Noncognitivism in Ethics

Noncognitivism in Ethics

BIBLIOGRAPHY Items are organized topically rather than alphabetically for ease of use as a resource. Some entries are duplicated, as a result. Within each group, entries are in chronological order of publication. General works in metaethics Moore, G.E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harman, Gilbert (1977). The Nature of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mackie, J.L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin, espe- cially chapters 1 and 2. Smith, Michael (1994a). The Moral Problem. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Darwall, Stephen, Allan Gibbard, and Peter Railton, eds. (1997). Moral Discourse and Practice: Some Philosophical Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Miller, Alexander (2003). An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. Cambridge: Polity. Copp, David, ed. (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fisher, Andrew, and Simon Kirchin, eds. (2006). Arguing about Metaethics. New York: Routledge. 236 BIBLIOGRAPHY Shafer-Landau, Russ, and Terence Cuneo, eds. (2007). Foundations of Ethics: An Anthology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Empirical work on moral judgment and philosophical discussions of its connection to metaethics de Waal, Frans (1996). Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Primates and Other Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Greene, J.D., R.B. Sommerville, L.E. Nystrom, J.M. Darley, and J.D. Cohen (2001). ‘An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment.’ Science 293: 2105–8. Haidt, Jonathan (2001). ‘The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.’ Psychological Review 108: 814–34. Greene, J.D., and J. Haidt (2002). ‘How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 517–23. Nichols, Shaun (2004). Sentimental Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Joyce, Richard (2006). The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Historical noncognitivism Ogden, C.K., and I.A. Richards (1923). The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt Brace. Barnes, W.H.F. (1933). ‘A Suggestion about Value.’ Analysis 1: 45–6. Broad, C.D. (1933). ‘Is “Goodness” the Name of a Simple Non-Natural Quality?’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 34: 249–68. Carnap, Rudolf (1935). Philosophy and Logical Syntax. Bristol: Thoemmes Press. Ayer, A.J. (1936). Language, Truth, and Logic. New York: Dover. Stevenson, C.L. (1937). ‘The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms.’ Reprinted in Stevenson (1963), Facts and Values. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Moore, G.E. (1942). ‘A Reply to My Critics.’ In Paul Schilpp, ed., The Philosophy of G.E. Moore. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Stevenson, C.L. (1942). ‘Moore’s Arguments against Certain Forms of Ethical Naturalism.’ In Paul Schilpp, ed., The Philosophy of G.E. Moore. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Stevenson, C.L. (1944). Ethics and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hare, R.M. (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hägerström, Axel (1953). Inquiries into the Nature of Law and Morals. Edited by Karl Olivecrona and translated by C.D. Broad. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell. BIBLIOGRAPHY 237 Edwards, Paul (1955). The Logic of Moral Discourse. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. Hare, R.M. (1963). Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stevenson, C.L. (1963). Facts and Values. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Urmson, J.O. (1968). The Emotive Theory of Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. Hare, R.M. (1972). Practical Inferences. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Hare, R.M. (1981). Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smart, J.J.C. (1984). Ethics, Persuasion, and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Satris, Stephen (1987). Ethical Emotivism. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Truth-conditional semantics Larson, Richard, and Gabriel Segal (1995). Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Heim, Irene, and Angelica Kratzer (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Speaker subjectivism and related theories Moore, G.E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Perry, R.B. (1926). General Theory of Value: Its Meaning and Basic Principles Construed in Terms of Interest. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Stevenson, C.L. (1937). ‘The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms.’ Reprinted in Stevenson (1963), Facts and Values. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Dreier, James (1990). ‘Internalism and Speaker Relativism.’ Ethics 101(1): 6–25. Timmons, Mark (1999). Morality without Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Finlay, Stephen (2004). ‘The Conversational Practicality of Value Judgment.’ Journal of Ethics 8: 205–23. Expressivism Blackburn, Simon (1984). Spreading the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gibbard, Allan (1990). Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 238 BIBLIOGRAPHY Blackburn, Simon (1993). Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Blackburn, Simon (1998). Ruling Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Horgan, Terry, and Mark Timmons (2000). ‘Nondescriptivist Cognitivism: Framework for a New Metaethic.’ Philosophical Papers 29: 121–53. Gibbard, Allan (2003). Thinking How to Live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Horgan, Terry, and Mark Timmons (2006). ‘Cognitivist Expressivism.’ In Horgan and Timmons, eds., Metaethics after Moore. Oxford: Oxford University Press. The nature of the expression relation Jackson, Frank, and Philip Pettit (1998). ‘A Problem for Expressivism.’ Analysis 58(4): 239–51. Barker, Stephen (2000). ‘Is Value Content a Component of Conventional Implicature?’ Analysis 60(3): 268–79. Copp, David (2001). ‘Realist-Expressivism: A Neglected Option for Moral Realism.’ Social Philosophy and Policy 18: 1–43. Joyce, Richard (2002). ‘Expressivism and Motivation Internalism.’ Analysis 62(4): 336–44. Jackson, Frank, and Philip Pettit (2003). ‘Locke, Expressivism, and Conditionals.’ Analysis 63(1): 86–92. Smith, Michael, and Daniel Stoljar (2003). ‘Is There a Lockean Argument against Expressivism?’ Analysis 63(1): 76–86. Dreier, James (2004). ‘Lockean and Logical Truth Conditions.’ Analysis 64(1): 84–91. Finlay, Stephen (2005). ‘Value and Implicature.’ Philosophers’ Imprint 5(4), avail- able online at www.philosophersimprint.org/005004/. Boisvert, Daniel (2008). ‘Expressive-Assertivism.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89: 169–203. Schroeder, Mark (2008a). ‘Expression for Expressivists.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76(1): 86–116. Cognitivism about instrumental reason Harman, Gilbert (1976). ‘Practical Reasoning.’ Reprinted in Harman (1999), Reasoning, Meaning, and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Davis, Wayne (1984). ‘A Causal Theory of Intending.’ American Philosophical Quarterly 21: 43–54. BIBLIOGRAPHY 239 Bratman, Michael (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Setiya, Kieran (2007). ‘Cognitivism about Instrumental Reason.’ Ethics 117(4): 649–73. Bratman, Michael (2009). ‘Intention, Belief, Theoretical, Practical.’ Forthcoming in Simon Robertson, ed., Spheres of Reason: New Essays in the Philosophy of Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ross, Jacob (2008). ‘How to Be a Cognitivist about Practical Reason.’ Forthcoming in Oxford Studies in Metaethics. The Frege–Geach problem Before Geach and Searle Acton, H.B. (1936). ‘The Expletive Theory of Morals.’ Analysis 4: 42–5. Ross, W.D. (1939). Foundations of Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, chapter 2. Hare, R.M. (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, especially chapter 2. The classical problem Geach, Peter (1958). ‘Imperative and Deontic Logic.’ Analysis 18: 49–56. Geach, Peter (1960). ‘Ascriptivism.’ Philosophical Review 69: 221–5. Searle, John (1962). ‘Meaning and Speech Acts.’ Philosophical Review 71: 423–32. Geach, Peter (1965). ‘Assertion.’ Philosophical Review 74: 449–65. Searle, John (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hare, R.M. (1970). ‘Meaning and Speech Acts.’ Philosophical Review 79(1): 3–24. Early approaches and responses Blackburn, Simon (1973). ‘Moral Realism.’ Reprinted in Blackburn (1993), Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Zimmerman, David (1980). ‘Force and Sense.’ Mind 89: 214–33. Blackburn, Simon (1984). Spreading the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schueler, G.F. (1988). ‘Modus Ponens and Moral Realism.’ Ethics 98(3): 492–500. 240 BIBLIOGRAPHY Zangwill, Nick (1992). ‘Moral Modus Ponens.’ Ratio (NS) 5(2): 177–93. Hale, Bob (1993). ‘Can There Be a Logic of Attitudes?’ In John Haldane and Crispin Wright, eds., Reality, Representation, and Projection. New York: Oxford University Press. van Roojen, Mark (1996). ‘Expressivism and Irrationality.’ Philosophical Review 105(3): 311–35. Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2000). ‘Expressivism and Embedding.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61(3): 677–93. Kölbel, Max (2002). Truth without Objectivity. New York: Routledge. Deflationist responses Horwich, Paul (1993). ‘Gibbard’s Theory of Norms.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 22: 67–78. Stoljar, Daniel (1993). ‘Emotivism and Truth Conditions.’ Philosophical Studies 70: 81–101. Price, Huw (1994). ‘Semantic Deflationism and the Frege Point.’ In S. L. Tsohatzidis, ed., Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London: Routledge. Dreier,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us