DOCSLIB.ORG

Rockingham Lakes Regional Park Proposed Final Management Plan 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Rockingham Lakes Regional Park Proposed Final Management Plan 2010 Conservation Commission of Western Australia Department of Environment and Conservation City of Rockingham Rockingham Lakes Regional Park Proposed Final Management Plan 2010 PLANNING TEAM The Planning Team, representing the managers of Rockingham Lakes Regional Park, coordinated the development of this plan on behalf of the Conservation Commission of Western Australia. The Planning Team was assisted by a consultancy team led by Environmental Resources Management Australia Pty Ltd. Jacinta Overman Department of Environment and Conservation Brendan Dooley Department of Environment and Conservation Tim Bowra Department of Environment and Conservation Paddy Strano City of Rockingham ii How to Use This Plan This Plan is divided into chapters and sections as set out in the table of contents. Guiding principles are stated at the beginning of each chapter. An objective is given at the beginning of each section, followed by a discussion of the main issues and then strategies, which list responsible agencies and a priority rating. Priority ratings provide an indication of the relative importance of a strategy. Key Performance Indicators are listed in the Plan and outline performance measures, targets and reporting requirements. A number of issues raised in this Plan are interrelated and are dealt with under more than one section. Where this is the case, the discussion refers the reader to other related sections. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Numerous individuals and groups have contributed valuable ideas and information in the preparation of this draft management plan and their efforts are gratefully acknowledged. In particular, the contribution of the Rockingham Lakes Regional Park Community Advisory Committee is appreciated. The assistance of the Environmental Resources Management Australia Pty Ltd consultancy team is also appreciated. NOMENCLATURE Inclusion of a name in this publication does not imply its approval by the relevant nomenclature authority. THE CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION All national parks, conservation parks, nature reserves, and other similar reserves are vested in the Conservation Commission of Western Australia (Conservation Commission). These reserves are managed on behalf of the Conservation Commission by the Department of Environment and Conservation. As the controlling body, the Conservation Commission is responsible for having management plans prepared for all lands that are vested in it. This plan has been prepared by the Department of Environment and Conservation on behalf of the Conservation Commission. iii Preface Regional parks consist of areas of land that have been identified as having outstanding conservation, landscape and recreation values. Regional parks may consist of land areas managed by a range of different management agencies, and private landowners. Regional parks therefore provide the opportunity for a consortium of land managers and landowners to work together to develop a coordinated management approach. Set in a rapidly growing urban area, Rockingham Lakes Regional Park is a network of environmentally significant lands containing coastal, wetland and upland ecosystems. The park occupies a significant proportion of the City of Rockingham, and is not only important for conservation in this urban context, but also for the range of recreational opportunities it provides. The park crosses the unique Rockingham-Becher Plain, from the coastal promontories of Cape Peron and Port Kennedy, to the wetlands of Lakes Cooloongup and Walyungup. This area is significant for its geomorphic landforms because the distinct parallel sand ridges indicate the positions of former shorelines, providing a record of sea level changes over the past 7,000 years. Wetlands have formed in between the sand ridges, and these are also significant because they form part of an evolutionary time sequence and support unique vegetation communities. The Becher Point Wetlands are listed as wetlands of international significance under the Ramsar Convention. Thus the area is of considerable interest and importance for research on coastal history, the evolution of wetlands and biological succession. The park also contains significant flora and fauna, including two ‘threatened ecological communities’: sedgelands in Holocene dune swales and thrombolites at Lake Richmond. In addition, the woodlands and wetlands around Lake Cooloongup, Lake Walyungup, Tamworth Hill, Tamworth Hill Swamp, Anstey and Paganoni Swamps are important remnants of ecosystems that were once widespread on the Swan Coastal Plain. While the park has undoubtedly high nature conservation values and contains some popular recreation areas, it is at the same time beset by a number of critical management problems, such as vegetation degradation and loss, widespread weed invasion and feral animal impacts. This management plan, which is based on previously prepared ecological, recreational and historical surveys, as well as information collected during the study period, seeks to establish clear objectives on how best to manage and protect Rockingham Lakes Regional Park. The Rockingham Lakes Regional Park Community Advisory Committee was established early in the planning process to provide input during the preparation of the plan. The plan has been developed through consultation with a range of stakeholder groups and it reflects their contributions. The draft plan was released for public comment on 27 October 2003 until 27 February 2004. This final plan reflects the outcomes of the investigative and consultative periods and provides a way forward for the sustainable and cooperative management of the Rockingham Lakes Regional Park. It is recognised that a considerable period of time has elapsed since the draft management plan was released for public comment in 2003. The delay in preparing the final management plan in no way diminishes the value of the contributions made by any organisation or individual. These contributions are important, and remain critical to the integrity of the management plan and ultimately, to the management of the park. Some issues that were identified in the draft management plan in 2003 may no longer be current or may have changed. New issues have arisen. In finalising the management plan, DEC has attempted to capture the changes that have occurred since 2003 with individual stakeholders and managing agencies without compromising the integrity of the original process of developing the draft plan. iv Table of Contents A. INTRODUCTION 1 1. Purpose and Status of the Management Plan............................................................................................. 1 2. Regional Parks............................................................................................................................................ 1 3. Rockingham Lakes Regional Park .............................................................................................................. 2 4. The Management Planning Process and Community Involvement ............................................................. 5 B. PRINCIPAL MANAGEMENT DIRECTIONS 6 5. The Vision for the Park................................................................................................................................ 6 6. Legislation and Management Policies......................................................................................................... 6 7. Park Boundary ............................................................................................................................................ 6 8. Land Tenure................................................................................................................................................ 8 9. Interim Management Arrangements.......................................................................................................... 10 10. Park Management Zones.................................................................................................................... 10 11. Integrated Management and Planning of the Park and Adjacent Areas. ............................................ 15 12. Key Performance Indicators, Monitoring and Reporting...................................................................... 16 13. Research ............................................................................................................................................ 16 C. CONSERVING THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 18 14. Guiding Principles for Conserving the Natural Environment ............................................................... 18 15. Geomorphology, Geology and Soils ................................................................................................... 18 16. The Coast and Foreshore................................................................................................................... 19 17. Hydrology and Wetlands..................................................................................................................... 22 18. Flora and Vegetation........................................................................................................................... 25 19. Threatened Ecological Communities .................................................................................................. 30 20. Fauna.................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance

    Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance

    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
  • The Urban Bush Telegraph Autumn 2018

    The Urban Bush Telegraph Autumn 2018

    Autumn 2018 Newsletter of the Urban Bushland Council WA Inc PO Box 326, West Perth WA 6872 Email: [email protected] THE UBC TURNS TWENTY FIVE By Philip Jennings More than 80 UBC supporters joined the Committee and invited guests at a celebratory function in Kings Park on Sunday 15 April. It was a bright sunny morning and the weather perfect- ly matched the mood of the crowd. The event was organized to mark the 25th anniversary of the founding of the UBC on March 23, 1993. The previous issue of this newsletter covered some of the history of the UBC and the events that occurred on that day. Photo by M Owen On this occasion Colma Keating Some of the founding members at the UBC celebration (from left) Joanne Payne, Rob Greenwood, Mary Gray, Angela Carr, David Wake, Norma welcomed the participants and Calcutt and Senator Rachel Siewert. called on several speakers to re- Colma Keating wound up the great also to have two other count their personal stories about speeches by recounting that 48 children (from two other the UBC and its achievements. people have volunteered on families) along this time with First up was Senator Rachel 163 occasions over the past 25 their parents …..we hope Siewert who was involved in the years to serve on 26 UBC com- they will become active sup- formation and early years of the mittees concerned with urban porters and we will see them UBC. She complimented all bushland conservation. We are as they grow up. fortunate indeed to have so concerned for their tireless con- The event was a great oppor- tributions to protecting the biodi- many volunteers who are will- ing to contribute their time and tunity for all concerned to Bush Telegraph versity of the Metropolitan Area.
  • Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia

    Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia

    Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia By: D.A. Cumming, D. Garratt, M. McCarthy, A. WoICe With <.:unlribuliuns from Albany Seniur High Schoul. M. Anderson. R. Howard. C.A. Miller and P. Worsley Octobel' 1995 @WAUUSEUM Report: Department of Matitime Archaeology, Westem Australian Maritime Museum. No, 98. Cover pholograph: A view of Halllelin Bay in iL~ heyday as a limber porl. (W A Marilime Museum) This study is dedicated to the memory of Denis Arthur Cuml11ing 1923-1995 This project was funded under the National Estate Program, a Commonwealth-financed grants scheme administered by the Australian HeriL:'lge Commission (Federal Government) and the Heritage Council of Western Australia. (State Govenlluent). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Heritage Council of Western Australia Mr lan Baxter (Director) Mr Geny MacGill Ms Jenni Williams Ms Sharon McKerrow Dr Lenore Layman The Institution of Engineers, Australia Mr Max Anderson Mr Richard Hartley Mr Bmce James Mr Tony Moulds Mrs Dorothy Austen-Smith The State Archive of Westem Australia Mr David Whitford The Esperance Bay HistOIical Society Mrs Olive Tamlin Mr Merv Andre Mr Peter Anderson of Esperance Mr Peter Hudson of Esperance The Augusta HistOIical Society Mr Steve Mm'shall of Augusta The Busselton HistOlical Societv Mrs Elizabeth Nelson Mr Alfred Reynolds of Dunsborough Mr Philip Overton of Busselton Mr Rupert Genitsen The Bunbury Timber Jetty Preservation Society inc. Mrs B. Manea The Bunbury HistOlical Society The Rockingham Historical Society The Geraldton Historical Society Mrs J Trautman Mrs D Benzie Mrs Glenis Thomas Mr Peter W orsley of Gerald ton The Onslow Goods Shed Museum Mr lan Blair Mr Les Butcher Ms Gaye Nay ton The Roebourne Historical Society.
  • Sedgelands in Holocene Dune Swales Recovery Plan

    Sedgelands in Holocene Dune Swales Recovery Plan

    INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO. 314 SEDGELANDS IN HOLOCENE DUNE SWALES RECOVERY PLAN September 2011 Department of Environment and Conservation Species and Communities Branch Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA, 6983 FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) Policy Statements Nos 44 and 50. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. DEC is committed to ensuring that critically endangered ecological communities are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by DEC’s Director of Nature Conservation. This Interim Recovery Plan will operate from September 2011 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the community is still listed as critically endangered after five years, the need for an updated plan will be evaluated. The provision of funds identified in this Interim Recovery Plan is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting DEC, as well as the need to address other priorities. Information in this IRP was accurate at September 2011. This interim recovery plan replaces plan number 110 Sedgelands in Holocene dune swales 2002-2007 by V. English, J. Blyth, N. Gibson, D. Pember, J. Davis, J. Tucker, P. Jennings and B. Walker. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This interim recovery plan was prepared by Gemma Grigg and Valerie English.
  • Wetlands Fact Sheet 23

    Wetlands Fact Sheet 23

    Environmental Defender’s Office of Western Australia (Inc.) Wetlands Fact Sheet 23 Updated December 2010 An introduction to Wetlands Western Australia contains a large number of significant wetlands that provide important habitats for native plants and animals. Many of these wetlands have been damaged or destroyed by land developments, the alteration of natural water system regimes and pollution. In agricultural areas, significant land clearing has led to many naturally saline lakes and marshes becoming hyper-saline and unable to sustain native species. It is estimated that over 80% of the wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain have been destroyed, with only 15% retaining high conservation values. This fact sheet examines the legal protection that applies to wetlands in Western Australia and identifies the bodies responsible for their management. For information on the laws relating to other water resources, see Fact Sheet 21: River, watercourses and groundwater. What are wetlands? The Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (WA) (“RIWI Act”) defines a wetland as a natural collection of water (permanent or temporary) on the surface of any land and includes any lake, lagoon, swamp or marsh; and a natural collection of water that has been artificially altered. A wetland is not a watercourse (i.e. any river, creek, stream, brook or reservoir in which water flows into, through or out of; or any place where water flows that is prescribed by local by-laws to be a watercourse). Under the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat 1971 (“Ramsar Convention”), a wide variety of natural and human-made habitat types can be classified as wetlands.
  • A Petition Into the Proposed Marina at Point Peron

    A Petition Into the Proposed Marina at Point Peron

    THIRTY -SEVENTH PARLIAMENT REPORT 7 STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS A PETITION INTO THE PROPOSED MARINA AT POINT PERON Presented by Hon Louise Pratt MLC (Chairman) December 2006 STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS Date first appointed: 17 August 2005 Terms of Reference: The following is an extract from Schedule 1 of the Legislative Council Standing Orders: “1. Environment and Public Affairs Committee 1.1 An Environment and Public Affairs Committee is established. 1.2 The Committee consists of 5 members. 1.3 The functions of the Committee are to inquire into and report on - (a) any public or private policy, practice, scheme, arrangement, or project whose implementation, or intended implementation, within the limits of the State is affecting, or may affect, the environment; (b) any bill referred by the House; and (c) petitions. 1.4 The Committee, where relevant and appropriate, is to assess the merit of matters or issues arising from an inquiry in accordance with the principles of ecologically sustainable development and the minimisation of harm to the environment. 1.5 The Committee may refer a petition to another committee where the subject matter of the petition is within the competence of that committee. 1.6 In this order “environment” has the meaning assigned to it under section 3(1), (2) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 .” Members as at the time of this inquiry: Hon Louise Pratt MLC (Chairman) Hon Paul Llewellyn MLC Hon Bruce Donaldson MLC (Deputy Hon Robyn McSweeney MLC Chairman) Hon Kate Doust MLC Staff as at the time of this inquiry: Mark Warner, Committee Clerk Vincent Cusack, Advisory Officer (General) Address: Parliament House, Perth WA 6000, Telephone (08) 9222 7222 [email protected] Website: http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au ISBN 1 921243 04 X Government Response This Report is subject to Standing Order 337: After tabling, the Clerk shall send a copy of a report recommending action by, or seeking a response from, the Government to the responsible Minister.
  • Supplementary Material Spatial Analysis of Limiting Resources on An

    Supplementary Material Spatial Analysis of Limiting Resources on An

    10.1071/WR14083_AC ©CSIRO 2014 Supplementary Material: Wildlife Research 41 , 510–521 Supplementary material Spatial analysis of limiting resources on an island: diet and shelter use reveal sites of conservation importance for the Rottnest Island quokka Holly L. Poole A, Laily Mukaromah A, Halina T. Kobryn A and Patricia A. Fleming A,B ASchool of Veterinary & Life Sciences, Murdoch University, WA 6150, Australia. BCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1. Raw data of plant fragment identification for 67 faecal samples from Rottnest Island quokkas Plant Family Plants No. No. No. field group faecal fragments validation sample quadrats sites present in present in Dicot Malvaceae Guichenotia ledifolia 52 9854 75 Dicot Fabaceae Acacia rostellifera 37 3018 37 Monocot Asphodelaceae Trachyandra divaricata 46 2702 145 Dicot Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata 25 1506 28 Dicot Chenopodiaceae Tecticornia 13 1350 4 halocnemoides Monocot Poaceae Stipeae (Tribe) 34 1302 171 Monocot Asphodelaceae Asphodelus fistulosus 26 1103 22 Dicot Chenopodiaceae Rhagodia baccata 13 1002 46 Dicot Chenopodiaceae Suaeda australis 12 862 2 Dicot Chenopodiaceae Threlkeldia diffusa 15 829 0 Monocot Poaceae Rostraria cristata 27 788 71 Monocot Poaceae Sporobolus virginicus 5 617 2 Dicot Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia sp . 10 560 0 Dicot Lamiaceae Westringia dampieri 5 383 46 Dicot Goodeniaceae Scaevola crassifolia 10 349 20 Monocot Cyperaceae Gahnia trifida 8 281 6 Other Cupressaceae Callitris preissii 3 148 18 Monocot Poaceae Poa poiformis 2 116 0 Dicot Chenopodiaceae Atriplex spp. (A. 1 40 1 paludosa ) Monocot Poaceae Polypogon maritimus 1 39 0 Dicot Myrtaceae Agonis flexuosa 1 15 0 Monocot Poaceae Brachypodium distachyon 0 0 1 Monocot Asphodelaceae Bulbine semibarbata 0 0 1 Dicot Pittosporaceae Pittosporum 0 0 1 phylliraeoides Monocot Poaceae Spinifex longifolius 0 0 1 Dicot Fabaceae Acacia saligna 0 0 2 Dicot Chenopodiaceae Atriplex cinerea 0 0 2 1 Dicot Asteraceae Centaurea sp .
  • View / Download

    View / Download

    R.L. Barrett, Description of six Lepidosperma species 295 Nuytsia The journal of the Western Australian Herbarium 22(5): 295–322 Published online 6 November 2012 Description of six Lepidosperma species (Cyperaceae) based on type specimens Russell L. Barrett Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Kings Park and Botanic Garden, West Perth, Western Australia 6005 School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983 Email: [email protected] Abstract Barrett, R.L. Description of six Lepidosperma species (Cyperaceae) based on type specimens. Nuytsia 22(5): 295–322 (2012). Many species of Lepidosperma Labill. have been poorly circumscribed, resulting in significant nomenclatural confusion. Full descriptions of six species based solely on type specimens held in the Webb Herbarium in Florence (FI-W) and the Preiss Herbarium in Lund (LD) are presented here in order to facilitate accurate application of the names involved. Descriptions are provided for Lepidosperma costale Nees, L. gladiatum Labill., L. fimbriatum Nees, L. humile (Nees) Boeck., L. longitudinale Labill. and L. squamatum Labill., as well as notes about these species. Introduction The genus Lepidosperma Labill. contains 73 currently named species (Barrett & Wilson 2012) with a large number of unnamed taxa remaining to be described. Determining the correct application of existing names is crucial before any new names are created so as not to increase nomenclatural confusion. Barrett and Wilson (2012) have recently examined all relevant type specimens and chosen lectotypes as required, resolving a great deal of past confusion.
  • A Journey Towards Facilitating Multiple-Use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II And

    A Journey Towards Facilitating Multiple-Use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II And

    A journey towards facilitating Multiple-use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II and III Background paper for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Prepared in consultation with the Multiple-use Support Team 2009 ISBN 1 921094 18 4 A Journey towards Facilitating Multiple-use of Cockburn Sound and Owen Anchorage Stage One Parts I, II and III Background Paper for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Initiated by Barb Green Prepared and developed by Barb Green, Geoff Botting, Dr Tom Rose and Officers of the Cockburn Sound Management Council – Department of Environment and Conservation for the Cockburn Sound Management Council Shop 1/ 15 Railway Terrace Rockingham Beach WA 6168 In consultation with the Cockburn Sound Management Council’s Multiple-use Support Team Dr Tom Rose – Council Coordinator Professor Kateryna Longley – Chair Mr Keith Tocas – Recreational Fishing Representative Mr John Smedley – Recreational Boating Representative Mr Bart Houwen – Community Representative Mr Gino Valenti – Fremantle Ports Representative Mr Andrew Hill – Department of Fisheries Representative Mr Tim Bray (in Andrew Hill’s absence) Mr Ian Briggs – Department of Industry and Resources Representative Dr John Keesing – CSIRO Marine Representative Dr Rod Lukatelich – Kwinana Industries Council Representatives and Mr Milan Vicentic – GIS Coordinator, Department of Environment and Conservation Mr Chris Coffey – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council Ms Jessica Davis – Environment Officer, Cockburn Sound Management Council
  • Monogeneans from the Southern Pacific Ocean: Polyopisthocotyleids from the Australian Fishes, the Subfamily Microcotylinae

    Monogeneans from the Southern Pacific Ocean: Polyopisthocotyleids from the Australian Fishes, the Subfamily Microcotylinae

    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1985 Monogeneans from the southern Pacific Ocean: Polyopisthocotyleids from the Australian fishes, the subfamily Microcotylinae W. A. Dillon William J. Hargis Jr. Virginia Institute of Marine Science Antonio E. Harrises Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Oceanography Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Dillon, W. A., Hargis, W. J., & Harrises, A. E. (1985) Monogeneans from the southern Pacific Ocean: Polyopisthocotyleids from the Australian fishes, the subfamily Microcotylinae. Translation series (Virginia Institute of Marine Science) ; no. 32. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports/25 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Monogeneans from the southern Pacific Ocean. Polyopisthocotyleids from Australian fishes. I The subfamily Microcotylinae. by William A. Dillon, William J. Hargis, Jr., and Antonio E. Harrises English version of the paper which first appeared in the Russian language periodical ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL (Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal) Volume 63, Number 3 pp. 348-359 Moscow, 1984 Edited by William A. Dillon and William J. Hargis, Jr. Translation Series Number 32 of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science The College of William and Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, U.S.A. March, 1985 i Monogeneans from the southern Pacific Ocean. Polyopisthocolylids from Australian fishes. The Subfamily Microcotylinae (Special note:· Plate and figure enumeration differ from those in Russian version.
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands

    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands

    Nomination of additional Ramsar wetlands in Western Australia 1 Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. NOTE: It is important that you read the accompanying Explanatory Note and Guidelines document before completing this form. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. 1. Date this sheet was DD MM YY completed/updated: August 2000 Designation date Site Reference Number 2. Country: Australia 3. Name of wetland: Becher Point Wetlands 4. Geographical coordinates: 320 23’ S, 1150 44’ E. 5. Elevation: (average and/or max. & min.) a few m above sea level (Australian Height Datum). 6. Area: (in hectares) 677 ha (of which less than 10 % is wetland). 7. Overview: (general summary, in two or three sentences, of the wetland's principal characteristics) The Site comprises a substantial portion of the system of inter-dunal wetlands associated with Becher Point, on the coast of South-Western Australia. The series of wetlands within the Site exhibits a continuum of development in geomorphology, hydrology and vegetation and is considered by researchers to be a unique wetland system in Western Australia and one of the youngest wetland systems on the Swan Coastal Plain. The sedgelands of the Site are included in the national list of threatened ecological communities. 8. Wetland Type (the applicable codes for wetland types as listed in Annex I of the Explanatory Note and Guidelines document.) Where the type includes options, the relevant options are shown in bold: Ts (seasonal/intermittent freshwater marshes/pools). W (shrub-dominated wetlands). Please now rank these wetland types by listing them from the most to the least dominant: W, Ts.
  • Download This PDF File

    Download This PDF File

    Volume 24: 53–60 ELOPEA Publication date: 25 March 2021 T dx.doi.org/10.7751/telopea14922 Journal of Plant Systematics plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea • escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL • ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) • ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) Netrostylis, a new genus of Australasian Cyperaceae removed from Tetraria Russell L. Barrett1–3 Jeremy J. Bruhl4 and Karen L. Wilson1 1National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia 2Australian National Herbarium, Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601 3School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009 4Botany and N.C.W. Beadle Herbarium, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia Author for Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract A new genus, Netrostylis R.L.Barrett, J.J.Bruhl & K.L.Wilson is described for Australasian species previously known as Tetraria capillaris (F.Muell.) J.M.Black (Cyperaceae tribe Schoeneae). The genus is restricted to southern and eastern Australia, and the North Island of New Zealand. Two new combinations are made: Netrostylis capillaris (F.Muell.) R.L.Barrett, J.J.Bruhl & K.L.Wilson and Netrostylis halmaturina (J.M.Black) R.L.Barrett, J.J.Bruhl & K.L.Wilson. Netrostylis is a member of the Lepidosperma Labill. Clade. Keywords: Cyperaceae; Netrostylis; Tetraria; Neesenbeckia; Machaerina; Schoeneae; Australia; New Zealand. Introduction Recent molecular phylogenetic studies in Cyperaceae have greatly increased our understanding of relationships in the family (Muasya et al.