Pittsburg State University Pittsburg State University Digital Commons Electronic Thesis Collection Winter 12-15-2017 THE MARCH OF THE UNION ARMIES: JAMES HENRY LANE, THE UNION, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL WAR ON THE KANSAS-MISSOURI BORDER Alex Lahasky Pittsburg State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pittstate.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Lahasky, Alex, "THE MARCH OF THE UNION ARMIES: JAMES HENRY LANE, THE UNION, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL WAR ON THE KANSAS-MISSOURI BORDER" (2017). Electronic Thesis Collection. 261. https://digitalcommons.pittstate.edu/etd/261 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Pittsburg State University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis Collection by an authorized administrator of Pittsburg State University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MARCH OF THE UNION ARMIES: JAMES HENRY LANE, THE UNION, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL WAR ON THE KANSAS-MISSOURI BORDER A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Alex Wilson Lahasky Pittsburg State University Pittsburg, Kansas December, 2017 THE MARCH OF THE UNION ARMIES: JAMES HENRY LANE, THE UNION, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL WAR ON THE KANSAS-MISSOURI BORDER Alex Wilson Lahasky APPROVED: Thesis Advisor _______________________________________________________ Dr. John L. S. Daley, History, Philosophy, and Social Sciences Committee Member ___________________________________________________ Dr. Kirstin L. Lawson, History, Philosophy, and Social Sciences Committee Member ___________________________________________________ Dr. Charles C. Blatchley, Physics ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As with any project of this magnitude, the present study is the product of many people’s efforts. I must extended my sincerest gratitude to my thesis advisory committee at Pittsburg State University: Dr. John L. S. Daley, Dr. Kirstin L. Lawson, and Dr. Charles C. Blatchley. This project would not have been possible if not for their patience, guidance, and encouragement. I am also grateful to my undergraduate history professors at William Carey University, Dr. Jonathan Brooke and Dr. Myron C. Noonkester, who first instilled in me a passion for the study of history. Special thanks are in order to the staffs of the Axe Library at Pittsburg State University and the Spencer Research Library at the University of Kansas, and to my colleagues in the history department at Blue Valley West High School. Finally, my sincerest thanks are owed to my parents, Mark and Sally Lahasky, to whom this study is dedicated for their undying love and support, and to my patient partner, Jennifer Berroth, who endured many a lonely summer afternoon and weekend night as I labored on this project. iii THE MARCH OF THE UNION ARMIES: JAMES HENRY LANE, THE UNION, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOTAL WAR ON THE KANSAS-MISSOURI BORDER An Abstract of the Thesis by Alex Wilson Lahasky James Henry Lane was a giant of Kansas politics during the mid-nineteenth century. His leadership during the territorial crisis of 1855—commonly known as the “Bleeding Kansas” era—contributed mightily to Kansas’s entry as a free state in 1861. During the early stages of the ensuing Civil War, Lane’s political and military presence on the plains was ubiquitous; he served simultaneously as a United States Senator and a brigadier general of the Union Army. Lane’s activities during the first year of the war provide the focal point of the present study. With Kansas under threat from secessionist elements in neighboring Missouri, Lane commanded a three-regiment brigade of volunteers in the fall of 1861. His tactics, though unconventional for the time, served to temporarily flush the region of its pro- Confederate operations. The present study evaluates the enigmatic memory of this 1861 campaign. Although the historiographical record depicts Lane as a radical jayhawker in the same category as Charles Jennison and James Montgomery, evidence suggests that his ideological motivation was far from radical. Despite the charges of his critics, Lane exhibited consistent political principles throughout his career. At the core of his beliefs were a Jacksonian brand of Unionism and a politically based opposition to slavery. As the 1850s waned, Lane’s opposition to the “peculiar institution” intensified; Bleeding Kansas revealed to him that the Southern Slave Power and the Union had grown incompatible with one another. When the war iv began, this recognition inspired Lane to wage total war on the rebel citizenry and on the institution of slavery itself. Lane’s controversial tactics, however, were not the product of a moral crusade against the institution, but rather the realization that unrestricted coercion of the South was a strategic necessity. Lane was among the first Union generals to make war in this way, demonstrating an understanding of the conflict that was years ahead of his time. v TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................iii ABSTRACT.........................................................................................................................v CHAPTER I. Introduction...................................................................................................1 CHAPTER II. Historiography.............................................................................................5 CHAPTER III. Man of Jackson: Jim Lane’s Political Pedigree........................................21 CHAPTER IV. Man of Douglas: Jim Lane in Indiana.......................................................37 CHAPTER V. Man of Seward: Lane’s Path to Republicanism.........................................58 CHAPTER VI. Man of Robinson: Jim Lane and Bleeding Kansas...................................83 CHAPTER VII. Man of Lincoln: Jim Lane and the Outbreak of War.............................101 CHAPTER VIII. Man of Sherman: The Lane Brigade in Western Missouri...................112 CHAPTER IX. Conclusion: Jim Lane’s Return to Politics..............................................137 BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................148 vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION In terms of its drama, Kansas’s path to statehood is unrivaled. Her story, which features fraud, shadow governments, failed constitutions, and violence, reads like a prequel to the American Civil War. Although sectionalism had long been a defining feature of the United States, the first real manifestation of the “irrepressible conflict” occurred on Kansas soil. There, Free State and proslavery interests jockeyed to secure the territory for their respective section. Kansas’s entrance to the Union as the thirty- seventh state represented a small victory for democracy, but it came amid an apparent collapse of the American democratic experiment. No sooner did Kansas join the Union than did that Union plunge into the bloodiest conflict in its history. Kansas’s part in the Civil War contained all the drama that had become familiar to her frontier settlers—with the added stakes of the very survival of the nation. Perhaps no single person was more influential during Kansas’s formative years than James Henry Lane. The Indiana migrant and son of a United States congressman became the public face of the Free State movement. When the territorial crisis turned violent, Lane became Kansas’s chief protector. During the first year of the Civil War, he became Kansas’s foremost champion of the Union. Lane was the state’s first senator and the first sitting senator in American history to lead troops in battle. By all accounts, he 1 was a clever politician and a master orator. Though not without enemies, Lane was a true representative of the American frontier: hardy, self-made, and resilient. Yet, in the historiographical record of Kansas history, Lane remains enigmatic. The prevailing body of literature on Lane reduces the Kansas politician to a caricature— defined more by his eccentric personality than his ideology or accomplishments. As a result, many who have endeavored to tell his story have misinterpreted the nature of that ideology and the weight of those accomplishments. To some extent, the present study intends to redeem Lane’s memory as a legitimate and preeminent frontier politician of the Civil War era. To a greater extent, however, the study endeavors to fill a gap that exists both in Kansas historiography, and in that of the American Civil War. Jim Lane saw his first military action in the Mexican American War and got his first taste of national politics as a congressman from Indiana. His real notoriety, however, began after he became a Kansan in 1855. Following his relocation from Indiana, Lane underwent a change in party affiliation and became a political figurehead of the Free State movement in Kansas. During the Bleeding Kansas era, Lane also exercised military control as the commander of the Free State Militia, a ragtag collection of volunteers assembled to defend Lawrence against the region’s pro-slavery posses. After Kansas finally achieved her statehood, Lane took up arms again—this time on the pretense of Civil War. During the war's first year, Lane exercised controversial military authority as the commander of a three-regiment formation known as the Kansas Brigade.