Appendix A: Tables Table A.1 Trade value of international and local repertoire sales by format and in total (millions of ZAR) according to the RiSA statistics (for the years 1997–2012; format details for 2007 not available) International Local CD CD MC, MC Albums DVD, music Total CD CD MC, MC Albums DVD, music Total Total singles single video intern. single single video local all 1997 405 40 51 – 496 53 2 92 – 147 643 1998 451 31 35.2 – 517.2 69 5 87.5 – 161.5 678.7 1999 476.3 33.6 34.2 0.001 – 544.2 70.8 1.6 76.1 – 148.47 692.67 2000 430 18.5 18.8 0.025 – 467.3 72.1 0.9 66.1 0,003 – 139.1 606.5 2001 415.45 12.1 21.2 −0.006 4 452.7 87.1 0.6 67 2.1 156.8 609.5 2002 445.9 16.4 22.3 0.006 27.5 512.17 122.8 1.5 64.8 3 192.16 704.3 2003 416 4 20.3 0.02 40 480 150.2 1.2 67.7 5.9 225 705 2004 464 1 12 63 540 259 – 74 14 347 887 2005 501 1 7 83 592 285 1 54 42 382 974 2006 460 – 4 73 537 339 1 44 71 455 992 2007 – 577 – 443 1,020 2008 440 0.013 2 67.3 509.3 291.3 10 9.2 63.3 383.8 893.1 2009 409.73 0.07 1.4 60.3 471.53 320.5 6 10 58.7 395.27 866.8 2010 366 1.6 0.45 58.1 426.2 291 3.5 8.3 61.2 364 790.2 Physical Digital Physical Digital 2011 337 42.2 379.2 311.2 – 311.2 690.4 2012 305.7 48.3 354 289.7 0.04 289.7 643.7 Note: – = not available; intern. = international. Appendix A 185 Table A.2 Sales of units by format (millions), according to RiSA, AGM (2007, p. 11). The numbers of units broken down by format in the international and domestic repertoire are not available after 2006 International Local CD CD MC DVD Total CD CD MC DVD Total single single 1997 9.8 2.2 2.4 – 14.4 2.0 0.1 6.0 – 8.1 1998 10.7 1.8 1.7 – 14.2 2.3 0.2 5.6 – 8.1 1999 10.2 1.8 1.5 – 13.5 2.2 0.1 5.0 – 7.3 2000 9.0 0.9 1.0 – 10.9 2.2 – 4.4 – 6.6 2001 7.7 0.6 1.1 (0.1) 9.5 2.3 – 4.5 – 6.8 2002 7.7 0.7 1.2 0.2 9.8 3.0 – 4.2 (*) 7.2 2003 7.0 0.1 1.2 0.3 8.6 3.7 – 4.5 (*) 8.2 2004 7.9 – 0.7 0.6 9.2 6.5 – 4.7 0.2 11.4 2005 9.5 – 0.4 0.9 10.8 7.6 – 3.4 0.6 11.6 2006 8.5 – 0.3 1.0 9.8 9.7 – 2.9 1.1 13.7 Note: – = not available. Table A.3 Shares of international and local music in the sales, in terms of trade value and units, and annual changes in the total trade value, according to the RiSA statistics (1997–2012) International repertoire Local repertoire Total trade value, change Value share Unit share Value share Unit share 1997 77% 64% 22% 36% 1998 76% 63.4% 23.7% 36.6% 5.3% 1999 78.5% 64.8% 21.4% 35.2% 2.2% 2000 77% 62.2% 22.9% 37.8% −12.4% 2001 74.3% 58% 25.7% 42% 0.5% 2002 72.7% 57.4% 27.3% 42.6% 15.6% 2003 68% 51% 32% 49% 0.1% 2004 60.7% 44.1% 39.3% 55.5% 25.9% 2005 60.7% 48% 39.3% 51.8% 10% 2006 54.2% 41.7% 45.7% 58.3% 2% 2007 56.6% – 43.4% – 2.8% 2008 57% 48.2% 43% 51.8% −12.4% 2009 54.4% 45.9% 45.6% 54.1% −2.9% 2010 54% 46.4% 46% 53.6% −8.8% 2011* 55% – 45% – −12.7%* (−17.9%)** 2012 55% – 45% – −6.7% Note: * Digital sales included in the RiSA statistics from 2011 on. ** Trade value change of physical product between 2010 and 2011. – = not available. 186 Appendix A Table A.4 South African recorded music trade value by format and in total (US$ million; Total also in ZAR million) as given in the following IFPI reports: RIN 2005 (IFPI 2006, p. 96; for the years 2001–2003), RIN 2008 (IFPI 200, p. 83; for the years 2004–2008); RIN 2013 (IFPI 2014, p. 103; for the years 2009–2013) Physical Digital Perf. Synch. Total Total Change % rights revenue US$ ZAR 2001 104.8 666.3 2.2 2002 119.1 757.3 13.7% 2003 119.2 758.1 0.1% 2004 110.6 – – 110.6 915.5 20.8% 2005 121.5 0.5 – – 122.0 1,010.2 10.3% 2006 124.0 2.0 – – 126.0 1,043.1 3.3% 2007 126.2 2.8 – – 129.0 1,067.5 2.3% 2008 114.6 3.4 1.7 – 119.7 990.9 −7.2% 2009 95.6 3.5 2.1 – 101.2 976.3 −1.3% 2010 87.1 3.8 1.9 0.6 93.4 901.6 −7.6% 2011 71.5 4.3 – 0.8 76.6 739.0 −18.0% 2012 66.3 4.3 – 0.7 71.3 687.8 −6.9% 2013 52.7 8.8 – 1.4 63.0 607.6 −11.7% Note: – = not available; Perf. = performance; Synch. = synchronization. Table A.5 Format shares in the sales (in value terms), according to IFPI’s RIN reports (2014–1999, with data for 2001 missing) Physical, Digital, Music MC, VHS, CD, DVD, Perf. Synch. Other*, value value video value value value value rights rights value 2013 84% 14% 2% 2012 91% 8% 1% 2011 93% 6% 1% 2010 93% 5% 2% 2009 94% 4% 2% 2008 96% 3% 1% 2007 98% 2% 18% 82% 2006 98% 2% 79% 14% 5%* 2005 <1% 80% 13% 7%* 2004 9.6% 0.3% 81.3% 8.7% 0.1%** Singles, value LPs, value MC VHS CD DVD 2003 0.7% 12.5% 0.6% 80.3% 5.9% 2002 2.5% – 12.4% – 80.7% 3.8% 2001 – 2000 3.2% 0.005% 14.0% 82.8% 1999 5% – 16% 79% 1998 6% – 18% 77% Note: * Other: physical singles, LP, MC, VHS. ** Other: singles. – = not available; Perf. = performance; Synch. = synchronization . The reported categories have changed over the years. 187 188 Appendix A Table A.6 Sales of international and local repertoire, in trade value terms, according to IFPI’s RIN reports (IFPI 1994–2012). The shares differ somewhat from those given by RiSA (Table 4), because IFPI add a weighting to the raw data of the national organizations in an attempt to reflect the overall market Domestic International Classical repertoire repertoire 2011 48% 52% 2010 45% 55% 2009 45% 55% 2008 43% 57% 2007 43% 57% 2006 45% 55% 2005 40% 60% 2004 41% 59% 2003 32% 66% 2% 2002 27% 73% – 2001 27% 71% 2% 2000 23% 74% 3% 1999 21% 73% 6% 1998 24% 70% 6% 1997 23% 71% 6% 1996 22% 71% 6% 1995 20% 74% 6% 1994 19% 71% 11% 1993 43% 51% 6% 1992 43% 51% 6% Note: – = not available. Table A.7 Formats by average value in international and local repertoire (in ZAR), according to RiSA, AGM (2007, p. 12). Data on the average value are not available after the year 2006 International Local CD CD single MC DVD CD CD single MC DVD 1997 41.22 17.12 21.18 – 27.03 15.98 15.26 – 1998 42.05 17.55 20.71 – 29.51 20.13 15.47 – 1999 46.72 19.21 23.18 – 31.67 18.70 15.33 – 2000 48.16 20.97 18.90 – 33.51 21.19 15.13 – 2001 53.96 19.79 18.81 91.11 38.07 18.42 14.98 – 2002 57.61 21.88 18.34 114.53 40.32 22.69 15.34 89.5 2003 59.51 24.65 16.98 114.95 40.52 20.89 15.18 87.05 2004 58.72 12.45 17.55 99.88 39.89 8.41 15.80 77.47 2005 52.91 24.72 17.24 88.11 37.36 19.33 15.84 69.57 2006 54.28 25.32 14.92 73.42 34.95 17.30 15.21 67.09 Note: – = not available. 189 Appendix B: Interviewed People Agulnik Alex, founder and CEO of African Cream label (since 1995) (interview: 10 June 2005). Alexander David, MD of Sheer Publishing Ltd; former MD at Sheer Publishing, and former MD at Tequila Music (interview: 14 November 2013). Allingham Rob, the Archive Manager for Gallo Africa from 1990 until 2008; cur- rently owns a label called Recordiana (interview: 4 November 2013). Azevedo Joe, Director of RTG (Replication Technology Group) (interview: 26 May 2005). Bennett Mark, worked at the record label Shifty Records; in the 1990s owned and ran two music retail outlets, and later he run the Jive City music retail chain for six years (until 2005) (interview: 1 June 2005).