigles et abréviations………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 0. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 0.1. Contexte…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 2.2. Objectifs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 0.3. Présentation sommaire de la province enquêtée …………………………………………………………………………… 6 1. METHODOLOGIE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 1.1. Approche globale ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 1.2. Domaine de l’enquête……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 1.3. Type de sondage…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 1.4. Sélection des unités d’enquête……………………………………………………………………………………………………... 12 2.10 Données collectées………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 12 2. ORGANISATION DU TRAVAIL SUR TERRAIN….……………………………………………………………………………… 14 2.1. Comité technique de l’enquête………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 2.1. Comité de validation……………….………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 2.3. Formation et supervision………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 14 3. COUVERTURE DEL’ECHANTILLON ….…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 15 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith Based Organizations and Public Goods in Africa: Islamic Associations in the Education Sector of the Democratic Republic of Congo
    FAITH BASED ORGANIZATIONS AND PUBLIC GOODS IN AFRICA: ISLAMIC ASSOCIATIONS IN THE EDUCATION SECTOR OF THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO By ASHLEY ELIZABETH LEINWEBER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 © 2011 Ashley Elizabeth Leinweber 2 In memory of Donald McCloud Leinweber, my beloved grandfather, and in honor and gratitude to the resilient people of the Congo. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research for this dissertation was made possible by the generous funding in the form of a Dissertation Research Grant from the African Power and Politics Program (APPP), through the Center for African Studies at the University of Florida. APPP is a consortium research program funded by the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID), with additional support from Irish Aid, for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed here are solely my own and not necessarily those of DFID, Irish Aid or the APPP as a whole. I would also like to thank the Department of Political Science at the University of Florida for granting me a Dissertation Research Travel Award for fieldwork in 2008. I am also grateful for assistance during the writing phase in the form of a Dissertation Writing Fellowship from the APPP for fall semester 2009 and by a Delores A. Auzenne Doctoral Dissertation Award through the Graduate School of the University of Florida for spring semester 2011. In addition to financial assistance, this dissertation would not have been possible without the endless encouragement and guidance of several communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Elixir Journal
    54892 Christophe Myonge Lukusa et al./ Elixir Agriculture 147 (2020) 54892-54901 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Agriculture Elixir Agriculture 147 (2020) 54892-54901 Zootechnical and Economic Analysis of Piglet Farming Systems in the Town of Kindu (Case of Mikelenge-Kasuku and Alunguli) Democratic Republic of Congo Christophe Myonge Lukusa1, Kabondo Robert2 and Solia Edondoto Sylvain3 1Faculty of Agricultural Sciences at Kindu University. 2Faculty of Agricultural Sciences of IFA-YANGAMBI/Kisangani. 3Faculty Agricultural Sciences of IFA-YangambiS/Kisangani. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: In order to better understand the zootechnical and economic characteristics of piglet Received: 26 April 2020; farming, a diagnostic study was conducted from October to December 2019, three Received in revised form: months with 30 pig farmers, in the form of cross-sectional and retrospective surveys in 9 October 2020; the three municipalities of the town of Kindu in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Accepted: 19 October 2020; results showed that pig farming was practiced by both married and educated men and women. They were mainly zimba, Kusu and Nande and associated livestock with Keywords agriculture, private activity or trade. They operated in two different livestock systems Piglets, (traditional and semi-intensive), with a clear predominance of the traditional system Operating System, (85.5% of farms). The latter was characterized by semi-intensive hog barns (51.1%), Zootechnics and Economics. where local-bred pigs were mostly reared (90.4% of farms). The average herd size was DRC, 19.2 - 20.1 pigs. In 97% of cases, farmers fed the animals from kitchen waste and Maniema Province , agricultural and agro-industrial by-products.
    [Show full text]
  • Province Du Maniema Profil Resume Pauvrete Et
    Programme des nations unies pour le développement Unité de lutte contre la pauvreté RDC PROVINCE DU MANIEMA PROFIL RESUME PAUVRETE ET CONDITIONS DE VIE DES MENAGES Mars 2009 - 1 – Province Du Maniema Sommaire PROVINCE DU MANIEMA Province Maniema Avant-propos..............................................................3 Superficie 132.250 km² 1 – La province du Maniema en un clin d’oeil............4 Population 2005 1,6 millions 2 – La pauvreté dans la province du Maniema ..........6 Densité 12 habitants / km² 3 – L’éducation.........................................................10 Nb de communes 3 4 – Le développement socio-économique des Nb de territoires 7 femmes.....................................................................11 Routes d’intérêt national 945 km 5 – La malnutrition et la mortalité infantile ...............12 Routes d’intérêt provincial 1.093 km 6 – La santé maternelle............................................13 Routes secondaires 962 km 7 – Le sida et le paludisme ......................................14 Réseau ferroviaire nd 8 – L’habitat, l’eau et l’assainissement ....................15 Gestion de la province Gouverneur provincial 9 – Le développement communautaire et l’appui des Nb de ministres provinciaux 10 Partenaires Techniques et Financiers (PTF) ...........16 Nb de députés provinciaux 12 - 2 – Province Du Maniema Avant-propos Le présent rapport présente une analyse succincte des conditions de vie des ménages du Maniema. Cette analyse se base essentiellement sur les récentes enquêtes statistiques menées en RDC. Il fait partie d’une série de documents sur les conditions de vie de la population des 11 provinces de la RDC. Cette série de rapports constitue une analyse menée en toute indépendance par des experts statisticiens-économistes, afin de fournir une vision objective de la réalité de chaque province en se basant sur les principaux indicateurs de pauvreté et conditions de vie de la population, spécialement ceux se rapportant aux OMD et à la stratégie nationale de réduction de la pauvreté.
    [Show full text]