University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2016 Old Tales, New Renditions: The oundF ations And Development Of Anti-Semitic Ritual Murder Libels With Emphasis On A Shift nI Centrality From Crucifixion To Blood Motifs In Late Medieval And Early Modern German Contexts Evan John Halbach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Halbach, Evan John, "Old Tales, New Renditions: The oundF ations And Development Of Anti-Semitic Ritual Murder Libels With Emphasis On A Shift nI Centrality From Crucifixion To Blood Motifs In Late Medieval And Early Modern German Contexts" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 2024. https://commons.und.edu/theses/2024 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OLD TALES, NEW RENDITIONS: THE FOUNDATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT OF ANTI- SEMITIC RITUAL MURDER LIBELS WITH EMPHASIS ON A SHIFT IN CENTRALITY FROM CRUCIFIXION TO BLOOD MOTIFS IN LATE MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN GERMAN CONTEXTS by Evan John Halbach Bachelor of Arts, University of North Dakota, 2013 Master of Arts, University of North Dakota, 2016 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Grand Forks, North Dakota December 2016 20 II PERMISSION Title Old Tales, New Renditions: The Foundations and Development of Anti-Semitic Ritual Murder Libels with Emphasis on a Shift in Centrality from Crucifixion to Blood Motifs in Late Medieval and Early Modern German Contexts Department History Degree Master of Arts In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the Chairperson of the department or the dean of the School of Graduate Studies. It is understood that any copying or publication or other use of this thesis or part thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of North Dakota in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Evan J. Halbach December 6, 2016 III TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………………………………………………………. 00V ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………... 0 0VI INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………. 001 CHAPTER I: CONSTRUCTING BARRIERS BETWEEN CHRISTIANS AND JEWS: CHRISTIAN REDEFINITION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTI-SEMITIC SUSPICION………………… 018 CHAPTER II: A MORE MENACING JEW: A CONSIDERATION OF DAS JÜDEL AS A REACTION TO A THIRTEENTH CENTURY POLEMICAL CONTEXT…………………………………………………………. 056 CHAPTER III: FROM RITUAL MURDER TO BLOOD LIBEL: THE EARLY MODERN SHIFT IN EMPHASIS IN ANTI-SEMITIC LIBELS FROM CRUCIFIXION TO BLOOD MOTIFS………………………….. 0 082 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………….. 116 REFERENCES………………………………………..…………………………… 121 IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my very sincere and heartfelt appreciation for the support and guidance of my advisory committee throughout this process and more generally during my time in the master’s program. I would additionally like to thank Dr. James Mochoruk for providing fundamental instruction during my undergraduate career and for lending a tireless set of eyes to myriad drafts of a range of projects over the years as well as necessary suggestions for revision. I would also like to thank Dr. Hans Broedel both for the many indispensable suggestions that enriched the present work but also for many patient explanations of various medieval concepts drawn from natural science, philosophy, and theology. I additionally would like to thank Dr. Caroline Campbell for her significant role in informing the present work’s methodological approach and her encouragement of this line of enquiry. I also owe a great debt to Dr. Amanda Boyd for working with me on German source material as well as Dr. William Caraher and Dr. Eric Ross for generous Latin instruction. Finally, I would like to thank the staff of the Chester Fritz Library at the University of North Dakota and all the people who have helped to fulfill endless Interlibrary Loan requests I have made over the years. Without their work, my work would not have been possible. V ABSTRACT The terms “ritual murder libel” and “blood libel” both refer primarily to medieval and early modern anti-Semitic allegations that Jews murdered Christian children on religious holidays, either to abuse or profane Christ and Christians, or to acquire Christian blood for use in Jewish ritual, sorcery, or as a medicine to treat stereotypical racial infirmities. Scholars to this point have generally treated the two libels as either synonymous, or have considered distinctions to be relatively insignificant. Insufficient treatment has been given to an inversion of primary and secondary motivations attributed to the libels’ constructed villains. In “ritual murder libels,” contempt for Christians and a desire to inflict harm on them is the alleged primary motivation for their murder at the hands of Jews, and while the acquisition of human blood stands present, it is of secondary emphasis. In contrast, “blood libel” places the acquisition of blood as primary while in some cases excludes the other motivation entirely. By examining a broad range of libel material, both “popular” and intellectual, spanning the late-twelfth through the mid-sixteenth centuries, in reference to their contexts of formulation, this study endeavors to demonstrate that while the libels did share the same symbolic motifs, the ritual murder libel evolved, and ultimately experienced a shift in late medieval Germany into what can properly be called “blood libel.” By acknowledging the distinction between the libels, one is able to contextualize and better understand both the function and form of these contemptible accusation. VI INTRODUCTION Wherever anti-Semitism has flourished, supporting stereotypes and tropes have likewise flourished. The charge of ritual murder of Christian children on Jewish holidays is no exception. The charge involved the belief that Jews on a regular or semi-regular basis abducted and killed Christian children, especially during religious festivals, according to the mandates of their religion. Two primary motivations supported the trope. The first was that the Jews crucified these children in order to mock Christ or commemorate his crucifixion at the hands of their ancestors. The second which forms the basis of the blood libel, a term generally used synonymously with “ritual murder,” is that Jews required blood for religious, magical, and later “medical” use. Generally speaking, accusations of and stories about Jewish ritual murder featured both mock crucifixions as well as abuse of the child and the draining of his or her blood. But although “ritual murder libel” and “blood libel” are often used synonymously, there is cause to treat the pair of terms as more than an accidental redundancy. From the first appearance of the charge in the twelfth century into the fourteen century, the primary motivation of Jews in the libel was to abuse and profane Christianity and as such, most early cases featured Christian children put to death on wooden crosses or posts. Blood certainly was not absent from these early cases but while the libels could lack the collection of blood, its crucifixion motifs were indispensable from the start. But when ritual murder charges surfaced in southern Germanic Europe and northern Italy at the close of the fifteenth century, primary emphasis was inverted and it was suggested that Jews kidnapped and killed Christian children not in order to abuse them 1 (although they were still featured as doing so) but to drain their blood. Extant blood libel narratives from the late medieval and early modern periods feature Jews meticulously, even surgically draining blood while earlier crucifixion motifs are minimized or absent. But as crucifixion motifs did not disappear entirely, it takes focused attention to subtle changes over time to notice this significant shift in emphasis. In the following chapters it will be demonstrated that the blood libel is a distinct charge that evolved out of but came to stand independent from the ritual murder libel. In pursuit of this understanding, Chapter 1 explores the preconditions and developments that made the eventual appearance of the ritual murder charge possible and influenced its early form. To accomplish this, the chapter first explores how generally peaceful relations between Jews and Christians from the fourth century A.D. regressively devolved as Jews were culturally and legally separated from their Christian neighbors. This separation, it will be shown, was a precondition for the creation of a Jewish scapegoat and the development of the fears that were necessary for the growth in anti-Semitic libels in the High Middle Ages. These fears were mixed with the religious anxieties of the age to create a likewise religiously-oriented accusation utilizing crucifixion symbolism. Chapter 2 explores the