Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Search engine freedom: on the implications of the right to freedom of expression for the legal governance of Web search engines van Hoboken, J.V.J. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): van Hoboken, J. V. J. (2012). Search engine freedom: on the implications of the right to freedom of expression for the legal governance of Web search engines. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:02 Oct 2021 References ‘2600’ 1985: 2600, ‘Seized!, August 1985, http://72.52.208.92/~gbpprorg/2600/seized.txt. 28th International Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners' Conference 2006: 28th International Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners' Conference, ‘Resolution on Privacy Protection and Search Engines’, London, United Kingdom, 2 and 3 November 2006. Abbate 2000: Janet Abbate, Inventing the Internet, Cambridge/London: The MIT Press, 2000. Aikens 1996: G. Scott Aikens, ‘The democratization of Systems of Public Opinion Formation,’ International Symposium on Technology and Society, Technical Expertise and Public Decisions, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. American Library Association 1996: American Library Association, ‘Library Bill of Rights’, Adopted June 18, 1948, amended February 2, 1961, and January 23, 1980, inclusion of "age" reaffirmed January 23, 1996, by the ALA Council. Anderson 1975: David A. Anderson, ‘Libel and Press Self-Censorship’, 53 Texas Law Review 422, 1975. Anderson 2008: Nate Anderson, ‘Google relents, adds privacy link to Spartan homepage’, Ars Technica, 7 July 2008, http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2008/07/google-relents-adds-privacy-link-to-spartan-homepage.ars. Angelopoulos 2009: Christina Angelopoulos, ‘Filtering the Internet for Copyrighted Content in Europe’, IRIS-plus (Supplement to IRIS - Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual Observatory), 2009-4. Anklesaria et al. 1993: F. Anklesaria et al., ‘The Internet Gopher Protocol (a distributed document search and retrieval protocol)’, IETF, Request for Comments (RFC) 1436, March 1993, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1436. Ardia 2010: David S. Ardia, ‘Free Speech Savior or Shield for Scoundrels: An Empirical Study of Intermediary Immunity Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act’, 43 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 373, 2010. Arnbak et al 1990: J.C. Arnbak, J.J. van Cuilenburg, E.J. Dommering, et al. , Verbinding en Onvlechting in de Communicatie, Een studie naar toekomstig overheidsbeleid voor de openbare elektronische informatievoorziening, Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel, 1990. Arnold 2010: Stephen E. Arnold, ‘Could Google Become the Semantic Web?’, Semantic Universe, 2010 Arnold et al 2011: Michael Arnold, Eric Darmon & Thierry Penard, ‘To Sponsor or Not to Sponsor: Sponsored SearchAuctions with Organic Links and Firm Dependent Click-Through Rates’, 1 June 2011, ftp://193.196.11.222/pub/zew- docs/veranstaltungen/ICT2011/Papers/Darmon.pdf Article 29 Working Party 2007: Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‘Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data’, WP 148, 20 June 2007. Article 29 Working Party 2008: Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 1/2008 on data protection issues related to search engines, WP 148, Brussels, 4 April 2008. Asheim 1953: Lester Asheim, ‘Not Censorship but Selection’, Wilson Library Bulletin, September 1953. AT Internet 2011: AT Internet, ‘Baromètre des moteurs - Mars 2011’, 2011, http://www.atinternet.com/. Aula & Rodden (Google) 2009: Anne Aula & Kerry Rodden, ‘Eye-tracking studies: more than meets the eye’, The Official Google Blog, 6 February 2009, http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/eye-tracking-studies-more-than-meets.html; Auletta 2009: Ken Auletta, Googled: The End of the World As We Know It, New York: The Penguin Press, 2009. Baeza-Yates & Ribeiro-Neto 2011: Ricardo Baeza-Yates & Berthier Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval, The concepts and technology behind search, Second Edition, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2011. Baker 1989: C. Edwin Baker, Human Liberty and Free Speech, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. Baker 1994: C. Edwin Baker, ‘Turner Broadcasting, Content-Based Regulation of Persons and Presses’, 1994 Supreme Court Review 57, 1994. Baker 2002: C. Edwin Baker, Media, Markets, and Democracy, Cambridge (U.K.): Cambridge University Press, 2002. Baker 2009a: C. Edwin Baker, ‘The Future of News Part One’, 21 January 2009, Balkinization, http://balkin.blogspot.com/2009/01/future-of-news-part-one-problem.html. 357 Baker 2009b: C. Edwin Baker, ‘The Future of News Part Two’, 22 January 2009, Balkinization, http://balkin.blogspot.com/2009/01/future-of-news-part-two-solutions.html. Baker (Google) 2010: Steven Baker, ‘Helping computers understand language’, The Official Google Blog, 19 January 2010, http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/helping-computers-understand-language.html. Baldwin & Cave 1999: Robert Baldwin & Martin Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice, Oxford University Press, 1999. Balkin 1990: Jack M. Balkin, ‘Some Realism about Pluralism. Legal Realist Approaches to the First Amendment’, 1990 Duke L.aw Journal 375, 1990. Balkin 2004: Jack M. Balkin, ‘Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society’, 79 New York University Law Review 1, 2004. Bambauer forthcoming 2011: Derek E. Bambauer, ‘Orwell's Armchair’, University of Chicago Law Review, Forthcoming 2011. Barbaro & Zeller 2006: Michael Barbaro & Tom Zeller jr., ‘A Face Is Exposed for AOL Searcher No. 4417749’, The New York Times, 9 August 2006, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09aol.html. Barendt 2005: Eric Barendt, Freedom of Speech, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, 2005. Barlow 1996: John Perry Barlow, A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace, Davos, Switzerland, February 8, 1996. Barron 1993: Jarome A. Barron, ‘The Telco, The Common Carrier Model and the First Amendment – The “Dial-A-Porn” Precedent, 19 Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 371, 1993 Barron 1996: Jerome A. Barron, ‘Access to the Press. A New First Amendment Right’, 80 Harvard Law Review 1641, 1967. Bar-Ilan 2007: Judit Bar-Ilan, ‘Position Paper: Access to Query Logs – An Academic Researcher’s Point of View’, WWW 2007, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.104.1866&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Bartz 2011: Diane Bartz, ‘FTC, Justice Dept mull Google antitrust probe’, Reuters, 5 April 2011, http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/05/us-google-ftc-idUSTRE7340L520110405. Bass 1969: Abraham A. Bass, ‘Redefining the 'gatekeeper' concept: a U.N. Radio case study’, 46 Journalism Quarterly 59, 1969. Battelle 2006: John Battelle, The Search. How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture, New York: Portfolio, 2006. Battelle 2010: John Battelle, The Database of Intentions is Much Larger Than I Thought’, John Battelle’s Search Blog, 5 March 2010, http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/03/the_database_of_intentions_is_far_larger_than_i_thought.php. BBC 2010: BBC, ‘Nobel: China Blocks Foreign Websites Ahead of Ceremony’, 9 December 2010, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11962520. Benjamin et al 2006: Stuart M. Benjamin et al., Telecommunications Law and Policy, Durham (NC): Carolina Academic Press, 2006. Benkler 2000: Yochai Benkler, ‘From Consumers to Users: Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation Toward Sustainable Common and User Access’, 52 Federal Communications Law Journal 561, 2000. Benkler 2001: Yochai Benkler ‘Siren Songs and Amish Children: Autonomy, Information, and Law’, 76 New York University Law Review 23, 2001. Benkler 2006: Yochai Benkler, The Wealth of Networks - How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2006. Benkler 2011: Yochai Benkler, ‘A Free Irresponsible Press: Wikileaks and the Battle over the Soul of the Networked Fourth Estate’, Harvard Civil Rights - Civil Liberties Law Review, Spring 2011. Berlin 2002: Isaiah Berlin, ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, in: I. Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty, London: Oxford University Press, 2002. Berlin Group 2006: Berlin Group, ‘Common Position on Data Protection and search engines on the Internet’, Hong Kong, 15 April 1998, updated Washington D.C ., 6-7 April 2006. Berman & Weizner 1995: Jerry Berman & Daniel J. Weitzner, ‘Abundance and User Control: Renewing the Democratic Heart of the First Amendment in the Age of Interactive Media’, 104 Yale Law Journal 1619, 1995. 358 Bermejo 2007: Fernando Bermejo, The Internet Audience, Constitution and Measurement, New York: Peter Lang, 2007. Berners-Lee & Cailliau 1990:

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    29 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us