NATO Project Societal Security and Environmental Impacts Concerning Mariculture in the Red Sea

NATO Science for Peace project “Societal security and environmental impacts concerning mariculture in the Red Sea”

Bibliography

1.Aarset, B. & S. Beckmann, J. Binge, M. Beveridge, T. Bjorndal, M.J. Bunting, P. McDonagh, C. Mariojouls, J.F. Muir, A. Prothero, L.A. Reisch, A.P. Smith, R.Tveteras & J.A. Young. Without date. The European Consumers’ Understanding and Perceptions of OrganicSalmon Production.

2.Arnold, A. 2004. A review of public attitudes towardsmarine issues within and beyondNew Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand.

3.Chopin, T.A. & C. Buschmann, M. Halling, N. Troell, A. Kautsky, G. Neori, J. Kraemer, C. Zertuche-Gonzalez, ?. Yarish &C. Neefus. 2001. Integrating seaweeds into marineaquaculture systems: A key toward sustainability. Journal of Phycology37:975-986.

4.Collier, L.M. &E.H. Pinn. 1998. An assessment of the acute impact of the sea licetreatment ivermectin on a benthic community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology230:131-147.

5.Department of Marine Resources, Maine. 2006. Marine Aquaculture website (June 2006).

6.Duke, J.M. &R. Aull-Hyde. 2002. Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics 42: 131–145.

7.Elliot, M. 2003. Risk Perception Frames in Environmental Decision Making. Environmental Practice 5-3: 214-222.

8.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2002. State of the world’s fisheries and aquaculture 2002.FAO Fisheries Department, Rome.

9.FAO (Halwart, M. D. Soto & R. Arthur). 2007. Cage aquaculture - Regional reviews and global overview.

10.FAO. 2004. The State of WorldFisheries and Aquaculture 2004.

11.FAO. 2005. Guidelines for theEco-Labeling of Fish and Fishery Products from Marine Capture Fisheries.

12.FAO. 2006. State of world aquaculture: 2006. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 500. FAO Fisheries Department.

13.Firestone, J. &R. Barber. 2003. Fish as pollutants: limitations of and crosscurrents in law,science, management and policy. Washington Law Review,78:693-756.

14.Folke, C. & N. Kautsky M. Troell. 1994. The costs of eutrophication from salmon farming:implications for policy. Journal of Environmental Management40:173-182.

15.Gross, T. 2001. Consumer Attitudes towardsFarmed Seafood.

16.Guo, L. & Z. Li. 2003. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus from fish-cage culture on thecommunities of a shallow lake in the middle Yangtze River basin of China. Aquaculture226: 201-212.

17.Hallerman, E.M. 2000. Genetically modified organism mariculture in the coastal zone.Integrated Coastal Zone Management 1:209-212.

18.Hertrampf, J.W. & F. Piedad-Pascual. 2000. Handbook on Ingredients for AquacultureFeeds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London.

19.Hopkins, D.D. & R.J. Goldburg & A. Marston. 1997. An environmental critique of governmentalregulations and policies for open ocean aquaculture. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal2:235-260.

20.Howarth, R. & D. Anderson, J. Cloern, C. Elfring, C. Hopkinson, B. Lapointe, T. Malone, N. Marcus, K. McGlathery, A. Sharpley & D. Walker. 2000. Nutrient pollution of coastal rivers, bays and seas.Issues in Ecology (7). Ecological Society of America. Washington, DC.

21.Islam, M.S. 2005. Nitrogen and phosphorus budget in coastal and marine cage aquacultureand impacts of effluent loading on ecosystem: review and analysis towards model development.Marine Pollution Bulletin 50:48–61.

22.Loya, Y. &H. Lubinevsky, M. Rosenfeld & E. Kramarsky-Winter. 2004. Nutrient enrichmentcaused by in situ fish farms at Eilat, Red Sea is detrimental to coral reproduction.Marine Pollution Bulletin 49:344–353.

23.Lupatsch, I. & G. Kissil. 1998. Predicting aquaculture wastes from gilthead seabream(Sparus aurata) culture using nutritional approach. Aquatic Living Resources 11(4):265-268.

24.Mardle, S. &S. Pascoe &I. Herrero. 2004. Management objective importance in fisheries: an evaluation using the Analytic HierarchyProcess. Environmental Management 33 (1): 1–11.

25.Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). 2006. Marine Stewardship Council website.

26.Mazur, N. & H. Aslin & I. Byron. 2005. Community Perceptions of Aquaculture: Final Report. Australian Government, Bureau of Rural Sciences.

27.Mazur, N. & H. Aslin, A. Curtis, I. Byron & C. Magpantay. 2004.Community perceptions ofaquaculture: report on the Eyre Peninsula. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.

28.Mazur, N. & H. Aslin, A. Curtis, I. Byron & C. Magpantay. 2004. Community perceptions ofaquaculture: report on the Port Phillip Bay. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.

29.Mazur, N. 2004. Community perceptions of aquaculture: related social research. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.

30.National Research Council (NRC). 1992. Marine Aquaculture: Opportunities for Growth. National Academy Press, Washington DC.

31.Peterson, T.R. 2003. Social Control Frames: Opportunities or Constraints?Environmental Practice 5(3):232–238.

32.Ridler et al. 2007. ???

33.Rieser, A. 1996. Defining the federal role in offshore aquaculture: should it feature delegationto the states? Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 2:209-233.

34.Robertson, R.A. 2001. Effect of balanced information on attitudes towards open ocean aquaculture development in New England.

35.Robinson,B.2004. Social Aspects of Aquaculture in the Bay of Fundy. University of New Brunswick, Saint John.

36.Secretariat of the Convention on biological diversity. 2004. Solutions for sustainable mariculture avoiding the adverse effects of mariculture on biological diversity.

37.Shindler, B.A. & M. Brunson &G.H. Stankey. 2002. Social acceptability of forest conditions andmanagement practices: a problem analysis. United States Department of Agriculture,Forest Service: Corvallis, Oregon.

38.Shmueli, D. & M. Ben Gal. 2003. Stakeholder Frames in the Mapping of the Lower Kishon River Basin Conflict, Conflict Resolution Quarterly, January, 21:2, pp.211-238.

39.Shmueli, D. & M. Ben Gal. 2003. Reframing of Protracted EnvironmentalDisputes: The Tool, Conflict Mapping, Organizational Profiles andEnvironmentalDiscourse in Israel. Second year final report, Israeli Ministryof Environment, Jerusalem, 205 pp. (in Hebrew).

40.Shmueli, D. and M. Ben Gal. 2005. Creating Environmental Stakeholder Profiles: a tool for dispute management,Environmental Practice 7(3), September, pp. 165-175.

41.Weber, M. 2003. What Price farmed fish:A review of the environmental &social costs of farming carnivorous fish. For the SeaWeb Aquaculture Clearinghouse.

42.Whitmarsh, D. & P. Wattage. 2006. Public Attitudes Towards theEnvironmental Impact of SalmonAquaculture in Scotland. European Environment16, 108–121. Published online in Wiley InterScience (

43.Wilson, D. 2001. Community consultation survey of aquaculture developments in the BowenRegion. Queensland Department of State Development, Brisbane.

44.Wondolleck, J. & B. Gray & T. Bryan. 2003. Us versus Them: How Identitiesand Characterizations Influence Conflict. Environmental Practice5(3):207-213.

Further Internet Sources

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50.