DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Codex Alimentarius and Other Fao and Who Food Standards Work

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the Codex Alimentarius and Other Fao and Who Food Standards Work Food and Agriculture Organization World Health of the United Nations Organization Report of the EVALUATION OF THE CODEX ALIMENTARIUS AND OTHER FAO AND WHO FOOD STANDARDS WORK Acknowledgements The evaluators wish to express their appreciation to all those from Government and the International Community who were so helpful and willingly provided information and their thoughts on the Codex and other aspects of food standards work through questionnaires and during country visits and other meetings. Similar thanks go to FAO and WHO senior and technical staff in Headquarters, Regional and Country Offices who were prepared to put at the evaluators’ disposal the time needed to respond to the many questions we raised. Particular votes of thanks go to: Maria Gattone, Gemma Harper, Nadine Monnichon and Heather Young, at FAO, Christine Perry and Mary Vallanjon at WHO and Seoung-Yong Lee of the Codex Secretariat for their tireless patience and effort in organizing contractual and logistic matters, and in assisting with questionnaire and other supporting analysis for the evaluation. Report of: Evaluation Team: Independent Expert Panel: W. Bruce Traill, Team Leader Alejandro Cravioto, Chairperson Rachel Bedouin Irina du Bois Katharine Gourlie Ken Buckle Jerri Husch Dilma Scala Gelli Alicia Lustre Spencer Henson Anwarul Hoda Liu Xiumei Diane McCrea Ruth K. Oniang’o Kaye Wachsmuth 15 November 2002 CONTENTS Abbreviations Used in the Text .......................................................................................................4 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................6 1. BACKGROUND AND CONDUCT OF THE EVALUATION................................................10 2. OVERVIEW OF CODEX AND OTHER FAO AND WHO FOOD STANDARDS WORK ..11 3. THE ROLES OF FOOD STANDARDS AND SOME ISSUES FOR THE EVALUATION...12 3.1 The Roles of Food Standards...............................................................................................12 3.2 Core Themes for the Evaluation ..........................................................................................14 4. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CODEX...............................................15 4.1 The Present Scope of Codex Work and Codex Working Procedures..................................15 4.1.1 Committee Structure ....................................................................................................16 4.1.2 Standard Setting and Adoption .....................................................................................18 4.1.3 Consensus-based Decision Making .............................................................................18 4.1.4 Observers .....................................................................................................................19 4.1.5 Priority Setting .............................................................................................................19 4.1.6 Roles of Science and ‘Other Legitimate Factors’ ........................................................19 4.1.7 Resources ......................................................................................................................20 4.2 Procedures in Other International Standard Setting Bodies.................................................20 4.3 Findings and Proposals on the Usefulness of Codex, Prioritization, Scope of Work and Mandate......................................................................................................................................23 4.3.1 Findings on the Usefulness of Codex ...........................................................................23 4.3.2 Scope and Prioritization of Codex Work ......................................................................24 4.3.3 A Clear Mandate for Codex .........................................................................................28 4.3.4 WTO and Codex ...........................................................................................................29 4.4 Reform of Codex.................................................................................................................30 4.4.1 Degree of Independence of Codex...............................................................................30 4.4.2 Links to OIE and IPPC.................................................................................................30 4.4.3 Findings and Recommendations for Codex Organization and Procedures..................31 4.5 Communication...................................................................................................................43 4.6 Increased Resources for Codex............................................................................................44 5. INDEPENDENT RISK ASSESSMENT – EXPERT SCIENTIFIC INPUT TO CODEX.......45 5.1 Existing Arrangements for Expert Advice...........................................................................45 5.2 Effectiveness of Expert Advice............................................................................................45 5.3 Priority Setting ....................................................................................................................46 5.4 Speed and Efficiency of Advice..........................................................................................47 5.5 Are Outputs of Risk Assessments in a Suitable form for Risk Managers?.........................48 5.6 Quality of Scientific Advice and Data Used.......................................................................49 5.7 Independence of Experts.....................................................................................................50 5.8 Transparency.......................................................................................................................50 5.9 A Way Forward...................................................................................................................51 5.10 Immediate Resource Implications.....................................................................................53 6. FAO AND WHO CAPACITY BUILDING IN RELATION TO FOOD STANDARDS........55 6.1 Members’ Needs and the Emphases of the FAO and WHO Programmes...........................56 6.2 Policy and Institutional Arrangements in FAO and WHO ..................................................58 6.3 FAO Capacity-building Activities .......................................................................................59 2 6.3.1 Volume of FAO’s Work Related to Capacity Building................................................59 6.3.2 Training and Workshops...............................................................................................59 6.3.3 FAO Project Activities..................................................................................................60 6.4 WHO Capacity-building Activities......................................................................................61 6.4.1 Volume of WHO’s Work Related to Capacity Building ..............................................61 6.4.2 Regional Strategies and Workshops .............................................................................61 6.5 Extent of WHO and FAO Collaboration on Capacity Building ..........................................62 6.6 Financing Capacity Building for Food Safety: Global Initiatives .......................................62 6.6.1 FAO/WHO Trust Fund .................................................................................................63 6.6.2 Global Facility for Capacity Building in Sanitary and Phyto-Sanitary Measures ........63 6.6.3 FAO Trust Funds for Food Safety ................................................................................63 6.7 Areas for Improvement .......................................................................................................64 6.7.1 Improved In-Country Coordination by FAO and WHO...............................................64 6.7.2 New Challenges ............................................................................................................64 6.7.3 Mobilizing Funds for Capacity Building ......................................................................65 6.8 The Role of Codex in Capacity Building.............................................................................65 7. IN CONCLUSION.....................................................................................................................65 Contribution of the Recommendations to the Four Key Objectives of the Evaluation .............66 Annex 1: Members of the Evaluation Team and Expert Panel......................................................69 Annex 2: Working Terms of Reference.........................................................................................70 Annex 3: Resource Use and Resource Requirements for Food standards Work...........................73 Annex 4: Summary of Analysis of Questionnaires........................................................................79 Annex 5: Countries and International Organizations Visited ........................................................96 Annex 6: Bibliography of Major Documents Prepared and Consulted for the Evaluation ...........98 Annex 7: Methodology of the Evaluation....................................................................................100 3 Abbreviations Used in the Text ADI Acceptable Daily Intake AFC Arab Federation of Consumers ALOP Acceptable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Food Safety, Everyone's Business
    7 June 2019 World Food Safety Day Food safety, everyone’s business A Guide to World Food Safety Day 2019 Get Started! The first ever World Food Safety Day (WFSD) will be celebrated on 7 June 2019 to draw attention and inspire action to help prevent, detect and manage foodborne risks, contributing to food security, human health, economic prosperity, agriculture, market access, tourism and sustainable development. Theme “Food safety, everyone’s business” Everyone has the right to safe, nutritious and sufficient food. Still today, almost one in ten people in the world fall ill after eating contaminated food. When food is not safe, children cannot learn, adults cannot work. Human development cannot take place. Safe food is critical to promoting health and ending hunger, two of the primary goals of the 2030 Agenda. There is no food security without food safety and in a world where the food supply chain has become more complex, any adverse food safety incident may have global negative effects on public health, trade and the economy. Yet food safety is taken for granted. It is often invisible until you get food poisoning. Unsafe food containing harmful bacteria, viruses, parasites or chemical substances, causes more than 200 diseases – ranging from diarrhoea to cancer. This international day is an opportunity to strengthen efforts to ensure that the food we eat is safe. Whether you produce, process, sell or prepare food, then you have a role in keeping it safe. Everybody along the food chain is responsible for food safety. For this inaugural WFSD all stakeholders are invited to raise global awareness about food safety in general and to highlight that everyone involved in food systems has a part to play.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Regulations for Mycotoxins in Food and Feed 2003
    FAO Worldwide Regulations Food and for mycotoxins in food Nutrition Paper and feed 2003 81 A F O F S I I A N T P A Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables........................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ vi Foreword ............................................................................................................................................... vii Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................viii Explanatory note ..................................................................................................................................... x 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Factors affecting the constitution of mycotoxin regulations in food and feed .............................. 3 2.1 Hazard identification and hazard characterization................................................................. 3 2.2 Exposure assessment.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Controls for Animal Food Safety
    Vol. 80 Thursday, No. 180 September 17, 2015 Part III Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Parts 11, 16, 117, et al. Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Food for Animals; Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Sep 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\17SER3.SGM 17SER3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 56170 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., IX. Subpart A: Comments on Qualifications HUMAN SERVICES Rockville, MD 20855, 240–402–6246, of Individuals Who Manufacture, email: [email protected]. Process, Pack, or Hold Animal Food Food and Drug Administration A. Applicability and Qualifications of All SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Individuals Engaged in Manufacturing, Table of Contents Processing, Packing, or Holding Animal 21 CFR Parts 11, 16, 117, 500, 507, and Food (Final § 507.4(a), (b), and (d)) 579 Executive Summary B. Additional Requirements Applicable to Purpose and Coverage of the Rule Supervisory Personnel (Final § 507.4(c)) [Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0922] Summary of the Major Provisions of the Rule X. Subpart A: Comments on Proposed RIN 0910–AG10 Costs and Benefits § 507.5—Exemptions I. Background A. General Comments on the Proposed Current Good Manufacturing Practice, A. FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Exemptions Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based B. Stages in the Rulemaking for the Animal B. Proposed § 507.5(a)—Exemption for Food Preventive Controls Rule Facilities Not Required To Register Preventive Controls for Food for C.
    [Show full text]
  • Codex Alimentarius Commission C O D E X a L I M E N T a R I U S Issn 1020-8070
    PM_21_2012_1pageEN.pdf 1 23/04/2013 11:18:05 CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION C O D E X A L I M E N T A R I U S ISSN 1020-8070 C M Y www.codexalimentarius.org 21 Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme CM 2013 MY CY Manual - Procedural CMY K The Procedural Manual of the Codex Alimentarius Commission is intended to help Member Governments participate effectively in the work of the joint CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. The manual is particularly useful for national delegations attending Codex meetings and for international organizations attending as observers. It sets out the basic Rules of Procedure, PROCEDURAL MANUAL procedures for the elaboration of Codex standards and related texts, basic definitions and guidelines for the operation of Codex committees. Twenty-first edition Twenty-first edition It also gives the membership of the Codex Alimentarius Commission. FAO/WHO ISBN 978-92-5-107570-8 9 789251 075708 I3243E/1/03.13 PM_21_2013_2pageEN.pdf 1 08/05/2013 16:21:06 For further information on the activities of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, please contact: Secretariat of the Codex Alimentarius Commission Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome, Italy E-mail (Internet): [email protected] Web site: www.codexalimentarius.org Codex publications may be obtained through the worldwide Sales Agents C of FAO or by writing to: M Y Sales and Marketing Group Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations CM Viale
    [Show full text]
  • A Theological Reading of the Gideon-Abimelech Narrative
    YAHWEH vERsus BAALISM A THEOLOGICAL READING OF THE GIDEON-ABIMELECH NARRATIVE WOLFGANG BLUEDORN A thesis submitted to Cheltenham and Gloucester College of Higher Education in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts & Humanities April 1999 ABSTRACT This study attemptsto describethe contribution of the Abimelech narrative for the theologyof Judges.It is claimedthat the Gideonnarrative and the Abimelechnarrative need to be viewed as one narrative that focuseson the demonstrationof YHWH'S superiority over Baalism, and that the deliverance from the Midianites in the Gideon narrative, Abimelech's kingship, and the theme of retribution in the Abimelech narrative serve as the tangible matter by which the abstracttheological theme becomesnarratable. The introduction to the Gideon narrative, which focuses on Israel's idolatry in a previously unparalleled way in Judges,anticipates a theological narrative to demonstrate that YHWH is god. YHwH's prophet defines the general theological background and theme for the narrative by accusing Israel of having abandonedYHwH despite his deeds in their history and having worshipped foreign gods instead. YHWH calls Gideon to demolish the idolatrous objects of Baalism in response, so that Baalism becomes an example of any idolatrous cult. Joash as the representativeof Baalism specifies the defined theme by proposing that whichever god demonstrateshis divine power shall be recognised as god. The following episodesof the battle against the Midianites contrast Gideon's inadequateresources with his selfish attempt to be honoured for the victory, assignthe victory to YHWH,who remains in control and who thus demonstrateshis divine power, and show that Baal is not presentin the narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Manufacturing Practices
    Training Modules on General Food Safety Plans for the Food Industry Good Manufacturing Practices 2012 APEC Secretariat, Michigan State University and The World Bank Group. Module Overview Building an effective food safety system requires the establishment and maintenance of appropriate good practices which provide an environment conducive to producing safe food. In a food manufacturing setting, these practices are often collectively referred to as Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs). There are many GMPs which a food safety manager must effectively manage. The design and management of a facility and the surrounding environment is important to minimize the risk of contamination in food products. The materials used to construct the facility, its design, maintenance, and location should all be taken into consideration when developing and implementing a food safety management system. Similarly, there are GMPs pertaining to other critical food safety elements such as control of food plant operations, transportation, appropriate labeling, and employee training. This learning module covers a subset of GMP requirements described in the Codex Alimentarius General Principles of Food Hygiene. The following topics will be discussed: • Establishment – Design and Facilities • Control of Operation • Storage and Transportation • Product Information and Consumer Awareness • Training 2012 APEC Secretariat, Michigan State University and The World Bank Group. Module Overview Before an effective food safety management system such as Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) can be implemented, the company must be operating in accordance with good hygiene and good manufacturing practices. These prerequisite programs (PRPs) provide the strong foundation necessary to ensure the food facility has an overall environment that is conducive for producing safe food.
    [Show full text]
  • Wager Guide Pimlico Race Course Oct03 Preakness
    1/ST BET WAGER GUIDE PREAKNESS STAKES OCT03 PIMLICO RACE COURSE THOUSAND WORDS (6/1) 5 Owner: Albaugh Family Stable & Spendthrift Farm PRIMARY Trainer: Bob Baffert Jockey: Florent Geroux STAKES NUMBER POSITIVE JESUS’ TEAM (30/1) 6 Owner: Grupo Seven C Stable Trainer: Jose D’Angelo Jockey: Jevian Toledo 145 NY TRAFFIC (15/1) Owner: John Fanelli, Cash is King, 7 LC Racing, Paul Braverman & Team Hanley Trainer: Saffie Joseph Jr. Jockey: Horacio Karamanos EXCESSION (30/1) MAX PLAYER (15/1) 1 Owner: Calumet Farm 8 Owner: George Hall & SportBLX Trainer: Steve Asmussen Thoroughbreds Jockey: Sheldon Russell Trainer: Steve Asmussen Jockey: Paco Lopez MR. BIG NEWS (12/1) AUTHENTIC (9/5) Owner: Spendthrift Farm, Owner: Allied Racing Stable, LLC 2 9 MyRaceHorse Stable, Madaket Trainer: Bret Calhoun Stables & Starlight Racing Jockey: Gabriel Saez Trainer: Bob Baffert Jockey: John Velazquez ART COLLECTOR (5/2) PNEUMATIC (20/1) 3 Owner: Bruce Lunsford 10 Owner: Winchell Thoroughbreds Trainer: Tom Drury Jr. Trainer: Steve Asmussen Jockey: Brian Hernandez Jr. Jockey: Joe Bravo SWISS SKYDIVER (6/1) LIVEYOURBEASTLIFE 4 Owner: Peter J. Callahan 11 (30/1) Trainer: Ken McPeek Owner: William H. Lawrence Jockey: Robby Albarado Trainer: Jorge Abreu Jockey: Trevor McCarthy 1ST.COM/BET 2 MEET THE PREAKNESS CONTENDERS By Johnny D., @XBJohnnyD AUTHENTIC: He’s the wire-to-wire upset winner of the Kentucky Derby at over 8-1 odds for 6-time roses-wearing trainer Bob Baffert. The trainer’s record with Derby winners returning in Preakness is unblemished—5-for-5. Baffert won additional Preakness scrums with Derby disappointments Point Given and Lookin At Lucky for a record 7 wins in the traditional second leg of the Triple Crown.
    [Show full text]
  • Codex: Food Labelling
    JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION FOOD LABELLING – COMPLETE TEXTS Revised 1999 Issued by the Secretariat of the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. © FAO/WHO, Rome, 1999. This text may be reproduced in printed or electronic form for private study or use, but not for commercial purposes. Complete Texts Codex Alimentarius PREFACE THE CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION AND THE FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME The Codex Alimentarius Commission implements the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, the purpose of which is to protect the health of consumers and to ensure fair practices in the food trade. The Codex Alimentarius (Latin, meaning Food Law or Code) is a collection of internationally adopted food standards presented in a uniform manner. It also includes provisions of an advisory nature in the form of codes of practice, guidelines and other recommended measures to assist in achieving the purposes of the Codex Alimentarius. The Commission has expressed the view that codes of practice might provide useful checklists of requirements for national food control or enforcement authorities. The publication of the Codex Alimentarius is intended to guide and promote the elaboration and establishment of definitions and requirements for foods, to assist in their harmonization and, in doing so, to facilitate international trade. FOOD LABELLING - COMPLETE TEXTS Food labelling is the primary means of communication between the producer and seller of food on one hand, and the purchaser and consumer of the other. The Codex Alimentarius standards and guidelines on food labelling published in various volumes of the Codex Alimentarius are now collected and republished in this compact format to allow their wide use and understanding by governments, regulatory authorities, food industries and retailers, and consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ensuring Food Safety and Fair Trade Practices: JECFA and the Codex Committee on Food Additives
    Ensuring Food Safety and Fair Trade Practices: JECFA and the Codex Committee on Food Additives Nick Gardner International Food Additive Council Presentation Overview • IFAC Background • Codex Alimentarius 101 • JECFA Background • The JECFA Safety Evaluation • Codex Committee on Food Additives • International Harmonization through the GSFA • IFAC’s Promotion of International Harmonization The International Food Additives Council (IFAC) IFAC is an international association, representing companies who produce high quality substances used worldwide as food ingredients. www.foodadditives.org IFAC Background IFAC strives to promote science-based regulation worldwide by: • Participating in international regulatory processes • Establishing IFAC as a source of credible scientific information on food ingredients • Organizing and sponsoring pertinent scientific research on food ingredients • Defending food ingredients and industry practices Codex Alimentarius A joint intergovernmental body of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) Mission: to create harmonized international food standards to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair trade practices. Codex standards are voluntary and science based • Development of standards assisted by independent international risk assessment bodies or ad-hoc consultations Codex generally operates by consensus Codex Objectives Protect The health of consumers Ensure Fair practices in the food trade All work regarding food standards Coordinate To
    [Show full text]
  • Honest Mischief
    equineline.com Product 40P 04/06/19 13:48:57 EDT Honest Mischief Bay Colt; Mar 20, 2016 Harlan, 89 dk b/ Harlan's Holiday, 99 b Christmas in Aiken, 92 b Into Mischief, 05 b Tricky Creek, 86 b Honest Mischief Leslie's Lady, 96 b Crystal Lady, 90 b Foaled in Kentucky Bold Reasoning, 68 dk b/ Seattle Slew, 74 dk b/ Honest Lady, 96 dk b/ My Charmer, 69 b El Gran Senor, 81 b Toussaud, 89 dk b/ Image of Reality, 76 b By INTO MISCHIEF (2005). Stakes winner of $597,080, CashCall Futurity [G1] (HOL, $403,000), etc. Among the leading sires in U.S., sire of 8 crops of racing age, 811 foals, 504 starters, 46 stakes winners, 3 champions, 356 winners of 1027 races and earning $46,357,597 USA, including Conquest Enforcer (Champion in Canada, $551,938 USA, Mathis Brothers Mile S. [G2] (SA, $120,000), etc.), Miss Mischief (Champion twice, $522,980 USA, Bessarabian S. [G2] (WO, $120,000(CAN)), etc.), Buzz Nightmare (Champion in Jamaica, $42,038 USA), Goldencents ($3,044,000, Breeders' Cup Dirt Mile [G1] (SA, $550,000) twice, etc.), Audible (to 3, 2018, $2,130,520 USA, Xpressbet Florida Derby [G1] (GP, $595,200), etc.), Practical Joke ($1,795,800, Champagne S. [G1] (BEL, $300,000), etc.). 1st dam HONEST LADY, by Seattle Slew. 6 wins, 2 to 4, $894,168, Santa Monica H. [G1], A Gleam H. [G2], Distaff Breeders' Cup H. [G2], Santa Ynez S. [G2], 2nd Breeders' Cup Sprint [G1], Metropolitan H. [G1], Humana Distaff H.
    [Show full text]
  • Raging River (KY) Dark Bay Or Brown Colt; Feb 09, 2020 Mr
    Raging River (KY) Dark Bay or Brown Colt; Feb 09, 2020 Mr. Prospector, 70 b Smart Strike, 92 b Classy 'n Smart, 81 b English Channel, 02 ch Theatrical (IRE), 82 dk b/ Raging River Belva, 98 b Committed, 80 b Foaled in Kentucky Octagonal (NZ), 92 br Lonhro (AUS), 98 dk b/ Phantara, 13 b Shadea (NZ), 88 br A.P. Indy, 89 dk b/ Gateway, 06 b Toussaud, 89 dk b/ By ENGLISH CHANNEL (2002). Champion grass horse in U.S., Stakes winner of $5,319,028, Breeders' Cup Turf [G1]-cre, 1 1/2 miles in 2:36.96 (MTH, $1,620,000), etc. Sire of 11 crops of racing age, 825 foals, 629 starters, 55 stakes winners, 7 champions, 419 winners of 1393 races and earning $55,988,085 USA, including Channel Maker (Champion twice, to 6, 2020, $3,191,551 USA, Man o' War S. [G1] (BEL, $375,000), etc.), Heart to Heart (Champion in Canada, $2,035,090 USA, Gulfstream Park Turf S. [G1] (GP, $180,420), etc.), Strait of Dover (Champion in Canada, $749,628 USA, Queen's Plate S. -R-ntr, 1 1/4 miles in 2:01.99 (WO, $600,000(CAN)), etc.), Johnny Bear (Champion in Canada, $702,706 USA, Northern Dancer Turf S. [G1] (WO, $216,000(CAN)) twice, etc.). 1st dam PHANTARA, by Lonhro (AUS). Unplaced in FR . Dam of 3 foals, 2 of racing age. 2nd dam GATEWAY, by A.P. Indy. Unraced. Half-sister to EMPIRE MAKER ($1,985,800, Belmont S. [G1] (BEL, $600,000), etc., Among the leading sires in U.S.), CHESTER HOUSE ($1,944,545 (USA), Arlington Million S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1930S Greats Horses/Jockeys
    1930s Greats Horses/Jockeys Year Horse Gender Age Year Jockeys Rating Year Jockeys Rating 1933 Cavalcade Colt 2 1933 Arcaro, E. 1 1939 Adams, J. 2 1933 Bazaar Filly 2 1933 Bellizzi, D. 1 1939 Arcaro, E. 2 1933 Mata Hari Filly 2 1933 Coucci, S. 1 1939 Dupuy, H. 1 1933 Brokers Tip Colt 3 1933 Fisher, H. 0 1939 Fallon, L. 0 1933 Head Play Colt 3 1933 Gilbert, J. 2 1939 James, B. 3 1933 War Glory Colt 3 1933 Horvath, K. 0 1939 Longden, J. 3 1933 Barn Swallow Filly 3 1933 Humphries, L. 1 1939 Meade, D. 3 1933 Gallant Sir Colt 4 1933 Jones, R. 2 1939 Neves, R. 1 1933 Equipoise Horse 5 1933 Longden, J. 1 1939 Peters, M. 1 1933 Tambour Mare 5 1933 Meade, D. 1 1939 Richards, H. 1 1934 Balladier Colt 2 1933 Mills, H. 1 1939 Robertson, A. 1 1934 Chance Sun Colt 2 1933 Pollard, J. 1 1939 Ryan, P. 1 1934 Nellie Flag Filly 2 1933 Porter, E. 2 1939 Seabo, G. 1 1934 Cavalcade Colt 3 1933 Robertson, A. 1 1939 Smith, F. A. 2 1934 Discovery Colt 3 1933 Saunders, W. 1 1939 Smith, G. 1 1934 Bazaar Filly 3 1933 Simmons, H. 1 1939 Stout, J. 1 1934 Mata Hari Filly 3 1933 Smith, J. 1 1939 Taylor, W. L. 1 1934 Advising Anna Filly 4 1933 Westrope, J. 4 1939 Wall, N. 1 1934 Faireno Horse 5 1933 Woolf, G. 1 1939 Westrope, J. 1 1934 Equipoise Horse 6 1933 Workman, R.
    [Show full text]