Dichlorodifluoromethane CAS #: 75-71-8 Revised By: RRD Toxicology Unit Revision Date: August 17, 201

Dichlorodifluoromethane CAS #: 75-71-8 Revised By: RRD Toxicology Unit Revision Date: August 17, 201

CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET Chemical Name: Dichlorodifluoromethane CAS #: 75-71-8 Revised By: RRD Toxicology Unit Revision Date: August 17, 201 (A) Chemical-Physical Properties Part 201 Value Updated Value Reference Source Comments Molecular Weight (g/mol) 120.91 120.91 EPI EXP Physical State at ambient temp Liquid Gas MDEQ Melting Point (˚C) 138 -158.00 EPI EXP Boiling Point (˚C) -29.8 -29.80 EPI EXP Solubility (ug/L) 3.00E+5 2.80E+05 EPI EXP Vapor Pressure (mmHg at 25˚C) 4864 4.85E+03 EPI EXP HLC (atm-m³/mol at 25˚C) 2.60 3.43E-01 EPI EXP Log Kow (log P; octanol-water) 2.15 2.16 EPI EXP Koc (organic carbon; L/Kg) 60.4 43.89 EPI EST Ionizing Koc (L/kg) NR NA NA Diffusivity in Air (Di; cm2/s) 0.08 7.30E-02 W9 EST Diffusivity in Water (Dw; cm2/s) 8.0E-6 1.0233E-05 W9 EST Soil Water Partition Coefficient NR NR NA NA (Kd; inorganics) CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET Dichlorodifluoromethane (75-71-8) Part 201 Value Updated Value Reference Source Comments Flash Point (˚C) NA NA NA NA Lower Explosivity Level (LEL; NA NA NA NA unit less) Critical Temperature (K) 384.95 EPA2004 EXP Enthalpy of Vaporization 9.42E+03 EPA2004 EXP (cal/mol) 3 Density (g/mL, g/cm ) 1.35 PC EXP EMSOFT Flux Residential 2 m 2.71E-05 2.81E-05 EMSOFT EST (mg/day/cm2) EMSOFT Flux Residential 5 m 6.67E-05 6.93E-05 EMSOFT EST (mg/day/cm2) EMSOFT Flux Nonresidential 2 m 3.87E-05 4.49E-05 EMSOFT EST (mg/day/cm2) EMSOFT Flux Nonresidential 5 m 9.48E-05 1.10E-04 EMSOFT EST (mg/day/cm2) 2 CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET Dichlorodifluoromethane (75-71-8) (B) Toxicity Values/Benchmarks Source/Reference/ Comments/Notes Part 201 Value Updated Value Date /Issues PPRTV, Reference Dose 2.3E-1 5.0E-3 (RfD) (mg/kg/day) 2010/MDEQ 2015 Tier 2 Source: Complete PPRTV: Basis: PPRTV is a more current evaluation than IRIS. PPRTV (9/29/2010) subchronic p-RfD = 5.0E-2. MDEQ applied an additional UF = 10 for use of a Rat chronic subchronic exposure study. PPRTV notes that the subchronic p-RfD is lower than dietary study the IRIS RfD as a database uncertainty factor was not considered at the time that (Sherman 1974). the IRIS chronic RfD was derived. NOAEL = 300; UF Critical Study (ies): Sherman, H. (1974) Long-term feeding studies in rats and dogs = 100. (300mg/kg with dichlorodifluoromethane (FREON 12 food freezant). Haskell Laboratory for x 0.076kg/kg bw = Toxicology and Industrial Medicine. Medical Research Project No. 1388. Haskell 22.8/100 = Laboratory Report No. 24–74. Unpublished study conducted for DuPont de 0.23mg/kg/day). Nemours Co. Critical effect = Method(s): Long-term oral toxicity studies in two species (rats and dogs) and a reduced body multi-generation reproductive toxicity study in rats. Weanling Charles River CD RfD details weight. *IRIS oral rats (50/sex/dose) from dams exposed during gestation were administered RfD (2E-1) dichlorodifluoromethane (purity not reported) via gavage at 0, 0.2, or 2% in corn changed. oil 7 days/week for 6 weeks and 5 days/week thereafter for 2 years The chronic Replaced IRIS rat study includes quarterly tabulation (i.e., every 3 months) of average body- assumed rat food weight gains. In female rats, compared to controls, exposure was associated with consumption a significant (i.e., >10%) reduced body-weight gain in every quarter from initiation value with MDNR to terminus of study. For the first quarter, Days 0–91 of the study, a sub chronic default value. LOAEL of 150 mg/kg-day and NOAEL of 15 mg/kg-day are identified based on a Source: IRIS reduction in body-weight gain in females. Sherman (1974) also administered CCD/RRD date: dichlorodifluoromethane (purity not specified) to Beagle dogs (4/sex/dose) at 0, 7/22/1985 300, or 3,000 ppm in the diet for 2 years. Critical effect: decreased body-weight gain End point or Point of Departure (POD): NOAEL = 15 mg/kg-day (Although NOAELs are also available from the studies for systemic toxicity in dogs (Sherman, 1974), reproductive toxicity in rats (Sherman, 1974), and developmental toxicity in rats 3 CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET Dichlorodifluoromethane (75-71-8) Source/Reference/ Comments/Notes Part 201 Value Updated Value Date /Issues (Culik and Sherman, 1973) these occurred at higher dichlorodifluoromethane doses) Uncertainty Factors: UF = 300 (10 each for interspecies variability and interspecies extrapolation, and 3 for database inadequacies) Source and date: PPRTV, 9/29/2010 Tier 1 and 2 Sources: IRIS: Per IRIS (11/01/1995), RfD = 2.0E-1 mg/kg-day. The RfD was derived as follows: Critical Study: Sherman, H. 1974. Long-term feeding studies in rats and dogs with dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12 Food Freezant). Haskell Laboratory for Toxicology and Industrial Medicine Report No. 24-74.) Method(s): Dogs and rats were exposed to 300 ppm or 3,000 ppm of dichlorodifluoromethane in the diet for 2 years Critical effect: reduced body weight End point or Point of Departure (POD): NOAEL = 300 ppm (converted to 15 mg/kg/day assuming 1 ppm = 0.05 mg/kg-day rat consumption) Uncertainty Factors: UF = 100 (10 each for interspecies variability and interspecies extrapolation) Source and date: IRIS, Last revision date - 11/01/1995. An IRIS comprehensive review of toxicological studies in 2005 did not identify significant new data. MRL: No MRL record available at this time. Tier 3 Source: MDEQ: Per DEQ-CCD/RRD (7/22/1985), RfD = 2.3E-1 mg/kg-day. See Part 201 Value RfD details. Oral Cancer Slope Factor (CSF) -- NA MDEQ, 2015 (mg/kg-day)-1) Carcinogen Weight-of-Evidence (WOE) Class: “Inadequate Information to Assess Complete [the] Carcinogenic Potential” NA CSF details IRIS WOE Basis: human cancer data are lacking, and the available animal data are inadequate to assess potential carcinogenicity. Genotoxicity data are primarily 4 CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET Dichlorodifluoromethane (75-71-8) Source/Reference/ Comments/Notes Part 201 Value Updated Value Date /Issues negative. Source and Date: PPRTV, 9/29/2010 Tier 1 and 2 Sources: IRIS: Per IRIS (11/01/1995), no value at this time. IRIS has not evaluated dichlorodifluoromethane for evidence of carcinogenic potential. PPRTV: Per PPRTV (9/29/2010), no value at this time. MRL: NA; MRLs are for non-cancer effects only. Tier 3 Source: MDEQ: Per DEQ-CCD, no value at this time. Reference Concentration PPRTV, (RfC) or Initial 4.95E+4 3.3 E+2 Threshold 2010/MDEQ, 2015 Screening Level (ITSL) (µg/m³) ACGIH TLV key Tier 3 Source: Complete study based on PPRTV: Prendergast et al. Basis: PPRTV evaluation is more current than IRIS. PPRTV (9/29/2010) subchronic (1967). p-RfD = 1.0E+0 mg/m3 . MDEQ applied an additional UF of 3 to account for Hepatonecrosis subchronic to chronic exposure extrapolation to derive a chronic RfC = 3.3E-1 and potential mg/m3 (3.3E+2 µg/m3). The composite UF is 3,000. This value has lower pulmonary uncertainty than the PPRTV Screening Value that EPA considers a Tier 3 source. impacts were PPRTV sub chronic p-RfD derivation: RfC/ITSL details seen in guinea Critical Study: Prendergast, JA; Jones, RA; Jenkins, LJ; et al. (1967) Effects on pigs following 90 experimental animals of long term inhalation of trichloroethylene, carbon days continuous tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, dichlorodifluoromethane and 1,1- inhalation dichloroethylene. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 10(2):270–289. exposure. Method(s): 6-week intermittent inhalation study in guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs, and TLV/100 X 1000 = monkeys ITSL. Critical effect: reduced body weight gain 3 CCD/AQD date: End point or Point of Departure (POD): LOAELHEC = 985 mg/m 7/05/2001. Uncertainty Factors: UF = 1,000 (10 each for interspecies variability and use of a 5 CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET Dichlorodifluoromethane (75-71-8) Source/Reference/ Comments/Notes Part 201 Value Updated Value Date /Issues LOAEL and 3 (100.5) each for interspecies extrapolation and database inadequacies). Source and date: PPRTV, 9/29/2010. Tier 1 and 2 Sources: IRIS: Per IRIS (1/31/1987), no value at this time. PPRTV: PPRTV (9/29/2010) chronic inhalation screening level p-RfC = 1.0E-1 mg/m3. Per PPRTV, a provisional chronic RfC cannot be confidently derived from the Prendergast study die to the high level of overall uncertainty associated with using a 6-week data. EPA considers Screening Value a Tier 3 source. Critical Study: Prendergast, JA; Jones, RA; Jenkins, LJ; et al. (1967) Effects on experimental animals of long term inhalation of trichloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, dichlorodifluoromethane and 1,1- dichloroethylene. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 10(2):270–289. Method(s): 6-week intermittent inhalation study in guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys Critical effect: reduced body weight gain 3 End point or Point of Departure (POD): LOAELHEC = 985 mg/m Uncertainty Factors: UF = 10,000 (10 each for interspecies variability, use of a LOAEL and use of a sub chronic study, and 3 each for interspecies extrapolation and database inadequacies) Source and date: PPRTV, 9/29/2010. MRL: No MRL record available at this time. Tier 3 Source: MDEQ: Per DEQ-CCD/AQD (7/05/2001), RfC = 4.95E+4 µg/m3. See Part 201 Value RfC/ITSL details. Inhalation Unit Risk Factor -- NA MDEQ, 2015 (IURF) ((µg/m3)-1) Carcinogen Weight-of-Evidence (WOE) Class: “Inadequate Information to Assess Complete IURF details NA [the] Carcinogenic Potential” IRIS WOE Basis: human cancer data are lacking, and the available animal data are 6 CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET Dichlorodifluoromethane (75-71-8) Source/Reference/ Comments/Notes Part 201 Value Updated Value Date /Issues inadequate to assess potential carcinogenicity.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us