Oross, Ildikó Pap, Jessica Pearson

Oross, Ildikó Pap, Jessica Pearson

Experiencia vivida en el Neolítico Antiguo de la Gran Llanura Húngara Oross, Ildikó Pap, Jessica Pearson, Anne Pike-Tay, Debemos también un encarecido agradecimiento Mike Richards, Rick Schulting, Elisabetta Starnini, Pál al Instituto de Arqueología de la Academia Húngara Sümegi, Kathy Willis, Laura Willis, Pia Windland, Nur de Ciencias, Budapest, y al Museo Munkácsy Mihály, Yusof y István Zalai-Gaál. Békéscsaba, Co. Békés, por su cooperación. El apoyo de The British Academy, The Humanities Research los Prof. Csanád Bálint, Dr. Eszter Bánffy y Dr. Imre Board, The Arts and Humanities Research Board, The Szatmári ha sido enormemente valioso. Society of Antiquaries of London, The Prehistoric Society Gracias, finalmente, a Doug Bailey, Vicki Cummings, y la Universidad de Cardiff patrocinaron el trabajo de John Evans, Dani Hofmann y Ollie Harris por su conse- campo en Ecsegfalva. jos y comentarios críticos a este artículo. BIBLIOGRAFÍA Evans, J.G. 2003. Environmental archaeology and the social order. London: Routledge. Alès, C. 2000. Anger as a marker of love: the ethic of convi- Gell, A. 1998. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. viality among the Yanomami. En J. Overing y A. Passes Oxford: Clarendon Press. (eds.) The anthropology of love and anger: the aesthe- Gillings, M. 1998. Embracing uncertainty and challenging tics of conviviality in Native Amazonia: 133-51. London: dualism in the GIS-based study of a palaeo flood-plain. Routledge. European Journal of Archaeology 1: 117-44. Ammerman, A.J. y Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. 1973. A population Gow, P. 2000. Helpless – the affective preconditions of Piro model for the diffusion of early farming in Europe. En C. social life. En J. Overing y A. Passes (eds.) The anthropol- Renfrew (ed.), The explanation of culture change, 343-57. ogy of love and anger: the aesthetics of conviviality in London: Duckworth. Native Amazonia: 46-63. London: Routledge. Amit, V. 2002. Reconceptualizing community. In V. Amit (ed.) Halstead, P. 1989. Like rising damp? An ecological approach Realizing community: concepts, social relationships and to the spread of farming in southeast and central Europe. sentiments: 1-20. London: Routledge. En A. Milles, D. Williams y N. Gardner (eds.) The begin- Bailey, D.W. 2000. Balkan prehistory: exclusion, incorpora- nings of agriculture: 23-53. Oxford: British Archaeological tion and identity. London: Routledge. Reports. v Bánffy, E. 2000. Starcevo und/oder LBK? Die ersten Harris, M. 2000. Life on the Amazon: the anthropology of Ergebnisse der westungarischen Ausgrabungen aus der a Brazilian peasant village. Oxford: Oxford University Entstehungsphase der Bandkeramik. Varia Neolithica 1: Press. 47-60. Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays in Bánffy, E. 2003. Szentgyörgyvölgy-Pityerdomb: the 6th millen- livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge. nium BC boundary in western Transdanubia and its role in James, W. 2003. The ceremonial animal: a new portrait of the central European Neolithic transition. Tesis Doctoral anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. inédita presentada para el acceso a grado de ‘Doctor en la Kalicz, N., Virág, Z.M. y Biró, K.T. 1998. The northern v Academia Húngara de Ciencias’. periphery of the Early Neolithic Starcevo culture in south- Banner, J. 1937. Die Ethnologie der Körös Kultur. Dolgozatok western Hungary: a case study of an excavation at Lake Szeged 13: 32-49. Balaton. Documenta Praehistorica 25: 151-88. Barrett, J.C. 2001. Agency, the duality of structure, and the Kuper, A. 1999. Culture: the anthropologists’account. Cambrid- problem of the archaeological record. En I. Hodder (ed.) ge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Archaeological theory today: 141-64. Oxford: Blackwell. Makkay, J. 1992. Excavations at the Körös culture settlement Barrett, J.C. y Fewster, K.J. 2000. Intimacy and structural of Endród-Örgeszölög 119 in 1986-1989. En S. Bökönyi transformation: Giddens and archaeology. En C. Holtorf y (ed.) Cultural and landscape changes in south-east H. Karlsson (eds.) Philosophy and archaeological prac- Hungary. 1. Reports on the Gyomaendröd Project: 121- tice: perspectives for the 21st century: 25-33. Göteborg: 193. Budapest: Institute of Archaeology, Hungarian Bricoleur Press. Academy of Sciences. Bogaard, A. 2002. The permanence, intensity y seasonality of Mateiciucová, I. 2001. Silexindustrie in der ältesten early crop cultivation in western-central Europe. Tesis Linearbandkeramik-Kultur in Mähren und Niederösterre- Doctoral inédita presentada para el acceso a grado de ich auf der Basis der Silexindustrie des Lokalmeso- ‘Doctor en la Academia Húngara de Ciencias’, Sheffield lithikums. En R. Kertész y J. Makkay (eds.) From the University. Mesolithic to the Neolithic: 283-99. Budapest: Archaeo- Ecsedy, I., Kovács, L., Maráz, B. y Torma, I. 1982. Mag- lingua. yarország Régészeti Topográfiája: a Szeghalmi járás IV/1. McFadyen, L. 2000. Comment: the trouble with the ‘real’ Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. thing. En C. Holtorf y H. Karlsson (eds.), Philosophy and 25 Alasdair Whittle archaeological practice: perspectives for the 21st century, aesthetics of conviviality in Native Amazonia: 252-67. 34-7. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press. London: Routledge. Moore, H. 1999. Whatever happened to women and men? Sherratt, A.G. 1983. The development of Neolithic and Gender and other crises in anthropology. En H. Mooere Copper Age settlement in the Great Hungarian Plain. Part (ed.), Anthropological theory today: 151-71. Cambridge: II: site survey and settlement dynamics. Oxford Journal Polity Press. of Archaeology 2: 13-41. Nagel, T. 1979. What is it like to be a bat? En T. Nagel, Mor- Starnini, E. 2000. Stone industries of the Early Neolithic cul- tal questions: 165-80. Cambridge: Cambridge University tures in Hungary and their relationships with the Mesolithic Press. background. Società Preistoria Protostoria Friuli-Venezia Neustupny, E. 1998. Structures and events: the theoretical Giulia, Trieste 8: 207-19. basis of spatial archaeology. En E. Neustupny (ed.) Starnini, E. y Szakmány, G. 1998. The lithic industry of the Space in prehistoric Bohemia: 9-44. Praha: Institute of Neolithic sites of Szarvas and Endryd (south-eastern Hun- Archaeology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech gary): techno-typological and archaeometrical aspects. Republic. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae Otte, M. y Noiret, P. 2001. Le Mésolithique du Bassin 50: 279-342. Pannonien et la formation du Rubané. L’Anthropologie Whittle, A. 2003. The archaeology of people: dimensions of 105: 409-19. Neolithic life. London: Routledge. Overing, J. 2000. The efficacy of laughter: the ludic side of Whittle, A. en prensa. Connections in the Körös culture world: magic within Amazonian sociality. En J. Overing and exchange as an organising principle. Antaeus 26. A. Passes (eds.) The antrophology of… Amazonia: 1. Whittle, A. (ed.) en preparación. The Early Neolithic on the London: Routledge. Great Hungarian Plain: investigations of the Körös cul- Overing, J. y Passes. A. 2000a. Preface. In J. Overing and A. ture site of Ecsegfalva 23, Co. Békés. Budapest: Institute Passes (eds.) The anthropology of love and anger: the aes- of Archaeology. thetics of conviviality in Native Amazonia: xi-xiv. London: Whittle, A., Bartosiewicz, L., Boric, D., Pettitt, P. y Richards, Routledge. M. 2002. En the beginning: new radiocarbon dates for the Overing, J. y Passes. A. 2000b. Introduction: conviviality and Early Neolithic in northern Serbia and south-east Hungary. the opening up of Amazonian anthropology. En J. Overing Atraeus 25: 20-30. y A. Passes (eds.) The anthropology of love and anger: the Willis, K.J. 1997. The impact of early agriculture upon the aesthetics of conviviality in Native Amazonia: 1-30. Hungarian landscape. En J. Chapman y P. Dolukhanov London: Routledge. (eds.) Landscape in flux: central and eastern Europe in Rivière, P. 2000. ‘The more we are together…’. En J. Overing Antiquity: 193-207. Oxford: Oxbow. y A. Passes (eds.) The anthropology of love and anger: the 26 Yolanda Carrión Marco BIBLIOGRAFÍA Mary, G. 1992. La evolución del litoral cantábrico durante el Holoceno. En A. Cearreta y F.M. Ugarte (eds.) The late Aedo, C., Diego, C. y García, J.C. 1990. El bosque en Canta- quaternary in the Western Pyrenean Region: proceedings bria. Santander: Asamblea regional de Cantabria. of the Internacional Conference on the Environment and Badal, E. 2002. Bosques, campos y pastos: el potencial econó- the Human Society in the Western Pyrenees and the mico de la vegetación mediterránea. En E. Badal, J. Ber- Basque Mountains during the upper Pleistocene and Ho- nabeu y B. Martí (eds.) El paisaje en el Neolítico medite- locene: 161-171. Vitoria: Universidad del País Vasco. rráneo. Saguntum – PLAV, Extra 5: 129-146. Mary, G. y Médus, J. 1993. El Holoceno de la región de San Carrión Marco, Y. 2003. Afinidades y diferencias de las se- Vicente de la Barquera (Cantabria y Asturias). En Instituto cuencias antracológicas de las vertientes mediterránea y Tecnológico y Geominero de España (ed.) El Cuaternario atlántica de la península Ibérica. Tesis Doctoral. en España y Portugal: 961-963. Madrid. Universitat de València. Muñoz Sobrino, C. 1995. Dinámica pleistocena y holocena del Chabal, L. 1988. Pourquoi et comment prélever les charbons bosque en la Sierra de Ancares. Lugo: Memoria del Depar- de bois pour la période antique: les méthodes utilisées sur tamento de Biología Vegetal, Área de Botánica. USC. le site de Lattes (Hérault). Lattara 1: 187-222. Muñoz Sobrino,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    151 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us