Grazing by Marine Nanoflagellates on Viruses and Virus-Sized Particles: Ingestion and Digestion

Grazing by Marine Nanoflagellates on Viruses and Virus-Sized Particles: Ingestion and Digestion

l MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 94: 1-10. 1993 Published March 3 1 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. l Grazing by marine nanoflagellates on viruses and virus-sized particles: ingestion and digestion Juan M. Gonzalezl**,Curtis A. suttle2.** 'college of Oceanography, Oregon State University, Oceanography Admin. Bldg #104, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5503, USA *~arineScience Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, PO Box 1267, Port Aransas, Texas 78373-1267, USA ABSTRACT: We examined grazing of marine viruses and bacteria by natural assemblages and cultures of phagotrophic nanoflagellates. Ingestion rates were determined using fluorescently labelled viruses (FLVs) and bacteria (FLB), and 50 or 500 nm diameter fluorescent microspheres (FMs). Calculated clearance rates of viruses by natural nanoflagellate assemblages were about 4 % of those for bacter~a when the bacteria and viruses were present at natural concentrations. Different viruses were ingested at different rates w~ththe smallest virus being ingested at the slowest rate. Further, we found differ- ences in digestion times for the same flagellates grazing on different vlruses and for different flagellate assemblages grazing on the same viruses. FMs of 50 nm diameter were used as a control for egestion of undlgested particles. As rates of digestion were greater than those for ingestion both processes would occur simultaneously; hence, our estimates of grazing rate are likely conservative. Ingestion rates were positively correlated with the concentration of 50 nm FMs. Discriminat~onagalnst 50 nm FMs in favor of FLVs was also observed. Our calculations suggest that vlruses may be of nutritional sig- nificance for phagotrophic flagellates. When there are lob bacteria ml-l and 10' to 10' vvlruses ml-l, viruses may represent 0.2 to 9 % of the carbon, 0.3 to 14 '% of the nitrogen and 0.6 to 28 "/a of the phos- phorus that the flagellates obtain from ingestion of bacteria. This study demonstrates that both natural assemblages and cultures of phagotrophic nanoflagellates consume and digest a variety of marine vlruses, thereby deriving nutritional benefit and serving as a natural sink for marine viral particles. In addition, these results imply that some nanoflagellates are likely capable of consuming a wide spec- trum of organlc particles in the colloidal size range. INTRODUCTION rioplankton assemblages contain viral particles, which implies that a significant fraction of bacterial and Although it is well established that viruses infect cyanobacterial production may be diverted into viral marine bacteria (e.g. Spencer 1955, Hidaka 1971, Moe- production (Bergh et al. 1989, Barrsheim et al. 1990, bus 1980),it was only relatively recently demonstrated Proctor & Fuhrman 1990, Heldal & Bratbak 1991). that the concentrations of virus-like particles in sea- Despite the great abundance of viruses in the sea water are typically in excess of 107 ml-', whether and turnover times estimated to range from hours to counted by electron or epifluorescent microscopy days (e.g. Berry & Noton 1976, Kapuscinski & Mitchell (Bergh et al. 1989, Proctor & Fuhrman 1990, Suttle et al. 1980, Heldal & Bratbak 1991, Suttle & Chen 1992) 1990, Hara et al. 1991, Paul et al. 1991). There are also much remains to be learned concerning the processes viruses which infect marine prokaryotic and eukaryotic responsible for the decay of infectivity and removal of phytoplankton (Mayer & Taylor 1979, Suttle et al. 1990, viral particles from seawater. Obviously a number of 1991). However, our understandmg of how viruses fit mechanisms potentially contribute to the decay of viral into aquatic foodwebs is still very incomplete. Estimates particles and infectivity in seawater including adhe- suggest that up to 16 % of the bacteria in natural bacte- sion to particulate material, bacterial exoenzymatic activity, chemical inactivation and degradation by solar radiation (e.g. Berry & Noton 1976, Kapuscinslu & ' Present address: Japan Marine Science and Technology Center (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237, Mitchell 1980, Suttle & Chen 1992).Another possibility Japan is that viral particles are removed through grazing by ' ' Addressee for correspondenc~ phagotrophic flagellates. 0 Inter-Research 1993 2 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 94: 1-10, 1993 In this work, we report on a method for fluorescently decreased viral infectivity (data not shown). Following labelling viruses so that they are suitable for use as sonication and filtration, the FLVs were counted using tracers for the ingestion of viruses by phagotrophic epifluorescence microscopy (see below) and immedi- flagellates. Using this methodology and fluorescent ately inoculated into the water samples. The infectivity microspheres, we have investigated the potential of of FLVs following staining and sonication was tested isolates and natural assemblages of nanoflagellates to by plaque assays on the appropriate bacterial host. ingest marine bacteriophages and virus-sized parti- Electron microscopy. The viruses used for the graz- cles. We also examined digestion rates by quantifying ing studies were characterized morphologically using the disappearance of ingested viruses from within fla- electron microscopy. Samples either from amplified gellate food vacuoles. Our results confirm that being virus stocks or from freshly filtered fluorescently grazed by protists is one of the possible fates for labelled viral preparations were spotted onto 400 viruses in aquatic ecosystems. In addition, our calcula- mesh carbon-coated copper grids and allowed to tions indicate that viruses can contribute significantly adsorb for 30 min. The grids with the adsorbed to the nutrition of nanoflagellates. These results extend viruses were then rinsed through several drops of our concept of phagotrophic nanoflagellates as con- deionized-distilled water to remove salts and stained sumers of picoplanktonic cells, including virus-sized with 1 % w/v uranyl acetate and observed using particles as well. This further emphasizes the key role either a Joel JEM-1000X or Philips 301 transmission of flagellates in aquatic microbial foodwebs and sug- electron microscope. Procedures are outlined further gests that they may be even more important as re- in Suttle (1993). mineralizers than previously conceived. Ingestion rates. Aliquots (50 to 100 ml) of cultures or freshly collected seawater were poured into WhirlPak bags or polycarbonate flasks, which had been pre- MATERIALS AND METHODS soaked m 10 % (v/v) HC1, and rinsed with deionized water. To allow the protists to recover from handling Samples and enrichments. Seawater for grazing shock, experimental samples were incubated for experiments, enrichment cultures and isolation of fla- 30 min prior to the beginning of each experiment. gellates and viruses was collected from the pier at the Natural flagellate communities were from the Texas Marine Science Institute of The University of Texas at sampling location and were incubated at the in situ Austin (Port Aransas, Texas, USA) and from a sampling temperature (ca 30 'C). Cultures and enrichments of site located 5 km due west of Yaquina Bay (Oregon, flagellates were from Oregon and were incubated at USA). The bodonid isolate (E4, ca 5 X 8 pm in size) and 15 "C. Flagellate cultures were grown in 0.2 pm fil- the enrichments of natural flagellate communities orig- tered natural seawater plus 0.001 % yeast extract and inated with seawater collected from the Oregon sam- were used in grazing experiments during the late- pling site. Flagellate enrichments were prepared by exponential or stationary phases of growth. adding 0.001 % yeast extract (final concentration) to We compared the ingestion rates of flagellates on natural samples. Both monospecific cultures and nat- FLVs, 50 and 500 nm diameter fluorescent micro- ural enrichments were incubated in the dark at 15 "C spheres (FMs) (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, Pa), and without shaking. The growth of associated bacteria fluorescently labelled bacteria (FLB) (Sherr et al. resulted in a yield of approximately 105 flagellates 1987). All treatments were duplicated. Prior to experi- ml-l. With the exception of bacteriophage T4, the ments the FMs were protein-coated in 5 mg ml-' albu- viruses used in these studies were isolated from Texas min solution for 24 h (Pace & Bailiff 1987). The FLVs coastal waters and were pathogens of marine bacteria. and 50 nm FMs (virus-sized particles) were added to Preparation of fluorescently labelled viruses the samples at a final concentration of about 107ml-l, (FLVs). Viruses were fluorescently labelled by whereas the FLB and 500 nm FMs (bacteria-sized adding 0.5 p1 of a solution of 4 mg ml-' of DTAF (5- particles) were added at about 106 ml-l. Grazing rates [{4,6-dichlorotriazin-2-y1)aminojfluorescein)in 0.05M on different particles were determined in independent Na2HP0, to 1 m1 of viral suspension (ca 101° viruses), experiments. Approximately 44 to 53 % of the virus- mixing gently and incubating overnight at 4 "C in the sized particles and 3 to 33 % of the bacteria-sized par- dark. The DTAF solution was filtered through a 0.2pm ticles in the natural samples were comprised of the pore-size polycarbonate filter before use. Stained viral fluorescent surrogates. The effect of particle concen- suspensions were sonicated for 1 min in an ultrasonic tration on ingestion rates of natural flagellate assem- cleaner (Branson Ultrasonic Co.), and filtered through blages was corrected according to McManus & Okubo a 0.2 pm pore-size polycarbonate filter

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us