Determining the Viability of Early Pregnancies: Two Case Reports

Determining the Viability of Early Pregnancies: Two Case Reports

Brief.Reports Determining the Viability of Early Pregnancies: Two Case Reports Pamela M . D avis, M D Northridjje, C alifornia First-trimester bleeding demands that an expedient diag­ ported last menstrual period. The implications o f the nosis be made if an ectopic pregnancy is suspected. In slow rise in the /3-HCG were discussed, and the patient addition, rapid determination of a failed pregnancy or wished the pregnancy terminated if the physicians be­ blighted ovum is often sought to facilitate quick evacu­ lieved it was abnormal. Two days later the /3-HCG was ation of the products of conception. Ultrasonography 17,900. After gynecological consultation, she was tenta­ and quantitative measurement o f the /3-subunit o f human tively scheduled for a dilation and curettage (D&C). chorionic gonadatropin (/3-HCG) have raised the expec­ On further consideration, surgery was postponed. A tation that early determination o f fetal viability is possi­ repeat ultrasound 6 days after the initial one revealed no ble. These expectations may be unfounded. This report change: a persistent empty gestational sac without a fetal presents two cases in which undue reliance on laboratory pole (Figure 1). The evidence pointed to an inevitable interpretations could have led to adverse iatrogenic out­ abortion; however, the patient’s stable condition and the comes. clinician’s skepticism about the available information prompted further waiting. Two days later, the /3-HCG level was 29,000, and a third ultrasound 13 days after the original one demonstrated a viable intrauterine preg­ Case 1 nancy corresponding to a fetal age o f 8 weeks. The A 28-year-old woman, gravida 6, para 1, with a history patient subsequently gave birth to a normal male infant at of 3 therapeutic abortions and 1 spontaneous abortion, term. presented to the office 6 5/7 weeks after her last menstrual period. She had a history o f occasional irregular periods and was not using contraception. Her examination was unremarkable except for obesity. A qualitative serum Case 2 /3-HCG pregnancy test was positive. Two weeks later the A 35-year-old woman, with an obstetric history identical patient reported pain on the left side o f her pelvis. The to the patient in case 1, was seen 6 V2 weeks after her last uterus felt soft and enlarged, and the adnexa were nor­ menstrual period to confirm a possible pregnancy. She mal. A pelvic ultrasonogram showed an echogenic ring in had a history o f regular periods and was trying to con­ the center o f the uterus, consistent with an atypical ceive; therefore, she was not using contraception. The gestational sac, and a 5-cm cyst on her right ovary. The patient began spotting that day. Examination revealed a radiologist reported this as most consistent with a drop o f blood on a closed cervix, a soft fundus, and blighted ovum, but concluded that abnormal gestation or normal adnexa. Continued spotting and fears arising early normal gestation was possible. At the time of the from a recent miscarriage prompted the patient to re­ test, the patient’s /3-HCG level was 9100 mlU/mL, and quest an ultrasound examination. At 7 2h weeks a pelvic 48 hours later it was 14,300 mlU/mL. The patient re­ ultrasound examination was obtained. It indicated a ges­ membered some “red discharge” 1 month after her re- tational sac o f 22 mm mean diameter, which corre­ sponded to an age o f 7 weeks. No fetal pole was visual­ ized, however, and the possibility of a blighted ovum or Submitted, r ev ised Jum 27y 1991. an incomplete abortion was raised (Figure 2). One week trom the Northridge Family Practice Presidency Program. Requests fo r reprints should later the physical examination was unchanged. The pa­ be addressed to Pam ela M . D ans, M D , Northridge Family Practice Residency Pro- gram, 18406 Roscoe Blvd, Northridge, CA 91325. tient’s /3-HCG level that day (82/z weeks) was 123,000 ® 1991 Appleton & Lange ISSN 0094-3509 The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 33, No. 4, 1991 401 Pregnancy Viability Davis Figure 3. Pelvic ultrasonogram at 9 weeks after last menstrual Figure 1. Pelvic ultrasonogram 7 weeks after last menstrual period demonstrates a viable 972-week fetus (case 2). period (case 1). Note the echogenic ring in the uterus without a fetal pole, consistent with a blighted ovum. Discussion Ultrasonic demonstration o f cardiac activity by 9 weeks is mIU/mL; 48 hours later the level was 50,840 mlU/mL. an established test o f fetal viability.1 Earlier confirmation The patient was informed of the significance of the is now frequently possible with vaginal probe ultraso­ results and advised to repeat the tests in 1 week. The nography. Measurements o f /3-HCG are most predictive following week the patient’s /3-HCG level was 710,000 before 6 weeks.2'3 It is in the 6-to-9-weeks stage, when mIU/mL, and a second ultrasound examination 2V i bleeding often occurs, that prognosis is difficult. weeks after the initial study demonstrated a viable 9V2- Single samples o f (3-H C G are not reliable predictors week fetus (Figure 3). The patient gave birth to a normal o f fetal viability4-5; therefore, serial measurements of female infant at 42 weeks. /3-HCG arc advocated.2’6-12 The character o f /3-HCG levels to rise in normal pregnancy has led to the use of the /3-HCG “doubling time” to establish viability. Measured doubling times vary from 1.4 to 5 days and increase with gestational age.6’7 The need to translate these data into clinical practice has resulted in the establishment of 48 hours as the normal doubling time in early pregnan- Cy.8, 13— is The usc 0f doubling time is often faulty, how­ ever, owing to its relationship to the gestational age, which may be in error. One difficulty in establishing pregnancy viability early lies in differentiating the blighted ovum (“empty' sac”) from the similar appearing misdated early gestation. The pelvic ultrasound cannot distinguish between the two before 8 weeks’ gestation.16’17 Therefore, the diag­ nosis o f a blighted ovum requires two or three serial ultrasound examinations. Certain sonographic findings arc proposed as measures o f nonviability. The only indi­ cator universally agreed upon is that a sac 2.5 mL in size without a fetal pole is the threshold o f nonviability. 15~21 Figure 2. Pelvic ultrasonogram at 7 weeks after last menstrual The vaginal probe ultrasound, which is now available, period (case 2). No fetal pole is visualized. offers earlier confirmation o f viability. Additional expe- continued on page 404 402 The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 33, No. 4, 1991 Pregnancy Viability Davis continued from page 402 rience is necessary to see if it eliminates the uncertainty in references in the literature to possible complications of a identifying a blighted ovum. delayed expulsion of a spontaneous abortion (maternal The use o f both serum /3T ICG levels and ultrasono­ infection, hemorrhage, and anxiety) are not equivalent to grams helps to eliminate the uncertainty. Between 6 and the known morbidities of an ectopic pregnancy. 16’22,28 9 weeks, the use o f /3-HCG can be helpful with an If the exclusion o f a clinically suspected extrauterine inconclusive ultrasonogram and can predict abortion in pregnancy can be made by sonography or serology, do 95% of cases.2’3’22 Jouppilla et al1 reported, however, the other diagnostic possibilities require proof in an that the /3-HCG level and gestational sac diameter were urgent manner? The cases presented here suggest that usually normal between 6 and 9 weeks of gestation, even actions to terminate a potentially nonviable pregnancy in pregnancies that later aborted.1 Nybcrg et al23-24 con­ based on the available laboratory and radiographic data cluded that when ultrasound findings are uncertain, a would have led to the unwarranted destruction of two disproportionately low /3-HCG level is supportive evi­ healthy fetuses. dence for an abnormal pregnancy, and serial /3-HCG levels complement ultrasound predictions.25’26 These K ey words. Fetal viability; gonadotropins, chori­ studies point out that normal values do not guarantee onic; ultrasonic diagnosis; pregnancy outcome. future viability, and that abnormal values usually portend a poor outcome, but not with complete certainty. References Widespread recommendations from the family prac­ tice and obstetrics literature encourage the use of a simple 1. Jouppilla P, Huhtaniemi I, Herva R, Puroinen O. Correlation of human chorionic gonadotropin in early pregnancy failure with size 48-hour doubling time standard without emphasis on its o f gestational sac and placental histology'. Obstet Gynecol 1984' limitations.8’13’14 Thus, in case 1, the radiologist’s origi­ 63:5 3 7 -4 2 . nal ultrasonogram interpretation of “most consistent 2. Batzer F, Weiner S, Corson S, et al. Landmarks during the first forty-two days of gestation demonstrated by the /i-subunit of with a blighted ovum,” (confirmed 1 week later by a “no human chorionic gonadotropin and ultrasound. Am J Obstet change” reading) was “substantiated” by the failure o f Gynecol 1983; 146:973-9. /3-HCG levels to double appropriately. The difficulties 3. Gerhard I, Runnebaum B. Predictive value o f hormone determi­ nations in the first half of pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod encountered in case 2 might have been avoided when the Biol 1984; 17:1-17. original inconclusive ultrasonogram, again reading pos­ 4. Jouppilla P, Tapanainen J, Huhtaniemi I. Plasma HCG levels in sible blighted ovum, was compared with the initial patients with bleeding in the first and second trimesters of preg­ nancy.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us