DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan By Beth A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation Beth, A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves, 2007, Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michi- gan. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1236, 78 p. Cover photographs Clockwise from upper left: Photograph of Pretty Lake by Gary Huffman. Photograph of a river in winter by Dan Wydra. Photographs of Lake Michigan and the Looking Glass River by Sharon Baltusis. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................1 Study Area.......................................................................................................................................................1 County Summaries .........................................................................................................................................3 Alcona County .......................................................................................................................................3 Alger County ..........................................................................................................................................3 Allegan County ......................................................................................................................................4 Alpena County .......................................................................................................................................5 Antrim County ........................................................................................................................................6 Arenac County .......................................................................................................................................6 Baraga County .......................................................................................................................................8 Barry County ..........................................................................................................................................8 Bay County .............................................................................................................................................9 Benzie County ......................................................................................................................................10 Berrien County.....................................................................................................................................11 Branch County .....................................................................................................................................11 Calhoun County ...................................................................................................................................12 Cass County .........................................................................................................................................13 Charlevoix County ...............................................................................................................................13 Cheboygan County ..............................................................................................................................14 Chippewa County ................................................................................................................................15 Clare County.........................................................................................................................................16 Clinton County......................................................................................................................................17 Crawford County .................................................................................................................................18 Delta County.........................................................................................................................................18 Dickinson County ................................................................................................................................19 Eaton County ........................................................................................................................................20 Emmet County ......................................................................................................................................22 Genesee County ..................................................................................................................................23 Gladwin County ...................................................................................................................................24 Gogebic County ...................................................................................................................................25 Grand Traverse County ......................................................................................................................26 Gratiot County ......................................................................................................................................27 Hillsdale County...................................................................................................................................28 Houghton County.................................................................................................................................29 Huron County .......................................................................................................................................29 Ingham County.....................................................................................................................................31 Ionia County .........................................................................................................................................32 Iosco County ........................................................................................................................................33 Iron County ...........................................................................................................................................34 Isabella County ....................................................................................................................................35 Jackson County ...................................................................................................................................35 Kalamazoo County ..............................................................................................................................36 Kalkaska County ..................................................................................................................................37 iv Kent County ..........................................................................................................................................37 Keweenaw County ..............................................................................................................................39 Lake County..........................................................................................................................................39 Lapeer County......................................................................................................................................40 Leelanau County..................................................................................................................................41 Lenawee County..................................................................................................................................42 Livingston County ................................................................................................................................43 Luce County .........................................................................................................................................44 Mackinac County ................................................................................................................................45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Ground-Water Quality in Michigan, 1974-87
    NATURAL GROUND-WATER QUALITY IN MICHIGAN, 1974-87 By T. Ray Cumnings U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 89-259 Prepared in cooperation with the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION Lansing, Michigan July 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5 Federal Center, Building 810 Lansing, Michigan 48911 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract l Introduction 1 Purpose and scope 2 Methods of investigation 2 General water-quality conditions 3 Areal variations in water quality 12 Relation of water quality to geologic source 17 Relation of water quality to mineral associations 25 Conclusions 28 Selected references 30 Definition of terms 32 Appendix: Median values of chemical and physical characteristics of water from geologic sources 33 ill ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Relation of dissolved-solids concentration to chemical characteristics of water 6 2. Relation of specific conductance to dissolved-solids concentration of water 7 3. Areal variation of dissolved solids in water 13 4. Areal variation of ammonia and hardness of water 14 5. Areal variation of total recoverable lead and total recoverable mercury in water- 15 6. Areal variation of total recoverable iron and total recoverable copper in water 16 7. Relation of depth of well to dissolved-solids concentration 18 8. Chemical characteristics of water from glacial deposit s 20 9.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Petroleum Plays and Characteristics of the Michigan Basin
    DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A summary of petroleum plays and characteristics of the Michigan basin by Ronald R. Charpentier Open-File Report 87-450R This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Denver, Colorado 80225 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION.............................................. 3 REGIONAL GEOLOGY.......................................... 3 SOURCE ROCKS.............................................. 6 THERMAL MATURITY.......................................... 11 PETROLEUM PRODUCTION...................................... 11 PLAY DESCRIPTIONS......................................... 18 Mississippian-Pennsylvanian gas play................. 18 Antrim Shale play.................................... 18 Devonian anticlinal play............................. 21 Niagaran reef play................................... 21 Trenton-Black River play............................. 23 Prairie du Chien play................................ 25 Cambrian play........................................ 29 Precambrian rift play................................ 29 REFERENCES................................................ 32 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Index map of Michigan basin province (modified from Ells, 1971, reprinted by permission of American Association of Petroleum Geologists)................. 4 2. Structure contour map on top of Precambrian basement, Lower Peninsula
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division
    ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A S STATE OF MICHIGAN P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SR42 April 2007 The Fish Community and Fishery of Lake Leelanau, Leelanau County, Michigan with Emphasis on Walleyes, Northern Pike, and Smallmouth Bass Patrick A. Hanchin, Todd G. Kalish, Zhenming Su, and Richard D. Clark, Jr. ������������� ��������������������������� 0 1 2 3 Miles www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 42 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 42 April 2007 The Fish Community and Fishery of Lake Leelanau, Leelanau County, Michigan with Emphasis on Walleyes, Northern Pike and Smallmouth Bass Patrick A. Hanchin, Todd G. Kalish, Zhenming Su, and Richard D. Clark, Jr. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State’s natural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Basement Control on the Development of Selected Michigan Basin Oil and Gas Fields As Constrained by Fabric Elements in Paleozoic Limestones
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1991 Basement Control on the Development of Selected Michigan Basin Oil and Gas Fields as Constrained by Fabric Elements in Paleozoic Limestones Robert Thomas Versical Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Versical, Robert Thomas, "Basement Control on the Development of Selected Michigan Basin Oil and Gas Fields as Constrained by Fabric Elements in Paleozoic Limestones" (1991). Master's Theses. 1010. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1010 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BASEMENT CONTROL ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SELECTED MICHIGAN BASIN OIL AND GAS FIELDS AS CONSTRAINED BY FABRIC ELEMENTS IN PALEOZOIC LIMESTONES by Robert Thomas Versical A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Geology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 1991 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. BASEMENT CONTROL ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SELECTED MICHIGAN BASIN OIL AND GAS FIELDS AS CONSTRAINED BY FABRIC ELEMENTS IN PALEOZOIC LIMESTONES Robert Thomas Versical, M.S. Western Michigan University, 1991 Hydrocarbon bearing structures in the Paleozoic section of the Michigan basin possess different structural styles and orientations. Quantification of the direction and magnitude of shortening strains by applying a calcite twin-strain analysis constrains the mechanisms by which these structures may have developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery & Geology of the Guinness World Record Lake Copper, Lake
    DISCOVERY AND GEOLOGY OF THE GUINNESS WORLD RECORD LAKE COPPER, LAKE SUPERIOR, MICHIGAN by Theodore J. Bornhorst and Robert J. Barron 2017 This document may be cited as: Bornhorst, T. J. and Barron, R. J., 2017, Discovery and geology of the Guinness world record Lake Copper, Lake Superior, Michigan: A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Web Publication 2, 8 p. This document was only internally reviewed for technical accuracy. This is version 2 of A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum Web Publication 2 first published online in 2016. The Copper Pavilion at the A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum exhibits a 19-ton mass of native copper recovered on the bottomland of Lake Superior on permanent loan from the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources. Discovery This Guinness World Record holding tabular mass of native copper, weighing approximately 19 tons, was recovered from the bottomlands of Lake Superior and is now on exhibit in the Copper Pavilion at the A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum of Michigan Tech referred to here as the "Lake Copper." Figure 1: Location of the Lake Copper shown in context with the generalized bedrock geology along the flank of the Midcontinent rift system (after Bornhorst and Lankton, 2009). 1 It was discovered in July of 1991 by local divers Bob Barron and Don Kauppi on the bottomlands of Lake Superior in about 30 feet of water northwest of Jacob’s Creek, Great Sand Bay between Eagle River and Eagle Harbor (Figure 1 and 2). The tabular Lake Copper was horizontal when discovered rather than vertical in the vein as it had fallen over.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Limnology of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron
    PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY OF SAGINAW BAY, LAKE HURON ALFRED M. BEETON U. S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan STANFORD H. SMITH U. S. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan and FRANK H. HOOPER Institute for Fisheries Research Michigan Department of Conservation Ann Arbor, Michigan GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION 1451 GREEN ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN SEPTEMBER, 1967 PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY OF SAGINAW BAY, LAKE HURON1 Alfred M. Beeton, 2 Stanford H. Smith, and Frank F. Hooper3 ABSTRACT Water temperature and the distribution of various chemicals measured during surveys from June 7 to October 30, 1956, reflect a highly variable and rapidly changing circulation in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. The circula- tion is influenced strongly by local winds and by the stronger circulation of Lake Huron which frequently causes injections of lake water to the inner extremity of the bay. The circulation patterns determined at six times during 1956 reflect the general characteristics of a marine estuary of the northern hemisphere. The prevailing circulation was counterclockwise; the higher concentrations of solutes from the Saginaw River tended to flow and enter Lake Huron along the south shore; water from Lake Huron entered the northeast section of the bay and had a dominant influence on the water along the north shore of the bay. The concentrations of major ions varied little with depth, but a decrease from the inner bay toward Lake Huron reflected the dilution of Saginaw River water as it moved out of the bay. Concentrations in the outer bay were not much greater than in Lake Huronproper.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTY TWP RNG SEC OPERATOR WELL NAME FORMATIONS from to BOXE S COMMENTS TYPE Alger 44N 21W 19 DNR--ERD Village of Trenary MW 24
    COUNTY TWP RNG SEC OPERATOR WELL NAME FORMATIONS FROM TO BOXE COMMENTS TYPE S Alger 44N 21W 19 DNR--ERD Village of MW 24 Limestone with vugs and 10 112 13 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary shale layers Alger 44N 21W 19 DNR--ERD Village of MW 25 (TWQ) Limestone w\lenses of 4 52 8 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary shale and siltstone Alger 44N 21W 19 DNR--ERD Village of MW 26 (TWW) Ls. & vugs w\lenses of 5 92 10 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary shale and siltstone Alger 44N 21W 19 DNR--ERD Village of MW 29 Ls. & vugs w\lenses of 47 81 4 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary shale and siltstone Alger 44N 21W 20 DNR--ERD Village of RL-4 Dolomite 13 29 2 Lithologic log available Core Trenary Alger 44N 21W 20 DNR--ERD Village of RL-6 Dolomite 17 34 2 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary Alger 44N 21W 20 DNR--ERD Village of RL-8 Dolomite 21 37 2 Lithologic log available. Core Trenary Alger 44N 22W 9 Cleveland-Cliffs Kiva Core #1 Black River to 18 567 4 Lithologic log available. Core Precambrian Samples of core chips only Alger 45N 22W 31 Cleveland-Cliffs #1 Dolomite & sandstone 26 132 13 Lithologic log available. Core Alger 46N 18W 29 Amoco Production Per.# St. Amour 1-29 Autrain Fm. 90 361 45 Lithologic log available. Core 021-871-202 Declared a "lost hole" & moved short distance to start 1-29R. Alger 46N 18W 29 Amoco Production Per.# St. Amour 1-29R Autrain, Munising, Oronto 160 7179 929 Lithologic and several electric Core 021-871-202 (Jacobsville) and Portage logs are available.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field and Petrographic Study of the Freda
    A FIELD AND PETROGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE FREDA FORMATION ALONG THE MONTREAL RIVER, GOGEBIC COUNTY, MICHIGAN fey GORDON R. SMALE A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 1958 ProQuest Number: 10008738 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10008738 Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 A FIELD AND PETROGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE FREDA FORMATION ALONG THE MONTREAL RIVER, GOGEBIC COUNTY, MICHIGAN •"by Gordon R „ Smal'e ABSTRACT The Montreal River provides a geographic boundary between Wisconsin and Michigan on the south shore of Lake Superior. A geologic study, both field and laboratory, was made of the 12,000 foot thickness of steeply dipping Freda for­ mation exposed along this river. The field study Includes mapping of sedimentary structures In an effort to determine the dominant current directions during deposition of the formation. Pebble and quartz grain orientation as well as heavy mineral and rock composition analyses were made In the laboratory to supplement the field work.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Ordovician
    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Huron Scuba Diving
    SOUTHERN LAKE ASSESSMENT SOUTHERN RECREATION PROFILE LAKE Scuba Diving: OPPORTUNITIES FOR LAKE HURON ASSESSMENT FINGER LAKES SCUBA LAKES FINGER The southern Lake Huron coast is a fantastic setting for outdoor exploration. Promoting the region’s natural assets can help build vibrant communities and support local economies. This series of fact sheets profiles different outdoor recreation activities that could appeal to residents and visitors of Michigan’s Thumb. We hope this information will help guide regional planning, business develop- ment and marketing efforts throughout the region. Here we focus on scuba diving – providing details on what is involved in the sport, who participates, and what is unique about diving in Lake Huron. WHY DIVE IN LAKE HURON? With wildlife, shipwrecks, clear water and nearshore dives, the waters of southern Lake Huron create a unique environment for scuba divers. Underwater life abounds, including colorful sunfish and unusual species like the longnose gar. The area offers a large collection of shipwrecks, and is home to two of Michigan’s 12 underwater preserves. Many of the wrecks are in close proximity to each other and are easily accessed by charter or private boat. The fresh water of Lake Huron helps to preserve the wrecks better than saltwater, and the lake’s clear water offers excellent visibility – often up to 50 feet! With many shipwrecks at different depths, the area offers dives for recreational as well as technical divers. How Popular is Scuba Diving? Who Scuba Dives? n Scuba diving in New York’s Great Lakes region stimulated more than $108 In 2010, 2.7 million Americans went scuba A snapshot of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • AN OVERVIEW of the GEOLOGY of the GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J
    AN OVERVIEW OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J. Bornhorst 2016 This document may be cited as: Bornhorst, T. J., 2016, An overview of the geology of the Great Lakes basin: A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Web Publication 1, 8p. This is version 1 of A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum Web Publication 1 which was only internally reviewed for technical accuracy. The Great Lakes Basin The Great Lakes basin, as defined by watersheds that drain into the Great Lakes (Figure 1), includes about 85 % of North America’s and 20 % of the world’s surface fresh water, a total of about 5,500 cubic miles (23,000 cubic km) of water (1). The basin covers about 94,000 square miles (240,000 square km) including about 10 % of the U.S. population and 30 % of the Canadian population (1). Lake Michigan is the only Great Lake entirely within the United States. The State of Michigan lies at the heart of the Great Lakes basin. Together the Great Lakes are the single largest surface fresh water body on Earth and have an important physical and cultural role in North America. Figure 1: The Great Lakes states and Canadian Provinces and the Great Lakes watershed (brown) (after 1). 1 Precambrian Bedrock Geology The bedrock geology of the Great Lakes basin can be subdivided into rocks of Precambrian and Phanerozoic (Figure 2). The Precambrian of the Great Lakes basin is the result of three major episodes with each followed by a long period of erosion (2, 3). Figure 2: Generalized Precambrian bedrock geologic map of the Great Lakes basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Natural and Preserves
    The Leelanau Conservancy An Accredited Organization The Leelanau Conservancy was awarded accreditation status in September, 008. The Land Trust Accreditation Commission awards the accreditation seal to community institutions that meet national quality standards for protecting important natural places and working lands forever. Learn more at the Land Trust Alliance website: www.landtrustaccreditation.org. Map of Natural and Preserves Leelanau State Park and Open to the public Grand Traverse Light Best seen on a guided hike Lighthouse West Natural Area Finton Natural Area Critical areas, o limits Je Lamont Preserve Kehl Lake Natural Area North Soper Preserve Manitou Houdek Dunes M201 Island Natural Area NORTHPORT Gull Island Nedows Bay M 22 Preserve OMENA Belanger 637 Creek South Leland Village Green Preserve Manitou Whittlesey Lake MichiganIsland LELAND 641 Preserve Hall Beach North PESHAWBESTOWN Frazier-Freeland Manitou Passage Preserve Lake Leelanau M204 Whaleback Suttons Bay Sleeping Bear Dunes Natural Area 45th Parallel LAKE Park National Lakeshore LEELANAU SUTTONS Narrows 643 Natural Area GLEN Little M 22 BAY Crystal River HAVEN Traverse GLEN Lake Krumweide ARBOR 633 Forest 645 Reserve Little Big Greeno Preserve Glen Glen Lime Mebert Creek Preserve BINGHAM Teichner Lake Lake Lake 643 Preserve South M109 616 Lake Grand BURDICKVILLE MAPLE Leelanau Traverse CITY CEDAR 641 Chippewa Run Bay 669 651 M 22 Natural Area M 22 677 Cedar River 667 614 Cedar Sleeping Bear Dunes Lake Preserve Visitor's Center EMPIRE 616 DeYoung 651 616 Natural Area GREILICKVILLE M 72 Benzie County Grand Traverse County TRAVERSE CITY Conserving Leelanau’s Land, Water, and Scenic Character Who We Are We’re the group that, since 1988, has worked to protect the places that you love and the character that makes the Leelanau Peninsula so unique.
    [Show full text]