Multidecadal Climate Variability and the Florescence of Fremont Societies in 2 Eastern Utah

Multidecadal Climate Variability and the Florescence of Fremont Societies in 2 Eastern Utah

ARTICLE 1 Multidecadal Climate Variability and the Florescence of Fremont Societies in 2 Eastern Utah 3 Judson Byrd Finley , Erick Robinson, R. Justin DeRose, and Elizabeth Hora 4 Fremont societies of the Uinta Basin incorporated domesticates into a foraging lifeway over a 1,000-year period from AD 300 to 5 AD 1300. Fremont research provides a unique opportunity to critically examine the social and ecological processes behind the 6 adoption and abandonment of domesticates by hunter-gatherers. We develop and integrate a 2,115-year precipitation recon- 7 struction with a Bayesian chronological model for the growth of Fremont societies in the Cub Creek reach of Dinosaur National 8 Monument. Comparison of the archaeological chronology with the precipitation record suggests that the florescence of Fremont 9 societies was an adaptation to multidecadal precipitation variability with an approximately 30-plus-year periodicity over most, 10 but not all, of the last 2,115 years. Fremont societies adopted domesticates to enhance their resilience to periodic droughts. We 11 propose that reduced precipitation variability from AD 750 to AD 1050, superimposed over consistent mean precipitation avail- 12 ability, was the tipping point that increased maize production, initiated agricultural intensification, and resulted in increased 13 population and development of pithouse communities. Our study develops a multidecadal/multigenerational model within 14 which to evaluate the strategies underwriting the adoption of domesticates by foragers, the formation of Fremont communities, 15 and the inherent vulnerabilities to resource intensification that implicate the eventual dissolution of those communities. 16 Keywords: Fremont, Uinta Basin, Bayesian modeling, precipitation reconstruction 17 Las sociedades de Fremont de la cuenca de Uinta incorporaron a los domesticados en una forma de vida de alimentación dur- 18 ante un período de 1,000 años desde 300–1300 dC. La investigación de Fremont brinda una oportunidad única para examinar 19 críticamente los procesos sociales y ecológicos detrás de la adopción y el abandono de los domésticos por parte de los caza- 20 dores-recolectores. Desarrollamos e integramos una reconstrucción de precipitación de 2.115 años con un modelo cronológico 21 Bayesiano para el crecimiento de las sociedades de Fremont en el alcance de Cub Creek del Dinosaur National Monument. La 22 comparación de la cronología arqueológica con el registro de precipitación sugiere que la floración de las sociedades de Fre- 23 mont fue una adaptación a la variabilidad de precipitación multidecadal con una periodicidad de aproximadamente 30 años en 24 la mayoría, pero no en todos, de los |últimos 2,115 años. Las sociedades de Fremont adoptaron domesticados para mejorar su 25 resistencia a las sequías periódicas. Proponemos que la variabilidad reducida de la precipitación desde 750–1050 dC, super- 26 puesta sobre la disponibilidad de precipitación media constante, fue el punto de inflexión que aumentó la producción de maíz, 27 inició la intensificación agrícola y dio como resultado un aumento de la población y el desarrollo de las comunidades de médu- 28 las. Nuestro estudio desarrolla un modelo multidecadal / multigeneracional dentro del cual evaluar las estrategias que sustentan 29 la adopción de domesticados por parte de los recolectores, la formación de comunidades de Fremont y las vulnerabilidades 30 inherentes a la intensificación de recursos que implican la eventual disolución de esas comunidades. 31 Palabras clave: Fremont, Cuenca Uinta, modelado Bayesiano, reconstruccion precipitacion Judson Byrd Finley ▪ Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology, Utah State University, 0730 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-0730, USA (judson.fi[email protected], corresponding author) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-8630 Erick Robinson ▪ Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology, Utah State University, 0730 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-0730, USA ([email protected]) R. Justin DeRose ▪ Ecology Center and Department of Wildland Resources, 5205 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-5205; and Forest Inventory and Analysis, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 507 25th Street, Ogden, UT 84401, USA (rjustinderose@ gmail.com) Elizabeth Hora ▪ Utah State Historic Preservation Office, 300 S. Rio Grande Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84101, USA (ehora@ utah.gov) American Antiquity 0(0), 2019, pp. 1–20 Copyright © 2019 by the Society for American Archaeology doi:10.1017/aaq.2019.79 1 2 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY [Vol. 0, No. 0, 2019 32 cholars working in the eastern Great Basin that unfolded over the course of a few decades to 82 33 and northern Colorado Plateau have long a century at most (Simms 2008:189). The poten- 83 34 Srecognized the potential of the Fremont tial provided by a generational (∼25 years; Whit- 84 35 archaeological record to contribute to broad tle and Bayliss 2007) framework for the 85 36 understandings of the foraging-farming transi- foraging-farming transition is something that 86 37 tion. We follow an inclusive definition of Fre- cannot be attained in other global case studies 87 38 mont as those northern Colorado Plateau of this critical but repeated moment in human 88 39 Formative societies that cultivated domesticates history. However, coarse-grained chronologies 89 40 from 200 BC (Geib 1996; Roberts 2018; Wilde based primarily on long-lived radiocarbon sam- 90 41 et al. 1986) into the AD 1500s in certain loca- ples currently applied to the Fremont record 91 42 tions peripheral to the region (Creasman and (Massimo and Metcalfe 1999; Spangler 2000, 92 43 Scott 1987; Spangler and Jones 2012). Most Fre- 2002; Talbot and Wilde 1989) limit our potential 93 44 mont groups adopted domesticates relatively late to realize a generational perspective on commu- 94 45 in prehistory, a period spanning 1,000 years from nity formation during the foraging-farming 95 46 AD 300 to AD 1300, creating large pithouse transition. 96 47 hamlets and rock art galleries that have been This study provides the first steps toward 97 48 studied for more than a century (Montgomery developing generational-scale approaches to the 98 49 1894; Morss 1931). Opinions vary in how to Fremont record by examining the formation of 99 50 best interpret the record as either an enigmatic a pithouse community in the Cub Creek reach 100 51 northern periphery of the American Southwest of Dinosaur National Monument in eastern 101 52 (Judd 1926; Kidder 1924), an historically Utah’s Uinta Basin. We propose that the devel- 102 53 independent phenomenon (Gunnerson 1969; opment of high-precision archaeological chron- 103 54 Marwitt 1970), an exemplar of behavioral vari- ology and a high-resolution precipitation 104 55 ability as it pertains to the foraging-farming tran- reconstruction are essential to achieving a gener- 105 56 sition (Madsen and Simms 1998), or a player in a ational perspective of the Fremont foraging- 106 57 vast regional system (Talbot 2018, 2019). At farming transition. High-precision chronology 107 58 some fundamental level, all of these perspectives in our analysis means three things. First, sam- 108 59 are correct. The regional adoption of maize agri- pling strategies focus as much as possible on 109 60 culture overlaps chronologically with the final short-lived annuals that target specific events. 110 61 centuries of the Basketmaker II period on the Second, new dating methods yield small stand- 111 62 southern Colorado Plateau (Matson 1991), and ard errors in individual radiocarbon ages that 112 63 many Fremont communities likely represented reduce the probabilities of calibrated age ranges. 113 64 a mix of indigenous foragers and immigrant Third, formal Bayesian models that incorporate 114 65 farmers (Simms 2008:199–205). archaeological information such as sample loca- 115 66 Madsen and Simms (1998) isolate the prob- tion and site type and that enable potential 116 67 lem of Fremont behavioral variability by focus- inbuilt-age samples (e.g., “old wood”) to be sta- 117 68 ing on the concepts of adaptive diversity and tistically accounted for reduce the potential to 118 69 residential cycling. In the Fremont example, overestimate the spans of target events to be 119 70 one facet of adaptive diversity refers to the timely dated (Bayliss et al. 2007; Bronk Ramsey 120 71 incorporation of cultigens in a primarily foraged 2009). Formal Bayesian models provide poster- 121 72 diet, while residential cycling describes the ior densities, which estimate ages for the begin- 122 73 movement of individuals into and out of semi- ning and end of Fremont occupations that 123 74 sedentary horticultural communities and life- approach multidecadal, multigenerational scales 124 75 ways throughout their life histories. Both of analysis. Bayesian model output is different 125 76 processes characterize the vast frontier between from more commonly used summed probability 126 77 true foraging and farming societies of western distribution (SPD) models in that posterior prob- 127 78 North America (Upham 1994). Within this con- ability densities are age ranges reducing uncer- 128 79 text, we must consider the Fremont archaeo- tainty in the timing of events of archaeological 129 80 logical record, particularly the formation of interest rather than a continuous time series repre- 130 81 pithouse communities, as a generational process sented by SPDs. As such, Bayesian age models 131 Judson Byrd Finley et al.] MULTIDECADAL CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND FREMONT FLORESCENCE 3 132 are not subject to issues of taphonomic loss chronology allows us to capture behavioral vari- 182 133 (Surovell et al. 2009) that are often considered ability that Madsen and Simms (1998) proposed 183 134 in regard to SPDs. In addition, and most import- in order to characterize the Fremont foraging- 184 135 ant to this study, SPDs provide coarse-grained farming transition. Our reconstruction of Uinta 185 136 regional analyses that lack the small-scale and Fremont culture history is incongruent with 186 137 site-specific resolving power of Bayesian age Spangler’s(2000) Uinta adaptation, including a 187 138 models.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us