Ethos Structures in Natural Language

Ethos Structures in Natural Language

Department of English and General Linguis cs University of Łódź PhiLang 2019 Sixth Interna onal Conference on Philosophy of Language and Linguis cs Łódz, 10-12 May 2019 Book of Abstracts edited by Mar n Hinton & Wiktor Pskit Department of English and General Linguistics Institute of English Studies University of Łódź Sixth International Conference on Philosophy of Language and Linguistics PhiLang 2019 Łódź, 10-12 May 2019 Organising Committee: Piotr Stalmaszczyk (chair) Aleksandra Majdzińska Wiktor Pskit Martin Hinton Ryszard Rasiński Special Session PhilArg: The Philosophy of Argumentation Convenor: Martin Hinton Book of Abstracts edited by Martin Hinton & Wiktor Pskit Łódź, 2019 Contents Anna Brożek (Plenary Speaker) ..................................................................................................... 7 The relations between logic and linguistics in the Lvov-Warsaw School ........................................... 7 Stacie Friend (Plenary Speaker) ..................................................................................................... 8 Co-identification again ........................................................................................................................ 8 Ulrike Hahn (Plenary Speaker) ...................................................................................................... 9 Norms for real world argument ........................................................................................................... 9 Kasia M. Jaszczolt (Plenary Speaker) ........................................................................................... 10 Rethinking being Gricean: New challenges for metapragmatics ...................................................... 10 Stephen Mumford (Plenary Speaker) .......................................................................................... 11 Negation and denial ........................................................................................................................... 11 Tadeusz Szubka (Plenary Speaker) .............................................................................................. 12 Contemporary philosophy of language and its transformations ........................................................ 12 Special Session: The Philosophy of Argumentation ...................................................................... 13 Katarzyna Budzyńska et al. ......................................................................................................... 14 Ethos structures in natural language .................................................................................................. 14 Cristina Corredor ........................................................................................................................ 15 Speaking, inferring, arguing. On the inferential and argumentative character of speech ................. 15 Richard Davies ........................................................................................................................... 16 May we recommend fallacious argumentation? ................................................................................ 16 Don Dedrick ............................................................................................................................... 17 The “appeal to popularity” should not be treated as an informal fallacy of argumentation .............. 17 Kamila Dębowska-Kozłowska ...................................................................................................... 18 Manipulating variables for a persuasive change in an experimental setting ..................................... 18 Martin Hinton ............................................................................................................................ 19 Philosophical fallacies of language ................................................................................................... 19 Miklós Könczöl ........................................................................................................................... 20 Rhetorical issues (staseis) in Aristotle ............................................................................................... 20 Patrycja Kupś ............................................................................................................................. 21 Description Logics based ontologies as a tool in argument evaluation ............................................. 21 Tomáš Ondráček ........................................................................................................................ 22 Forms of denial strategy in organization’s reactions to crises ........................................................... 22 Brian Plüss et al. ......................................................................................................................... 23 Implicit logos, implicit ethos: inference anchoring theory with conventional implicatures ............. 23 2 Mariusz Urbański & Paweł Łupkowski ......................................................................................... 24 Cooperative multi-agent problem solving from an interrogative perspective: questioning agendas and informant’s credibility ................................................................................................................ 24 Jean H.M. Wagemans ................................................................................................................. 25 A theoretical rationale for distinguishing four basic argument forms ............................................... 25 General Session .......................................................................................................................... 26 Edgar Andrade-Lotero & Julián Ortiz-Duque ................................................................................ 26 There is a division of linguistic labor ................................................................................................ 26 Filippo Batisti ............................................................................................................................. 27 Linguistic relativity and non-standard accounts of cognition ........................................................... 27 André Bazzoni ............................................................................................................................ 28 Naive rigidity ..................................................................................................................................... 28 Marcin Będkowski ...................................................................................................................... 29 Twardowski and Ajdukiewicz on content and meaning .................................................................... 29 Krystian Bogucki ......................................................................................................................... 30 Was the context principle the basis of Frege’s philosophy after 1891? ............................................ 30 Annie Bosse ............................................................................................................................... 31 Denying generics ............................................................................................................................... 31 Tadeusz Ciecierski & Paweł Grabarczyk ....................................................................................... 32 Utterances .......................................................................................................................................... 32 Jonas Dagys ................................................................................................................................ 33 Could anyone have been identical with Holmes? Rigidity and fiction once again ........................... 33 Matej Drobnak ........................................................................................................................... 34 Context, content, and inferentialism .................................................................................................. 34 Marta Dynel ............................................................................................................................... 35 On bald-faced lies and bullshit .......................................................................................................... 35 Juliana Faccio Lima ..................................................................................................................... 36 Frege’s Puzzle and multiple iterations of attitude verbs .................................................................... 36 Sarah Fisher ............................................................................................................................... 37 Reframing implicatures ..................................................................................................................... 37 Grzegorz Gaszczyk ...................................................................................................................... 38 The norm and aim of the speech act of explanation .......................................................................... 38 Christopher Genovesi & Eros Corazza .......................................................................................... 39 On anaphora and the fictional use of metaphors in argument position ............................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    88 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us