STANDING COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL REPORT November 2001 Hon. Murray Scott Speaker House of Assembly Province House Halifax, Nova Scotia Dear Mr. Speaker: On behalf of the Standing Committee on Economic Development, I am pleased to submit the 2000 / 2001 Report of the Committee for the Second Session of the Fifty-Eighth General Assembly. Respectively submitted, Brooke Taylor, MLA (Colchester - Musquodoboit Valley) Chairman Standing Committee on Economic Development Halifax, Nova Scotia 2001 Page 2 Standing Committee on Economic Development 2000-2001 Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 4 Cape Breton Regional Municipality Background 34 Georgia - Pacific Canada Inc. Matters of Discussion 34 Background 5 Matters of Discussion 6 Statement of Submission 37 Mac Tara Limited Committee Membership / Meetings 38 Background 7 Matters of Discussion 8 Notices / Transcripts / Reports 39 LaFarge Canada Inc. Acknowledgements 39 Background 9 Matters of Discussion 10 Atlantic Provinces Ready-Mixed Concrete Association Background 12 Matters of Discussion 13 Maritime Lumber Bureau Background 14 Matters of Discussion 14 Southwest Fishermen’s Rights Association Background 16 Matters of Discussion 17 Department of Fisheries and Oceans Background 18 Matters of Discussion 20 Britech Information Systems Background 21 Matters of Discussion 23 Information Technology Industry Alliance of Nova Scotia Background 24 Matters of Discussion 26 Communities in Bloom Background 27 Matters of Discussion 29 B.C.A. Holdings Ltd. Background 30 Matters of Discussion 31 Page 3 Standing Committee on Economic Development 2000-2001 Annual Report Foreword The report of the Standing Committee on Economic Development was written according to the mandate of the committee categorizing specific topics of interest under the Departments and Ministers to which the Standing Committee can consider. The report is written under individualized headings outlining the concerns and issues brought forth from each group /organization. Several topics listed were of great interest to the Standing Committee and / or were brought forward as a request to the Committee which do not specifically fall under its mandate. Mandate For greater certainty, the Economic Development Committee is established for the purpose of considering matters normally assigned to or within the purview of the Department of Economic Development and the Minister responsible for the Department and the Department and Minister of Transportation and Public Works and matters relating to the Technology and Science Secretariat. (1987 R. 60(2); am. 1993; am. 1996) Page 4 Standing Committee on Economic Development 2000-2001 Annual Report Georgia-Pacific Canada, Inc. Witnesses Georgia-Pacific Corporation Mr. Thomas Howard - Northeast Regional Manager, Government Affairs Georgia-Pacific Canada, Inc. Mr. Robert Fraser - Plant Manager, Sugar Camp Quarry Mr. James Graham - Melford Manager Background The presentation opened with the introduction of Georgia - Pacific’s Sugar Camp mine site. This site has about four years of reserves remaining which is now being phased out while phasing in the new deposit at Melford. In 1997 GP initiated environmental assessments on their Melford site. This process took about two years before they received a conditional permit. They began, at that time, to construct an interchange from the Trans Canada Highway into the Melford deposit and had hoped to have it completed by the fall of 2000. Georgia-Pacific has been in Nova Scotia for 40 years with the development of the Melford project and is looking at another 30 years of doing business in Nova Scotia. The local economy around Sugar Camp, at that time, was about $16.5 million; this consists of payroll, taxes, and other revenues. Georgia-Pacific’s environmental record has been stellar. Their first deposit opened at Big Brook in River Denys has been nominated for the President’s Award for Excellence for the reclamation work that was done on it. Their safety record is also commendable, recognizing employees for completing 500,000 hours with an injury. The company has more than 30 processing plants across North America, but only two production facilities, one on the Baja Peninsula in Mexico and the other in Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia. Manufacturing facilities are located in Ontario, Quebec, B.C. Edmonton and Winnipeg. They also have a paper mill in Thorold and are in the process of acquiring the assets of the Fort James Corporation which manufactures paper products. Page 5 Standing Committee on Economic Development 2000-2001 Annual Report Matters of Discussion There were a number of matters discussed throughout the meeting. Outlined below are the topics that were dealt with during the meeting. , Discussion on Georgia-Pacific’s environmental assessment permits for the Melford location and issues surrounding their Memorandum of Agreement with First Nations groups. They had committed that 25 percent of the mine force at Melford will be first nation peoples. , Issues surrounding Georgia-Pacific’s application for mine abandonment and Mine Site Reclamation. , Discussions on Wallboard Plant production in Nova Scotia, and the viability of marketing the product here compared to shipping it out-of-province. Another issue with producing wallboard is that it has to be produced relatively close to the marketplace because of the low margins and the difficulty transporting the product any great distance. , Transportation costs and the pros and cons of highways versus railways. , Discussion of the $.12 cent gypsum tax placed on the raw material and not on the processing side. , Levels of employment and the impact on the local economy. Documentation Requested There was no documentation requested during this meeting. A copy of the transcript of this meeting is available from the Legislative Committees Office. The transcript of this meeting can also be found online at the following address: http://www.gov.ns.ca/legi/hansard/comm/ed/ed001026.htm Page 6 Standing Committee on Economic Development 2000-2001 Annual Report MacTara Limited Witnesses MacTara Limited Mr. Allan Reese - Vice President Mr. John MacLellan - Timber Manager Background MacTara is the largest sawmill operation in Nova Scotia and the single largest mill site operating in the Atlantic Provinces. The company directly employs 340 persons, and 210 indirectly through contract operations. They are the largest employer in Central Nova Scotia. The payroll for the last fiscal year was in the area of $15 million. The average wage is in the range of $15 to $16 per hour. MacTara is also an ISO 9002 certified facility. MacTara produces one and two-inch dimension lumber for the North American Market. Softwood and hardwood pulp are also produced for other companies such as the hardboard plant in Chester. They have a chipping facility in Sheet Harbour that produces for Mitsubishi, and produces softwood chips for both Kimberly-Clark and Stora Enso mills. They also produce pelletized bark fuel of which approximately 60,000 tons are produced and exported to the European market. In addition, MacTara purchases both saw logs and cut-to-length as well as tree-length form. They also buy and harvest stud logs. Production is in excess of 180 million board feet per year with approximately $1.2 million spent on reforestation and thinning. The company regulates both the harvesting and transportation of forest products through their own standards called their ERA program (Effective, Responsible and Accountable). This program regulates how a product is loaded, secured and what condition the equipment is in. MacTara provides an important market for forest products in Nova Scotia, spending $48 million on wood acquisitions per year. They are an active steward of the forest with both private and public stewardship programs now entering its fourth year. MacTara also supports community projects through scholarships, and they also sponsored a community playground project in Upper Musquodoboit and a high-tech classroom at Musquodoboit Rural High School. Page 7 Standing Committee on Economic Development 2000-2001 Annual Report Matters of Discussion There were a number of matters discussed throughout the meeting. Outlined below are the topics that were dealt with during the meeting. , The downturn in the lumber industry and its effect on MacTara. , MacTara’s partnerships in the Private Lands Program, Stewardship Agreements, Silviculture, and Sustainable Forestry Funds programs. , Discussions regarding MacTara’s Occupational Health and Safety commitments and initiation of their own Safety Committee. , Products provided to U.S. Market and other countries, and the possible expansion of their wood pellet industry. , The utilization and harvesting of old forest growth. , Stumpage rates and the whole process of consensus and input. Documentation Requested During the meeting the Committee had asked of the witnesses to provide information on the following: MacTara’s WCB assessment rates on premiums regarding accident rates; and information from MacTara’s Safety committee regarding specific aspects of Health and Safety that could be studied and streamlined. A copy of the transcript of this meeting is available from the Legislative Committees Office. The transcript of this meeting can also be found online at the following address: http://www.gov.ns.ca/legi/hansard/comm/ed/ed001205.htm Page 8 Standing Committee on Economic Development 2000-2001 Annual Report LaFarge Canada Inc. Witnesses LaFarge Canada Inc. Mr. Jim Cross - Plant Manager