Planetary Science Update & Perspectives on Venus Exploration

Planetary Science Update & Perspectives on Venus Exploration

Planetary Science Update & Perspectives on Venus Exploration Presentation at VEXAG James L. Green Director, Planetary Science Division May 6, 2008 1 Outline • FY09 Presidents Budget • Venus exploration opportunities: – Plans for next New Frontiers – Plans for next Discovery – Plans for SALMON – R&A opportunities 2 BUDGET BY SCIENCE THEME 3 Planetary Division 4 Planetary Division 5 What Changed, What’s the Same What Changed: • Initiated an Outer Planets Flagship (OPF) study activity joint with ESA/JAXA. • Lunar Science Research augmented to include a series of small lunar spacecraft. • Augments and enhances R&A to return more results from Planetary missions. • Discovery Program: Includes the recently selected MoOs (EPOXI and Stardust-NExT), adds Aspera-3 2nd extension (ESA/Mars Express), and selected GRAIL. • Preserves critical ISP work FY08 thru FY10, but deletes outyear activities in favor of more critical R&A and RPS enhancements. • Completes the Advanced Stirling RPS development and prepares for flight demonstration. • Mars Scout 2011 delayed to 2013 due to conflict of interest discovered during proposal evaluation. • Direction to the Mars Program to study Mars Sample Return (MSR) as a next decade goal • Expands US participation on the ESA/ExoMars mission by funding the potential selection of BOTH candidate U.S. instruments and EDL support. What’s the Same: • Discovery Program: MESSENGER, Dawn, Mars Express/Aspera-3, Chandraayn/MMM • New Frontiers Program: Juno and New Horizons • Mars Program: Odyssey, MER, MRO, Phoenix, MSL • Research Program: Lunar Science, PDS, ESA/Rosetta, JAXA/Hayabusa 6 7 TBD 8 New Frontiers & Discovery SALMON & ROSES 9 Just Released NRC NOSSE Report • “Opening New Frontiers in Space: Choices for the Next New Frontiers AO” - NASA should: – R1: Emphasize science objectives – R2: Expand the list of candidate missions – R3: Limit to the list below unless compelling science • Complete NF target list in alphabetic order: – Asteroid Rover/Sample Return* – Comet Surface Sample Return – Ganymede Observer* – Io Observer* – Jupiter Polar Orbiter with Probes - Juno – Kuiper Belt/Pluto -> New Horizons – Lunar South Pole Aitken Basin Sample Return – Network Science* – Trojan/Centaur Reconnaissance* – Venus In-Situ Explorer * Additions 10 Current NF AO Status • NRC’s recommendations lists new targets to be considered • All missions proposed must fit NF3 mission cost, timescale, and launch vehicle constraints • Proposed missions must also be consistent with the unavailability of radioisotope power sources • Launch Vehicle in or out of cost cap • NF3 Schedule: – Draft in September 2008 – AO in December 2008 • Expect NF3 AO to be greatly simplified • PI experience requirements have been posted • Final decisions for these elements have been made by Dr. Weiler and should be posted shortly 11 Discovery Program Mars evolution: Lunar formation: NEO characteristics: Mars Pathfinder (1996-1997) Lunar Prospector (1998-1999) NEAR (1996-2001) d e t e l p m o C t Solar wind sampling: Comet diversity: Nature of dust/coma: h g Genesis (2001-2004) CONTOUR Stardust (1999-2006 ) i l F n I / A u L d g o e s t 1 t e 5 l 2 p 0 0 m 2 o C t n Main-belt asteroids: Lunar Interior & Gravity: e Comet internal structure: Mercury environment: m Deep Impact (2005-2006) MESSENGER (2004-2012) Dawn (2007-2015) GRAIL (2011) p o l e v e D / t h g i l F n I 12 Next Discovery AO • Expected release in FY09 • Contents to be determined: – Cost Cap – Launch Vehicle in or out of cost cap – Use of Stirling Radioisotope Power System as GFE • Final approval for these elements are with Dr. Weiler 13 Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generator Engineering Unit Lockheed Martin/Sunpower • Operation in space and on surface of atmosphere- bearing planets and moons • Characteristics: – !14 year lifetime – Nominal power : 140 We – Mass ~ 20 kg – System efficiency: ~ 30 % – 2 GPHS (“Pu238 Bricks”) modules – Uses 0.8 kg Pu238 • Final wiring and connections Paired converters with interconnect for ASRG engineering unit sleeve assembly underway • Reliability to be demonstrated by the end of 2009 Outboard Housing and Paired ASC-Es 14 Discovery & Mars Scout Capability Enhancement NRA • Program solicited mission concept proposals for small planetary missions that require the ASRG power source – Two Stirling Engines ~140 Watts each (as GFE) • Intended to foster science exploration in planetary science by missions enabled by ASRG • Mission design assistance for these 6 month mission concept studies will be offered by NASA • Selected 9 proposals – 40 proposals submitted with average budget of $271K – NRA directed proposers to budget $200,000-$300,000 15 DSMCE Selections Aerial Polar VALOR: The Feasibility of A Nuclear-Powered Long- Baines, Kevin JPL Venus Vehicle Duration Balloon Mission to Explore the Poles of Venus Los Alamos National Locating and Characterizing Lunar Polar Volatiles: Feasibility Elphic, Richard Moon Lander Laboratory of a Discovery-Class Mission Journey to the land of Eternal Darkness and Ice (JEDI): A Jolliff, Bradley Washington University Moon Rover Lunar Polar Volatile Explorer Rivkin, Andrew Applied Physics Lab Asteroid Lander Ilion: An ASRG-Enabled Trojan Asteroid Mission Concept A tour through Martian history: An ASRG-powered polar ice Hecht, Michael JPL Mars Lander borehole. Stofan, Ellen Proxemy Research Outer Planets Lander Titan Mare Explorer (TiME) McEwen, Alfred University of Arizona Outer Planets Orbiter Mission Concept: Io Volcano Observer (IVO) Sample Concept Study for a Comet Coma Rendezvous Sample Sandford, Scott NASA/AMES Comet Return Return Mission Sunshine, Jessica Univeristy of Maryland Comet Lander Comet Hopper 16 Current SALMON AO Schedule • SALMON Solicitation Development Sept 2007 – Feb 2008 • Release Draft for comment March 2008 • Revise SALMON based on comments April 2008 • SALMON Release – Program Element Cycle I May 2008 • Proposals Due August 2008 • Selections Announced NLT February 2009 • SALMON Amendments (notional) – Program Element Cycle II (special) May 2008 – Program Element Cycle III (regular) May 2009 • Final approval for the release of this AO has been made by Dr. Weiler expect an announcement soon 17 Types of Missions of Opportunity • Traditional MoOs – Investigations involving participation in non-NASA space missions (ie: science instrument, technology demonstrations, hardware components …) • U.S. Participating Investigator – Co-Investigator (non-hardware) for a science or technology experiment to be built and flown by an agency other than NASA • New Science Missions using Existing Spacecraft – Investigations that propose a new scientific use of existing NASA spacecraft (ie: NExT, EPOXI …) • Small Complete Missions – Science investigations that can be realized within the specified cost cap (includes all phases from access to space through data publication) • Focused Opportunities – Investigations that address a specific, NASA-identified flight opportunity 18 PSD R&A Opportunities • ROSES 2008: – Discovery Data Analysis Program (DDAP) -> Planetary Mission Data Analysis Program (PMDAP) • Participating Scientist Program for Venus Climate Orbit is under discussion • A comparative Climatology of Venus-Earth-Mars is under consideration for ROSES 2009 19 NASA’s “Flyby, Orbit, Land, Rove, and Return Samples” 20 Outer Planets Flagship 21 Cassini Mission • Prime mission July 2004 – July 2008 – Cassini spacecraft virtually 100% operational • Approved extended mission goes to Sept. 2010 • Extended mission science goals include: – Titan (26 encounters) The extended mission plan includes 2 ~ 25 km passes – Enceladus (7 encounters + Rhea, Dione) thru Enceladus’ plume. – Observe Saturn system thru Aug. ‘09 equinox Prime observations on curved line. • Estimate ~46% of hydrazine will remains at end of the extended mission – Depending on health an XXM is viable – Important for end of life to retain adequate fuel • Cassini costs: – LLC to end of prime mission: $3.27B ($2.6B US, $660M ESA) – Yearly operations: $80M 22 Flagship Mission Studies Europa Jupiter System Titan Enceladus 23 Background • Phase I - January 2007 four studies initiated: – Europa Explorer - Led by JPL – Jupiter System Observer - Led by JPL – Titan - Led by APL – Enceladus - Led by GSFC • Final study reports submitted August 29th to Science Panel & NASA Technical Management and Cost (TMC) Review Teams • Dec. 23, 2007 NASA announced the Phase II studies: – NASA leads: Europa Explorer & Titan – ESA leads: Jupiter System Orbiter 24 Background (cont.) • Phase II studies to concentrate on the findings from Science & TMC panels • Other Programmatic changes include: – Focused missions (not like Cassini, Galileo) – Europa Jupiter System Mission (EJSM) consisting of NASA Europa Orbiter, ESA Jupiter Planetary Orbiter, JAXA Magnetospheric Orbiter – Titan Saturn System Mission (TSSM) consisting of NASA Titan Orbiter, ESA insitu vehicles (lander & balloon) – NASA cost cap ($2.1B FY07), MMRTGs only, 34m DSN 25 Schedule & Next Steps • August 4-Sept. 12: Independent review of reports by Science and TMC panels • Sept. 12 - Oct. 22: Teams respond to findings • Oct. 22: Updated Phase II report due • Nov.- Dec.: Final down-select to a single mission by NASA & ESA – Mission must be above the “floor” of Planetary Decadal level science – Technical feasible (ex: low or medium/low) within budget • NASA and ESA jointly study one Phase A mission, establish consistent schedule 26.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    26 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us