Directing Human Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation Towards a Renal Lineage Generates a Self-Organizing Kidney

Directing Human Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation Towards a Renal Lineage Generates a Self-Organizing Kidney

LETTER Directing human embryonic stem cell differentiation towards a renal lineage generates a self-organizing kidney M. Takasato1, P. X. Er1, M. Becroft1, J. M. Vanslambrouck1, E. G. Stanley2,3, A. G. Elefanty2,3 and M. H. Little1,4 With the prevalence of end-stage renal disease rising 8% per initially arises from the posterior primitive streak, we first examined annum globally1, there is an urgent need for renal regenerative whether hESCs responded to these morphogens in a similar way strategies. The kidney is a mesodermal organ that differentiates to mice. We have previously shown that 20:100 (ng ml−1) of from the intermediate mesoderm (IM) through the formation of BMP4/activin A induced GFPC primitive streak from the reporter a ureteric bud (UB) and the interaction between this bud and hESC line MIXL1GFP/wt, in which GFP is knocked into the MIXL1 the adjacent IM-derived metanephric mesenchyme2 (MM). The gene locus, a robust marker of primitive streak11. Using this nephrons arise from a nephron progenitor population derived reporter line in monolayer culture, we tested several combinations from the MM (ref. 3). The IM itself is derived from the posterior of BMP4 and activin A (5:200, 20:100, 30:10, 30:0 and 0 V 0 ng ml−1) primitive streak4. Although the developmental origin of the or varying concentrations of a canonical Wnt signalling agonist, kidney is well understood2, nephron formation in the human CHIR99021 (5, 7, 9 µM) for optimal differentiation. All in vitro kidney is completed before birth5. Hence, there is no postnatal experiments were performed under chemically defined serum-free stem cell able to replace lost nephrons. In this study, we have culture conditions12. Comparative expression of MIXL1, T (posterior successfully directed the differentiation of human embryonic primitive streak) and SOX17 (anterior primitive streak) suggested that stem cells (hESCs) through posterior primitive streak and IM high BMP4/low activin A (30:10) or high CHIR99021 (>7 µM) was under fully chemically defined monolayer culture conditions optimal for posterior primitive streak (Fig.1 c,d and Supplementary using growth factors used during normal embryogenesis. This Fig. 1a–c). Under both conditions, approximately 90% of cells differentiation protocol results in the synchronous induction of became GFPC (Fig.1 b). UB and MM that forms a self-organizing structure, including The second stage of differentiation was to induce IM from primitive nephron formation, in vitro. Such hESC-derived components streak. After gastrulation, the definitive mesoderm can give rise to IM, show broad renal potential ex vivo, illustrating the potential for paraxial (PM) and lateral plate mesoderm (LPM). Previous studies pluripotent-stem-cell-based renal regeneration. investigating renal differentiation of pluripotent cells have relied on OSR1 as a definitive marker of IM and even MM formation13. However, On the basis of described embryology, we have defined a three-stage OSR1 expression is seen in trunk mesoderm and extends into LPM framework for the differentiation of hESCs to the key cellular (ref. 14). Spontaneous differentiation after initial induction of primitive compartments of the developing kidney, including genes that mark streak (BMP4/activin A (30:10), 3 days) showed OSR1 expression or exclude a specific end result6 (Fig.1 a). The primitive streak, (Supplementary Fig. 1d) but no evidence of more definitive IM markers, the progenitor population for both mesoderm and endoderm, can PAX2 and LHX1 (refs 14–16), by either PCR with reverse transcription be induced from mouse ESCs (mESCs) using activin A (ref. 7) (RT–PCR) or immunofluorescence. This indicated a need for further with opposing gradients of BMP4 and activin A specifying anterior growth factors to appropriately direct the next stage. FGF signalling (endoderm) versus posterior (mesoderm) primitive streak in mice8,9. was one possible requirement. FGF8 is expressed from primitive Canonical Wnt signalling has also been reported as an inducer streak through to posterior trunk mesoderm and FGF9 is expressed for primitive streak in mESCs and hESCs (refs 7,10). As the IM in IM and PM (refs 17,18). MM survival in vitro is supported by 1Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Queensland, Australia. 2Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia. 3Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia. 4Correspondence should be addressed to M.H.L. (e-mail: [email protected]) Received 23 January 2013; accepted 18 November 2013; published online 15 December 2013; DOI: 10.1038/ncb2894 118 NATURE CELL BIOLOGY VOLUME 16 j NUMBER 1 j JANUARY 2014 © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved LETTER abc Ectoderm No GFs 20:100 30:10 Day 3 0% 92.3% 89.1% 2.0 SOX1 Endoderm T PAX6 MIXL1 OCT4 1.5 FOXA2 NANOG SOX17 SOX17 MIXL1–GFP 1.0 T Metanephric µ SIX2 hESCs No GFs 8 M CHIR HESC MIXL1 mesenchyme WT1 0.1% 0.2% 96.4% 0.5 Primitive PAX2 Relative gene LHX1 streak expression to 20:100 0 HOXB7 Intermediate GATA3 Ureteric 0:0 30:0 MIXL1–GFP mesoderm 30:10 5:200 hESCs epithelium FSC 20:100 deh30 BMP4/10 ActA PAX2 DAPI PAX2 LHX1 200 FGF9 or 8 CHIR T Day 3 0 2 6 (Days) 2.0 MIXL1 M –FGF9 µ SOX17 fg 1.5 B/A CHIR FGF9 1.0 –+ 100 PAX2 80 0.5 60 Relative gene LHX1 40 expression to 7 expression 0 OSR1 µ µ µ 20 +FGF9 (B/A) hESCs No GFs 5 M7 M9 M cells PAX2+ GAPDH of Percentage 0 –++ FGF9 n = 5 i Day 6 j Day 6 2,500 2,000 PAX2 +FGF9 (CHIR) PAX2 FOXF1 2,000 LHX1 LHX1 TBX6 1,500 FOXF1 k 1,500 TBX6 1,000 TBX6 1,000 to hESCs to hESCs 500 500 Relative expression PAX2 Relative expression 0 0 hESCs 200 200 200 200 200 FGF9 hESCs 0 10 50 200 400 250 25 –– –NOG –1 (ng ml FGF9) –––550BMP4 (ng ml–1) Figure 1 Sequential differentiation of primitive streak and intermediate positive for PAX2 protein at day 6 in the presence or absence of 200 ng ml−1 mesoderm from human ESCs. (a) Schematic of developmental stages from FGF9 from day 2–6. Both differentiation protocols using BMP4/activin A inner cell mass to renal lineages. Genes shown in each stage represent (B/A) and CHIR99021 (CHIR) exceeded 80% induction efficiency. Error specific markers of that stage. (b) FACS analysis (GFP and forward scatter bars are s.d. (n D 5 fields in total from 3 experiments). (h) The presence (FSC)) showing the percentage of MIXL1–GFP-positive primitive streak and co-expression of PAX2 (red) and LHX1 (green) proteins at day 6 through cells induced with different ratios of BMP4/activin A (ng ml−1) or 8 µM of primitive streak induction using either BMP4/activin A (B/A) or CHIR99021 CHIR99021 after 3 days of culture. hESC, starting cells; No GFs (growth (CHIR). Scale bars, 100 µm. (i) qRT–PCR showing the expression of markers factors), 3 days culture with basal media. (c) Relative expression levels of IM (PAX2, LHX1), PM (TBX6) and LPM (FOXF1) at day 6 across a of SOX17, brachyury (T ) and MIXL1 at day 3 for each ratio of BMP4 and concentration gradient of FGF9 from day 2 to 6. Error bars are s.d. (n D 3 activin A (ng ml−1) assessed by qRT–PCR analysis). (d) The same qRT–PCR experiments). (j) qRT–PCR showing the expression change of mesoderm analysis for different concentrations of CHIR99021. Error bars are s.d. markers at day 6 in the presence of FGF9 together with NOG or BMP4 from (n D 3 experiments). (e) Schematic representation of the differentiation day 2 to 6. Error bars are s.d. (n D 3 experiments). (k) Immunofluorescence protocol used from hESC to IM. (f) RT–PCR at day 6 showing the expression at day 6 showing a major IM population marked by PAX2 (red) and a of markers of IM (PAX2, LHX1, OSR1) in the presence or absence of non-overlapping PM marked by TBX6 (green). Scale bars, 100 µm. The 200 ng ml−1 FGF9 from day 2–6. (g) Quantification of the percentage of cells source data for graphs are provided in Supplementary Table 1. culture in either FGF2/BMP7 (ref. 19) or FGF9 (ref. 20). We therefore dose dependent (optimal at 200 ng ml−1) with suppression of the LPM tested the capacity of three FGF family members, FGF2, FGF8 and markers, FOXF1 (Fig.1 i) and OSR1 (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Cellular FGF9, to induce IM from posterior primitive streak. hESC-induced co-localization of PAX2 and OSR1 proteins was observed after initial posterior primitive streak was treated with 200 ng ml−1 of FGF2, induction with either BMP4/activin A or CHIR99021 followed by FGF9, 8 or 9 for 4 days before analysis using immunofluorescence and with LHX1 and PAX2 proteins co-localized in 79.5% (±4.7% s.d.; quantitative RT–PCR (qRT–PCR) (Fig.1 e). In the presence of FGF2 n D 5) of cells (Supplementary Fig. 2c,d). Hence, an FGF signal is or FGF9, but not FGF8, OSR1, PAX2 and LHX1 were co-expressed sufficient to efficiently specify IM after posterior primitive streak. In with >80% of cells PAX2C, suggesting differential IM induction early mesoderm development, BMP signalling is the key morphogen (Fig.1 f–h). PAX2 and LHX1 induction in response to FGF2 or FGF9 regulating lateral–medial patterning. Low BMP4 induces IM whereas was markedly inhibited by PD173074, a chemical inhibitor for FGFR1 high BMP4 induces LPM and NOG (noggin)-mediated antagonism and FGFR3 (Supplementary Fig.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us