Towards a Natural Classification of Sapotaceae Subfamily Chrysophylloideae in the Neotropics

Towards a Natural Classification of Sapotaceae Subfamily Chrysophylloideae in the Neotropics

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2017, 185, 27–55. With 4 figures. Towards a natural classification of Sapotaceae subfamily Chrysophylloideae in the Neotropics APARECIDA DONISETE DE FARIA1*, JOSÉ RUBENS PIRANI2, JOSÉ EDUARDO LAHOZ DA SILVA RIBEIRO1, STEPHAN NYLINDER3, MÁRIO HENRIQUE TERRA-ARAUJO4, Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/botlinnean/article-abstract/185/1/27/4100608 by guest on 18 May 2020 PEDRO PAULO VIEIRA5 and ULF SWENSON3 1Departamento de Biologia Animal e Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Campus Universitário, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, PR 445, Km 380, 86057-970, Londrina, PR, Brazil 2Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, 277, 05508-9070, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 3Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 4Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida André Araujo 2936, Coordenação de Pesquisas em Botânica, 69060-000, Manaus, AM, Brazil 5Laboratório de Biologia Molecular, Fundação de Medicina Tropical, Av. Pedro Teixeira, 25, Dom Pedro, 69040-000, Manaus, AM, Brazil Received 17 January 2017; revised 15 May 2017; accepted for publication 2 June 2017 Generic limits of Chrysophyllum and Pouteria (Chrysophylloideae, Sapotaceae) have been found to be untenable. We here search for natural lineages in Neotropical Chrysophylloideae by sampling 101 terminals for molecular sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA (external and internal transcribed spacer), the nuclear gene RPB2 and 17 morphological characters. Data were analysed with Bayesian inference and parsimony jackknifing. Morphological traits were finally optimized onto the tree to identify the most coherent characters. The resulting phylogenetic tree suggests that the limits of the well-known genera Chrysophyllum and Pouteria must be amended. Diploon, Ecclinusa and Elaeoluma can be maintained and Chrysophyllum sections Ragala section Prieurella and the satellite gen- era Achrouteria, Cornuella, Martiusella and Nemaluma merit generic resurrection. Lucuma may be restored if the type species belongs to the clade. The accepted genera Chromolucuma, Pradosia and Sarcaulus gain strong clade support, but are embedded in a core clade of Pouteria and may be relegated to the subgeneric level if morphologi- cal studies cannot provide evidence concurring with narrow generic concepts. Circumscriptions of Micropholis and Chrysophyllum sections Chrysophyllum and Villocuspis remain unclear and must be explored by using an extended taxon sampling. We predict that yet-to-be-analysed species of Pouteria sections Franchetella, Gayella, Oxythece and Pouteria and members of the currently accepted genera Chromolucuma, Pradosia and Sarcaulus will fall inside the core clade of Pouteria when analysed. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: BEAST – Chrysophyllum – classification – jackknife – Pouteria – South America. INTRODUCTION of the family include the presence of latex, simple and entire leaves, malpighiaceous trichomes and flowers Sapotaceae are important wet forest components arranged in fascicles (except in Sarcosperma Hook.f.). throughout the Neotropics, with some members also The number of species has been estimated at c. 1250 being found in drier biomes of the Brazilian Cerrado (Pennington, 1991; Govaerts, Frodin & Pennington, and Campo Rupestre. Important diagnostic characters 2001), but it is steadily increasing in tropical America (Pennington, 2006, 2007), Africa (Gautier et al., *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] 2016) and the Pacific region (Swenson, Munzinger & © 2017 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2017, 185, 27–55 27 28 A. D. DE FARIA ET AL. Bartish, 2007b; Munzinger & Swenson, 2009; Swenson The African Pouteria satellite genus Donella Pierre ex & Munzinger, 2012, 2016). A new subfamilial classifi- Baill. has been recently reinstated (Mackinder, Harris cation was proposed by Swenson & Anderberg (2005), & Gautier, 2016), but Aningeria Aubrév. & Pellegr., recognizing Chrysophylloideae (similar in circum- Gambeya Pierre and Malacantha Pierre are also scription to Chrysophylleae), Sarcospermatoideae and in need of resurrection; however, their circumscrip- Sapotoideae, with the last now including four tribes tions have not yet been investigated (Swenson et al., (Isonandreae, Sapoteae, Sideroxyleae and Tseboneae; 2008b). Similarly, circumscription of the genera of Smedmark, Swenson & Anderberg, 2006; Smedmark Chrysophylloideae in the New World remains unclear. & Anderberg, 2007; Gautier et al., 2013). The num- Recent phylogenetic analyses of molecular data indi- ber of genera in the family has fluctuated according cate that Neotropical Chrysophylloideae probably form Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/botlinnean/article-abstract/185/1/27/4100608 by guest on 18 May 2020 to the adopted generic concepts, from Aubréville’s 122 a clade that could have originated in South America in (Aubréville, 1964a), to Baehni’s 63 (Baehni, 1965) and the Palaeocene, c. 59 Mya (Bartish et al., 2011). Some Pennington’s 53 (Pennington, 1991), all depending on of the diagnostic characters used by Pennington (1990) the morphological features chosen to be indicative to delimit the Neotropical genera are presence vs. of natural relationships. Generic boundaries in the absence of stipules, staminodes and endosperm, with family are still not entirely clear, particularly in the the shape of the corolla (rotate/cup-shaped or cyathi- Neotropical Chrysophylloideae (Swenson, Richardson form/tubular). Also, Pennington’s (1990) dichotomous & Bartish, 2008a). generic keys indicate that the genera could be unnatu- Pennington (1990, 2006, 2007) recognized approxi- rally delimited; for example, the majority of Pouteria mately 350 species in Chrysophylleae in the New spp. possess staminodes, but some lack them, a char- World, distributed in nine genera: Chromolucuma acter pertinent for other genera. Stipules, a diagnos- Ducke (five species), Chrysophyllum L. (45 species), tic feature for Chromolucuma and Ecclinusa, are also Diploon Cronquist (one species), Ecclinusa Mart. (11 found in P. congestifolia Pilz, P. flavilatex T.D.Penn. and species), Elaeoluma Baill. (four species), Micropholis P. stipulifera T.D.Penn., leading Alves-Araújo & Alves (Griseb.) Pierre (39 species), Pouteria Aubl. (c. 200 (2012a) to transfer P. congestifolia to Chromolucuma. species), Pradosia Liais (25 species) and Sarcaulus Chrysophyllum sensu Pennington comprises species Radlk. (five species). He adopted wide generic concepts with pentamerous flowers, no staminodes (or with for Chrysophyllum and Pouteria, resulting in pan- fewer than the corolla lobes) and copious endosperm, tropical distributions. Phylogenetic reconstructions of a combination of characters that is also suggestive of Sapotaceae have, however, clearly demonstrated that some Pouteria spp. We therefore do not exclude the these two genera are polyphyletic, that the type species possibility that some of the Neotropical species of are placed in clades restricted to the New World and that Chrysophyllum and/or Pouteria belong to other gen- features traditionally used for their delimitation show era. Since many new sapotaceous species have been extensive homoplasy that lead to untenable classifica- recently described (Alves-Araújo & Alves, 2011, 2012a, tions (Swenson & Anderberg, 2005; Triono et al., 2007; b; Morales, 2012; Terra-Araujo, Faria & Vicentini, Swenson, Bartish & Munzinger, 2007a; Swenson et al. 2012a; Santamaría-Aguilar, Chaves-Fallas & Aguilar, 2008a; Swenson, Nylinder & Munzinger, 2013). Thus, 2017), deficiencies in the diagnostic delimitation are of species of the non-staminodial genus Chrysophyllum great concern and there is a scientific desire to reach in Malesia and New Caledonia (Vink, 1958) are bet- nomenclatural stability. ter placed in Amorphospermum F.Muell., Niemeyera Pennington’s (1990, 1991) infrageneric classifica- F.Muell. or Pycnandra Benth. (Swenson et al., 2013) tion of Chrysophyllum and Pouteria recognized six and are only distantly related to Chrysophyllum spp. sections in Chrysophyllum (Aneuchrysophyllum Engl., in the New World (Swenson et al., 2008a). Similarly, Chrysophyllum, Donella Pierre ex Baill. Prieurella several Australasian taxa were included in Pouteria by Pierre, Ragala Pierre and Villocuspis (A. DC.) Aubrév. Baehni (1942), transferred to Planchonella Pierre (van & Pellegr.) and nine in Pouteria (Aneulucuma, Royen, 1957), transferred back to Pouteria (Baehni, Antholucuma, Franchetella, Gayella, Oligotheca, 1965), returned to Planchonella (Aubréville, 1967) and Oxythece, Pierrisideroxylon, Pouteria and Rivicoa). again united with Pouteria (Pennington, 1991). These Five sections of Chrysophyllum and eight of Pouteria changing taxonomic positions reflect results of taxo- are present in the Neotropics. Most of them stem from nomic work done before molecular phylogenetic tools taxa established in the late 1800s by Pierre (1890, became widely used. Molecular phylogenetic analyses 1891) and Baillon (1891), taxa that Aubréville (1964a) of the Australasian taxa clearly group species into still recognized as distinct genera, but were reduced monophyletic lineages concurring with Planchonella, to sections by Pennington (Table 1). The objectives of Pleioluma (Baill.) Baehni, Sersalisia R.Br. and this study are to investigate the phylogenetic rela- Van-royena Aubrév. (Swenson et al., 2007a, 2013). tionships of the Neotropical Chrysophylloideae

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    29 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us