journal of jesuit studies 7 (2020) 417-446 brill.com/jjs A Sketch of the Controversy de auxiliis R. J. Matava Notre Dame Graduate School of Christendom College, Alexandria, VA, USA
[email protected] Abstract In the 16th century, the Dominicans and the Jesuits engaged in a polarized theological debate about how God can move the human will in a way that neither compromises human free choice nor makes God the author of moral evil. This debate, called the “controversy de auxiliis,” was never resolved. In 1607, Pope Paul v decreed that neither side was heretical and forbade further publishing on the issue without his explicit per- mission. This article explains the main theological points of the various Dominican and Jesuit actors, the human factors that contributed to the debate, and the reasons why this is still an important issue today. It concludes that both positions were based on important theological insights that would need to be taken into account if any reso- lution were to be found, that a resolution of this debate would benefit the Church in a number of ways, and that Jesuit and Dominican tribalism and polemics have contrib- uted to keeping this issue unresolved. Keywords de auxiliis – nature/grace – Jesuits – Dominicans – Augustine – Thomism – Domingo Báñez – Luis de Molina – Francisco Suárez Among the theological debates that have divided the Dominicans and Jesuits, the most infamous, fundamental, and enduring is the Controversy de auxiliis. The controversy de auxiliis concerned the relationship between divine and human agency. More specifically, theologians disagreed over how to conceptu- alize the efficacy of “actual” grace (called auxilium or “divine assistance”).