DOCSLIB.ORG

Alphabetical List of Special High Quality Waters Contained in Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1-05, Effective July 1, 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Alphabetical List of Special High Quality Waters contained in Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1-05, effective July 1, 2003 Water Body Name - Segment Description Antideg. Flows Into Drainage Basin Hydrologic Unit Code(s) (HUC) Category* Alum Creek - headwaters to West Branch (RM 42.8) Big Walnut Creek Scioto SHQW 05060001 150 Anderson Fork - Grog Run (RM 11.02) to the mouth Caesar Creek Little Miami SHQW 05090202 040 Archers Fork Little Muskingum Central Ohio SHQW 05030201 100 River Tributaries Arney Run - Black Run (RM 2.2) to the mouth Clear Creek Hocking SHQW 05030204 040 Ashtabula River - confluence of East and West Fork Lake Erie Ashtabula SHQW (RM 27.54) to adjacent East 23rd street (RM 2.00) 04110003 050 Auglaize River - Kelly Road (RM 77.32) to Jennings Maumee Maumee SHQW Creek (RM 47.02) 04100007 020 Aurora Branch - State Route 82 (RM 17.08) to the Chagrin River Chagrin OSW-E mouth 04110003 020 Bantas Fork Twin Creek Great Miami OSW-E 05080002 040 Baughman Creek Grand River Grand SHQW 04110004 010 Beech Fork Salt Creek Scioto SHQW 05060002 070 Bend Fork - Joy Fork (RM 4.0) to the mouth Captina Creek Central Ohio SHQW 05030106 110 Tributaries Big Darby Creek Scioto River Scioto OSW-E 05060001 190, 05060001 200, 05060001 210, 05060001 220 Big Run Federal Creek Hocking SHQW 05030204 090 Big Walnut Creek - Rocky Fork (RM 28.3) to the Scioto River Scioto SHQW mouth 05060001 140 Blue Creek Churn Creek Scioto SHQW 05060002 140 Brill Run Marietta Run Hocking SHQW 05030204 090 Page 1 of 11 Alphabetical List of Special High Quality Waters contained in Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1-05, effective July 1, 2003 Water Body Name - Segment Description Antideg. Flows Into Drainage Basin Hydrologic Unit Code(s) (HUC) Category* Buskirk Creek Deer Creek Scioto SHQW 05060003 030 Caesar Creek - Caesar Creek Lake (RM 13.92) to Little Miami River Little Miami SHQW the mouth 05090202 050 Captina Creek - North/South Forks (RM 25.42) to Ohio River Central Ohio OSW-E State Route 7 (RM 0.70) Tributaries 05030106 110 Cedar Fork Clear Fork Mohican Muskingum SHQW 05040002 030 River Cedar Lick Creek Cross Creek Central Ohio SHQW 05030101 340 Tributaries Center Fork Elkhorn Creek Central Ohio SHQW 05030101 180 Tributaries Chagrin River - Woodiebrook Road (RM 49.14) to Lake Erie Chagrin OSW-E State Route 6 (RM 11.1) 04110003 020, 04110003 030 Chapman Creek Mad River Great Miami SHQW 05080001 160 Clear Creek Rocky Fork Scioto SHQW 05060003 060 Clear Creek - Cattail Creek (RM 9.52) to the mouth Hocking River Hocking SHQW 05030204 040 Compton Creek North Fork Paint Scioto SHQW 05060003 080 Creek Congo Creek Scippo Creek Scioto SHQW 05060002 010 Conneaut Creek - State line (RM 23.83) to the Lake Erie Ashtabula OSW-E mouth 04120101 010 Cuyahoga River - Troy-Burton township line (RM Lake Erie Cuyahoga OSW-E 83.9) to U.S. Route 14 (RM 60.75) 04110002 010 Cuyahoga River - Sand Run (RM 39.12) to Lake Erie Cuyahoga OSW-R Rockside Road (RM 13.13) 04110002 040 Deer Creek - Deer Creek dam (RM 23.89) to the Scioto River Scioto OSW-E mouth 05060002 030, 05060002 040 Page 2 of 11 Alphabetical List of Special High Quality Waters contained in Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1-05, effective July 1, 2003 Water Body Name - Segment Description Antideg. Flows Into Drainage Basin Hydrologic Unit Code(s) (HUC) Category* Deer Creek - Bradford/Sugar Creek confluence (RM Scioto River Scioto SHQW 41.22) to Deer Creek Reservoir (RM 29.40) 05060002 030 Dismal Creek Witten Fork Central Ohio SHQW 05030201 090 Tributaries East Branch Chagrin River - Heath Road (RM Chagrin River Chagrin OSW-E 14.49) to the mouth 04110003 030 East Branch Jelloway Creek Jelloway Creek Muskingum SHQW 05040003 040 East Fork Little Miami River - East Fork Lake (RM Little Miami River Little Miami SHQW 20.5) to the mouth 05090202 120, 05090202 130 East Fork Little Miami River - Howard Run (RM Little Miami River Little Miami SHQW 45.18) to Tunnel Mill Road (RM 30.1) 05090202 110 East Fork Queer Creek Queer Creek Scioto SHQW 05060002 100 Elkhorn Creek Yellow Creek Central Ohio SHQW 05030101 180 Tributaries Federal Creek - Hyde Fork (RM 16.21) to the mouth Hocking River Hocking SHQW 05030204 090 Fish Creek - Indiana state line (RM 5.57) to the St. Joseph River Maumee OSW-E mouth 04100003 050 Fish Creek - headwaters to the Indiana state line St. Joseph River Maumee SHQW (RM 29.37) 04100003 050 Furnace Run Cuyahoga River Cuyahoga SHQW 04110002 040 Goose Run - downstream Winnerline Road (RM Bantas Fork Great Miami SHQW 3.00) to the mouth 05080002 040 Grace Run Cherry Fork Southwest Ohio SHQW 05090201 040 Tributaries Grand River - State Route 322 (RM 67.08) to U.S. Lake Erie Grand OSW-E Route 20 (RM 5.67) 04110004 001, 04110004 020, 04110004 040 Page 3 of 11 Alphabetical List of Special High Quality Waters contained in Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1-05, effective July 1, 2003 Water Body Name - Segment Description Antideg. Flows Into Drainage Basin Hydrologic Unit Code(s) (HUC) Category* Great Miami River - Quincy Dam (RM 143.4) to Ohio River Great Miami SHQW Pasco-Montra Road (RM 134.8) 05080001 040 Great Miami River - Sidney Water Works Dam (RM Ohio River Great Miami SHQW 130.2) to Loramie Creek RM (119.9) 05080001 001 Great Miami River - Lost Creek (RM 100.0) to the Ohio River Great Miami SHQW CSX Railroad Bridge (RM 84.5) 05080001 001 Greenville Creek - Indiana state line (RM 34.48) to Stillwater River Great Miami OSW-E the mouth 05080001 110, 05080001 120 Hay Run Deer Creek Scioto SHQW 05060002 040 Hellbranch Run - Kropp Road RM (5.04) to the Big Darby Creek Scioto SHQW mouth 05060001 220 Honey Creek Great Miami River Great Miami SHQW 05080001 200 Huron River - East/West branch confluence (RM Lake Erie Huron SHQW 14.7) to the Ohio Turnpike (RM 9.1) 04100012 030 Indianfield Run Kokosing River Muskingum SHQW 05040003 030 Jelloway Creek Kokosing River Muskingum SHQW 05040003 040 Joes Run Big Run Hocking SHQW 05030204 090 Kokosing River Walhonding River Muskingum OSW-E 05040003 010, 05040003 030, 05040003 040 Lake Erie SHQW Laurel Run Salt Creek Scioto SHQW 05060002 070 Leith Run Ohio River Central Ohio SHQW 05030201 020 Tributaries Little Beaver Creek Ohio River Little Beaver OSW-E 05030101 090 Creek Page 4 of 11 Alphabetical List of Special High Quality Waters contained in Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1-05, effective July 1, 2003 Water Body Name - Segment Description Antideg. Flows Into Drainage Basin Hydrologic Unit Code(s) (HUC) Category* Little Darby Creek (Big Darby RM 34.10) Big Darby Creek Scioto OSW-E 05060001 210 Little Darby Creek (Big Darby RM 78.34) Big Darby Creek Scioto SHQW 05060001 190 Little Miami River Ohio River Little Miami OSW-E 05090202 001, 05090202 010, 05090202 020, 05090202 030 Little Muskingum River - Witten Fork (RM 46.44) to Ohio River Central Ohio SHQW Fifteen Mile Creek (RM 14.75) Tributaries 05030201 090, 05030201 100 Lower Twin Creek Ohio River Southwest Ohio SHQW 05090201 010 Tributaries Lost Creek Great Miami River Great Miami SHQW 05080001 080 Long Run Rocky Fork Muskingum SHQW 05040006 050 Lost Run Rocky Fork Muskingum SHQW 05040006 050 Mac-o-chee Creek Mad River Great Miami SHQW 05080001 150 Mad River - headwaters to Mac-o-chee Creek (RM Great Miami River Great Miami SHQW 51.75) 05080001 150 Marietta Run Federal Creek Hocking SHQW 05030204 090 Massie Creek Little Miami River Little Miami SHQW 05090202 020 Maumee River - Indiana state line (RM 108.1) to the Maumee Bay Maumee OSW-R U.S. Route 25 bridge (RM 15.05) 04100001 001 McCullough Creek Scioto Brush Creek Scioto SHQW 05060002 150 McKee Creek Stony Creek Great Miami SHQW 05080001 040 Middle Fork Laurel Run Laurel Run Scioto SHQW 05060002 070 Page 5 of 11 Alphabetical List of Special High Quality Waters contained in Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1-05, effective July 1, 2003 Water Body Name - Segment Description Antideg. Flows Into Drainage Basin Hydrologic Unit Code(s) (HUC) Category* Middle Fork Little Beaver Creek - Middle Run (RM Little Beaver Creek Little Beaver OSW-E 8.57) to the mouth Creek 05030101 070 Middle Fork Salt Creek Salt Creek Scioto SHQW 05060002 080 Mill Creek South Fork Scioto Scioto SHQW 05060002 140 Brush Creek Mohican River - Rocky Fork (RM 27.60) to an Walhonding River Muskingum SHQW Unnamed Tributary (RM 16.10) 05040002 001 Morgan Fork Sunfish Creek Scioto SHQW 05060002 130 Muskingum River - confluence of Tuscarawas and Ohio River Muskingum SHQW Walhonding Rivers (RM 111.13) to State Route 208 (RM 92.0) 05040004 001 Muskingum River - Licking River (RM 76.20) to Ohio River Muskingum SHQW Moxahala Creek (RM 73.50) 05040004 001 Muskingum River - Salt Creek (RM 67.03) to Branch Ohio River Muskingum SHQW Run (RM 52.58) 05040004 001 Muskingum River - McConnelsville Dam (RM 49.0) Ohio River Muskingum SHQW to Madison Run (RM 34.4) 05040004 001 Muskingum River - Beverly Dam (RM 24.9) to Ohio River Muskingum SHQW Cushing Run (RM 18.77) 05040004 001 Muskingum River - Lowell Dam (RM 14.1) to Ohio River Muskingum SHQW Rainbow Creek (RM 7.7) 05040004 001 Muskingum River - Devola Dam (RM 5.77) to the Ohio River Muskingum SHQW mouth 05040004 001 Nancy Run North Fork Yellow Central Ohio SHQW 05030101 190 Creek Tributaries Nellis Run Big Run Hocking SHQW 05030204 090 Page 6 of 11 Alphabetical List of Special High Quality Waters contained in Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1-05, effective July 1, 2003 Water Body Name - Segment Description Antideg.
Recommended publications
  • Page 1 03089500 Mill Creek Near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale C

    Page 1 03089500 Mill Creek Near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale C

    Table 2-1. Basin characteristics determined for selected streamgages in Ohio and adjacent States. [Characteristics listed in this table are described in detail in the text portion of appendix 2; column headings used in this table are shown in parentheses adjacent to the bolded long variable names] Station number Station name DASS Latc Longc SL10-85 LFPath SVI Agric Imperv OpenWater W 03089500 Mill Creek near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale Creek near Pricetown, Ohio 21.68 41.0908 81.0409 14.09 12.88 0.8076 40.46 1.08 0.48 2.31 03092090 West Branch Mahoning River near Ravenna, Ohio 21.81 41.2084 81.1983 20.23 11.19 0.5068 38.65 2.35 1.01 2.51 03102950 Pymatuning Creek at Kinsman, Ohio 96.62 41.4985 80.6401 5.46 21.10 0.6267 52.26 0.82 1.18 5.60 03109500 Little Beaver Creek near East Liverpool, Ohio 495.57 40.8103 80.6732 7.89 55.27 0.4812 38.05 1.98 0.79 1.41 03110000 Yellow Creek near Hammondsville, Ohio 147.22 40.5091 80.8855 9.37 33.62 0.5439 19.84 0.34 0.33 0.36 03111500 Short Creek near Dillonvale, Ohio 122.95 40.2454 80.8859 15.25 27.26 0.3795 30.19 1.08 0.93 1.16 03111548 Wheeling Creek below Blaine, Ohio 97.60 40.1274 80.9477 13.43 27.46 0.3280 40.92 0.97 0.56 0.64 03114000 Captina Creek at Armstrongs Mills, Ohio 133.69 39.9307 81.0696 13.56 26.99 0.6797 32.76 0.54 0.64 0.66 03115400 Little Muskingum River at Bloomfield, Ohio 209.94 39.6699 81.1370 5.50 44.84 0.7516 10.00 0.25 0.12 0.12 03115500 Little Muskingum River at Fay, Ohio 258.25 39.6406 81.1531 4.32 60.10 0.7834
  • Chagrin River Watershed Action Plan

    Chagrin River Watershed Action Plan

    Chagrin River Watershed Action Plan Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. PO Box 229 Willoughby, Ohio 44096 (440) 975-3870 (Phone) (440) 975- 3865 (Fax) www.crwp.org Endorsed by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency and Ohio Department of Natural Resources on December 18, 2006 Revised December 2009 Updated September 2011 i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. vii List of Appendices ..................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... x Endorsement of Plan by Watershed Stakeholders ....................................................................................... xi List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ xii 1 Chagrin River Watershed ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Administrative Boundaries .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 History of Chagrin
  • 3745-1-22 AMENDMENT Rule Number TYPE of Rule Filing

    3745-1-22 AMENDMENT Rule Number TYPE of Rule Filing

    ACTION: Original DATE: 11/06/2007 8:08 AM Rule Summary and Fiscal Analysis (Part A) Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Agency Name Division of Surface Water (DSW) Bob Heitzman Division Contact 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 PO Box 1049 614-644-2001 614-644-2745 Columbus OH 43216-1049 Agency Mailing Address (Plus Zip) Phone Fax 3745-1-22 AMENDMENT Rule Number TYPE of rule filing Rule Title/Tag Line Chagrin river drainage basin. RULE SUMMARY 1. Is the rule being filed consistent with the requirements of the RC 119.032 review? Yes 2. Are you proposing this rule as a result of recent legislation? No 3. Statute prescribing the procedure in 4. Statute(s) authorizing agency to accordance with the agency is required adopt the rule: 6111.041 to adopt the rule: 119.03 5. Statute(s) the rule, as filed, amplifies or implements: 6111.041 6. State the reason(s) for proposing (i.e., why are you filing,) this rule: To fulfill a federal requirement to review and amend water body use designations when new information is available. 7. If the rule is an AMENDMENT, then summarize the changes and the content of the proposed rule; If the rule type is RESCISSION, NEW or NO CHANGE, then summarize the content of the rule: The rule amendments update beneficial use designations for water bodies in the Chagrin River drainage basin based on the latest scientific information the Agency [ stylesheet: rsfa.xsl 2.06, authoring tool: EZ1, p: 31078, pa: 39896, ra: 138590, d: 160526)] print date: 11/06/2007 09:14 PM Page 2 Rule Number: 3745-1-22 has gathered through water quality, biological, habitat, and other surveys.
  • Archaeological Modeling Study

    Archaeological Modeling Study

    Draft Report Archaeological Modeling for Segment II/III of the Eastern Corridor Multimodal Projects (HAM-SR32-0.00, PID 22970; FHWA-OH-EIS-04-02) G R AY & PA P E , I N C. ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORY HISTORIC PRESERVATION January 14, 2009 Submitted for: ENTRAN 1848 Summit Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 Submitted by: Gray & Pape, Inc. 1318 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Gray & Pape Project No. 08-11401 Project No. 08-11401 Archaeological Modeling for Segment II/III of the Eastern Corridor Multimodal Projects (HAM-SR32-0.00, PID 22970; FHWA-OH-EIS-04-02) Submitted to: ENTRAN 1848 Summit Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 (513) 761-1700 Contact: Deb Osborne Submitted by: Michael Striker, M.A., RPA Gray & Pape, Inc. 1318 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Tel: (513) 287-7700 __________________________ W. Kevin Pape Project Manager January 14, 2009 ABSTRACT Under contract to ENTRAN, Gray & Pape, Inc. has prepared recommendations concerning the archaeological potential of Segment II/III of the Eastern Corridor Multimodal Projects (HAM-SR32-0.00, PID 22970; FHWA-OH-EIS-04-02), located in Hamilton and Clermont Counties, Ohio. The recommendations are based on a model developed by Gray & Pape, Inc. using the results of previous work conducted for the project (Weed 2002), documentary research, interviews with landowners and other knowledgeable parties, and an informal reconnaissance of the project area. Gray & Pape, Inc. divided the project area into three zones: Zone 1 is the undeveloped floodplains and terraces of the Little Miami River. Zone 2 includes floodplains and terraces that have been developed in historical times, and Zone 3 includes the valley and uplands east of the Village of Newtown.
  • FLOOD of AUGUST 1935 Dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER Z < 5

    FLOOD of AUGUST 1935 Dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER Z < 5

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Water-Supply Paper 869 FLOOD OF AUGUST 1935 dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER o O z < 5 BY i ;> ^, C. V. YOUNGQUIST AND W. B. WITH SECTIONS ON THE ASSOCIATES METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOOT ^ ;j . » BY * V WALDO E. SMITH AND A. K. SHOWALTEK 2. Prepared in cooperation with the * ^* FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRAflCg^ OF PUBLIC WORKS ' -o j; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1941 jFor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. G. - * * « Price 40 cents (paper) CONTENTS Pag« Abstract---.--_-_-__-__-___--______.-__-_---_---_-__-_--_-__-.-_._ I Introduction.______________________________________________________ 1 Administration and personnel---_______--_-_____-__--____________-__ 3 Acknowledgments ________-________-----_--__--__-_________________ 3 Geography _ ____________________________________________________ 6 Topography, drainage, and transportation________________________ 6 Rainfall...--_---.-__-------.-_--------__..---_-----------_---- 7 Population, industry, and mineral resources_---_-__--_________--__ 8 Flood control-___-_-___-__-_-__-____-_--_-_-__--_--__.____--_- S General features of the flood-_______________________________________ 9 Damage.-__-_______--____-__--__--__-_-____--_______-____--__ IT Meteorologic and hydrologic conditions, by Waldo E. Smith____________ 19 General features of the storm.___-____-__________---_____--__--_ 19 Records of precipitation._______________________________________ 21 Antecedent
  • Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio Under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002

    Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio Under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002

    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002 March 25, 2002 prepared by Division of Surface Water Division of Surface Water, 122 South Front St., PO Box 1049, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 644-2001 Introduction Federal Water Quality Standard (WQS) program regulations require that States adopt and use an antidegradation policy. The policy has two distinct purposes. First, an antidegradation policy must provide a systematic and reasoned decision making process to evaluate the need to lower water quality. Regulated activities should not lower water quality unless the need to do so is demonstrated based on technical, social and economic criteria. The second purpose of an antidegradation policy is to ensure that the State’s highest quality streams, rivers and lakes are preserved. This document deals with the latter aspect of the antidegradation policy. Section 6111.12(A)(2) of the Ohio Revised Code specifically requires that the Ohio EPA establish provisions “ensuring that waters of exceptional recreational and ecological value are maintained as high quality resources for future generations.” Table 1 explains the proposed classification system to accomplish this directive. The shaded categories denote the special higher resource quality categories. The proposed rule contains 157 stream segments classified as either State Resource Waters (SRW) or Superior High Quality Waters (SHQW). The approximate mileage in each classification is shown in Table 1. The total mileage in both classifications represents less than four percent of Ohio’s streams. Refer to “Methods and Documentation Used to Propose State Resource Water and Superior High Quality Water Classifications for Ohio’s Water Quality Standards” (Ohio EPA, 2002) for further information about the process used to develop the list of streams.
  • The Unionidae of the Chagrin River: the Remnant of a Molluscan Fauna1

    The Unionidae of the Chagrin River: the Remnant of a Molluscan Fauna1

    The Unionidae of the Chagrin River: The Remnant of a Molluscan Fauna1 MICHAEL A. HOGGARTH2, The Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, Fountain Square, Columbus, OH 43224 ABSTRACT. The study of the distribution of the Unionidae of Ohio reveals information on the biogeography of this family that may be useful in the study of other groups of animals. Thirty sites on the Chagrin River and its major tributaries, the East and Aurora branches, were sampled for freshwater mussels during this study. A total of 268 specimens representing nine species of the family Unionidae were found. Living and/or freshly dead specimens of eight species were identified. Additionally, a single subfossil fragment of Alasmidonta marginata was taken, indicating that this species once occurred in the river. Three reaches of the Chagrin River system were found to support Unionidae: the Aurora Branch contained five species, the main stem of the Chagrin River below the town of Chagrin Falls contained five species, and the Chagrin River above Chagrin Falls contained seven species. The river above the falls contained the most significant proportion of the fauna in the system, with over 80% of all specimens collected from this reach, and suggests that the falls has not always acted as a barrier to distribution. OHIO J. SCI. 90 (5): 168-170, 1990 INTRODUCTION the collections made. These shells have been deposited at The molluscan fauna of the Chagrin River was the The Ohio State University Museum of Zoology. Hoggarth subject of study nearly 30 years ago (Loos I960). That (1990b) provides a complete account of the Unionidae study reported a fauna consisting of six species of aquatic collected during this study.
  • River of the Little Owls

    River of the Little Owls

    at Kenyon College Field Notes July 2014 Vol. 18 / No.3 July, August, September Before the State Route 229 that we know today, a wagon road followed the river between Mount Vernon and Gambier. This photo appeared in William Bodine’s 1891 “The Kenyon Book.” change the name back to the melodic original, which thankfully stuck.1 Though it makes for an interesting tale, thousands of years prior to the river’s naming a much larger regime of change led to its birth from a immense sheet of ice known as the Wisconsin glacier. Prior to its advance, the Ko- kosing River did not exist, nor the Ohio River. Instead, the great Teays River flowed from east to west through the center of the state. River of the Little Owls The Wisconsin glacier advanced 20,000 years ago over the Teays valley, scrap- ping, grinding and trapping all manner The State Scenic Kokosing River winds through the of earth and stone under its frozen heart of our community and colors our past with mass. As it receded, great volumes of melt water cut new river valleys, in- tales of ice, exploration, and survival. cluding the Kokosing’s. Boulders and The first of a two-part series, by Heather Doherty crushed rock were also released from the ice and deposited on the river’s edges. The Kokosing River runs through the that explores how the river connects us heart of Knox County and Mount to our past and touches us today. Fast-forward to 1890, and that glacial Vernon, and has long been central to debris becomes an important local com- life in the region.
  • Ohio Archaeological Inventory Form Instruction Manual

    Ohio Archaeological Inventory Form Instruction Manual

    Ohio Archaeological Inventory Form Instruction Manual With the support of the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Historic Preservation Fund and the Ohio Historic Preservation Office of the Ohio Historical Society Copyright © 2007 Ohio Historical Society, Inc. All rights reserved. The publication of these materials has been made possible in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of the Interior’s National Park Service, administered by the Ohio Historic Preservation Office. However, its contents do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products imply their endorsement. The Ohio Historic Preservation Office receives federal assistance from the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Historic Preservation Fund. U.S. Department of the Interior regulations prohibit unlawful discrimination in depart- mental federally assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or disability. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington D.C. 20240. Ohio Historic Preservation Office 567 East Hudson Street Columbus, Ohio 43211-1030 614/ 298-2000 Fax 614/ 298-2037 Visit us at www.ohiohistory.org OAl Rev. June 2003 Table of Contents Introduction and General Instructions 1 Definition of Archaeological Resource (Site) 1 Submitting an Ohio Archaeological Inventory Form 2 Itemized Instructions 3 A. Identification 3 1. Type of Form 3 2.
  • East Fork Little Miami River, Ohio

    East Fork Little Miami River, Ohio

    25 February 1971 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT East Fork Lake East Fork Little Miami River, Ohio Prepared by U. S. Army Engineer District, Louisville Louisville, Kentucky DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOUISVILLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P O BOX 5 9 LOUISVILLE KENTUCKY 40201 25 February 1971 Revised 26 March 1971 SUMMARY FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT EAST FORK LAKE EAST FORK MIAMI RIVER, OHIO 1. Coordination With Other Agencies. Date of Date of AGENCY Request Comment s Soil Conservation Service USDA 9 Oct 1970 27 Oct 1970 Federal Water Quality Administration, EPA 9 Oct 1970 4 Jan 1971 Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wild­ life, USD I 9 Oct 1970 28 Oct 1970 Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, USDI 9 Oct 1970 No comments received National Park Service, USDI 10 Sept 1970 22 Sept 1970 9 Oct 1970 Ohio Department of Natural Resources 9 Oct 1970 23 Nov 1970 Ohio Planning and Development Clearinghouse 14 Oct 1970 23 Nov 1970 Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Planning Authority (Comments furnished by Clermont County Planning Commission at request of O-K-I) 14 Oct 1970 16 Nov 1970 ORLPD-F East Fork Miami River, Ohio 2 * Environmental Impacts. Approximately 10,600 acres of land will be required for the project, with 2,160 acres of water surface at seasonal pool elevation. The ecology of the area would be modified to adjust to the slack water impoundment. Environment downstream would be enhanced by flood control, water quality control, and water supply. Agricultural lands will be inundated. Urbanization of the area can be expected to increase rapidly. 3 * Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided.
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land

    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land

    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Ohio - 39 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ADAMS 242 - XXX D ELLISON MEMORIAL PARK VILLAGE OF PEEBLES $74,000.00 C 3/7/1973 12/31/1975 2 ADAMS County Total: $74,000.00 County Count: 1 ALLEN 580 - XXX A STRAYER WOODS ACQUISITION JOHNNY APPLESEED METRO PARK DIST. $111,500.00 C 12/6/1977 12/31/1979 4 819 - XXX D OTTAWA RIVER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LIMA $45,045.00 C 3/21/1980 12/31/1984 4 913 - XXX D VILLAGE PARK VILLAGE OF SPENCERVILLE $11,265.00 C 7/28/1981 12/31/1986 4 ALLEN County Total: $167,810.00 County Count: 3 ASHLAND 93 - XXX D MOHICAN STATE PARK SWIMMING POOL DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES $102,831.30 C 4/23/1971 6/30/1972 16 463 - XXX D MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE CITY OF ASHLAND $144,615.70 C 4/7/1976 12/31/1978 16 573 - XXX A BROOKSIDE PARK EXPANSION CITY OF ASHLAND $45,325.00 C 11/10/1977 12/31/1979 16 742 - XXX D LEWIS MEMORIAL TENNIS COURTS VILLAGE OF JEROMESVILLE $4,715.00 C 5/2/1979 12/31/1983 16 807 - XXX D BROOKSIDE PARK CITY OF ASHLAND $200,300.00 C 7/14/1980 12/31/1985 16 953 - XXX D BROOKSIDE PARK III CITY OF ASHLAND $269,669.98 C 6/14/1983 12/31/1988 16 1159 - XXX D BROOKSIDE WEST CITY OF ASHLAND $154,500.00 C 7/11/1990 12/31/1995 16 ASHLAND County Total: $921,956.98 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Ohio - 39 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp.
  • Notes on the Growth and Ultrastructure of Biddulphia Laevis Ehr. (Bacillariophyceae) in the Maumee River, Ohio1

    Notes on the Growth and Ultrastructure of Biddulphia Laevis Ehr. (Bacillariophyceae) in the Maumee River, Ohio1

    OhioJ. Sci. CAECIDOTEA IN MASSACHUSETTS 125 Copyright © 1983 Ohio Acad. Sci. OO3O-O95O/83/OOO3-O125 $2.00/0 NOTES ON THE GROWTH AND ULTRASTRUCTURE OF BIDDULPHIA LAEVIS EHR. (BACILLARIOPHYCEAE) IN THE MAUMEE RIVER, OHIO1 J. P. KOCIOLEK,2 M. A. LAMB and R. L. LOWE, Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403 ABSTRACT. Masses of the chain-forming diatom Biddulphia laevis Ehr. were ob- served in the Maumee River in the summer of 1981. Standing crop of this diatom was de- termined at different thalli portions of its green algal substrate, Cladophora glomerata (L.) Kutz. Ultrastructural observations of valve morphology with SEM indicate this spe- cies is typical of other biddulphioid diatoms, except in the structure of the ocellus-like process, which appears to be intermediate between a typical rimless pseudocellus and the thickened rim of an ocellus. Attachment of B. laevis to Cladophora and the zigzag filamen- tous nature of the chains was observed with SEM and noted to be similar to that of marine centric diatoms of the same type. OHIOJ. SCI. 83 (3): 125-130, 1983 INTRODUCTION current. Cray ton and Sommerfield (1979) Biddulphia laevis Ehr., a relatively large encountered this diatom as a dominant centric diatom, is most commonly associ- member of the phytoplankton in the same ated with marine or brackish water. 2 streams. In Elves Chasm they observed Cholnoky (1968) characterizes this taxon to 6,500 cells/liter. They correlated distri- be oligo-to-mesohalobous while Simonsen bution of this diatom with high nitrate lev- (1962) considers it to be mesohalobous.