Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 400 3rd International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2019) Study on Changes of Garut School of Teachers and Education (STKIP) to be Changed to Garut Indonesia Education Institute (IPI) Eva Devi Sofyawati*, Djam’an Satori Educational Administration Department, School of Postgraduates Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Bandung, Indonesia *[email protected] Abstract—The change in status of STKIP Garut to IPI Garut where the community hopes that Universities can portray (2018-2022) is not a guarantee that the Garut IPI organization themselves as agent of knowledge and technology transfer and has also changed. In some ways, Garut's IPI is still influenced by finally as agents of economic development [1]. the Garut STKIP organization. The focus of the investigation is the management of organizational change. This investigation To meet the expectations of the community so that HEI can aims to uncover the change management organization of STKIP also act as an agent of economic development, HEI is required Garut to become IPI Garut. A qualitative approach was chosen to produce innovations that can provide economic benefits to to obtain the data, which were collected through observation, the community at large [2]. Even though HEI Indonesia has not interviews and documentation studies. Data were analyzed yet achieved the ability to produce innovations that bring direct through member check, snowball, negative cases, and benefits to the community today, many HEI studies are ready triangulation. The results of the investigation showed that the to be deployed to bring direct benefits to the community [3]. condition of the Garut STKIP organization before and after Kemensistekdikti further encourages and facilitates the ability becoming IPI Garut was simple, hierarchical, bureaucratic, to produce innovations that give benefit directly to the formalistic, and familial. Functions such as an integrator, community. identity, and leadership are stabilizers with simplicity and hierarchy. STKIP Garut changed to IPI Garut because Based on the demands of the community and competition, internally, their performance declined and externally there were and also the addition of new study programs, the leaders at global demands. Characteristics of organizations like IPI Garut STKIP Garut on November 21, 2017 through the decision of are complex, market oriented, tends to be effective and efficient, the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education of and flexible and towards professionals with sublime changes; the Republic of Indonesia Number 653 / KPT / I / 2017, STKIP namely from high schools to institutes with boundaries and Garut changed it’s identity to the Institute Indonesian scope, in between private, public and social areas. The Education (IPI). management of organizational change of STKIP Garut to IPI Garut is taken formally and non-formally and is influenced by The change in status of STKIP Garut to IPI Garut has not several factors that support and hinder the change in status. guaranteed any change in the organizational culture. In many aspects, Garut's IPI is still influenced by the organizational Keywords—higher education; organizational change culture of Garut's STKIP. The administrative system and organizational structure in Garut IPI are still centralized. Some I. INTRODUCTION strategic decisions are still flow from top-down. Higher education as part of the national education system STKIP Garut's status has changed to IPI Garut but the core participates in providing human resources with the competitive values of their new organizational culture have not been fully advantage of the Indonesian people with other nations. The internalized properly. The vision and mission have changed but dynamics of higher education is to always make continuous have not been entrenched in all members of the organization. If improvements towards better results and be progress in civilization is a process, then the civilization in the accordance with the demands of the ever-changing global and organization of IPI Garut is always a process [4]. national environment. The biggest risk of changing the organizational culture of The hope of the community at the Higher Education STKIP Garut into IPI Garut is counterproductive. Changes in Institution (HEI) is developing, when HEI was first established, the organizational culture of STKIP Garut to IPI Garut are at the community hoped that PT could act as an agent of risk of changing the fate of educational study programs. Over education. While HEI has been able to portray itself as an agent time they can be marginalized by general (new) study of education, the community hopes that HEI can not only programs. If the general study program is more advanced and portray itself as an agent of education but also act as an agent rapidly developing, the educational study program that have of research and development. This hope continues to this day Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL. This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). 23 Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 400 been considered to be running well will be threatened with because it shows how related processes support the institution losing popularity and can even be closed. [7]. The problem above shows that the focus of investigation is organizational change. The purpose of the investigation is to III. METHODOLOGY know: The study used a qualitative approach. Data were collected through observation, interviews and documentation studies. • Conditions of higher education before and after change; Data were analyzed through member check, snowball, negative • Factors that support the change in status of STKIP cases, and triangulation. Garut to IPI Garut; and • Factors that hinder the change in status of STKIP Garut IV. RESULTS to IPI Garut. A. The Condition of the University Before and After Change The assumption of the investigation establishes that the The Indonesian Educational Institute (IPI), formerly known organizational culture has a strong and long impact on the as the Garut College of Teacher Training and Education, performance and level of effectiveness of the organization. In (STKIP Garut) was established in July 1983, by the Pasundan order to improve its performance, organizations must develop a Education Foundation. In line with the dynamics, strategy to change it [3]. To improve the performance and developments, demands of the community and the government effectiveness of its organization, STKIP Garut which has for higher education at that time, and with the agreement of the changed to IPI Garut must change the old organizational founders of STKIP Garut with the Level II Regional culture (high school) with a new organizational culture Government of Garut Regency, the management change of the (institute). next STKIP Garut was the formation of the Timbanganten Foundation chaired by Mr. Taufiq Hidayat, District Head Level II. THEORETICAL STUDY II Garut Regency, at that time. Change is a sure thing to happen, including in the context Based on government provisions through the Kopertis of the organization. Change occurs because organization is run Region IV West Java coordinator only one university can be by human and humans continue to change. General allowed in each district. To follow up on these regulations, understanding of change is to make things happen [5]. As a three foundations that manage colleges in Garut, namely (1) social institution, universities have been good enough in their Timbanganten Foundation which manages the STKIP Garut, capacity to change and to keep changing until now. The (2) Yaperti who manages the Garut College of Social Sciences challenge as an institution, as a complex community, is to learn (STISIP), and (3) Pangeran Diponegoro Foundation managing how to work together to provide an environment where such the College of Law (STH) Garut agreed to establish the change is not seen as a threat, but as an opportunity that Foundation of Trustees of the University of Garut with the opposes the fun of engaging in the main activity at the abbreviation YP UNIGA. This institution is in charge of university, namely learning [6]. making preparations to combine the three universities into a Managing change in tertiary institutions must be based on university, namely the University of Garut. three things, namely: (1) expanding access, (2) overcoming the YP UNIGA was established with a notary deed from Ny. challenges currently faced, and (3) involving three main leaders Aam Warlimah S.H, Number 32 of 1985. However, in its namely the Chancellor, the Dean and the Chair of the development, the three tertiary institutions are still impressive Department. With these conditions, it is hoped that higher on their own. Coordination of the three PTs was so weak that it education will be able to manage change in a more solid and was finally agreed that STKIP Garut, STISIP Garut, and STH elegant way. It was also stated that in the restructuring process Garut to be handed back to their respective foundations. an approach that was recommended by a high school or university was needed. The four steps approach to the Considering the increasingly complex task of the restructuring process in tertiary institutions, namely (1) setting foundation there was a transfer of duties of Mr. Taufiq Hidayat, the