DOCSLIB.ORG

Superconducting Qubits and Circuits: Artificial Atoms Coupled To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Superconducting Qubits and Circuits: Artificial Atoms Coupled To Superconducting Qubits and Circuits: Artificial Atoms Coupled to Microwave Photons Steven M. Girvin1 Yale University Department of Physics New Haven, CT 06520 United States of America ⃝c 2011 1⃝c S.M. Girvin, 2011 Lectures delivered at Ecole d'Et´eLes Houches, July 2011 To be published by Oxford University Press. ii S.M. Girvin These lectures are based on work done in collabora- tion with many students, postdocs and colleagues, including particularly my friends and colleagues Michel H. Devoret and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Contents 0.1 Outline . 1 1 Introduction to Quantum Machines 3 2 Quantum Electrical Circuits 5 2.1 Introduction . 5 2.2 Plasma Oscillations . 6 2.3 Quantum LC Oscillator . 8 2.3.1 Coherent States . 15 2.4 Modes of Transmission Lines Resonators . 18 2.5 `Black Box' Quantization . 23 3 Superconductivity 27 4 Superconducting Qubits 33 4.1 The Cooper Pair Box . 33 4.2 Inductively Shunted Qubits . 43 5 Noise induced Decoherence in Qubit Circuits 49 6 Introduction to Cavity and Circuit QED 59 7 NOBEL SYMPOSIUM TEXT BEGINS HERE 65 7.1 Introduction . 65 7.2 Circuit QED . 66 7.2.1 The Quantronium Qubit . 70 7.2.2 Transmon Qubits . 71 7.2.3 Fluxonium Qubits . 74 7.3 Recent Progress and Future Directions . 74 8 Appendix: Semi-Infinite Transmission Lines, Dissipation and Input/Output Theory 79 8.0.1 Quantum Input-output theory for a driven cavity . 84 Bibliography 93 iii iv S.M. Girvin Circuit QED 1 Key papers students may wish to consult: • Blais et al., `Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting elec- trical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation,' Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004). • Clerk et al., `Introduction to quantum noise, measurement and am- plification,’ Rev. Mod. Phys (2008) (longer version with pedagogical appendices available at arXiv.org:0810.4729) 0.1 Outline 1. Introduction to Quantum Machines 2. Why are there so few degrees of freedom in SC circuits? (a) Superconducting excitation gap (b) Strong Coulomb force 3. Brief Introduction to the Quantum to Classical Crossover {why is it hard to make large objects that are quantum and not classical, and that have simple spectra like atoms? 4. Elements of a quantum electrical circuit: L,C,JJ 5. Quantization of a lumped-element LC oscillator (a) What is a photon? First quantization and second quantization views. (b) Role of circuit admittance Y (!) (c) Distributed element resonators: Box modes and how to quantize them using admittance 6. Josephson junctions (a) Just what is superconductivity anyway? (b) How does a Josephson junction JJ work? 7. Superconducting Qubits (a) Brief survey of different SC qubit topologies and geometries: charge, phase, flux, fluxonium (b) dephasing and decay mechanisms, T1;T2, sweet spots (c) strengths and weaknesses of different qubit designs (d) The transmon: World's simplest SC qubit: a JJ and an antenna 8. Introduction to Cavity and Circuit QED (a) Jaynes-Cummings model for a two-level atom 2 S.M. Girvin (b) dressed atom/polariton picture (c) vacuum Rabi coupling and degenerate regime (d) dispersive regime (e) strong dispersive regime, number splitting (f) weakly anharmonic transmon in a cavity: perturbation expansion in the anharmonicity; α ∼ g 9. Input-Output Theory (a) qubit driving via driving cavity (b) quantum noise, dissipation, decay and the Purcell effect (c) linear readout, back action, quantum Zeno (d) non-linear readout methods i. Josephson bifurcation amplifier ii. Chirped JBA iii. Using the self-non-linearity induced by qubit 10. Quantum Control and Algorithms (a) single qubit rotations, Rabi, Ramsey (b) two-qubit entangling operations using conditional phase shifts (c) qubit-cavity entangling operations in the strong-dispersive regime (d) QND measurement of photon number (e) Bell/CSHS inequalities (f) Grover Search and Deutsch-Josza algorithms on a two-qubit proces- sor (g) GHZ/Mermin inequalities (h) Towards Quantum Error Correction i. measurement based QEC ii. non-measurement based QEC 11. Towards Scaling up to Many Qubits (a) importance of large on-off coupling ratios (b) Houck double transmon (c) multiple-cavity architectures and communication protocols (d) cavities as quantum memories (e) cavities as qubits (f) qubits as switches (g) Many-body physics with lattice models for strongly interacting po- laritons Chapter 1 Introduction to Quantum Machines A quantum machine is a device whose degrees of freedom are intrinsically quan- tum mechanical. While we do not yet fully understand the properties of such devices, there is great hope (and some mathematical proof) that such machines will have novel capabilities that are impossible to realize on classical hardware. You might think that quantum machines have already been built. For example, the laser and the transistor would seem to rely on quantum physics for their operation. It is clear that the frequency of a laser cannot be computed without the quantum theory that predicts the excitation energies of the atoms in the laser. Similarly the optimal bias voltage of a bipolar transistor depends on the electronic band gap energy of the material from which it is made. Nevertheless, it is only the particular values of the operating parameters of these machines that are determined by quantum physics. Once we know the values of these parameters, we see that these are classical machines because their degrees of freedom are purely classical. Indeed the light output from a laser is special because it is exactly like the RF output of the classical oscillator that powers a radio station's antenna. Similarly, the currents and voltages in an ordinary transistor circuit need not be treated as non-commuting quantum operators in order to understand the operation of the circuit. Its degrees of freedom are, for all intents and purposes, classical. These lectures are devoted to understanding the basic components of quan- tum machines that can be constructed from superconducting electrical circuits. These circuits can be used to create resonators which store individual microwave photons and to create superconducting quantum bits. Both of these circuit ele- ments are intrinsically quantum mechanical. They have quantized energy levels with spacing much greater than temperature (for low enough temperatures!) and they can be placed into quantum superpositions of different energy states. To properly predict their properties, the currents and voltages in such circuits must be represented by non-commuting quantum operators. 3 4 S.M. Girvin The beauty of electrical circuits is that they can be constructed in a modular manner combining together a few different building blocks in a simple manner. The wires connecting these building blocks have to be capable of carrying quan- tum signals [1], but are still relatively simple and the problem of spatial mode matching that occurs in optical circuits is largely eliminated. Furthermore, with modern lithographic techniques, parallel fabrication of complex structures is rel- atively straightforward lending hope that (someday) it will be possible to scale up to processors with large numbers of qubits. We will study different qubit designs and their relative merits. We will also learn how to control and readout the quantum states of qubits and cavities, and how to entangle different their quantum degrees of freedom. In recent decades, we have come to understand that superposition and entanglement are features of quantum physics which can be used as resources to make powerful quantum computers to process information in ways that are impossible classically. What else we can do with quantum machines is not yet fully understood. The people who invented the laser had no idea that it would be used to play music, com- municate over optical fiber, and perform eye surgery. We expect that similar surprises and unexpected applications will be developed once quantum hardware becomes routine enough to play with. Chapter 2 Quantum Electrical Circuits 2.1 Introduction Quantum electrodynamics is the theory of interaction between electrons (and atoms) with electromagnetic fields. These lecture notes discuss the closely re- lated problem of quantization of electrical circuits [1,2]. Experimental progress over the last decade in creating and controlling quantum coherence in supercon- ducting electrical circuits has been truly remarkable. The quantum electrody- namics of superconducting microwave circuits has been dubbed `circuit QED' by analogy to cavity QED in quantum optics. These lecture notes will describe the quantum optics approach to microwave circuits with superconducting qubits playing the role of artificial atoms whose properties can be engineered. Despite being large enough to be visible to the naked eye, these artificial atoms have a very simple discrete set of quantized energy levels which are nearly as well understood as those of the prototypical single-electron atom, hydrogen. Fur- thermore it has proven possible to put these atoms into coherent superpositions of different quantum states so that they can act as quantum bits. Through clever engineering, the coherence times of such superposition states has risen more than four orders of magnitude from nanoseconds for the first supercon- ducting qubit created in 1999 [3] to several tens of microseconds today [4]. This 'Moore's Law' for the exponential growth of coherence time is illustrated in Fig. (??). In addition to being a potentially powerful engineering architecture for build- ing a quantum computer, circuit QED opens up for us a novel new regime to study ultra-strong coupling between `atoms' and individual microwave photons. The concept of the photon is a subtle one, but hopefully these notes will convince the reader that microwaves, despite their name, really are particles. We will ac- cordingly begin our study with a review of the quantization of electromagnetic fields in circuits and cavities. The quantization of electrical circuits has been thoroughly addressed in the Les Houches lecture notes of my colleague, Michel Devoret [2], to which I direct 5 6 S.M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1206.1084V3 [Quant-Ph] 3 May 2019
    Overview of Bohmian Mechanics Xavier Oriolsa and Jordi Mompartb∗ aDepartament d'Enginyeria Electr`onica, Universitat Aut`onomade Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, SPAIN bDepartament de F´ısica, Universitat Aut`onomade Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, SPAIN This chapter provides a fully comprehensive overview of the Bohmian formulation of quantum phenomena. It starts with a historical review of the difficulties found by Louis de Broglie, David Bohm and John Bell to convince the scientific community about the validity and utility of Bohmian mechanics. Then, a formal explanation of Bohmian mechanics for non-relativistic single-particle quantum systems is presented. The generalization to many-particle systems, where correlations play an important role, is also explained. After that, the measurement process in Bohmian mechanics is discussed. It is emphasized that Bohmian mechanics exactly reproduces the mean value and temporal and spatial correlations obtained from the standard, i.e., `orthodox', formulation. The ontological characteristics of the Bohmian theory provide a description of measurements in a natural way, without the need of introducing stochastic operators for the wavefunction collapse. Several solved problems are presented at the end of the chapter giving additional mathematical support to some particular issues. A detailed description of computational algorithms to obtain Bohmian trajectories from the numerical solution of the Schr¨odingeror the Hamilton{Jacobi equations are presented in an appendix. The motivation of this chapter is twofold.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Dispersive Monitoring of Charge Parity in Offset-Charge
    PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED 12, 014052 (2019) Direct Dispersive Monitoring of Charge Parity in Offset-Charge-Sensitive Transmons K. Serniak,* S. Diamond, M. Hays, V. Fatemi, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, R.J. Schoelkopf, and M.H. Devoret† Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA (Received 29 March 2019; revised manuscript received 20 June 2019; published 26 July 2019) A striking characteristic of superconducting circuits is that their eigenspectra and intermode coupling strengths are well predicted by simple Hamiltonians representing combinations of quantum-circuit ele- ments. Of particular interest is the Cooper-pair-box Hamiltonian used to describe the eigenspectra of transmon qubits, which can depend strongly on the offset-charge difference across the Josephson element. Notably, this offset-charge dependence can also be observed in the dispersive coupling between an ancil- lary readout mode and a transmon fabricated in the offset-charge-sensitive (OCS) regime. We utilize this effect to achieve direct high-fidelity dispersive readout of the joint plasmon and charge-parity state of an OCS transmon, which enables efficient detection of charge fluctuations and nonequilibrium-quasiparticle dynamics. Specifically, we show that additional high-frequency filtering can extend the charge-parity life- time of our device by 2 orders of magnitude, resulting in a significantly improved energy relaxation time T1 ∼ 200 μs. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.014052 I. INTRODUCTION charge states, like a usual transmon but with measurable offset-charge dispersion of the transition frequencies The basic building blocks of quantum circuits—e.g., between eigenstates, like a Cooper-pair box. This defines capacitors, inductors, and nonlinear elements such as what we refer to as the offset-charge-sensitive (OCS) Josephson junctions [1] and electromechanical trans- transmon regime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Quantum State : New Views on Old Phenomena Michel Paty
    The concept of quantum state : new views on old phenomena Michel Paty To cite this version: Michel Paty. The concept of quantum state : new views on old phenomena. Ashtekar, Abhay, Cohen, Robert S., Howard, Don, Renn, Jürgen, Sarkar, Sahotra & Shimony, Abner. Revisiting the Founda- tions of Relativistic Physics : Festschrift in Honor of John Stachel, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 451-478, 2003. halshs-00189410 HAL Id: halshs-00189410 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00189410 Submitted on 20 Nov 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. « The concept of quantum state: new views on old phenomena », in Ashtekar, Abhay, Cohen, Robert S., Howard, Don, Renn, Jürgen, Sarkar, Sahotra & Shimony, Abner (eds.), Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics : Festschrift in Honor of John Stachel, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 451-478. , 2003 The concept of quantum state : new views on old phenomena par Michel PATY* ABSTRACT. Recent developments in the area of the knowledge of quantum systems have led to consider as physical facts statements that appeared formerly to be more related to interpretation, with free options.
    [Show full text]
  • Light and Matter Diffraction from the Unified Viewpoint of Feynman's
    European J of Physics Education Volume 8 Issue 2 1309-7202 Arlego & Fanaro Light and Matter Diffraction from the Unified Viewpoint of Feynman’s Sum of All Paths Marcelo Arlego* Maria de los Angeles Fanaro** Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires CONICET, Argentine *[email protected] **[email protected] (Received: 05.04.2018, Accepted: 22.05.2017) Abstract In this work, we present a pedagogical strategy to describe the diffraction phenomenon based on a didactic adaptation of the Feynman’s path integrals method, which uses only high school mathematics. The advantage of our approach is that it allows to describe the diffraction in a fully quantum context, where superposition and probabilistic aspects emerge naturally. Our method is based on a time-independent formulation, which allows modelling the phenomenon in geometric terms and trajectories in real space, which is an advantage from the didactic point of view. A distinctive aspect of our work is the description of the series of transformations and didactic transpositions of the fundamental equations that give rise to a common quantum framework for light and matter. This is something that is usually masked by the common use, and that to our knowledge has not been emphasized enough in a unified way. Finally, the role of the superposition of non-classical paths and their didactic potential are briefly mentioned. Keywords: quantum mechanics, light and matter diffraction, Feynman’s Sum of all Paths, high education INTRODUCTION This work promotes the teaching of quantum mechanics at the basic level of secondary school, where the students have not the necessary mathematics to deal with canonical models that uses Schrodinger equation.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Quantum Scattering Problem for Systems of Two and Three Charged Particles
    Solving the quantum scattering problem for systems of two and three charged particles Solving the quantum scattering problem for systems of two and three charged particles Mikhail Volkov c Mikhail Volkov, Stockholm 2011 ISBN 978-91-7447-213-4 Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice US-AB, Stockholm 2011 Distributor: Department of Physics, Stockholm University In memory of Professor Valentin Ostrovsky Abstract A rigorous formalism for solving the Coulomb scattering problem is presented in this thesis. The approach is based on splitting the interaction potential into a finite-range part and a long-range tail part. In this representation the scattering problem can be reformulated to one which is suitable for applying exterior complex scaling. The scaled problem has zero boundary conditions at infinity and can be implemented numerically for finding scattering amplitudes. The systems under consideration may consist of two or three charged particles. The technique presented in this thesis is first developed for the case of a two body single channel Coulomb scattering problem. The method is mathe- matically validated for the partial wave formulation of the scattering problem. Integral and local representations for the partial wave scattering amplitudes have been derived. The partial wave results are summed up to obtain the scat- tering amplitude for the three dimensional scattering problem. The approach is generalized to allow the two body multichannel scattering problem to be solved. The theoretical results are illustrated with numerical calculations for a number of models. Finally, the potential splitting technique is further developed and validated for the three body Coulomb scattering problem. It is shown that only a part of the total interaction potential should be split to obtain the inhomogeneous equation required such that the method of exterior complex scaling can be applied.
    [Show full text]
  • A Scanning Transmon Qubit for Strong Coupling Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics
    ARTICLE Received 8 Mar 2013 | Accepted 10 May 2013 | Published 7 Jun 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2991 A scanning transmon qubit for strong coupling circuit quantum electrodynamics W. E. Shanks1, D. L. Underwood1 & A. A. Houck1 Like a quantum computer designed for a particular class of problems, a quantum simulator enables quantitative modelling of quantum systems that is computationally intractable with a classical computer. Superconducting circuits have recently been investigated as an alternative system in which microwave photons confined to a lattice of coupled resonators act as the particles under study, with qubits coupled to the resonators producing effective photon–photon interactions. Such a system promises insight into the non-equilibrium physics of interacting bosons, but new tools are needed to understand this complex behaviour. Here we demonstrate the operation of a scanning transmon qubit and propose its use as a local probe of photon number within a superconducting resonator lattice. We map the coupling strength of the qubit to a resonator on a separate chip and show that the system reaches the strong coupling regime over a wide scanning area. 1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Olden Street, Princeton 08550, New Jersey, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to W.E.S. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 4:1991 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2991 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2991 ver the past decade, the study of quantum physics using In this work, we describe a scanning superconducting superconducting circuits has seen rapid advances in qubit and demonstrate its coupling to a superconducting CPWR Osample design and measurement techniques1–3.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: the Interaction Picture
    Appendix: The Interaction Picture The technique of expressing operators and quantum states in the so-called interaction picture is of great importance in treating quantum-mechanical problems in a perturbative fashion. It plays an important role, for example, in the derivation of the Born–Markov master equation for decoherence detailed in Sect. 4.2.2. We shall review the basics of the interaction-picture approach in the following. We begin by considering a Hamiltonian of the form Hˆ = Hˆ0 + V.ˆ (A.1) Here Hˆ0 denotes the part of the Hamiltonian that describes the free (un- perturbed) evolution of a system S, whereas Vˆ is some added external per- turbation. In applications of the interaction-picture formalism, Vˆ is typically assumed to be weak in comparison with Hˆ0, and the idea is then to deter- mine the approximate dynamics of the system given this assumption. In the following, however, we shall proceed with exact calculations only and make no assumption about the relative strengths of the two components Hˆ0 and Vˆ . From standard quantum theory, we know that the expectation value of an operator observable Aˆ(t) is given by the trace rule [see (2.17)], & ' & ' ˆ ˆ Aˆ(t) =Tr Aˆ(t)ˆρ(t) =Tr Aˆ(t)e−iHtρˆ(0)eiHt . (A.2) For reasons that will immediately become obvious, let us rewrite this expres- sion as & ' ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ Aˆ(t) =Tr eiH0tAˆ(t)e−iH0t eiH0te−iHtρˆ(0)eiHte−iH0t . (A.3) ˆ In inserting the time-evolution operators e±iH0t at the beginning and the end of the expression in square brackets, we have made use of the fact that the trace is cyclic under permutations of the arguments, i.e., that Tr AˆBˆCˆ ··· =Tr BˆCˆ ···Aˆ , etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED
    Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED Experiment Theory Rob Schoelkopf Michel Devoret Andreas Wallraff Steven Girvin Alexandre Blais (Sherbrooke) David Schuster NSF/Keck Foundation Hannes Majer Jay Gambetta Center Luigi Frunzio Axel Andre R. Vijayaraghavan for K. Moon (Yonsei) Irfan Siddiqi Quantum Information Physics Terri Yu Michael Metcalfe Chad Rigetti Yale University R-S Huang (Ames Lab) Andrew Houck K. Sengupta (Toronto) Cliff Cheung (Harvard) Aash Clerk (McGill) 1 A Circuit Analog for Cavity QED 2g = vacuum Rabi freq. κ = cavity decay rate γ = “transverse” decay rate out cm 2.5 λ ~ transmissionL = line “cavity” E B DC + 5 µm 6 GHz in - ++ - 2 Blais et al., Phys. Rev. A 2004 10 µm The Chip for Circuit QED Nb No wires Si attached Al to qubit! Nb First coherent coupling of solid-state qubit to single photon: A. Wallraff, et al., Nature (London) 431, 162 (2004) Theory: Blais et al., Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004) 3 Advantages of 1d Cavity and Artificial Atom gd= iERMS / Vacuum fields: Transition dipole: mode volume10−63λ de~40,000 a0 ∼ 10dRydberg n=50 ERMS ~ 0.25 V/m cm ide .5 gu 2 ave λ ~ w L = R ≥ λ e abl l c xia coa R λ 5 µm Cooper-pair box “atom” 4 Resonator as Harmonic Oscillator 1122 L r C H =+()LI CV r 22L Φ ≡=LI coordinate flux ˆ † 1 V = momentum voltage Hacavity =+ωr ()a2 ˆ † VV=+RMS ()aa 11ˆ 2 ⎛⎞1 CV00= ⎜⎟ω 22⎝⎠2 ω VV= r ∼ 12− µ RMS 2C 5 The Artificial Atom non-dissipative ⇒ superconducting circuit element non-linear ⇒ Josephson tunnel junction 1nm +n(2e) -n(2e) SUPERCONDUCTING Anharmonic!
    [Show full text]
  • Zero-Point Energy of Ultracold Atoms
    Zero-point energy of ultracold atoms Luca Salasnich1,2 and Flavio Toigo1 1Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Galileo Galilei” and CNISM, Universit`adi Padova, via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy 2CNR-INO, via Nello Carrara, 1 - 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy Abstract We analyze the divergent zero-point energy of a dilute and ultracold gas of atoms in D spatial dimensions. For bosonic atoms we explicitly show how to regularize this divergent contribution, which appears in the Gaussian fluctuations of the functional integration, by using three different regular- ization approaches: dimensional regularization, momentum-cutoff regular- ization and convergence-factor regularization. In the case of the ideal Bose gas the divergent zero-point fluctuations are completely removed, while in the case of the interacting Bose gas these zero-point fluctuations give rise to a finite correction to the equation of state. The final convergent equa- tion of state is independent of the regularization procedure but depends on the dimensionality of the system and the two-dimensional case is highly nontrivial. We also discuss very recent theoretical results on the divergent zero-point energy of the D-dimensional superfluid Fermi gas in the BCS- BEC crossover. In this case the zero-point energy is due to both fermionic single-particle excitations and bosonic collective excitations, and its regu- larization gives remarkable analytical results in the BEC regime of compos- ite bosons. We compare the beyond-mean-field equations of state of both bosons and fermions with relevant experimental data on dilute and ultra- cold atoms quantitatively confirming the contribution of zero-point-energy quantum fluctuations to the thermodynamics of ultracold atoms at very low temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • BCG) Is a Global Management Consulting Firm and the World’S Leading Advisor on Business Strategy
    The Next Decade in Quantum Computing— and How to Play Boston Consulting Group (BCG) is a global management consulting firm and the world’s leading advisor on business strategy. We partner with clients from the private, public, and not-for-profit sectors in all regions to identify their highest-value opportunities, address their most critical challenges, and transform their enterprises. Our customized approach combines deep insight into the dynamics of companies and markets with close collaboration at all levels of the client organization. This ensures that our clients achieve sustainable competitive advantage, build more capable organizations, and secure lasting results. Founded in 1963, BCG is a private company with offices in more than 90 cities in 50 countries. For more information, please visit bcg.com. THE NEXT DECADE IN QUANTUM COMPUTING— AND HOW TO PLAY PHILIPP GERBERT FRANK RUESS November 2018 | Boston Consulting Group CONTENTS 3 INTRODUCTION 4 HOW QUANTUM COMPUTERS ARE DIFFERENT, AND WHY IT MATTERS 6 THE EMERGING QUANTUM COMPUTING ECOSYSTEM Tech Companies Applications and Users 10 INVESTMENTS, PUBLICATIONS, AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 13 A BRIEF TOUR OF QUANTUM COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES Criteria for Assessment Current Technologies Other Promising Technologies Odd Man Out 18 SIMPLIFYING THE QUANTUM ALGORITHM ZOO 21 HOW TO PLAY THE NEXT FIVE YEARS AND BEYOND Determining Timing and Engagement The Current State of Play 24 A POTENTIAL QUANTUM WINTER, AND THE OPPORTUNITY THEREIN 25 FOR FURTHER READING 26 NOTE TO THE READER 2 | The Next Decade in Quantum Computing—and How to Play INTRODUCTION he experts are convinced that in time they can build a Thigh-performance quantum computer.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamics in a Classical Transmon Circuit
    Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamics in a Classical Transmon Circuit Sasu Tuohino B. Sc. Thesis Department of Physical Sciences Theoretical Physics University of Oulu 2017 Contents 1 Introduction2 2 Classical network theory4 2.1 From electromagnetic fields to circuit elements.........4 2.2 Generalized flux and charge....................6 2.3 Node variables as degrees of freedom...............7 3 Hamiltonians for electric circuits8 3.1 LC Circuit and DC voltage source................8 3.2 Cooper-Pair Box.......................... 10 3.2.1 Josephson junction.................... 10 3.2.2 Dynamics of the Cooper-pair box............. 11 3.3 Transmon qubit.......................... 12 3.3.1 Cavity resonator...................... 12 3.3.2 Shunt capacitance CB .................. 12 3.3.3 Transmon Lagrangian................... 13 3.3.4 Matrix notation in the Legendre transformation..... 14 3.3.5 Hamiltonian of transmon................. 15 4 Classical dynamics of transmon qubit 16 4.1 Equations of motion for transmon................ 16 4.1.1 Relations with voltages.................. 17 4.1.2 Shunt resistances..................... 17 4.1.3 Linearized Josephson inductance............. 18 4.1.4 Relation with currents................... 18 4.2 Control and read-out signals................... 18 4.2.1 Transmission line model.................. 18 4.2.2 Equations of motion for coupled transmission line.... 20 4.3 Quantum notation......................... 22 5 Numerical solutions for equations of motion 23 5.1 Design parameters of the transmon................ 23 5.2 Resonance shift at nonlinear regime............... 24 6 Conclusions 27 1 Abstract The focus of this thesis is on classical dynamics of a transmon qubit. First we introduce the basic concepts of the classical circuit analysis and use this knowledge to derive the Lagrangians and Hamiltonians of an LC circuit, a Cooper-pair box, and ultimately we derive Hamiltonian for a transmon qubit.
    [Show full text]