JSC Capabilities Deep Dive Introduction Johnson Space Center September 19, 2019 Capabilities Deep Dive September 19, 2019 [email protected] Agenda • Points of Contact • Meeting Purpose & Disclaimers • JSC Unique Capabilities • Questions of Clarification /Closing Remarks 3 Center Points of Contact 4 Purpose • Today is an opportunity for potential vendors to further understand JSC capabilities in greater detail than provided during Industry Day – JSC considers its capabilities both unique & world-class – We will describe differences in capability between JSC vs. other Centers, where applicable • Through this Forum, an improved understanding of JSC capabilities will be achieved, while offline meetings are encouraged to further develop Appendix H support content & ideas • Today’s audience consists of potential Appendix H vendors & NASA JSC personnel – However, NASA participants have no knowledge of and cannot provide guidance to Appendix H requirements or Industry comments previously submitted – Deep Dive / Center Appendix H Support Team Is firewalled from HLS Program – See FedBiz Ops for official contacts 5 JSC Unique Capabilities 9:00-9:05 Introduction – Carlos Westhelle 9:05-9:20 Mission Analysis 9:20-9:35 System Engineering 9:35-9:45 Safety and Mission Assurance 9:45-9:55 Extravehicular Activity 9:55-10:15 Mission Operations 10:15-10:40 Human Health and Performance 10:40-12:05 Engineering Domain Expertise and Test – JSC & WSTF 12:05-12:15 Science 12:15-12:30 Questions of Clarification /Closing Remarks – Carlos Westhelle 6 Mission Analysis Johnson Space Center September 19, 2019 JSC Exploration Mission Planning • Strategic Analysis & Formulation – Advanced concept analysis, capabilities definition, and performance assessments – Development and analysis of concept architectures across disciplines • Mission Analysis & Integrated Assessments (MAIA) – Artemis mission design definition, integration, and implementation – Systems and mission analysis, identification of cross-program constraints, and definition of mission achievability • Project & Systems Integration – Technical integration, management, and coordination of projects for advanced systems evaluation and testing – High-fidelity integrated multi-disciplinary operational testing and mission planning to demonstrate exploration missions – Integrated vehicle performance modeling and simulation 8 MAIA Support to Program Lifecycle External/Program Offices Phase Arch Proposal Pre-Phase A Feasibility Review & Analysis Prelim Architectural Analysis SRR/SDR Prelim Mission GR&A Development Mission GRAs Element Concept Requirements Development (>4 years) & Integration Bounding Trajectories Conops Development Conceptual Flight Profiles As-Designed Values PDR to CDR Design Implementation GRA refinement Mission Constraints (~L-4 years) Requirements refinement Constraint accommodation, mission CFPs Vehicle Sizing and Bounding reintegration Annular Scans/Variations Constraints Init. Mission Baseline CDR to dd250 Conceptual Flight Profiles As-Built Values (MDB) (~L-2/3 years) Initial Contingency Analysis Mission Constraints Design Verification GR&A refinement Hardware Implementation -or- Mission Availability Baselining Constraint accommodation, mission As-built values and constraints Msn Mitigations/Redesign Mission in reintegration Manifest Mission Definition Baseline (MDB) MDB Baseline MIR Dd250 to Launch Final Mission Integration Workarounds (if needed) Flight Certification (~L-18months) Mission Availability Calendar Flight Trajectories Flight Ops Products -or- Launch Period/Aborts viewers Initiating Mission Management Databook MMT Products Transition to Flight Ops 9 HLS Mission Planning through MAIA • Mission Design and Integration Products/Services – Establish mission objectives, groundrules and constraints in integrated mission context • Mission GR&A Documents – Conduct mission trades for conditions, objectives, and/or design solutions • Mission Analysis Task Mgmt. & Analysis Memos – Identify/respond to programmatic or vehicle concerns resulting from mission design • Mission & Architecture Graphics • Mission requirements, – Coordinate/resolve conflicts related to mission design across programs objectives, contingency content – Coordination of end-to-end trajectory design, optimization, and cross-program implementation of • Mission Design Matrix • Trajectory design GRAs mission design (nominal, alternatives, and aborts) • Technical Performance • Mission Modeling & Simulation Measures • Conceptual Flight Profiles – Mission architecting and parametric sizing of spacecraft and in-space propulsion elements • Mission element sizing integrated with trajectory – Analysis and assessments for mission integration and design trades/investigations optimization (in development) • Mission Availability Calendars • Data Analytics • Launch Period and Abort – Trajectory database and post-processing tooling development Availability Summaries • Mission Management Databook – Analysis and production of mission management products and mission metrics – Analysis of characteristics, correlation of constraints, and products to aid decision makers Establishes mission requirements, assesses competing cross-program capabilities, develops integrated mission solutions, and ensures mission achievability per the vehicles being delivered 10 Mission Planning & Design Services • MAIA – In-line placement of systems engineering expertise specific to mission execution and integration representing contractor vehicle to integrated mission team • Examples: timeline analysis, operations definition, performance analysis and integration, etc. – Cross-program flight requirements definition and decomposition from mission designs • Examples: performance allocations, integrated vehicle system requirements, cross-program system knowledge and interfaces • Projects & Systems Integration – Inter-disciplinary project management and integration • Conops development and system requirement definition • Development and Implementation of appropriate Field Testing, – Single environment facilities (e.g., NBL) – High fidelity mission analogs (including crew office end operators, MCC, Science Team, comm latency, etc.) – Crew and Operator supported evaluations • Mission suitability evaluation for design alternatives • Operational integration of vehicles for cross-program integration – Vehicle systems performance modeling, simulation, and analysis • Examples: power/thermal sub-system modeling, time domain performance analysis 11 System Engineering and Integration Capabilities Johnson Space Center September 19, 2019 JSC SE&I Core Skills • Program Formulation – ConOps Definition – Mission/Architectural Modeling – Requirements development and flow-down (including interfaces) – V&V Policy and Process Definition – Human Rating Certification • Architecture Definition – Integrated Architecture – design constraints and interfaces definition Key Skills: – Integrated Groundrules and Assumptions for Design Analysis Cycles • Cross-Discipline Integration – Integration with data systems and tools • Technical Issue Resolution – Issue resolution, deep-dive assessments • Cross-Program Integration • Interface Definition for • Verification Planning, Assessments, Execution & Closure (includes interfaces) pressurized elements • Pre-flight Processing and Flight Test – Coordination and management of qualification and acceptance test requirement definition, assessment, and flow-down from system to unit (component) level – Test planning and tailored execution of spacecraft-level projects and subsystems such as Morpheus or AA2 testing – moved from above – Technical review of verification products – Validation closure: integrated tests and flight tests – Integrated HW/SW certification for flight – Support failure analysis reviews to identify impacts and/or recommend changes to test programs 13 Cross-Program Systems Integration Support • Mission level integration function provides horizontal and vertical integration and issue Ground Integration resolution to help coordinate and integrate between lander, Gateway, Orion, SLS, Exploration Ground Systems, Lunar Surface Systems • Product(s) engagement – Ensures content meets mission goals/objective and represents the intent of Requirements and Artemis ConOps – Works with vendors to ensure crew and flight operational concerns are incorporated into design – Works with vendors by reviewing program developed products prior to formal release, as necessary, to identify/resolve technical issues Aborts – Evaluates design against interface definition and requirements to identify/resolve disconnects • Communication and Network Integration and Testing • Cross-Program Avionics Software Design, Integration and Testing • Cross-Program Payload Interface Definition and Processes • Integrated Aborts/Contingency Assessment and Flight Rule Development • Flight Certification determines mission readiness and risk acceptance of crewed systems and provides tools/resources to support CoFR execution Comm/Network/Tracking • Systems Protection Office develops protection plans, conducts system vulnerability assessments, and coordinates threat information 14 Cross-Program Systems Integration Support • Integrated Risk Management – Provides coordination to integrate the risks collected from HLS lander and various Program sources into a coordinated, normalized risk posture from an integrated system perspective – Ensures proper coordination and mitigation of risks with appropriate stakeholders such as Safety & Mission Assurance, Health and Medical,