Why Xestospongia Testudinaria?

Why Xestospongia Testudinaria?

9th World Sponge Conference 2013. 4-8 November 2013, Fremantle WA, Australia Genetic diversity of the Indo-Pacific barrel sponge Xestospongia testudinaria (Haplosclerida : Petrosiidae) Edwin Setiawan1,2, Dirk Erpenbeck1, Thomas Swierts3, N.J. de Voogd3, Gert Wörheide1 1Dept.of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology, LMU München 2Dept.of Biology,10 November Institute of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia 3Naturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden, The Netherlands Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Why genetic diversity ? • Information for genetic connectivity & phylogeography • Impact of environmental disturbances to marine ecosystem (e.g. Sutherland 2004; Lopez- Legentil et al. 2008; Lopez- Legentil & Pawlik 2009) • Species delimitation Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Why Xestospongia testudinaria? • Abundant in the Indo-Pacific (de Voogd & van Soest 2002) • One of the most common Indonesian reef sponges (van Soest 1989; de Voogd & Cleary 2008) Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Background Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Research question • Genetic diversity & connectivity in a broader scale? • Species delimitation? = or ≠ X. testudinaria X. muta fig. Ritson-Williams et al. 2005 • What about X. bergquistia? 2 identical haplotype between it (Swierts et al. 2013) Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU RESULTS • 8 haplotypes Genetic connectivity • 2 identical haplotypes for: (3‘ partition of cox1 gene) X. testudinaria (206 sequences) X. bergquistia (4 sequences) X. muta (116 sequences) • 4 specific haplotypes for X. testudinaria • 2 specific haplotypes for X. muta • p-distance of 0.0092 & nucleotide diversity (π) of 0.0037 Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Haplotype distribution X. muta in the Caribbean (X. testudinaria & X. bergquistia) (Lopez-Legentil & Pawlik 2009) Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Phylogenetic reconstruction: All three barrel sponge taxa are not resolved Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Discussion • Haplotype diversity index of 3’ partition cox1: Xestospongia testudinaria (0.0037) similar to X. muta (π=0.0039), Lopez- Legentil & Pawlik 2009 Phorbas fictitius (π=0.0042), Xavier et al. 2010 • Low mtDNA substitution rates in Porifera • 3’ partition has a higher resolution than 5’ partition of cox1 (Erpenbeck et al., 2006) Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Species concept disagreement? Gray zone (De Quieroz, 2007) • Diagnosable species concept Morphology (Fromont 1991,van Soest 1980) X. testudinaria ≠ X. bergquistia = X. muta Sterol compounds (Fromont et al. 1994) X. testudinaria ≠ X. bergquistia = X. muta Microsatellites (Bell, 2013) X. testudinaria ≠ X. bergquistia Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU • Ecological species concept Reproductive (Fromont & Bergquist 1994) X. testudinaria ≠ X. bergquistia Geography (Montalvo & Hill 2011) X. testudinaria ≠ X. muta • Monophyletic species concept (cox1) X. testudinaria = X. bergquistia = X. muta Cosmopolite barrel sponges? Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Possible explanation: • Ancient Polymorphism? (Charlesworth 2010) • Haplotype similarity result of high longevity? (e.g., McMurray et al. 2008) Adapted figure from Charlesworth 2010 Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Conclusions 1. Severe problems in species delimitation. 2. Discrepancy between morphology & molecules in haplosclerid sponges (McCormack et al.2002; Raleigh et al. 2007; Redmond & McCormack 2008,2009; Redmond et al. 2007). 3. Employ other marker besides cox 1. 4. “Bottom up” re-examination for haplosclerid sponges (see Cardenas et al. 2012). Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Acknowledgements • DAAD and NCB Naturalis Leiden • Queensland Museum • Indonesian Government and ITS Surabaya • Graduate Center LMU Munich • Molecular Palaeobiology Lab LMU Munich Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU Further cox1 genetic pattern similarity to (ATP6) & Intron of ATPsynβ in X. testudinaria Earth & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology GeoBio-CenterLMU 5‘ partition of cox1 ATP 6 ATPsynβ X. testudinaria consist of at least three different species ?.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us