Church-State: a Legal Survey--1966--1968 Joseph P

Church-State: a Legal Survey--1966--1968 Joseph P

Notre Dame Law Review Volume 43 | Issue 5 Article 3 1-1-1968 Church-State: A Legal Survey--1966--1968 Joseph P. Kennedy Merle F. Wilberding Laurent L. Rousseau Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Joseph P. Kennedy, Merle F. Wilberding & Laurent L. Rousseau, Church-State: A Legal Survey--1966--1968, 43 Notre Dame L. Rev. 684 (1968). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol43/iss5/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SURVEY CHURCH-STATE: A LEGAL SURVEY - 1966-68 CONTENTS I. Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----- -686 II. Abortion ---.-------------------------.......................---------------------------------- - ---- 686 A. Introduction -------------------------.-.-------.........................-------------------------- 686 B. Abortion Laws in the United States ---------------------------------.-------687 1. Background --------------------------------------------------------------------------------687 2. Present Laws ------------------------------------------------------------------------------688 3. Practice under Present Laws -------------------------...-----------------------689 C. Proposals for Reform ------------------------------------------------------------------------694 1. Model Penal Code ---------------------------------------.....-------------------------694 2. State Legislation --------------------------------------------------------------------------694 D. The Abortion Debate ---------.-.--------------..........................----------------- 695 1. Arguments for these Reforms -------------------..............-----------------695 2. Arguments against these Reforms ------------------------------------------701 a. The Composition of the Opposition -------------..........------------ 701 b. Catholic Views on the Nature of the Fetus -----------------------702 c. Criticism of Reform in General -------------------------------------- 703 d. Criticism of Each Proposed Ground -------------------------------- 705 E. Can this Debate be Resolved? ---------------------------------------------------707 1. Legal Status of the Fetus --------------------------------------------------------707 2. Is Reform Consistent with the Legal Status of the Fetus? -------710 F. Perspective for the Future ------------------------..................----------------- 712 1. Goals of Reformers ----------------------------------------------------------------712 2. Future Developments ----------------------------------------------------------.--...712 a. Abortifacient Pills ------------------------------------------------------------712 b. Contraceptives ----------------------------------------------------------- 713 III. Artificial Insemination ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 715 A. Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 715, B. Theoretical Problems --------------------------------------------.-------------------716 1. M edical ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ 716 a. Procedure ---.-.------------.......................------------------------------------ 716 b. Donors --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -717 c. Sperm Banks -------------------------------------------------------------------718 2. Legal ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - -718 3. Religious -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ -719 a. Roman Catholic -----------------------------------------------................... .719 b. Protestant ----------------------------------------------------------------------------719 c. Jewish -------------------------------------------......------------------------- 720 4. Social ---...--.-.--------------......................----------------------------------------- 720 [Vol. 43:684] SURVEY C. Case Law ---------------------------------------------------.---------------------------------720 D. Legislation--------------------------------.-------...................--------------------- --... 722 1. Introduction ------------------------------------...........-----......................... .722 2. Implied Statutory Authority -------------.........................--------------- 722 3. Legitimacy Statutes ---...........................---------------------------------- 723 4. Perspective for the Future ----------------------...................------- ---- 724 E. Conclusion ------------------------------------------- ........------------------------------- 724 IV. Anti-Miscegenation ..-------.-.---------------------..........................-------------------- 725 V. The Study of Religion in the State University ---------------------------------726 A. Introduction -------...-..-.----------------------..................--------------------..---. 726 B. Constitutionality ---.-.-- ...--------------.-.--.....................-------------------- -.-. 727 C. Theoretical Justification - The Function of a University -------- 730 D. Practical Problems -------------------------..............---------------------------------- 731 E. Existing Practice ---...---------.........................----------------------------------- 732 1. Classification of Programs ------------------------------------------------------732 2. Specific Examples --------------.--.....................--------------- ------ 733 F. Perspective for the Future --------------------------------------------- ---------.....733 G. Conclusion -...-----------------------.......................------------------------ -..- --- - 734 VI. Governmental Aid to Elementary and Secondary Education --....-------- 734 A. Introduction ---------------------------.-..-.------..................---------- - --- ---- 734 1. The Constitutionality of Governmental Aid ---------......-------------- 735 a. Federal Constitution -------...-----------.........................--------------- 735 b. State Constitutions ----------------------------------------------------- 739 2. Availability of Governmental Aid -----------------------.........-------- 739 a. Necessity of Private Schools -------------------.............------------- 740 b. Necessity of Aid -------------------------------------------------------------- 740 c. Taxpayer Savings --------------------------.....................------ ----- 741 d. Effect on Public Schools -------.----............................-------------741 e. Effect on Integration -----------------................----------------- 743 3. Types of State Aid .---....-------------..........................----------- 744 a. Textbooks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------744 b. Transportation ----------------------------------------------------------------------745 c. Shared Time -------------------------------------------------------------------------747 d. Auxiliary Services ---...---.......................------------------------------- 748 4. Federal Aid ..---.......--------------------............................------------- 749 a. Title I-Assistance for Educationally Disadvantaged Children --------------------------------------------- ......------------------..- --- - 750 b. Title II-Library Resources and Textbooks ----------------. 752 c. Title III-Supplementary Education Centers and Services 752 5. Frothingham v. Mellon-A Judicial Roadblock -----------...--- 753 a. Judicial Attack ----------------------------------------------------------------------754 b. Legislative Attack --------------------------------------------------------------755 c. Conclusion --------------------------------------------------------------------------756 VII. Aid to Religion through Taxation ----------------------------------------------------756 A. Types of Tax Aid --------------------------------------------------.-------------------757 NOTRE DAME LAWYER [june, 1968] 1. Direct Tax Aid ----------------------------------------------------------------------------757 a. Federal Tax Exemptions --------------------------------------------------757 b. State and Municipal Exemptions --------------------------------------759 2. Indirect Tax Aid ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 760 B. The Constitutionality of Tax Aid ----------------------------------------.. 761 1. Direct Tax Aid -------.-.---------------------------.................--------------..- 761 2. Indirect Tax Aid ------------------------------------------------------------------------762 VIII. Free Exercise and the Police Power-Current Developments -------- 764 A. Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------....--------------------764 B. The Amish-A Case Study in Accommodation and Suppression .... 764 1. Folk Culture -------------------------------------------------------------------------------764 2. Theology and Religious Rubrics -----------------................----------- 765 3. Internal Regulation and Exterior Threats ............----------------- 766 4. Compulsory Education's Threat to Amish Culture -------------------768 5. Comparative Legal Treatment of Amish-Kansas, Iowa, Indiana ---------------------------------------

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    98 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us