The Transfer Function the Transfer Function

The Transfer Function the Transfer Function

The Transfer Function The Transfer Function • A generalization of the frequency response • Taking the z-transforms of both sides we get function ∞ ∞ ∞ −n ⎛ ⎞ −n • The convolution sum description of an LTI Y(z) = ∑ y[n]z = ∑∑⎜ h[k]x[n − k]⎟ z discrete-time system with an impulse n=−∞ nk=−∞⎝ =−∞ ⎠ ∞ ∞ response h[n] is given by ⎛ −n ⎞ = ∑∑h[k]⎜ x[n − k]z ⎟ ∞ k=−∞ ⎝ n=−∞ ⎠ y[n] = ∑h[k]x[n − k] ∞ ⎛ ∞ ⎞ k=−∞ −(l+k) = ∑∑h[k]⎜ x[l]z ⎟ k=−∞ =−∞ 1 2 ⎝ l ⎠ Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra The Transfer Function The Transfer Function ∞ ⎛ ∞ ⎞ • Hence, −l −k •Or,Y(z) = ∑∑h[k]⎜ x[l]z ⎟ z H (z) = Y(z)/ X (z) k=−∞ ⎝ =−∞ ⎠ l • The function H(z), which is the z-transform of X (z) the impulse response h[n] of the LTI system, ⎛ ∞ ⎞ −k is called the transfer function or the system • Therefore, Y(z) = ⎜ ∑h[k]z ⎟ X (z) ⎝ k=−∞ ⎠ function H(z) • The inverse z-transform of the transfer function H(z) yields the impulse response h[n] • Thus, Y(z) = H(z)X(z) 3 4 Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra The Transfer Function The Transfer Function • Consider an LTI discrete-time system characterized by a difference equation • Or, equivalently as M M −k ∑ pk z N d y[n − k] = M p x[n − k] H(z) = z(N −M ) k=0 ∑k=0 k ∑k=0 k N N −k ∑k=0 dk z • Its transfer function is obtained by taking • An alternate form of the transfer function is the z-transform of both sides of the above given by equation M −1 M −k p0 ∏k=1(1−ξk z ) ∑k=0 pk z H(z) = ⋅ • Thus H(z) = d N −1 N −k 0 ∏k=1(1− λk z ) ∑k=0 dk z 5 6 Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra 1 The Transfer Function The Transfer Function • Or, equivalently as • For a causal IIR digital filter, the impulse M response is a causal sequence p ∏ (z −ξk ) H(z) = 0 z(N −M ) k=1 N • The ROC of the causal transfer function d0 (z − λ ) ∏k=1 k M p0 (N −M ) ∏k=1(z −ξk ) • ξ1, ξ2,...,ξM are the finite zeros, and H(z) = z d N λ1, λ2,...,λN are the finite poles of H(z) 0 ∏k=1(z − λk ) •IfN > M, there are additional ( N − M ) zeros is thus exterior to a circle going through the at z = 0 pole furthest from the origin •IfN < M, there are additional ( M − N ) poles • Thus the ROC is given by z > maxλk k at z = 0 7 8 Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra The Transfer Function The Transfer Function • The transfer function has M zeros on the •Example- Consider the M-point moving- unit circle at z = e j 2 π k / M , 0 ≤ k ≤ M −1 average FIR filter with an impulse response • There are M − 1 poles at z = 0 and a single ⎧1/ M , 0 ≤ n ≤ M −1 pole at z = 1 M = 8 h[n] = ⎨ ⎩ 0, otherwise • The pole at z = 1 1 • Its transfer function is then given by exactly cancels the 0.5 7 0 M −1 −M M zero at z = 1 1 1− z z −1 Imaginary-0.5 Part H (z) z−n = = = ∑ −1 M • The ROC is the entire M n=0 M (1− z ) M[z (z −1)] -1 z-plane except z = 0 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 Real Part 9 10 Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra The Transfer Function The Transfer Function • Alternate forms: z2 −1.2z +1 •Example- A causal LTI IIR digital filter is H (z) = described by a constant coefficient z3 −1.3z2 +1.04z − 0.222 difference equation given by (z − 0.6 + j0.8)(z − 0.6 − j0.8) = y[n] = x[n −1]−1.2 x[n − 2]+ x[n − 3]+1.3 y[n −1] (z − 0.3)(z − 0.5 + j0.7)(z − 0.5 − j0.7) 1 −1.04 y[n − 2]+ 0.222 y[n − 3] •Note:Poles farthest from 0.5 • Its transfer function is therefore given by z = 0 have a magnitude 0 z−1 −1.2z−2 + z−3 Imaginary-0.5 Part H (z) = 0.74 −1 −2 −3 -1 1−1.3z +1.04z − 0.222z -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 11 12 • ROC: z > 0 . 74 Real Part Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra 2 Frequency Response from Frequency Response from Transfer Function Transfer Function • If the ROC of the transfer function H(z) • For a stable rational transfer function in the includes the unit circle, then the frequency form M H (e jω) p ∏ (z −ξk ) response of the LTI digital filter can H(z) = 0 z(N −M ) k=1 be obtained simply as follows: d N 0 ∏k=1(z − λk ) H (e jω) = H (z) z=e jω the factored form of the frequency response • For a real coefficient transfer function H(z) is given by it can be shown that M jω p ∏ (e − ξk ) jω 2 jω jω H (e jω) = 0 e jω(N −M ) k=1 H (e ) = H (e )H *(e ) d N jω jω − jω −1 0 ∏k=1(e − λk ) = H (e )H (e ) = H (z)H (z ) jω 13 z=e 14 Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Frequency Response from Frequency Response from Transfer Function Transfer Function • It is convenient to visualize the contributions which reduces to M jω of the zero factor (z − ξ )and the pole factor p ∏ e − ξk k H (e jω) = 0 k=1 (z − λ ) from the factored form of the N jω k d0 e − λ frequency response ∏k=1 k • The phase response for a rational transfer • The magnitude function is given by function is of the form M jω p ∏ e − ξk jω H (e jω) = 0 e jω(N −M ) k=1 arg H (e ) = arg( p0 / d0) + ω(N − M ) d N jω M N 0 ∏k=1 e − λk jω jω + ∑arg(e − ξk ) − ∑arg(e − λk ) 15 16 k=1 k=1 Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Frequency Response from Geometric Interpretation of Transfer Function Frequency Response Computation • The magnitude-squared function of a real- • The factored form of the frequency coefficient transfer function can be response M jω computed using p ∏ (e − ξk ) H (e jω) = 0 e jω(N −M ) k=1 N 2 M d jω jω − jω * 0 ∏k=1(e − λk ) jω 2 p0 ∏k=1(e − ξk )(e − ξk ) H (e ) = is convenient to develop a geometric d N (e jω − λ )(e− jω − λ* ) 0 ∏k=1 k k interpretation of the frequency response computation from the pole-zero plot as ω varies from 0 to 2π on the unit circle 17 18 Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra 3 Geometric Interpretation of Geometric Interpretation of Frequency Response Computation Frequency Response Computation • The geometric interpretation can be used to • As shown below in the z-plane the factor obtain a sketch of the response as a function (e jω − ρe jφ) represents a vector starting at of the frequency the point z = ρ e jφ and ending on the unit jω • A typical factor in the factored form of the circle at z = e frequency response is given by (e jω − ρe jφ) where ρ e jφ is a zero if it is zero factor or is a pole if it is a pole factor 19 20 Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Geometric Interpretation of Geometric Interpretation of Frequency Response Computation Frequency Response Computation •As ω is varied from 0 to 2π, the tip of the • As indicated by M jω vector moves counterclockise from the p ∏ e − ξk H (e jω) = 0 k=1 point z = 1 tracing the unit circle and back N jω d0 ∏ e − λk to the point z = 1 k=1 the magnitude response | H ( e j ω ) | at a specific value of ω is given by the product of the magnitudes of all zero vectors divided by the product of the magnitudes of all pole vectors 21 22 Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Geometric Interpretation of Geometric Interpretation of Frequency Response Computation Frequency Response Computation • Likewise, from jω arg H (e ) = arg( p0 / d0) + ω(N − M ) • Thus, an approximate plot of the magnitude + ∑M arg(e jω − ξ ) − ∑N arg(e jω − λ ) and phase responses of the transfer function k=1 k k=1 k of an LTI digital filter can be developed by we observe that the phase response examining the pole and zero locations at a specific value of ω is obtained by • Now, a zero (pole) vector has the smallest adding the phase of the term p / d and the 0 0 magnitude when ω = φ linear-phase term ω ( N − M ) to the sum of the angles of the zero vectors minus the angles of the pole vectors 23 24 Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra Copyright © 2005, S. K. Mitra 4 Geometric Interpretation of Stability Condition in Terms of Frequency Response Computation Frequency Response Computation the Pole Locations • To highly attenuate signal components in a • A causal LTI digital filter is BIBO stable if specified frequency range, we need to place and only if its impulse response h[n] is zeros very close to or on the unit circle in absolutely summable, i.e., this range ∞ • Likewise, to highly emphasize signal S = ∑ h[n] < ∞ components in a specified frequency range, n=−∞ we need to place poles very close to or on • We now develop a stability condition in the unit circle in this range terms of the pole locations of the transfer function H(z) 25 26 Copyright © 2005, S.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us