University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of

2010

Morphological and genetic analyses in the packardii group (: )

Mathew L. Brust University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected]

Erica J. Lindroth University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected]

W. Wyatt Hoback University of Nebraska at Kearney, [email protected]

Robert Wright University of Nebraska--Lincoln, [email protected]

Kathryn J. Hanford University of Nebraska, [email protected]

See next page for additional authors

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub

Part of the Entomology Commons

Brust, Mathew L.; Lindroth, Erica J.; Hoback, W. Wyatt; Wright, Robert; Hanford, Kathryn J.; and Foster, John E., "Morphological and genetic analyses in the Melanoplus packardii group (Orthoptera: Acrididae)" (2010). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 331. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/331

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Mathew L. Brust, Erica J. Lindroth, W. Wyatt Hoback, Robert Wright, Kathryn J. Hanford, and John E. Foster

This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ entomologyfacpub/331 Journal of Orthoptera Research 201 0, 19(2): 281-288

Morphological and genetic analyses in the Melanoplus packardii group (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

Submitted January 18, 201 0, accepted December 5, 201 ° MATHEW L. BRUST, ERICA J. LINDROTH, W. WYATI HOBACK, ROBERT J. WRIGHT, KATHY HANFORD AND JOHN E. FOSTER (MLB, EJL RJW, JEF; all based Nebraska USA) Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska Lincoln, 202 Entomology Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0816. Email: elindro [email protected], [email protected], jfoster1 @unl.edu (MLB) Present address: Department of Biology, Chadron State College, 1000 Main Street. Chadron, NE 69337. Email: [email protected] (WWH) Department of Biology, University of Nebraska at Kearney, 905 W 25th Street. Kearney, NE 68849. Email: [email protected] (KH) Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska Lincoln, 340 Hardin Hall North, Lincoln, NE 68583-0963. Email: [email protected] Abstract and subspecies in the packardii group: Melanoplus packardii, Melano­ Melanoplus packardii Scudder was described in 1897. Three additional plus foedus foedus, Melanoplus foedus fluviatilis, Melanoplus foedus isleyi, closely-related species were later described and their status as species has and Melanoplus stonei (Eades & OUe 2009). The ranges of M. foedus been questioned on numerous occasions. We examined morphology from foedus and M. foedus fluviatilis overlap across a large portion of the specimens collected in Nebraska which fit descriptions of three of the United States, and yet no apparent hybrids have been mentioned four forms and specimens that appeared to be hybrids. We found distinct in the literature. In addition, the range of M. foedus isleyi appears to morphological characters suggesting species status for M. foedus and M. overlap the range of M. foedus fluviatilis over a smaller area (Eades packardii, but not for M. foedus fluviatilis. Examination of aedeagi of these & Otte 2009). three forms suggests that M. foedus and M. packaTdii are each distinct, but All forms within this group are very difficult to differentiate that the aedeagi of M. f fluviatilis and M. f foedus cannot be distinguished. Molecular analyses ofthe three groups did not produce clear separations and because few morphological characters consistently differ between suggest gene exchange between these three forms may be ongoing. Together, them and even the genitalic differences are few. The cerci of the these data suggest that M. foedus and M. packardii should be recognized as males of all forms are virtually identical; however, the aedeagus of sibling species, butM. foedus fluviatilis is best considered a form ofM. foedus, M. packardii differs from that of M. foedus (Brooks 1958). typically found in low lying areas. Chapco et al. (1999) conducted mitochondrial DNA analyses on several North American Melanoplus species and determined that Keywords M. packardii and M. foedus were distinct, but closely related, species. However, genetic analysis of members of the group has also been Melanoplus packardii, morphometric, genetic, grasshopper, inconclusive and a later study by Chapco and Litzenberger (2002) systematics determined thatM. packardii andM. foedus had some genetic overlap among individuals. Together, these results suggest that these species Introduction either represent a variable single species or they represent a very recent evolutionary radiation with hybridization possible. More The taxonomic status of members of the Melanoplus packardii detailed studies on the genetic relationships between described group (Orthoptera: Acrididae) has been changed numerous times. species and subspecies within the M. packardii group are needed Melanoplus packardii packardii Scudder was described in 1897 to clarify these relationships. (Scudder 1897) and its taxonomic status has not shifted since Collections oflarge series from this group across Nebraska from (pfadt 2002, Capinera et al. 2004). Melanoplus foedus Scudder was 2005 to 2007 show trends that raise questions on the taxonomic described in 1897 (Scudder 1897), but was considered a subspe­ status of forms currently recognized as subspecies of M. foedus and cies of M. packardii for five years (Blatchley 1920, Hebard 1925). for M. packardii. This study scores morphological traits and uses It is currently recognized as a full species (Vickery & Kevan 1985, molecular analyses to test three hypotheses: 1) Melanoplus foedus Pfadt 2002, Capinera et al. 2004). Melanoplus packardii brooksi and M. packardii are distinct species; 2) Melanoplus foedus fluviatilis Vickery was described from Canada in 1979 (Vickery 1979) and represents a full species; and 3) local hybridization occurs between it remains recognized as a subspecies of M. packardii. Melanoplus M. packardii and M. foedus. fluviatilis Bruner was described as a species in 1897 (Bruner 1897), but without an extensive description. It was formally described in Methods 1920 (Blatchley 1920), but was later placed as a subspecies of M. foedus (Hebard 1931). Its taxonomic status has remained unchanged Large series of the forms M. packardii, M. foedus foedus, and M. since 1931 (Helfer 1987, Kirk & Bomar2005).Melanoplus foedus isleyi foedus fluviatilis were collected from across Nebraska, as well as from Hebard was described as a subspecies of M. foedus and remains as a single site in South Dakota, during the summers of 2005-2007. a subspecies under current classification (Hebard 1936a, Capinera Specimens were identified to species using a variety of resources, et al. 2004). Finally, Melanoplus stonei Rehn was described in 1904 including Bruner (1897), Scudder (1897), Helfer (1987), and Pfadt (Rehn 1904) and has since been recognized as a subspecies of M. (2002). foedus (Cantrall 1968) or M. packardii (Hebard 1928), but is now All specimens used for morphological studies were then pinned considered distinct [Hebard 1932 (1931), Vickery & Kevan 1985, and placed in the collection at USDA-APHIS in Lincoln, Nebraska. Kirk & Bomar 2005]. Specimens representing potential hybrids between M. foedus foedus In summary, the current literature recognizes the following species and M. packardii were grouped with the species or subspecies with

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPTERA RESEARCH 201 0, 19(2)  -,"2534 %*,).$2/4( 77(/"!#+ 2*72)'(4 +(!.&/2$!.$*%&/34%2

4ABLE.UMBEROFSPECIMENSOFEACH-ELANOPLUSTAXONBYCOUNTY WHICHTHEYSHAREDTHEGREATESTSIMILARITY'ENETICEXAMINATIONWAS OFCOLLECTIONEXAMINEDINMORPHOMETRICSTUDY THENUSEDTODETERMINETHEIDENTITYOFTHESEPOSSIBLEHYBRIDSSEE 3PECIES #OUNTY 1UANTITY BELOW !TOTALOF-FOEDUSmUVIATILIS -FOEDUSFOEDUS AND -FOEDUSmUVIATILIS "UFFALO  -PACKARDIIWEREEXAMINEDMORPHOLOGICALLY4ABLE  -FOEDUSmUVIATILIS $AWSON  .ONMEASUREMENTDATAINCLUDEDSPECIESDETERMINATION DATE -FOEDUSmUVIATILIS &URNAS  COUNTY LOCALITY SEX HINDTIBIALCOLOR POSTOCULARBARDEVELOPMENT -FOEDUSmUVIATILIS (UGHES3$  ANDPREDOMINANTCOLOR CONSISTENCYOFDORSALPRONOTALCOLORSOLIDOR -FOEDUSmUVIATILIS +EARNEY  STRIPED PREDOMINANTDORSALPRONOTALCOLOR ANDSECONDARYPRONOTAL -FOEDUSmUVIATILIS +EITH  COLOR-EASUREMENTDATAWEREOBTAINEDFORTEGMENLENGTHFROM -FOEDUSmUVIATILIS ,INCOLN  LOWESTINSERTIONALONGLOWERPRONOTUMTOTIP NARROWESTDORSAL -FOEDUSFOEDUS !RTHUR  DISTANCEBETWEENEYES ANDLENGTHOFMALEFURCULAE-EASUREMENTS -FOEDUSFOEDUS "ANNER  OFTEGMENLENGTHWEREDONEUSINGAVERNIERCALIPERANDESTIMATED -FOEDUSFOEDUS "LAINE  TOTHENEARESTMM WHILEMEASUREMENTSOFTHEINTEREYEDISTANCE -FOEDUSFOEDUS "OX"UTTE  ANDLENGTHOFFURCULAEWERETAKENWITHANOPTICALMICROMETER3COPE -FOEDUSFOEDUS "ROWN  /LYMPUS3: 343 X™XX-ICROMETER/LYMPUS!8 -FOEDUSFOEDUS #HERRY  /" - MM -ELANOPLUSFmUVIATILISAND-FFOEDUSWERE -FOEDUSFOEDUS #USTER  SEPARATEDBASEDONTHECHARACTERSLISTEDIN4ABLE -FOEDUSFOEDUS $EUEL  #HARACTERS WERE THEN ANALYZED USING 02/# ',)--)8 3!3 -FOEDUSFOEDUS $UNDY  )NSTITUTE)NC -EASUREMENTDATATEGMENLENGTH DISTANCE -FOEDUSFOEDUS 'ARDEN  BETWEENEYES ANDMALEFURCULALENGTH WEREANALYZEDUNDERANOR -FOEDUSFOEDUS 'RANT  MALDISTRIBUTIONWHILECATEGORICALVARIABLESTIBIALCOLOR POSTOCULAR -FOEDUSFOEDUS (ALL  BAR DEVELOPMENT AND POSTOCULAR COLOR WERE ANALYZED UNDER A -FOEDUSFOEDUS (OLT  MULTINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION "ECAUSE OF DISTINCT DIFFERENCES IN SIZE -FOEDUSFOEDUS (OOKER  BETWEENSEXES MALESANDFEMALESWERECOMPAREDSEPARATELYFOR -FOEDUSFOEDUS +EITH  MEASUREMENTVARIABLES -FOEDUSFOEDUS +EYA0AHA  -FOEDUSFOEDUS ,INCOLN  %XAMINATIONOF!EDEAGIˆ!EDEAGIFROMTHREEMALESOFSPECIMENS -FOEDUSFOEDUS ,OGAN  IDENTIlEDAS-FOEDUSmUVIATILIS -FOEDUSFOEDUS AND-PACKARDII -FOEDUSFOEDUS ,OUP  WEREEXAMINEDFORSTRUCTURALDIFFERENCES)NEACHCASE THETERMINAL -FOEDUSFOEDUS -C0HERSON  PARTOFTHEABDOMENOFTHREEMALESWASSEVERED INTESTINALCONTENTS -FOEDUSFOEDUS -ORRILL  REMOVED ANDTHEREMAININGSTRUCTURESOAKEDINASOLUTIONOF+/( -FOEDUSFOEDUS 2ED7ILLOW  FORAPPROXIMATELYH!FTERH THESEWERETRANSFERREDTO -FOEDUSFOEDUS 2OCK  ETHANOL AND THE AEDEAGUS THEN REMOVED !EDEAGI WERE CLEANED -FOEDUSFOEDUS 3COTTS"LUFF  UNDERADISSECTINGSCOPETOREMOVEBITSOFCONNECTIVETISSUE4HEY -FOEDUSFOEDUS 3HERIDAN  WEREPLACEDINETHANOLUNTILEXAMINATION0HOTOGRAPHSOFTHE -FOEDUSFOEDUS 3IOUX  AEDEAGIWERETAKENTHROUGHADISSECTINGSCOPE ANDDRAWNUSINGA -FOEDUSFOEDUS 4HOMAS  CAMERALUCIDA!COMPARISONWASMADEOFTHEGENERALSTRUCTUREOF -PACKARDII "ANNER  THETERMINALENDOFTHEAEDEAGUS ESPECIALLYINREGARDTOPARAMERE -PACKARDII "UFFALO  STRUCTURE -PACKARDII #HASE  -PACKARDII #HERRY  'ENETIC!NALYSES -PACKARDII #USTER  -PACKARDII $UNDY  $.!)SOLATIONAND1UANTIlCATIONˆ$.!WASISOLATEDFROMTHEHIND -PACKARDII &RANKLIN  LEGS OF  INDIVIDUALS OF EACH FORM FOLLOWING A MODIlED $OYLE -PACKARDII &URNAS  AND $OYLE  #4!" EXTRACTION PROTOCOL 0ELLETED $.! WAS -PACKARDII 'AGE  SUSPENDEDIN«LX4%BUFFERM-4RIS (#, M-%$4!  -PACKARDII 'ARDEN  4HELOCATIONS DATESOFCOLLECTION ANDTHENUMBEROFSPECIMENS -PACKARDII 'OSPER  USEDINTHEGENETICANALYSESAREPRESENTEDIN4ABLE -PACKARDII 'REELEY  -PACKARDII (ARLAN  !&,0 0#2ˆ'ENETICVARIATIONWASANALYZEDUSINGAMODIlED!&,0 -PACKARDII (AYES  AMPLIlEDFRAGMENTLENGTHPOLYMORPHISM PROCEDUREBASEDON -PACKARDII (ITCHCOCK  6OSETAL  -PACKARDII (OWARD  -PACKARDII +EITH  4EMPLATEPREPARATIONˆ!PPROXIMATELY«LOFNG«L$.!TEMPLATE -PACKARDII +NOX  WASINCUBATEDWITH«L%CO2) «L-SE).EW%NGLAND -PACKARDII ,OUP  "IOLABS «L/NE 0HOR !LLBUFFER'%(EALTHCARE «L -PACKARDII -ORRILL  BOVINESERUMALBUMIN.EW%NGLAND"IOLABS ANDNANOPUREWATER -PACKARDII 0AWNEE  FORTOTALVOLUMEOF«LATª#FORHINA04# 0ELTIER -PACKARDII 3COTTS"LUFF  4HERMAL#YCLER-*2ESEARCH )NC 7ALTHAM -! 4HERESULTING -PACKARDII 3HERIDAN  FRAGMENTS WERE THEN INCUBATED AT ª# FOR  H WITH A LIGATION -PACKARDII 3HERMAN  MIXTUREOF«L4$.!LIGASE X4$.!LIGASEBUFFER.EW -PACKARDII 3IOUX  %NGLAND"IOLABS &OSTER#ITY #! «L%CO2)ADAPTER «L-SE)

*/52.!,/&/24(/04%2!2%3%!2#(  -,"2534 %*,).$2/4( 77(/"!#+ 2*72)'(4 +(!.&/2$!.$*%&/34%2  4ABLE#HARACTERSFORDIFFERENTIATING-FOEDUSmUVIATILISAND-FOEDUSFOEDUS -FOEDUSFOEDUS -FOEDUSmUVIATILIS (INDTIBIACOLOR 0INKISHRED RARELYBLUE 0INKISHRED PURPLE ORBLUE #OLOROFDORSAL /RANGE BROWNWITHLIGHTSTRIPESLATERALLY 3OLIDglLLgWITHSPECKLEDAPPEARANCE WOODYBROWN PRONOTUM 0OSTOCULARBARS ,ACKINGORPOORLYDEVELOPED BROWNTOBLACK 3TRONGLYDEVELOPED BLACKTORARELYBROWN -ALEFURCULALENGTH 5SUALLY MM RARELYUNDERMM 5SUALLY MM RARELYOVERMM #OLORINNERHIND ,IGHTYELLOWISHTOLIGHTORANGE BROWN /RANGETORED MAYHAVEHEAVYBLACKISHSUFFUSION RARELYORANGE FEMUR BROWN ADAPTER/PERON4ECHNOLOGIES AND«LNANOPUREWATER! $ATA SCORING AND ANALYSISˆ/NE MICROLITER SAMPLES WERE ELECTRO DILUTIONWASTHENPERFORMEDONTHELIGATIONPRODUCTUSINGX PHORESEDTHROUGHA+"0LUSPOLYACRYLAMIDEGEL,) #/2 AND 4%BUFFER THEBANDSDETECTEDVIAINFRAREDmORESCENCE USINGALASERSCANNING MACHINE,) #/2-ODEL3  !N)2$ LABELED BP 0REAMPLIlCATIONˆ«LOFTHELIGATIONMIXTUREWASINCUBATEDWITH SIZESTANDARDWASUSEDTOESTIMATEFRAGMENTSIZE3IXTY TWOMARK «L0REAMPLIlCATION0RIMER-IX)))NVITROGEN «LX0#2 ERSWERESELECTEDBASEDONCLARITY ANDBANDSWERESCOREDUSINGTHE

BUFFER)) «L-G#L AND«L!MPLITAG$.!POLYMERASE PROGRAM3!'!-8,) #/2 4HEDATAWERECONVERTEDTOMATRIX !PPLIED"IOSYSTEMS 4HE0#2PROGRAMCONSISTEDOFCYCLES FORMFORFURTHERANALYSIS WITHAINDICATINGBANDPRESENCEANDA SATª# MINATª# MINATª# !DILUTIONWITH INDICATINGABSENCE$ATAWEREANALYZEDUSING0!50B3WOF NANOPUREWATERWASPERFORMEDONTHEPRODUCT FORD $ISTANCEANALYSISWASPERFORMEDUSINGNEIGHBORJOINING ANDMINIMUMEVOLUTION WHILEUNWEIGHTEDMAXIMUMPARSIMONY 3ELECTIVEAMPLIlCATIONˆ2EACTIONVOLUMESCONTAINING«LNANO WASPERFORMEDUSINGAHEURISTICSEARCH"OOTSTRAPANALYSESOF

PUREWATER «LX0#2BUFFER)) «L-G#L «L!M REPLICATESWEREPERFORMEDTOASSESSCLADESUPPORT!RPHIAXANTHOP PLITAG$.!POLYMERASE!PPLIED"IOSYSTEMS «L-SE)PRIMER TERA"URMEISTER SERVEDASANOUTGROUPTAXON/NESPECIMENOF ,) #/2 «L%CO2))2$ LABELEDPRIMER,) #/2 AND THEOUTGROUPANDATOTALOFSPECIMENSOFTHESELECTEDTAXAWERE «LOFTHEPREAMPLIlCATIONTEMPLATEWEREAMPLIlEDVIA0#20RIM USEDINTHEANALYSES4WOSPECIMENSOFTHESELECTEDTAXADIDNOT ERSWERESCREENEDANDCHOSENBASEDONTHENUMBERANDCLARITYOF DEMONSTRATEMARKERSDISTINCTENOUGHFORANALYSIS BANDSPRODUCED4HE0#2PROGRAMCONSISTEDOFONECYCLES ATª# SATª# MINATª# CYCLESSATª#  2ESULTS MINATª# ANDCYCLESSATª# SATª# MINAT ª# 4HEREACTIONWASSTOPPEDBYADDING«LSTOPSOLUTION $ISTRIBUTIONˆ-FOEDUSFOEDUSAND-FOEDUSmUVIATILISWEREONLYFOUND ,) #/2 4HEPRODUCTWASTHENDENATUREDFORMINATª#AND TOCO OCCURATASINGLESITEAPPARENTINTERGRADESWEREEXTREMELYRARE STOREDAT ª# ANDONLYFOUNDATTHATSITE%LSEWHEREIN.EBRASKAEACHOFTHESETWO FORMSOCCUPIEDDISTINCTHABITATS WITH-FFOEDUSOCCURRINGINDRY

&IG#OUNTY LEVELDISTRIBUTIONOFSPECIMENSCOLLECTEDFORMOR PHOMETRICANALYSESACROSS.EBRASKA,IGHTGRAYINDICATES-ELANOPLUS FOEDUS MEDIUMGRAYINDICATES-mUVIATILIS ANDDARKGRAYINDICATES -PACKARDII#OUNTIESWITHCHECKEREDPATTERNHADMORETHANONE SPECIESANALYZED

*/52.!,/&/24(/04%2!2%3%!2#(   -,"2534 %*,).$2/4( 77(/"!#+ 2*72)'(4 +(!.&/2$!.$*%&/34%2

4ABLE#OLLECTIONINFORMATIONFORSPECIMENSUSEDINGENETICANALYSES 3PECIES 3TATE #OUNTY ,OCATION LAT. LONG7 $ATE 1UANTITY !RPHIAXANTHOPTERA .EBRASKA ,ANCASTER ,INCOLN7ILDERNESS0ARK   3EPTEMBER  OUTGROUP  -ELANOPLUSFOEDUSmUVIATILIS .EBRASKA $AWSON KM3OF,EXINGTON   *ULY   -ELANOPLUSFOEDUSFOEDUS .EBRASKA ,INCOLN KM..7OF.ORTH0LATTE   *ULY   -ELANOPLUSPACKARDII .EBRASKA 0AWNEE KM.OF$U"OIS   *ULY   -FOEDUSXPACKARDII .EBRASKA -ORRILL KM37OF"RIDGEPORT   *ULY   -FOEDUSXPACKARDII .EBRASKA 'ARDEN KM33%OF,EWELLEN   *ULY   SANDYUPLANDSAND-FmUVIATILISINOPENSANDYWOODLANDSAND SPECIMENMAYBEANINTERGRADEWITH-FOEDUSFOEDUS!LL-FOEDUS THEUPPERREACHESOFSANDBARSALONGMAJORRIVERS&IG  FOEDUSAND-PACKARDIIHADTHEDORSALPRONOTUMDISTINCTLYSTRIPED %XTENSIVESAMPLINGSHOWED-FOEDUSAND-PACKARDIICO OCCUR 7HILE-FOEDUSFOEDUSAND-PACKARDIIWEREGENERALLYSIMILARIN ONLYRARELYIN.EBRASKA(OWEVER INSOMEAREASOFCO OCCURRENCE HAVING A STRIPED DORSAL PRONOTUM THE COLOR OF THE DARK STRIPES APPARENTHYBRIDSBETWEEN-FOEDUSAND-PACKARDIIWERECOLLECTED TENDEDMORESTRONGLYTOWARDRED BROWNINSPECIMENSIDENTIlEDAS FAIRLYCOMMONLY ANDATTHESESITES hHYBRIDvFORMSTENDEDTOPRE -FOEDUSFOEDUSANDDARKOLIVE BROWNIN-PACKARDII DOMINATEOVEREITHEROFTHETWOPARENTSPECIES MAKINGTHESPECIE (INDFEMURANDTEGMENLENGTHSWERESIMILARWITHINSEXESFOR DIFlCULTTODISTINGUISH!TONESITE IN+EITH#OUNTY .EBRASKA BOTH ALLTHREEFORMS4ABLE "OTHSEXESOF-FmUVIATILISAND-PACK SPECIESCO OCCURREDINLARGENUMBERSANDNOAPPARENTHYBRIDSWERE ARDIIDIFFEREDFROM-FFOEDUSINTHEMINIMUMDISTANCEBETWEEN OBSERVED4HISSUGGESTSTHATTHESETWOSPECIESMAYBEHYBRIDIZING THEEYES BUTWERESIMILARTOEACHOTHER4ABLESAND -ALESOF INSOMEAREASANDTHATTHEHYBRIDIZATIONMIGHTBEATLEASTPARTIALLY -ELANOPLUSFmUVIATILISAND-PACKARDIIDIFFEREDFROM-FFOEDUS DRIVENBYLOWABUNDANCEOFTHETWOFORMSATTHESESITES INTHELENGTHOFTHEMALEFURCULAE4ABLE  %XAMINATIONOFTHEAEDEAGIOFMALESSHOWEDSTRONGDIFFERENCES -ORPHOLOGICALEXAMINATIONˆ/NCESEPARATEDBASEDONORIGINALSPE INTHESHAPEANDANGLEOFTHEBASALRING ASWELLASINTHESHAPEAND CIESDESCRIPTIONSSEE%ADESAND/TTE EACHOFTHETHREEFORMS LENGTHWIDTHRATIOOFTHEPARAMERESAMONGADEAGIOF-PACKARDII WEREFOUNDTODIFFERSTATISTICALLYINSEVERALCHARACTERS!LLTHREEFORMS AND-FOEDUS4HEREWERENODISTINCTORCONSISTENTDIFFERENCESBE DIFFEREDSIGNIlCANTLYINTIBIALCOLORFREQUENCYP 4IBIAL TWEEN-FOEDUSmUVIATILISAND-FOEDUSFOEDUSINAEDEAGALSTRUCTURE COLOROF-FOEDUSWASNEARLYALWAYSREDTOPINKISHREDANDTHATOF !LTHOUGHTHEMIDDLETOOTHOFTHEINNERSIDEOFTHEPRIMARYVENTRAL -PACKARDIIWASMOSTOFTENBLUE&IG 4HETIBIALCOLOROF-F PARAMEREAPPEAREDTOBESLIGHTLYMOREPRONOUNCEDIN-FFOEDUS mUVIATILISWASVARIABLE BEINGRED PURPLE ORBLUE ORMORERARELY THISTRAITWASNOTCONSISTENT&IG  PALLID&IG 7ITHTHEEXCEPTIONOFASINGLESPECIMENFROM,AKE -C#ONAUGHY +EITH#OUNTY .EBRASKA ALL-FOEDUSmUVIATILISHAD 'ENETICANALYSESˆ!TOTALOFCHARACTERS BOTHMONOMORPHICAND THEDORSALPRONOTUMSOLIDLYCOLOREDUSUALLYBROWN ANDTHISSINGLE POLYMORPHIC WEREUSEDINTHISSTUDY&IFTY TWOOFTHECHARACTERS

&IG  0ROPORTIONS HIND TIBIAL COLORS AMONG THE  SPECIES .UMBER OF SPECI MENS EXAMINED - FOEDUS mUVIATILISN -FOEDUS FOEDUSN AND-PACK ARDIIN 

*/52.!,/&/24(/04%2!2%3%!2#(  -,"2534 %*,).$2/4( 77(/"!#+ 2*72)'(4 +(!.&/2$!.$*%&/34%2  4ABLE-EANSANDSTANDARDERRORSOFMEASUREMENTDATAMM FROMANALYZEDSPECIMENS &OREWINGLENGTH $ISTANCEBETWEENEYES &URCULALENGTH 3PECIESBY)$ 3EX -EAN 3TANDARDERROR 3EX -EAN 3TANDARDERROR 3EX -EAN 3TANDARDERROR -ELANOPLUSFOEDUSmUVIATILIS FEMALE   FEMALE   FEMALE .! .! -ELANOPLUSFOEDUSFOEDUS FEMALE   FEMALE   FEMALE .! .! -ELANOPLUSPACKARDII FEMALE   FEMALE   FEMALE .! .! -ELANOPLUSFOEDUSmUVIATILIS MALE   MALE   MALE   -ELANOPLUSFOEDUSFOEDUS MALE   MALE   MALE   -ELANOPLUSPACKARDII MALE   MALE   MALE   WEREPARSIMONY INFORMATIVE!LARGENUMBEROFPOLYMORPHICBANDS SEVERALCHARACTERISTICS(OWEVER THEAEDEAGUSOF-FmUVIATILISIS WEREFOUNDBOTHBETWEENANDWITHINSPECIES.EITHERDISTANCENOR VIRTUALLYINDISTINGUISHABLEFROMTHATOF-FFOEDUS4HESHAPEAND PARSIMONYANALYSISRESOLVETHISSPECIESCOMPLEX&IGS  SUGGEST ANGLEOFTHEBASALRINGASWELLASTHEFORMOFTHEPARAMERESAPPEAR INGTHATTHEREMAYBEFREQUENTHYBRIDIZATION)TISUNCLEARWHETHER TOBEIDENTICAL&IG  EACH OF THESE FORMS IS A DISTINCT SPECIES OR IF HYBRIDIZATION AND 4HELACKOFANYDISTINCTCLADESINTHEGENETICANALYSES&IGS  RESULTANT INTROGRESSION OCCURS 4HESE RESULTS ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE SUPPORTS-FOEDUSFOEDUSAND-FOEDUSmUVIATILISASBEINGTHESAME OBTAINEDBY#HAPCOAND,ITZENBERGER WHENTHEYANALYZED SPECIESANDTHATFREQUENTINTERBREEDINGORHYBRIDIZATIONOCCURSBE NUMEROUS SPECIES IN THE GENUS -ELANOPLUS USING MITOCHONDRIAL TWEENTHESETAXAAND-PACKARDII/URRESULTSARESIMILARTOTHOSE $.!4HESEAUTHORSWEREALSOUNABLETODISTINGUISHBETWEEN- OBTAINEDBY#HAPCOAND,ITZENBERGER WHENTHEYANALYZED PACKARDIIAND-FOEDUS NUMEROUSSPECIESINTHEGENUS-ELANOPLUSUSINGMITOCHONDRIAL$.! ANDWEREUNABLETODISTINGUISHBETWEEN-PACKARDIIAND-FOEDUS $ISCUSSION BASEDONGENETICCRITERIA -ORPHOLOGICALDIFFERENCESINTHEABSENCEOFCLEARGENETICDIF !SANTICIPATEDBASEDONDESCRIPTIONSOFTHEFORMS -ELANOPLUSF FERENCESSUGGESTSEVERALPOSSIBILITIES -FOEDUSAND-PACKARDII FOEDUS -FmUVIATILIS AND-PACKARDIIEACHDISPLAYMORPHOMETRIC AREENVIRONMENTALLYINDUCEDFORMSOFTHESAMESPECIES THEYARE DIFFERENCES#OMPAREDTO-FFOEDUS -FmUVIATILISISDISTINGUISHED SPECIESTHATWEREPREVIOUSLYSEPARATEDBUTHAVERETAINEDTHEABILITY BYHAVINGASOLIDCOLORONTHEDORSALPRONOTUMANDUSUALLYHAV TOINTERBREEDWHEREPOPULATIONSMEET ORTHEYARESUBSPECIESIN INGLARGE DARKPOSTOCULARBARS4HEMINIMUMDISTANCEBETWEEN THEPROCESSOFBECOMINGFULLSPECIES!LTHOUGHOURDATADONOTAL THEEYESWASSIGNIlCANTLYDIFFERENTBETWEEN-FFOEDUSAND-F LOWRESOLUTIONOFTHESEOROTHERPOSSIBILITIES THEFORMSIN.EBRASKA mUVIATILIS DESPITETHEFACTTHATTEGMENLENGTHSDIDNOTDIFFER4HE OCCURMOSTOFTENINDISTINCTHABITATS STRUCTUREOFTHEAEDEAGUSDIDNOTDIFFERBETWEENTHESUBSPECIES )N.EBRASKA -FFOEDUSOCCURSINUPLANDSANDYAREASWITHSPARSE BUTDIFFEREDBETWEEN-FOEDUSAND-PACKARDII(INDTIBIALCOLOR VEGETATIONANDISESPECIALLYCOMMONINTHE.EBRASKA3ANDHILLS COULDALSOBEUSEDTODIFFERENTIATE-FFOEDUSAND-PACKARDIIIN -ELANOPLUSFmUVIATILISOCCURSINLOWLANDAREASNEARRIVERS ESPECIALLY .EBRASKAAPPROXIMATELYOFTHETIME-FmUVIATILISAPPEARSTO ALONGTHEHIGHERAREASOFSANDBARSANDINOPENWOODLANDWHERE BEINTERMEDIATEINTHISCHARACTER WITHINDIVIDUALSEXHIBITINGBROAD THEREISMOREGROWTHOFWEEDYVEGETATION-ELANOPLUSPACKARDIIIS VARIATIONINCOLOR7HILE-STONEIWASNOTANALYZEDINTHISSTUDY MOSTCOMMONINAREASWITHSOMEWHATSPARSEVEGETATIONONGENERALLY ALLSPECIMENSCOLLECTEDBYTHESENIORAUTHORFROMNORTHWESTERN HEAVYSOILSSUCHASCLAYORLOESS0OPULATIONSOFSUSPECTEDHYBRIDS /NTARIO #ANADAHAVEREDHINDTIBIAE4OFURTHERCOMPLICATEIDEN BETWEEN - FOEDUS AND - PACKARDII HAVE BEEN FOUND MOSTLY IN TIlCATIONWITHINTHISGROUP OCCASIONALSPECIMENSRESEMBLING- SPARSELYVEGETATEDAREASONHETEROGENEOUSSOILS ESPECIALLYINAREAS FOEDUSISLEYIOCCURIN.EBRASKA4HISSUBSPECIESISDIFFERENTIATEDBY WHERECLAYSAREMIXEDWITHSMALLSTONESORGRAVEL4HESEOBSERVATIONS POORLYDEVELOPEDPOSTOCULARBARSANDPALLIDHINDTIBIAE SUGGESTTHATEACHFORMMAYDIFFERINSOILANDORPLANTPREFERENCE %XAMINATIONOFTHEMALEAEDEAGUSREVEALEDTHATIN-FOEDUS BUTMAYHYBRIDIZEWHEREMULTIPLEHABITATSMIX ITISCLEARLYANDCONSISTENTLYDISTINCTFROMTHATOF-PACKARDIIIN )NAREASWITHHETEROGENEOUSSOILS APPARENTHYBRIDSBETWEEN

4ABLE3PECIESANDSUBSPECIESCOMPARISONSOFTEGMENLENGTH MINIMUMDISTANCEBETWEENEYES ANDMALEFURCULALENGTH3IGNIlCANT DIFFERENCES AREINDICATEDBYANASTERISKANDBOLDTYPE 3PECIES#OMPARISON 3EX #HARACTER P -FOEDUSmUVIATILISVS-FOEDUSFOEDUS FEMALE TEGMENLENGTH  -FOEDUSmUVIATILISVS-PACKARDII FEMALE TEGMENLENGTH  -FOEDUSFOEDUSVS-PACKARDII FEMALE TEGMENLENGTH  -FOEDUSmUVIATILISVS-FOEDUSFOEDUS MALE TEGMENLENGTH  -FOEDUSmUVIATILISVS-PACKARDII MALE TEGMENLENGTH  -FOEDUSFOEDUSVS-PACKARDII MALE TEGMENLENGTH  -FOEDUSmUVIATILISVS-FOEDUSFOEDUS FEMALE DISTANCEBETWEENEYES  -FOEDUSmUVIATILISVS-PACKARDII FEMALE DISTANCEBETWEENEYES  -FOEDUSFOEDUSVS-PACKARDII FEMALE DISTANCEBETWEENEYES  -FOEDUSmUVIATILISVS-FOEDUSFOEDUS MALE DISTANCEBETWEENEYES  -FOEDUSmUVIATILISVS-PACKARDII MALE DISTANCEBETWEENEYES  -FOEDUSFOEDUSVS-PACKARDII MALE DISTANCEBETWEENEYES  -FOEDUSmUVIATILISVS-FOEDUSFOEDUS MALE FURCULALENGTH  -FOEDUSmUVIATILISVS-PACKARDII MALE FURCULALENGTH  -FOEDUSFOEDUSVS-PACKARDII MALE FURCULALENGTH 

*/52.!,/&/24(/04%2!2%3%!2#(   -,"2534 %*,).$2/4( 77(/"!#+ 2*72)'(4 +(!.&/2$!.$*%&/34%2

OFACLOSELYRELATEDSPECIESIFFEMALESOFTHESAMESPECIESARESCARCE 0LATTETAL  4HELACKOFGENETICDIFFERENTIATIONSUGGESTSTHAT-FOEDUSAND- PACKARDIIAREACTUALLYONESPECIES(OWEVER WEFEELTHATDIFFERENCESIN AEDEAGALSTRUCTUREANDHABITATOCCURRENCESHOULDBERECOGNIZEDAND THATTHESPECIESDESIGNATIONSHOULDREMAINUNTILADDITIONALGENETIC ORBEHAVIORALTESTSCANBEPERFORMED4HELACKOFRESOLUTIONINTHE GENETICTESTSCOULDBETHERESULTOFOCCASIONALHYBRIDIZATION 7HILEWECONCLUDETHAT-PACKARDIIAND-FOEDUSAREDISTINCT MORPHOLOGICALLY INCLUDINGINMALEGENITALIA WESUGGESTTHAT-F mUVIATILISSHOULDBESYNONYMIZEDUNDER-FOEDUS&URTHERRESEARCHIS NEEDEDTOVERIFYOURCONCLUSIONS BUTWESUSPECTTHAT-FmUVIATILIS ISANENVIRONMENTALLYINDUCEDVARIANTOF-FOEDUSANDDOESNOT QUALIFYASAVALIDSUBSPECIESBASEDONDISTRIBUTION"OTHFORMSCAN BEFOUNDTHROUGHOUT.EBRASKAINSUITABLEHABITAT4HUS ONECOULD FEASIBLYCONSIDERTHEMECOTYPESHOWEVER SOMEOFTHEEXTERNALTRAITS MAYBEINDISCRETEORSUBJECTTOENVIRONMENTALINmUENCE3HELFORD  /TTEAND7ILLIAMS 3UCHENVIRONMENTALFACTORSHAVE BEENSHOWNTOEXERTASTRONGINmUENCEONADULTCOLORATIONINOTHER GRASSHOPPERSPECIES/TTE7ILLIAMS &URTHERMORE COLLEC TIONSOFARELATEDSPECIES -ELANOPLUSANGUSTIPENNIS$ODGE HAVE SHOWNDARKERINDIVIDUALSMOREPREDOMINANTINPARTIALLYWOODED RIVERINEAREASCOMPAREDTOINADJACENTUPLANDSALTHOUGHNOTAS DARKAS-FOEDUSmUVIATILIS SOMETIMESWITHTHISCHANGENOTEDOVER ADISTANCEOFLESSTHANKM-,"RUST UNPUB 

!CKNOWLEDGEMENTS

7EWOULDLIKETOTHANKTHE53$EPARTMENTOF!GRICULTURE !NIMALAND0LANT)NSPECTION3ERVICE7EALSOTHANK4HOMAS(UNT FORPROVIDINGFUNDINGFORPARTOFTHISSTUDY4HANKSTO3TEVEN2 3KODAFORHISASSISTANCEEDITINGTHEMANUSCRIPT

2EFERENCES

"LATCHLEY73/RTHOPTERAOF.ORTHEASTERN!MERICA WITHESPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE FAUNAS OF )NDIANA AND &LORIDA .ATURE 0UBLISHING #OMPANY )NDIANAPOLIS ). "ROOKS !2  !CRIDOIDEA OF SOUTHERN !LBERTA 3ASKATCHEWAN AND -ANITOBA /RTHOPTERA  #ANADIAN %NTOMOLOGIST  3UPPLEMENT    "RUNER,4HEGRASSHOPPERSTHATOCCURIN.EBRASKA!NNUAL2EPORT %NTOMOLOGY .EBRASKA3TATE"UILDINGOF!GRICULTURE PP  #ANTRALL )*  !N ANNOTATED LIST OF THE $ERMAPTERA $ICTYOPTERA 0HASMATOPTERA AND/RTHOPTERAOF-ICHIGAN-ICHIGAN%NTOMOLOGIST   #APINERA*, 3ECHRIST43'RASSHOPPERS!CRIDIDAE OF#OLORADO IDENTIlCATION BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT #OLORADO 3TATE 5NIVERSITY %XPERIMENT3TATION"ULLETIN3  #APINERA*, 3COTT2$ 7ALKER4*&IELD'UIDETO'RASSHOPPERS +ATYDIDS AND#RICKETSOFTHE5NITED3TATES#ORNELL5NIVERSITY0RESS )THACA .9 #HAPCO7 +UPERUS72 ,ITZENBERGER'-OLECULARPHYLOGENYOF &IG$ORSALVIEWOFPARAMERESANDBASALRINGOFAEDEAGIOF- MELANOPLINEGRASSHOPPERS/RTHOPTERA!CRIDIDAE THEGENUS-ELANOPLUS FOEDUSmUVIATILISTOP -FOEDUSFOEDUSMIDDLE AND-PACKARDII !NNALS%NTOMOLOGICAL3OCIETYOF!MERICA  BOTTOM  #HAPCO7 ,ITZENBERGER'!MOLECULARPHYLOGENETICANALYSISOFTHE GRASSHOPPERGENUS-ELANOPLUS3TÍL/RTHOPTERA!CRIDIDAE ANUPDATE -FOEDUSAND-PACKARDIITENDTOPREDOMINATEOVEREITHERPARENT *OURNALOF/RTHOPTERA2ESEARCH  SPECIES BUTALLFORMSTENDTOOCCURATLOWTOMODERATEDENSITIES #OPPOCK 3 *R  4HE GRASSHOPPERS OF /KLAHOMA /KLAHOMA 3TATE !TONESITEIN.EBRASKA+EITH#OUNTY CAKMEASTOF2OSCOEOFF 5NIVERSITY !GRICULTURE %XPERIMENT 3TATION "ULLETIN 0ROCESSED 3ERIES (IGHWAY BOTH-FOEDUSAND-PACKARDIIAREABUNDANT BUTNO 0   APPARENTHYBRIDSWEREFOUND!TTHISSITE ITAPPEARSTHATTHEFORMS $OYLE ** $OYLE *,  ! RAPID $.! ISOLATION PROCEDURE FOR SMALL ARECAPABLEOFDIFFERENTIATINGBETWEENEACHOTHER4OGETHER THESE QUANTITIESOFFRESHLEAFTISSUE0HYTOCHEMISTRY"ULLETIN  OBSERVATIONSMAYLENDEVIDENCETOMALECHOICEDRIVINGHYBRIDIZATION %ADES$# /TTE$/RTHOPTERA3PECIES&ILE/NLINE6ERSION;ACCESSED ASMALESOFSOMESPECIESAREKNOWNTOMATEWITHFEMALES *UNE=HTTP/RTHOPTERA3PECIES&ILEORG

*/52.!,/&/24(/04%2!2%3%!2#(  -,"2534 %*,).$2/4( 77(/"!#+ 2*72)'(4 +(!.&/2$!.$*%&/34%2 

&IG.EIGHBOR JOININGTREEREPLICATEBOOTSTRAP "OOTSTRAPVALUES SHOWNABOVEBRANCHES,ETTER ABBREVIATIONSREPRESENTSPECIESANDNUMBERSREPRESENT INDIVIDUALS/'OUTGROUP!RPHIAXANTHOPTERA &, -ELANOPLUSFOEDUSmUVIATILIS &/-FOEDUSFOEDUS &X0 -FOEDUSFOEDUSXPACKARDII 0!-PACKARDII

&ROESCHNER2#4HEGRASSHOPPERSANDOTHER/RTHOPTERAOF)OWA)OWA (ELFER*2(OWTO+NOWTHE'RASSHOPPERS #RICKETS #OCKROACHESAND 3TATE#OLLEGEOF3CIENCE  4HEIR!LLIES$OVER0UBLICATIONS)NC .EW9ORK .9PP (EBARD-4HE/RTHOPTERAOF3OUTH$AKOTA0ROCEEDINGS!CADEMY )SLEY&"3EASONALSUCCESSION SOILRELATIONS NUMBER ANDREGIONAL OF.ATURAL3CIENCESOF0HILADELPHIA  DISTRIBUTIONOFNORTHEASTERN4EXASACRIDIANS%COLOGICAL-ONOGRAPHS (EBARD-4HE/RTHOPTERAOF-ONTANA0ROCEEDINGS!CADEMY.ATURAL   3CIENCESOF0HILADELPHIA  +IRK+ "OMAR#2'UIDETOTHEGRASSHOPPERSOF7ISCONSIN"UREAUOF (EBARD-4HE/RTHOPTERAOF+ANSAS0ROCEEDINGS!CADEMY.ATURAL )NTEGRATED3CIENCE3ERVICES 7ISCONSIN$EPARTMENTOF.ATURAL2ESOURCES 3CIENCESOF0HILADELPHIA  -ADISON 7)PP (EBARD - ;= 4HE /RTHOPTERA OF -INNESOTA 5NIVERSITY OF ,A2IVERS)!SYNOPSISOF.EVADA/RTHOPTERA!MERICAN-IDLAND -INNESOTA!GRICULTURE%XPERIMENT3TATION"ULLETIN  .ATURALIST  (EBARD-4HE$ERMAPTERAAND/RTHOPTERAOF)LLINOIS)LLINOIS.ATURAL ,OCKWOOD *, -C.ARY 4* ,ARSEN *# AND #OLE *  $ISTRIBUTION (ISTORY3URVEY"ULLETIN  ATLASFORGRASSHOPPERSANDTHE-ORMONCRICKETIN7YOMING  (EBARD-A/RTHOPTERAOF.ORTH$AKOTA.ORTH$AKOTA!GRICULTURE 5NIVERSITYOF7YOMING!GRICULTURE%XPERIMENT3TATION"ULLETIN"  %XPERIMENT3TATION"ULLETIN  PP (EBARD-B.EWGENERAANDSPECIESOFTHE-ELANOPLIFOUNDWITHIN -C$ANIEL"'RASSHOPPERSOF3OUTH$AKOTA3OUTH$AKOTA!GRICULTURE THE5NITED3TATESAND#ANADA4RANSACTIONS!MERICAN%NTOMOLOGICAL %XPERIMENT3TATION0UBLICATION4"  3OCIETY 

*/52.!,/&/24(/04%2!2%3%!2#(   -,"2534 %*,).$2/4( 77(/"!#+ 2*72)'(4 +(!.&/2$!.$*%&/34%2

&IG5NWEIGHTEDPARSIMONYTREEREPLICATEBOOTSTRAP "OOTSTRAPVALUES SHOWNABOVEBRANCHES,ETTERABBRE VIATIONSREPRESENTSPECIESANDNUMBERSREPRESENTINDIVIDUALS /'OUTGROUP!RPHIAXANTHOPTERA &,-ELANOPLUSFOEDUS mUVIATILIS &/-FOEDUSFOEDUS &X0-FOEDUSFOEDUSXPACK ARDII 0!-PACKARDII

/TTE$ 7ILLIAMS+%NVIRONMENTALLYINDUCEDCOLORDIMORPHISMSIN 3CUDDER3(2EVISIONOFTHEORTHOPTERANGROUP-ELANOPLI!CRIDIIDAE GRASSHOPPERS 3YRBULAADMIRABILIS $ICHROMORPHAVIRIDIS AND#HORTOPHAGA WITHSPECIALREFERENCETO.ORTH!MERICANFORMS0ROCEEDINGS"OSTON VIRIDIFASCIATA!NNALS%NTOMOLOGICAL3OCIETYOF!MERICA  3OCIETYOF.ATURAL(ISTORY  0FADT2%!lELDGUIDETOCOMMONWESTERNGRASSHOPPERS RDEDITION 3HELFORD6%#OLORANDCOLORPATTERNMECHANISMOFTIGERBEETLES 7YOMING!GRICULTURAL%XPERIMENT3TATION"ULLETIN  "IOLOGICAL-ONOGRAPHS  0LATT!0 2AWSON'7 "ALOGH')NTER SPECIlCHYBRIDIZATIONINVOLVING 3WOFFORD$)0!50 PHYLOGENETICANALYSISUSINGPARSIMONY AND ,IMENITISARCHIPPUSANDITSCONGENERICSPECIES.YMPHALIDAE *OURNAL OTHERMETHODS VERB3INAUER 3UNDERLAND -! OFTHE,EPIDOPTERISTS3OCIETY  6ICKERY62 +EVAN$+4HEGRASSHOPPERS CRICKETSANDRELATED 2EHN*!'!NEW-ELANOPLUSFROM.EW*ERSEY%NTOMOLOGICAL.EWS OF#ANADAANDADJACENTAREAS!GRICULTURE#ANADA0UBLICATION   PP 3!3)NSTITUTE)NC4HE',)--)80ROCEDURE3!3)NSTITUTE)NC #ARY 6ICKERY 62  .OTES ON SOME #ANADIAN !CRIDIDAE /RTHOPTERA  .ORTH#AROLINA 53! #ANADIAN%NTOMOLOGIST  3CHELL 3 ,OCKWOOD * 3CHELL 3 :IMMERMAN + $ISTRIBUTION !TLAS 6OS0 (OGERS2 "LEEKER- 2EIJANS- VANDE,EE4 (ORNES- &RIJTERS FOR 'RASSHOPPERS AND THE -ORMON #RICKET IN 7YOMING HTTP ! 0OT* 0ELEMAN* +UIPER- :ABEAU-!&,0ANEWTECHNIQUE WWWWYGISCUWYOEDUGRASSHOPPERGHWYWFRMHTM !CCESSED  FOR$.!lNGERPRINTING.UCLEIC!CIDS2ESEARCH  $ECEMBER

*/52.!,/&/24(/04%2!2%3%!2#(