DOCSLIB.ORG

090430Env.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
090430Env.Pdf October 31, 2018 Mr. Angel Correa Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration 700 West Capitol, Room 3130 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3298 Re: Job Number 090430 FAP Number NHPP-0044(15) Pigeon Creek Str. & Apprs. (S) Hwy. 74, Section 3 Bridge Number 03419 Madison County Tier 3 Categorical Exclusion Dear Mr. Correa: The Environmental Division reviewed the referenced project and has determined it falls within the definition of the Tier 3 Categorical Exclusion as defined by the ARDOT/FHWA Memorandum of Agreement on the processing of Categorical Exclusions. The following information is included for your review and, if acceptable, approval as the environmental documentation for this project. The purpose of the project is to replace a substandard bridge with a box culvert on Highway 74 over Pigeon Creek in Madison County, Arkansas. Total length of the project is 0.08 mile. A project location map is enclosed. The existing Pigeon Creek Bridge (Bridge Number 03419) is a 24‘ wide x 76’ long structure with four 19’ reinforced concrete channel beam sections supported by reinforced concrete bents and steel pile end bents. The existing roadway consists of two 11’ wide paved travel lanes with 3’ wide grass shoulders. The existing right of way width is 100’. A quintuplet steel reinforced concrete box culvert will be built on existing location. A temporary detour road will be constructed 104’ south of the existing structure Job Number 090430 Tier 3 Categorical Exclusion Page 2 of 3 and will utilize pipe culverts in crossing Pigeon Creek. The new approaches will consist of two 12’ wide paved travel lanes with 8’ wide shoulders. A proposed right of way width of 220’ will require 0.68 acres of additional right of way and 1.05 acres of temporary construction easements. Of this acreage, approximately 0.04 acre of Prime Farmland and 0.02 acre of Farmland of Statewide Importance will be converted to highway right of way. Form NRCS-CPA-106 for Farmland Conversion is enclosed. Design data for this project is as follows: Design Year Average Daily Percent Trucks Design Speed Traffic 2019 1,900 5 55 mph 2039 2,200 5 55 mph There are no relocations, wetlands, wellhead protection areas, public water supplies, cultural resources, or environmental justice issues involved with this project. Field inspections found no evidence of existing underground storage tanks or hazardous waste deposits on site. State Historic Preservation Office clearance is enclosed. Stream impacts at Pigeon Creek will result in less than 0.1 acre of permanent fill. Construction of the proposed project should be allowed under the terms of a Nationwide Permit 14 for Linear Transportation Projects. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation website lists the gray bat (Myotis grisescens), Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), Ozark big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii ingens), Rabbitsfoot (Theliderma cylindrica), and Missouri bladderpod (Physaria filiformis) as threatened and endangered species potentially occurring at or near the project location. A bat mist net survey was conducted on June 10-11, 2018 by HDR consultants that resulted in no captures of federally protected bats. With the limited amount of tree clearing, negative results of presence/absence survey, distance to known species locations, and best management practices to reduce sedimentation, the USFWS concurred with a determination of "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" for Indiana bat, gray bat, and Ozark big-eared bats on July 25, 2018. No ek Madison 7880 Rd Wesley ek e r ek C land Cre Rich n o e ig Madison 6105 Rd P 7 4 Madison 7305 Rd End Job 090430 Begin Job 090430 7 4 Madison 6290 Rd reek Lo Richland C llar s Creek 3 0 3 ! Project Location 0 960 1,920 Job 090430 Pigeon Creek Str. & Apprs. Feet (Hwy. 74) Project Location ARDOT - Environmental GIS - Hopkins Madison County ³ July 31, 2018 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NRCS-CPA-106 Natural Resources Conservation Service (Rev.1-91) FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING FOR CORRIDOR TYPE PROJECTS 10/1Tf2018 PART I (To be completed by Federal Agency) Job 090430 3 Date of Land Evaluation Request Sheet 1 of 1._ 1 r Name of Project Pigeon Creek Str & Apprs 5. Federal Agency Involved FHWA 2. Type of Project Bridge replacement with a box culvert 6. County and State Madison, AR 1. PART II (To be completed by NRCS) Date Request Received by NRCS 2. Person Completing Form 4. Acres Irrigated Average Farm Size 3. Does the corridor contain orime. unioue statewide or local imoortantfarmland? YES NO I (If no, the FPPA does not apply - Do not complete additional parts of this form). 5. Major Crop(s) 6. Farmable Land In Government Jurisdiction 7. Amount of Farmland As Defined In FPPA Acres: % Acres: % 8. Name Of Land Evaluation System Used 9. Name of Local Site Assessment System 10. Dale Land Evaluatlon Returned by NRCS AlternativeCorridor For Segment PART Ill (To be completed by Federal Agency) Corridor A CorrldorB Corridor C CorridorD A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 0.68 B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly, Or To Receive Services C. Total Acres In Corridor 2.02 PART IV (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Information A. Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland 0.04 B. Total Acres Statewide And Local ImportantFarmland 0.02 C. Percentage Of Farmland in County Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Converted D. Percentage Of Farmland in Govt. Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value PART V (To becomp leted by NRCS) LandEvaluation ln fonnationCriterion Relative value of Fannland toBe Serviced or Converted (Scale of O -100 Points) PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency) Corridor Maximum Assessment Criteria (These criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.S(c)) Points 1. Area in Nonurban Use 15 10 2. Perimeter in Nonurban Use 10 0 3. Percent Of Corridor Being Farmed 20 1 4. Protection Provided By State And Local Government 20 0 5. Size of Present Fanm Unit Compared To Average 10 1 6. Creation Of Nonfarmable Farmland 25 0 7. Availability Of Farm SupportServices 5 5 5 B. On-Farm Investments 20 9. EffectsOf Conversion On Farm SupportServices 25 0 10. Compatlbillty With Existing Agricultural Use 10 0 TOTAL CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 22 PART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency) Relative Value Of Farmland (From PartV) 100 100 Total Corridor Assessment (From PartVI above or a local site 160 22 assessment) TOTAL POINTS (Total of above 2 lines) 260 122 1. Corridor Selected 2. Total Acres of Farmlands to be 3. Date Of Selection: 4. Was A Local Site Assessment Used? Converted by Project: On existing location. 0.04 acres of Prime Farmland & October 17, 2018 0.02 acres of Statewide YES D NO 0 Importance 5. Reason For Selection: Best location. Signature ofPerson Completing this Part: IDATE October 17, 2018 � f3aeru, NOT omplete a form for each segment with more than one Alternate Corridor United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office 110 South Amity Suite 300 Conway, AR 72032-8975 Phone: (501) 513-4470 Fax: (501) 513-4480 http://www.fws.gov/arkansas-es In Reply Refer To: June 19, 2018 Consultation Code: 04ER1000-2018-SLI-0698 Event Code: 04ER1000-2018-E-01734 Project Name: Pigeon Creek Str. & Apprs. (S) Subject: Updated list of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies endangered, threatened, proposed, and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). This letter only provides an official species list and technical assistance; if you determine that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected in any way by the proposed project, even if the effect is wholly beneficial, consultation with the Service will be necessary. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found on our website. Please visit our website at http://www.fws.gov/arkansas-es/IPaC/home.html for species- specific guidance to avoid and minimize adverse effects to federally endangered, threatened, proposed, and candidate species. Our web site also contains additional information on species life history and habitat requirements that may be useful in project planning. 06/19/2018 Event Code: 04ER1000-2018-E-01734 2 If your project involves in-stream construction activities, oil and natural gas infrastructure, road construction, transmission lines, or communication towers, please review our project specific guidance at http://www.fws.gov/arkansas-es/IPaC/ProjSpec.html. The karst region of Arkansas is a unique region that covers the northern third of Arkansas and we have specific guidance to conserve sensitive cave-obligate and bat species.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Additional Vertebrate Records and Natural History Notes from Arkansas M
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 67 Article 30 2013 Additional Vertebrate Records and Natural History Notes from Arkansas M. B. Connior South Arkansas Community College, [email protected] C. Renn Tumlison Henderson State University H. W. Robison J. S. Placyk Jr. University of Texas at Tyler C. T. McAllister Eastern Oklahoma State College Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Connior, M. B.; Tumlison, C. Renn; Robison, H. W.; Placyk, J. S. Jr.; and McAllister, C. T. (2013) "Additional Vertebrate Records and Natural History Notes from Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 67 , Article 30. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol67/iss1/30 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This General Note is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 67 [2013], Art. 30 Additional Vertebrate Records and Natural History Notes from Arkansas M.B. Connior1*, R. Tumlison2, H.W. Robison3, J.S. Placyk, Jr.4 and C.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood-Frequency Comparison from 1995 to 2016 and Trends in Peak Streamflow in Arkansas, Water Years 1930–2016
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood-Frequency Comparison from 1995 to 2016 and Trends in Peak Streamflow in Arkansas, Water Years 1930–2016 MISSOURI Eleven Point River S p r i n White River g Strawberry River R iv Black River Illinois River er North Sylamore Creek White River Black River Little Red River TENNESSEE OKLAHOMA Arkansas River ARKANSAS James Fork River Poteau White River Dutch Creek Bayou Meto South Fourche LaFave River Fourche LaFave River Arkansas River A Cossatot River nto in e R Saline River i v e Saline River r Little Missouri River B a MISSISSIPPI y o Mississippi River u Little River B a r t Ouachita River h o l o m e Red River S w m a c Bayou Macon kover Creek TEXAS Ouachita River LOUISIANA Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5131 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Physiographic sections in Arkansas and surrounding States (modified from figure 1). Flood-Frequency Comparison from 1995 to 2016 and Trends in Peak Streamflow in Arkansas, Water Years 1930–2016 By Paul A. Ensminger and Brian K. Breaker Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Federal Emergency Management Agency Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5131 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Fatmucket (Lampsilis Powellii I
    Arkansas Fatmucket (Lampsilis powellii I. Lea, 1852) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office Conway, Arkansas 5-YEAR REVIEW Arkansas Fatmucket (Lampsilis powellii I. Lea, 1852) I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Methodology used to complete review Public notice of the initiation of this 5-year review was given in the Federal Register on September 8, 2006 (71 FR 53127-53129) and a 60 day comment period was opened. During the comment period, we did not receive any additional information about Arkansas fatmucket (Lampsilis powelllii) other than specific information from biologists familiar with the species. This review was completed by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Arkansas Field Office. Arkansas fatmucket only occurs in the state of Arkansas. Literature and documents on file at the Arkansas Field Office were used for this review. All recommendations resulting from this review are a result of thoroughly reviewing the best available information on the Arkansas fatmucket and the reviewer’s expertise as one of the leading authorities on this species. Comments and suggestions regarding the review were received from Arkansas Field Office supervisors and peer reviews from outside the Service (see Appendix A). No part of the review was contracted to an outside party. B. Reviewers Lead Region – Southeast Region: Nikki Lamp, (404) 679-7118 Lead Field Office – Conway, Arkansas: Chris Davidson, (501) 513-4481 C. Background 1. Federal Register Notice initiating this review: September 8, 2006. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Review of 14 Southeastern Species. (71 FR 53127) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Antoine River, Little Missouri River System, Southwestern Arkansas
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 37 Article 21 1983 Fishes of the Antoine River, Little iM ssouri River System, Southwestern Arkansas Henry W. Robison Southern Arkansas University Elaine Laird Southern Arkansas University Darryl Koym Southern Arkansas University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Robison, Henry W.; Laird, Elaine; and Koym, Darryl (1983) "Fishes of the Antoine River, Little iM ssouri River System, Southwestern Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 37 , Article 21. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol37/iss1/21 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 37 [1983], Art. 21 FISHES OF THE ANTOINE RIVER,LITTLEMISSOURI RIVER SYSTEM, SOUTHWESTERN ARKANSAS HENRY W. ROBISON, ELAINE LAIRD,1 and DARRYLKOYM Department of Biological Sciences Southern Arkansas University Magnolia, Arkansas 71753 ABSTRACT The fishes of theAntoine- River (LittleMissouri River system) in southwestern Arkansas were surveyed from September, 1980 June, 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas
    Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1970-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas State Highway Commission Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas By R. C. GILSTRAP FLOODS OF 1968 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1970-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas State Highway Commission u. s. s. s. WATER RESOURCES DIVISION ROLL A, MO. RECEIVED APR 101972 AM PM 7|8|9|10|ll|12[li2i3i4i5|6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 76-185107 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1214 CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................................................................................... Al Introduction.................................................................. ....................................................... 1 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................ 3 Definitions of terms and abbreviations...... .......... ........................................................... 3 Precipitation.................. .................................................................................................... 4 Floods..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • French Place Names in Clark County, Arkansas
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Articles Faculty Publications Winter 2019 French Place Names in Clark County, Arkansas Joe Jeffers Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/articles Part of the Geography Commons, and the United States History Commons Clark County Historical Journal -- 2019 French Place Names in Clark County, Arkansas Joe Jeffers French place names are common in Arkansas, especially in south Arkansas, where after the French explorers left, French trappers and settlers from Canada moved in. Some of those names remain unchanged from the original French. General usage and English speaking settlers modified others. Clark County was one of five counties established in the Arkansas Territory. Its boundaries changed five times before reaching its present form in 1877. This article explores French place names in today’s Clark County and in the original Clark County formed in 1818. ~~~~~~~~~~ French place names abound in Arkansas, particularly in south Arkansas. The indigenous people were Caddo, Osage, and Quapaw, among others. The first European explorers came in 1541, when Hernando de Soto led a Spanish expedition into Arkansas looking for gold. They found many tribal villages and large fields of maize, but no gold.1 They killed many tribesmen and transmitted disease, but left no settlements. DeSoto died a year later, and the Spanish were gone within another year. More than 100 years later, French explorers entered Arkansas -- Jacques Marquette and Louis Jolliet in 1673, and Robert La Salle and Henri de Tonti in 1681. They found only widely scattered tribal villages of mostly hunter-gatherer groups, not the more populous settlements encountered by the Spanish.
    [Show full text]
  • West Central Arkansas Planning and Development District, Inc
    WEST CENTRAL ARKANSAS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2014 – 2019 Produced by: West Central Arkansas Planning & Development District June 2014 Made possible by a planning grant from the Economic Development Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce, with matching funds provided by WCAPDD and regional in-kind contributions. 1 West Central Arkansas Planning & Development District Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy TABLE OF CONTENTS What is the “CEDS” 3 Organization and Management 4 CEDS Committee 4 Community and Private Sectors Participation 5 Local Contact 5 Management 6 Plan Area 6 I District Economic & Demographic Profile District Wide Assessment 8 Population 10 Geography 11 Workforce Development and Use 16 Transportation Access 17 II County Economic Profiles 18 III Analysis of District Economic Development Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats 24 Economic Clusters 26 Goals and Objectives 27 IV Strategic Projects, Programs, and Activities Economic Development Projects 36 V CEDS Plan of Action 38 VI Performance Measures 41 VII Disaster and Economic Recovery and Resiliency 42 VIII Appendices 43 2 West Central Arkansas Planning & Development District Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy What is a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)? A comprehensive economic development strategy, (CEDS) is designed to bring together the public and private sectors in the creation of an economic roadmap to diversify and strengthen regional economies. The CEDS should analyze the regional economy and serve as a guide for establishing regional goals and objectives, developing and implementing a regional plan of action, and identifying investment priorities and funding sources. A CEDS integrates a region’s human and physical capital planning in the service of economic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionalization of Low-Flow Characteristics of Arkansas Streams
    REGIONALIZATION OF LOW-FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF ARKANSAS STREAMS By A.H. Ludwig and Gary D. Tasker U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4013 Prepared in cooperation with the ARKANSAS SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION COMMISSION Little Rock, Arkansas 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division Federal Center, Building 810 2301 Federal Office Building Box 25425 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS CONVERSION FACTORS Multiply By To obtain cubic foot per second (ft3/s) 0.02832 cubic meter per second mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer Note: Before running the ARK program please be sure that the ANSI.SYS device line is in the CONFIG.SYS file. The CONFIG.SYS file is located in the root directory of the C: drive To get to the correct location enter the following commands. C: cd \ To view the current CONFIG.SYS file enter following: type CONFIG.SYS The ANSI.SYS line should be SIMILAR to one of the following lines: DEVICE=ANSI.SYS or DEVICE=C:\ANSI.SYS or DEVICE=C:\DOS\ANSI.SYS or DEVICE=C:\BIN\ANSI.SYS If your current CONFIG.SYS file does not contain a line similar to one of the lines listed above, find the location of ANSI.SYS on your machine. Your local PC support person can help you find it if you have problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Season Mean Monthly Flow and Harmonic Mean Flow Regression Equations for Selected Ungaged Basins in Arkansas
    Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality, Southwestern Energy, the Arkansas Natural Resources Commission, and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Dry Season Mean Monthly Flow and Harmonic Mean Flow Regression Equations for Selected Ungaged Basins in Arkansas Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5031 Version 1.1, July 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dry Season Mean Monthly Flow and Harmonic Mean Flow Regression Equations for Selected Ungaged Basins in Arkansas By Brian K. Breaker Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality, Southwestern Energy, the Arkansas Natural Resources Commission, and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5031 Version 1.1, July 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 First release: 2015 Revised: July 2015 (ver 1.1) For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenwood, Arkansas & the Diamond Lakes Since 1926 75 See Us Online: and Herald
    2 Sections • 14 Pages Thursday, August 20, 2015 th GLENWOOD USPS 220-180 90 Year • Issue 34 ¢ HERALDSERVING GLENWOOD, ARKANSAS & THE DIAMOND LAKES SINCE 1926 75 SEE US ONLINE: WWW.SWARKANSASNEWS.COM AND WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/GLENWOOD HERALD A burn ban was issued for Pike County on the Voting machine testing Arrests related to afternoon of August 13 by County Judge Dewight Mack set, public invited county burglaries http://www.arkfireinfo.org/ MURFREESBORO -- Pike County Clerk Sandy Campbell has announced that logic and accuracy test- made, investigation ing of all media to be used for the voting equipment for the 2015 Annual School Election will take place continues by PCSO in the Clerk’s ofice at 112 N. Washington, Suite A in Murfreesboro on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 at 10 a.m. MURFREESBORO -- According to coun- The public is invited to attend. ty police reports, the last few weeks in Pike County have proven to be a perilous time to be a criminal in Pike County Arkansas. Over the last several months, Pike County law enforcement agencies have been inun- dated with reports of residential burglaries and Library seeks to start thefts, stimulating a massive response into the criminal activity. pre-K program locally Since the beginning of the reports, aggres- sive investigations into the burglaries have GLENWOOD -- Bainum Library & Learning Cen- been conducted. The investigations -- led by ter will be starting a “1000 Books before Kindergar- Pike County Sheriff Charlie Caldwell, Chief ten” program with the kick-off day on Saturday, Sep- Deputy David Shelby, and Detective Glen tember 12, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Clark, Cleveland, and Dallas Counties, Arkansas
    Water Resources of Clark, Cleveland, and Dallas Counties, Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1879-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Geological Commission Water Resources of Clark, Cleveland, and Dallas Counties, Arkansas By RAYMOND O. PLEBUCH and MARION S. MINES CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1879-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Geological Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract______________-____--_-___-_____---__--___---_--__-------- Al Introduction._____________________________________________________ 2 Water resources._________________________-___-__-_-___----_-__-_-- 3 Surface water.________________________________________________ 4 Surface-water supplies without storage.______________________ 4 Augmentation of low flow by storage_______________________ 8 Quality ol water ____________________-___-___-___-__---_-_ 10 Ouachita River______________________________________ 11 Saline River_-_-___-__---------_--_----__--__----____- 11 Little Missouri River________________-__-___------__- 11 Caddo River_._________________________ 18 Tributary streams_______-__-_-___-_--_-__---_----__-_- 18 Ground water and its quality__________________________________ 19 Interior Highlands_-____--________-__-_---___-_---__--___-_
    [Show full text]
  • Red River Compact Commission
    RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION 40TH ANNUAL MEETING JUNE 29 -30, 2020 Postponed and Held Virtually Due to COVID-19 Travel Concerns AGENDA PACKET Table of Contents Monday, June 29, 2020: RRCC Committee Meetings - 1:30pm (CDT) I. 1:30pm - Environmental Committee – Scott Van Winkle, Chair Attachment A - Texas Environmental Report (5 pages) Attachment B - Arkansas Environmental Committee Report (15 pages) Attachment C – Oklahoma Environmental Committee Report (5 pages) II. 2:30pm - Engineering Committee – Scott Van Winkle, Chair Attachment D – Texas Engineering Committee Report (3 pages) Attachment E – Boeuf Monitoring Report (16 pages) III. 3:30pm - Legal Committee - Heather Hunziker, Chair Attachment F – Memorandum, Harry Vorhoff – RE: Summary of Legal Committee’s Activities for 2019-2020 (2 pages) Attachment G – Memorandum, Crystal Phelps – RE: Arkansas Compliance (2 pages) Attachment H – Email, Michael Bynum – RE: Response to draft memorandum by Crystal Phelps (2 pages) IV. 4:00pm - Budget Committee – Scott Van Winkle, Chair Attachment I – 2021 Proposed Budget (1 page) Attachment J – 2020 Budget vs. Actuals (1 page) Attachment K – 2020 Transaction Summary (1 page) (Note: Attachments I- K will be discussed again during the meeting on 6/30/20 under items VI and VIII A) Tuesday, June 30, 2020: Commission Meeting – 8:30am (CDT) I. Call to Order – Chairman Sue Lowry II. Welcome and Introductions III. Approval of the Agenda IV. Approval of the Minutes of the 2019 RRCC Annual Meeting held in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on April 30, 2019 Attachment L – 2019 Minutes of the 39th Annual Meeting of the RRCC (12 pages) V. Report of the Chairman – Sue Lowry VI.
    [Show full text]