Particle Physics HANDOUT V

Particle Physics HANDOUT V

1 Particle Physics Dr M.A. Thomson ´­ ѵ ¼ µ- µ- e- e+ e- e+ µ+ µ+ µ- µ- e- e+ e- e+ µ+ µ+ Part II, Lent Term 2004 HANDOUT V Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 2 Spin, Helicity and the Dirac Equation ★ Upto this point we have taken a hands-off approach to “spin”. ★ Scattering cross sections calculated for spin-less particles ★ To understand the WEAK interaction need to understand SPIN ★ Need a relativistic theory of quantum mechanics that includes spin ★ µ The DIRAC EQUATION Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 3 ★ SPIN complicates things.... e- µ- The process γ + e+ µ represents the sum over all possible spin states µ- µ- µ- µ- e- e+ e- e+ e- e+ e- e+ µ+ µ+ µ+ µ+ µ- µ- µ- µ- e- e+ e- e+ e- e+ e- e+ µ+ µ+ µ+ µ+ µ- µ- µ- µ- e- e+ e- e+ e- e+ e- e+ µ+ µ+ µ+ µ+ µ- µ- µ- µ- e- e+ e- e+ e- e+ e- e+ µ+ µ+ µ+ µ+ Å Å ¾ ¾ ¾ Å Å Å since ORTHOGONAL SPIN states. ½ ¾ ¾ Å ´ µ Cross-section : sum over all spin assignments, averaged over initial spin states. Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 4 The Klein-Gordon Equation Revisited Schrodinger¨ Equation for a free particle can be written as ½ ¾ Ö Ø ¾Ñ Derivatives : 1st order in time and 2nd order in space coordinates µ not Lorentz invariant From Special Relativity: ¾ ¾ ¾ Ô · Ñ from Quantum Mechanics: Ô Ö Ø Combine to give the Klein-Gordon Equation: ¾ ¾ ¾ ´Ö Ñ µ ¾ Ø Second order in both space and time derivatives - by construction Lorentz invariant. ★ Negative energy solutions µ anti-particles ★ BUT negative energy solutions also give negative particle densities !? £ ¼ Try another approach..... Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 5 Weyl Equations (The massless version of the Dirac Equation) Klein-Gordon Eqn. for massless particles: ¾ ¾ ´ Ö µ ¼ ¾ Ø ¾ ¾ ´ Ô µ ¼ Try to factorize 2nd Order KG equation ➔ equation linear in Ö AND : Ø Öµ´ · Öµ ¼ ´ Ø Ø with as yet undetermined constants Gives the two decoupled WEYL Equations ´ · · µ · Ü Ý Þ Ü Ý Þ Ø · · µ ´ Ý Þ Ü Ü Ý Þ Ø both linear in space and time derivatives. BUT must satisfy the Klein-Gordon Equation i.e. in operator form ´ Ôµ´ · Ôµ ¼ must satisfy ¾ ¾ ´ Ô µ ¼ Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 6 Weyl equations give: ¾ ´ Ô Ô Ô Ô Ô Ô Ü Ü Ý Ý Þ Þ Ü Ü Ý Ý Þ Þ Ô Ô Ô Ô Ü Ý Ý Ü Ü Ý Ý Ü Ô Ô Ô Ô Ý Þ Þ Ý Ý Þ Þ Ý Ô Ô Ô Ô µ ¼ Þ Ü Ü Þ Þ Ü Ü Þ Therefore in order to recover the KG equation: ¾ ´ Ô Ô Ô Ô Ô Ô µ ¼ Ü Ü Ý Ý Þ Þ require: ¾ ¾ ¾ ½ Ü Ý Þ ´ · µ ¼ Ø Ü Ý Ý Ü µ Ü Þ , Ý , ANTI-COMMUTE The simplest choice for are the Pauli spin matrices ½ ¼ ¼ ½ ¼ - Þ Ý Ü ¼ ½ ¼ ½ ¼ - Hence solutions to the Klein-Gordon equation ´ Ôµ´ · Ôµ ¼ are given by the Weyl Equations: Ôµ ¼ ´ ´ · Ôµ ¼ ¾ ¢ ¾ Since are matrices, need 2 component wave-functions - WEYL SPINORS. ½ ´Ø Ô Öµ Æ ¾ The wave-function is forced to have a new degree of freedom - the spin of the fermion. Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 7 Consider the FIRST Weyl Equation ´ Ôµ ¼ ´ · · · µ ¼ Ü Ý Þ Ø Ü Ý Þ For a plane wave solution: ½ ´Ø Ô Öµ Æ ¾ the first Weyl Equation gives ´ Ô Ô Ô µ ¼ Ü Ü Ý Ý Þ Þ ´ Ô µ ¼ where Ô Ô · Ô · Ô Ü Ü Ý Ý Þ Þ Ô Ô Ô Þ Ü Ý Ô · Ô Ô Ü Ý Þ Hence for the first WEYL equation, the SPINOR solutions of Ô µ ¼ ´ are given the coupled equations: µ Ô · ´Ô Ô µ Þ ½ Ü Ý ¾ ½ µ ´Ô · Ô µ Ô Ü Ý ½ Þ ¾ ¾ Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 8 ★ Ô Þ Ô Ô Choose along axis, i.e. Þ : ´ Ôµ ¼ ½ ´ · Ôµ ¼ ¾ ½ ¼ There are two solutions · and . ¼ ½ ½ ★ ·Ô The first solution, · , requires , i.e. ¼ a positive energy (particle) solution. Similarly, the second ¼ Ô , requires , i.e. a negative energy ½ (anti-particle) solution. ★ Back to the FIRST WEYL equation ´ Ôµ ¼ Ô ´ ·½ ¼ Ô Ô Ô ½ ¼ ★ The solutions of the WEYL equations are Eigenstates of the HELICITY operator. Ô À Ô ½ with Eigenvalues ·½ and respectively. σ p HELICITY is the projection of a particle’s SPIN onto its flight direction. (Recall WEYL equations applicable for massless particles) Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 9 ★ Interpret the two solutions of the FIRST WEYL equation ·½ as a RIGHT-HANDED À particle and a ½ LEFT-HANDED anti-particle À . E > 0, H = +1 E < 0, H = -1 RH particle LH anti-particle ★ The SECOND WEYL equation: ´ · Ôµ ¼ has LEFT-HANDED particle and RIGHT-HANDED anti-particle solutions. E < 0, H = +1 E > 0, H = -1 RH anti-particle LH particle SUMMARY: ★ By factorizing the Klein-Gordon equation into a form linear in the derivatives µ force particles to have a non-commuting degree of freedom, SPIN ! ★ Still obtain anti-particle solutions ★ Probability densities always positive ★ ‘Natural’ states are the Helicity Eigenstates ★ Weyl Equations are the ultra-relativistic (massless) limit of the Dirac Equation Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 10 Spin in the Fundamental Interactions ★ The ELECTROMAGNETIC, STRONG, and WEAK interactions are all mediated by VECTOR (spin-1) fields. In the massless limit, the fundamental fermion states are eigenstates of the helicity operator. HANDEDNESS ★ (CHIRALITY) plays a central roleˆ in the interactions between the field bosons and the fermions; the only allowed couplings are: LH particle to LH particle RH particle to RH particle LH anti-particle to LH anti-particle RH anti-particle to RH anti-particle LH particle to RH anti-particle RH particle to LH anti-particle · · EXAMPLE Of the 16 possibilities ONLY the following SPIN combinations contribute to the cross-section µ- µ- e- e+ e- e+ µ+ µ+ µ- µ- e- e+ e- e+ µ+ µ+ ¾ Å All other SPIN combinations give zero Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 11 Solutions of the Weyl Equations Consider the general case of a particle with travelling at an Þ angle with respect to the -axis Ô Ô Ó× Þ Ô Ô ×Ò Ü Ôµ ¼ WEYL 1 ´ ´ Ôµ µ Ô · Ô Þ ½ Ü ¾ ½ µ Ô Ô Ü ½ Þ ¾ ¾ ·Ô For the positive energy solution : µ Ó× · ×Ò ½ ¾ ½ µ ×Ò Ó× ½ ¾ ¾ ×Ò µ ½ ¾ ´½ Ó× µ Therefore ¾×Ò Ó× ½ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ´½ Ó× · ×Ò µ ¾ ¾ ¾ Ó× ½ ¾ ×Ò ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ · ½ ½ Normalizing such that ¾ gives: Ó× ½ ¾ ×Ò ¾ ¾ Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 12 ★ So the positive energy solution to the first Weyl equation (RH particle) gives + Ó× ´Ø Ô Öµ ¾ Æ ÊÀ ÖÑÓÒ ÊÀ + ×Ò ¾ This is still a Eigenvalue of the helicity operator with À ·½µ ´ i.e. a RH particle but now referred to an external axis. The positive energy solution to the SECOND Weyl equation (LH particle) gives - ×Ò ´Ø Ô Öµ ¾ Æ ÄÀ ÖÑÓÒ ÄÀ + Ó× ¾ Not much more than the Quantum Mechanical rotation properties of spin- ½ . ¾ ★ The spin part of a RH particle/anti-particle wave-function can be written + Ó× ¾ ´ µ · ×Ò Ó× Ê ¾ ¾ + ×Ò ¾ ★ Similarly for a LH particle/anti-particle - ×Ò ¾ · Ó× ´ µ ×Ò Ä ¾ ¾ + Ó× ¾ Ô´ µ For particles/anti-particles with momentum , i.e. an · angle to the z-axis: · Ó× ´ · µ ×Ò Ê ¾ ¾ ×Ò ´ · µ Ó× Ä ¾ ¾ Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 13 · · Application to µ- µ- e- e+ e- e+ ★ Four helicity combinations µ+ µ+ - - contribute to the cross-section. µ µ e- e+ e- e+ µ+ µ+ ★ Consider the first diagram µ- · · - + Ä Ê Ä Ê e e With the direction defin- µ+ ing the Þ axis: ★ The spin parts of the wave-functions : ´¼µ ´ µ · Ä = Ê = Ê Ä ´ µ ´ · µ · Ä = Ê Ä Ê ¾ ¾ Ó× Ó× µ ×Ò ×Ò ´ =- - + - ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ★ Giving the contribution the matrix element: ¾ ¾ ¾ Å · · ½ ¾ Ê Ä Ê Ä Õ ¾ ¾ Ó× ¾ Õ ¾ ½ ¾ ´½ · Ó× µ Õ ¾ Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 14 ★ Perform same calculation for the four allowed helicity combinations µ- - + α 2 θ e e M1 cos ( /2) µ+ → 1 θ 2 (1+cos ) µ- - + α 2 θ e e M2 sin ( /2) µ+ → 1 θ 2 (1-cos ) µ- - + α 2 θ e e M3 sin ( /2) µ+ → 1 θ 2 (1-cos ) µ- - + α 2 θ e e M4 cos ( /2) µ+ → 1 θ 2 (1+cos ) ★ For unpolarized electron/positron beams : each of the above process contributes equally. Therefore SUM over all matrix elements and AVERAGE over initial spin states. Giving the total Matrix Element (remember spin-states are orthogonal so sum squared matrix elements) : ¨ © ½ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Å Å · Å · Å · Å ½ ¾ ¿ ½ ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ¾ ´½ · Ó× µ · ´½ Ó× µ · Å Õ ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ´½ Ó× µ · ´½ · Ó× µ ¾ ¾ ´½ · Ó× µ Å Õ ★ Nothing more than the QM properties of a SPIN-1 particle decaying to two SPIN- ½ particles ¾ Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 15 + f e µ f p2 γ θ √α √α - + Qf e e µ 1 p - 1 q2 e f f ¾ ¾ ´Õ ×µ Electron/Positron beams along Þ -axis Using the spin-averaged matrix element ¾ ¾ ´½ · Ó× µ Å Õ ¾ ´«µ ¾ ¾ Å ´½ · Ó× µ ¾ × ¾ ¾ ¾ Å ¿ ª ´¾ µ ¾ ´«µ × ½ ¾ ¾ ´½ · Ó× µ ¾ ¿ × ´¾ µ ¾ ¾ « É ¾ ´½ · Ó× µ × · ÕÕ for . Ó× The angle is determined from the measured directions of the Ó× jets. is plotted since it is not possible to uniquely identify which jet corresponds to the quark and which corresponds to the anti- quark. The curve shows the ex- ¾ · Ó× µ pected ´½ distribution. QUARKS are SPIN- ½ ¾ Dr M.A. Thomson Lent 2004 16 (yet again) · Total cross section for ª ª ¾ ¾ ¾ « É ¾ ´½ · Ó× µ×Ò × ¼ ¼ ¾ ¾ ·½ « É ¾ ´½ · Ý µÝ ´Ý Ó× µ ¾× ½ ¾ ¾ « É ¿× ¾ « · · ´ µ ¿× · · ´ µ · for collider data at centre-of-mass ener- gies 8-36 GeV ★ This is the complete lowest order calculation of the · · cross-section (in the limit of massless fermions).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    22 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us