Chapter 5: Fishes of Southwestern Grasslands: Ecology, Conservation, and Management

Chapter 5: Fishes of Southwestern Grasslands: Ecology, Conservation, and Management

Bob Calamusso Chapter 5: Fishes of Southwestern Grasslands: Ecology, Conservation, and Management Introduction_______________________ consisting of eight speciose genera that comprise the majority of freshwater fish species on the continent, The world possesses an amazing number and vari- is species rich compared to the fish fauna of the ety of freshwater fishes. Fish, the most diverse taxon Southwestern grasslands of New Mexico, Texas, and on Earth, exhibit more species than all vertebrate Oklahoma and the fish fauna west of the Continental taxa combined (Hocutt and Wiley 1986, May 1988, Divide (Smith 1981b, Briggs 1986, Minckley and others Nelson 1994, Matthews 1998) (table 5-1). Worldwide, 1986, Moyle and Herbold 1987, Etnier and Starnes an estimated 28,500 fish species are in 57 orders 1993). Concentrations or “hot spots” of fish species and 482 families (Nelson 1994). The North American diversity east of the Divide occur in the Appalachian freshwater fish fauna is also relatively rich and and Ozark highlands and in Eastern streams. Here, highly diverse ranging from primitive forms such as some river systems contain as many as 100 to 200 the Petromyzontidae (lampreys) to more modern and fish species (Robison and Beedles 1974, Hocutt and advanced forms such as the Percidae (perches) (Miller others 1986, Schmidt 1986, Starnes and Etnier 1986, 1959, Gilbert 1976, Briggs 1986, Cavender 1986, Mayden 1987, Robison and Buchanan 1988, Etneier Nelson 1994). Currently, there are about 1,000 known and Starnes 1993, Matthews 1998). Diversity of fishes freshwater fish species representing 50 families in 201 is also high throughout the Mississippi-Missouri River genera in an area from Canada and Alaska south to the drainage, the region’s major basin, where at least 260 Isthmus of Tehuantepec (Gilbert 1976, Lee and others 1980, Briggs 1986, Mayden 1992a,b). Some of these fish families are endemic to North America whereas Table 5-1. Fish versus tetrapod diversity. Numbers given are others are also found on bordering continents (Briggs for described species worldwide in each taxon. (Adapted 1986). Despite persistent research for more than 100 from Nelson 1994 and May 1988) years, numbers of described fishes in North America continue to increase over time. For example, Lee and Species Numbers others (1980) described 770 North American fishes, whereas just over a decade later Mayden (1992a,b) Fishes 28,618 listed 971. Amphibians 2,800 Regionally significant differences in North American Reptiles 6,000 freshwater fish species numbers and diversity are Birds 4,500 evident. The fish fauna east of the Continental Divide, Mammals 4,500 USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-135-vol. 2. 2005 141 1986, Minckley and others 1986, Moyle and Herbold 1987). The fauna west of the Divide has only about one-fourth as many species as the waters of Eastern North America (Miller 1959, Briggs 1986, Minckley and others 1986). For example, Burr and Mayden (1992) suggest that the Colorado River basin has approximately 32 native fish species, whereas 375 native fishes could be found in the Mississippi River. Matthews and Gelwick (1990) indicated that a typical reach (200 m) in a medium or large stream in Eastern North America contained 20 species of fish, whereas a reach in semiarid or arid lands of the Midwestern to Western North America may only contain eight to 12 species. Moyle and Herbold (1987) suggested that a sample of fishes in Western North America could contain fewer than 10 species, whereas in the Mississippi River basin two to three times as many fishes could be found. The variation in fish species diversity and numbers between the Mississippi Basin and Southwestern grasslands east of the Continental Divide and the fish fauna west of the Continental Divide can be linked to Figure 5-1. Western Mississippi Basin. a myriad of obvious and less apparent factors such as historic and recent evolutionary geology, effects of inland seas, climate, past and present erosive species of fresh water fishes are found (Cross 1967, processes, and extant local fish faunas (Endler 1977, Smith 1981b, Cross and others 1986, Robison 1986, Briggs 1986, Minckley and others 1986, Smith and Moyle and Herbold 1987). Moving west into the western Miller 1986). In general, the fish fauna east of the Mississippi Basin (fig. 5-1) the number of native fish Divide experienced a relatively calm geologic history. species decline to about 235 and continues to decline as During the Pleistocene, the fish fauna of the East one moves westward into Western short-grass prairie was able to avoid a high number of extinctions due to and Southwestern grasslands east of the Continental the region’s large watershed size, stability, and lack Divide (fig. 5-2). of barriers to fish migration to refugia during glacia- In contrast, the fish fauna west of the Continental tion and subsequent recolonization of habitats as ice Divide is characterized by relatively depauperate fish sheets retreated northward (Smith 1981). In contrast, assemblages rich in endemic species, many of which the fish fauna of the eastern Rocky Mountain slopes are confined to a single spring, stream, or drainage and west of the Continental Divide experienced more (Minckley 1973, Pister 1974, Smith 1981a,b, Briggs intense geological events during their evolution. West Figure 5-2. Semiarid grasslands, deserts, and major rivers of the Southwestern United States. 142 USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-135-vol. 2. 2005 of the Divide, the fish fauna evolved in small isolated including shovelnose sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus plato- basins that were influenced by periods of extreme rynchus), spotted gar (Lepisosteus osculates), bonytail tectonic uplift, regional erosion, mountain building, chub (Gila elegans), and freshwater drum (Aplodinotus volcanism, and increasing aridity (Dickinson 1981, grunniens), had been extirpated in New Mexico (Koster Minckley and others 1986). In contrast to events east 1957, Sublette and others 1990). Noticing this down- of the Continental Divide, these processes created ward trend prompted Miller (1946b) to call for studies barriers to fishes moving in search of refugia and of Western fishes to ensure their persistence. th prevented dispersal and recolonziation of waters It was not until the middle of the 20 century, subsequent to these geologic events (Smith 1981b, however, when large-scale continental and regional Dott and Batten 1981). Isolation, fragmentation, and changes in the native fish faunas occurred and were allopatric speciation prevailed in this region. Many finally recognized by the scientific community (Miller fish populations were extirpated, others were isolated 1961, 1972, Minckley and Deacon 1991). Miller or restricted to small habitats where genetic varia- (1961) examined and provided data on changes in tion of the population was limited and speciation was the Southwestern fish fauna. In a more extensive allowed to proceed (Miller 1946a,b, 1959, Simberloff effort, Miller (1972) provided a preliminary effort to 1966, Moyle 1976, Smith 1978, 1981a,b, Minckley identify threatened fishes of the 50 States and again and others 1986). These factors, coupled with loss of highlighted the decline of Southwestern native fishes, genetic variation, contributed to rapid evolutionary provided reasons for the decline, and listed species change (Hubbs and Miller 1948, Hubbs and others of threatened fishes for each of the 50 States in the 1974). These events account for a fish fauna that is United States (Miller 1972). He listed 305 fishes as characterized by special adaptations, endemism, and threatened. Nine fish species were listed as threatened relatively depauperate populations. in Arizona and five in New Mexico. Miller and others (1989) documented the extinction of three genera, 27 species, and 13 subspecies of fishes from North America Population Trends__________________ during the past 100 years. Today, most native Western fishes have become As illustrated, the Southwestern fish fauna evolved listed as threatened or endangered by the USDI Fish in a region with highly variable climate and a dynamic and Wildlife Service, and others are given protection geologic history. These environmental influences are afford by individual States (Johnson and Rinne 1982, reflected in the specializations and unique adaptations Williams and others 1989, Minckley and Douglas 1991, of the native Southwestern fish fauna. Unfortunately, USFWS 2003). Of the 150 fishes recognized by Lee and the adaptations that have allowed these fishes to sur- others (1980) west of the Continental Divide, 122 are vive the harsh hydrologic conditions of the Southwest considered to be in danger of extirpation (Minckley and uplands and grasslands also made them vulnerable to Deacon 1991). A large percentage (34 percent) of the large-scale human-induced ecological changes (Johnson fishes currently listed by the USDI Fish and Wildlife and Rinne 1982, Minckley and Deacon 1991). Service are from the Western United States (USFWS Native fishes of the Southwestern United States TESS 2003). Viability of many of these populations have experienced a severe reduction in both range and is questionable. Many species not afforded protection numbers since the region was first surveyed in the th under the Endangered Species Act or by State regula- 19 century (Williams and others 1985). Significant tions are also believed to be in decline. fish faunal changes were first observed in the early In New Mexico, a minimum of 66 and possibly as 1900s (Miller 1946a, 1961, Minckley and Deacon 1968, many as 70

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    28 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us