Special Values of Riemann's Zeta Function

Special Values of Riemann's Zeta Function

The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Special values of Riemann's zeta function Cameron Franc UC Santa Cruz March 6, 2013 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Riemann's zeta function If s > 1 is a real number, then the series X 1 ζ(s) = ns n≥1 converges. Proof: Compare the partial sum to an integral, N X 1 Z N dx 1 1 1 ≤ 1 + = 1 + 1 − ≤ 1 + : ns xs s − 1 Ns−1 s − 1 n=1 1 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 The resulting function ζ(s) is called Riemann's zeta function. Was studied in depth by Euler and others before Riemann. ζ(s) is named after Riemann for two reasons: 1 He was the first to consider allowing the s in ζ(s) to be a complex number 6= 1. 2 His deep 1859 paper \Ueber die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Gr¨osse" (\On the number of primes less than a given quantity") made remarkable connections between ζ(s) and prime numbers. Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 In this talk we will discuss certain special values of ζ(s) for integer values of s. In particular, we will discuss what happens at s = 1, 2 and −1. Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Overview 1 The divergence of ζ(1) 2 The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 3 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 What happens as s ! 1? The value ζ(s) diverges to 1 as s approaches 1. To see this, use an integral to bound the partial sums from below for s > 1: N X 1 Z N+1 dx 1 1 ≥ = 1 − : ns xs s − 1 (N + 1)s−1 n=1 1 It follows that ζ(s) ≥ (s − 1)−1 for s > 1. Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 In summary, so far we've seen that for s > 1, 1 1 ≤ ζ(s) ≤ + 1: s − 1 s − 1 Since the lower bound diverges as s ! 1, so does ζ(s). This is related to the fact that the Harmonic series 1 1 1 1 + + + + ··· 2 3 4 diverges. Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Cute proof that the Harmonic series diverges We consider the partial sum involving 2k terms: 20 terms 21 terms 2k−1 terms 2k z}|{ z }| { z }| { X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 + + + + ··· + + + ··· + n 2 3 4 2k−1 + 1 2k−1 + 2 2k n=1 20 terms 21 terms 2k−1 terms z}|{ z }| { z }| { 1 1 1 1 1 1 ≥ 1 + + + + ··· + + + ··· + 2 4 4 2k 2k 2k 1 2 2k−1 = 1 + + + ··· + 2 4 2k k = 1 + 2 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Overview 1 The divergence of ζ(1) 2 The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 3 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 If we apply the bounds 1 1 ≤ ζ(s) ≤ + 1 s − 1 s − 1 from the previous part to s = 2 we deduce that 1 ≤ ζ(2) ≤ 2: But what number in this interval is 1 1 1 1 1 ζ(2) = 1 + + + + + + ···?! 4 9 16 25 36 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 It turns out that π2 ζ(2) = : 6 In fact, more generally if k ≥ 1 is any positive integer, then B (2π)2k ζ(2k) = (−1)k+1 2k : 2(2k)! Here Bn is a rational number, the nth Bernoulli number, defined to be the coefficient of X n=n! in the series 1 X X X n = B : eX − 1 n n! n=0 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Thus, each value ζ(2k) is a rational multiple of π2k . If that isn't surprising to you, be aware of the following: the odd values ζ(2k + 1) are not expected to be related to π in any significant algebraic way. Why the even zeta values ζ(2k) are algebraically related to π and the odd values ζ(2k + 1) are (probably) not is one unsolved problem in mathematics. Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 We'll now offer seven proofs that ζ(2) = π2=6, one for every day of the week. Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 First proof: An elementary trigonometric argument First we note that for θ = π=(2N + 1) one has N(2N − 1) cot2(θ) + cot2(2θ) + ··· + cot2(Nθ) = : 3 For x in (0; π=2) the inequality sin x < x < tan x implies 1 cot2 x < < cot2 x + 1: x2 Apply this to each of x = θ, 2θ, 3θ, etc, and sum to deduce N(2N − 1) 1 1 1 1 N(2N − 1)) < 1 + + + ··· + < + N: 3 θ2 22 32 N2 3 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Multiply by θ2 = π2=(2N + 1)2 to deduce N π2 N(2N − 1) X 1 π2 N(2N − 1) N < < + π2 3 (2N + 1)2 n2 3 (2N + 1)2 (2N + 1)2 n=1 Since the upper and lower bounds both converge to the same limit as N grows, and the middle one converges to ζ(2), we deduce that 2 2 1 2 π N(2N − 1) π 1 − 2 π ζ(2) = · lim = · lim 2N = : 3 N!1 (2N + 1)2 3 N!1 1 2 6 2(1 + 2N ) Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Second proof: Fourier series The Fourier series expansion of x2 is 1 π2 X cos(nx) x2 = + 4 (−1)n : 3 n2 n=1 Since cos(nπ) = (−1)n for integers n, evaluating at x = π gives 1 π2 X 1 π2 π2 = + 4 = + 4ζ(2): 3 n2 3 k=1 Hence ζ(2) = π2=6. Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Third proof: A double integral We evaluate a certain double integral two ways. First, Z 1 Z 1 dxdy I = 0 0 1 − xy X Z 1 Z 1 = (xy)ndxdy n≥0 0 0 X Z 1 y n−1 = dy n n≥1 0 X 1 = = ζ(2): n2 n≥1 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 p On thep other hand, the substitutions x = ( 2=2)(u − v) and y = ( 2=2)(u + v) allow one to write p p p Z 2=2 Z u dudv Z 2 Z 2−u dudv I = 4 2 2 + 4 p 2 2 : 0 0 2 − u + v 2=2 0 2 − u + v Persistance and some trig substitutions allow one to evaluate both of the above integrals and show that π2 π2 π2 ζ(2) = I = + = : 18 9 6 |{z} |{z} first integral second integral Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Fourth proof: the residue theorem The following can be proved using the residue theorem from complex analysis. Theorem (Summation of rational functions) Let P and Q be polynomials with deg Q ≥ deg P + 2 and let f (z) = P(z)=Q(z). Let S ⊆ C be the finite set of poles of f . Then N X X lim f (k) = − residuez=p(πf (z) cot(πz)): N!1 k=−N p2S k62S Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Let's take f (z) = 1=z2. In this case S = f0g and the theorem gives a formula for the sum 1 1 X 1 X 1 = 2 = 2ζ(2): k2 k2 k=−∞ k=1 k6=0 Since the polar set S consists only of 0, the preceding summation theorem shows us that this sum is nothing but 2 −residuez=0(π cot(πz)=z ): That is, the theorem immediately gives us the formula π cot(πz) ζ(2) = − · residue : 2 z=0 z2 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 We have residue cot(πz) 1 a a b z}|{c = + b + cz + dz2 + ··· = + + +d+··· z2 z2 z z3 z2 z and hence cot(πz) 1 d2 cot(πz) π residue = · z3 · = − : z=0 z2 2 dz2 z2 3 z=0 Putting everything together shows that π cot(πz) π π π2 ζ(2) = − · residue = − · − = 2 z=0 z2 2 3 6 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 Fifth proof: Weierstrass product Let P(X ) be a polynomial of the form P(X ) = (1 + r1X )(1 + r2X ) ··· (1 + rnX ): Then the coefficient of X in P(X ) is equal to r1 + r2 + ··· + rn: Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 The sine function is like a polynomial: it has a Taylor series X 3 X 5 X 7 sin(X ) = X − + − + ··· 3! 5! 7! and a Weierstrass product 1 Y X 2 sin(X ) = X 1 − : (πn)2 n=1 If we cancel X and let Z = X 2 then we deduce that 1 Z Z 2 Z 3 Y 1 1 − + − + ··· = 1 + − Z : 3! 5! 7! (πn)2 n=1 Cameron Franc Special values of Riemann's zeta function The divergence of ζ(1) The identity ζ(2) = π2=6 The identity ζ(−1) = −1=12 In analogy with polynomials, the identity 1 Z Z 2 Z 3 Y 1 1 − + − + ··· = 1 + − Z : 3! 5! 7! (πn)2 n=1 suggests that the coefficent of Z should be the sum of the reciprocal roots on the right.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    41 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us