Ql0rttKU Imucrattg ffiibtarg 3t\}acu, S?ettt ^ark -WiAi-HaETf!Gnd The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029632001 THE UNSEEN WORLD, AND OTHER ESSAYS JOHN FISKE lis S' oTSey ci rh fpv /tfv eVri KarSaveTy, Euripides THIRTEENTH EDITION BOSTON HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY New York ; 11 East Seventeenth Street V.\CSr Copyright, 1876, Br JOHN FISKE. All rights reserved. TO JAMES SIME. My dear Simb : Life has now and then some supreme moments of pure happi- ness, which in reminiscence give to single days the value of months or years. Two or three such moments it has been my good fortune to enjoy with you, in talking over the mysteries which forever fas- cinate while they forever bafBe us. It was our midnight talks in Great Eussell Street and the Addison Road, and our bright May holiday on the Thames, that led me to write this scanty essay on the "Unseen World," and to whom could I so heartily dedicate it as to you ? I only wish it were more worthy of its origin. As for the dozen papers which I have appended to it, by way of clearing out my workshop, I hope you will read them indulgently, and be- lieve me Ever faithfully yours, JOHN PISKE. Harvaed TJniveksitt, FebiTiary 3, 1878. — CONTENTS. —• Page I. The Unseen World 1 II. " " The To-mokrow of Death . 59 III. The Jesus of History 66 IV. The Christ of Dogma 101 V. A Word about Miracles 129 VI. Draper on Science and Religion . 138 VII. Nathan the Wise 147 VIII. Historical Difficulties 169 IX. The Famine of 1770 in Bengal. 190 X. Spain and the Netherlands . 211 XI. Longfellow's Dante 237 XII. Paine's "St. Peter" 266 XIII. A Philosophy op Art 280 XIV. Athenian and American Life . 302 INDEX 339 ESSAYS, I. THE UNSEEN WOELD. PART FIRST. "TTTHAT are you, where did you come from, and V T whither are you bound ?" — the question which from Homer's days has been put to the wayfarer in strange lands — is likewise the all-absorbing question which man is ever asking of the universe of which he is himself so tiny yet so wondrous a part. From the earliest times the ultimate purpose of all scientific re- search has been to elicit fragmentary or partial responses to this question, and philosophy has ever busied itself in piecing together these several bits of information ac- cording to the best methods at its disposal, in order to make up something like a satisfactory answer. In old times the best methods which philosophy had at its disposal for this purpose were such as now seem very crude, and accordingly ancient philosophers bungled con- siderably in their task, though now and then they came surprisingly near what would to-day be called the truth. It was natural that their methods should be crude, for scientific inquiry had as yet supplied but scanty ma- terials for them to work with, and it was only after a 2 THE UNSEEN WORLD. very long course of speculation and criticism that men could find out what ways of going to work are likely to prove successful and what are not. The earliest think- ers, indeed, were further hindered from accomplishing much by the imperfections of the language by the aid of which their thinking was done ; for science and phi- losophy have had to make a serviceable terminology by dint of long and arduous trial and practice, and linguistic processes fit for expressing general or abstract notions accurately grew up only through numberless failures and at the expense of much inaccurate thinking and loose talking. As in most of nature's processes, there was a great waste of energy before a good result could be secured. Accordingly primitive men were veiy wide of the mark in their views of nature. To them the world was a sort of enchanted ground, peopled with sprites and goblins ; the quaint notions with which we now amuse our children in fairy tales represent a style of thinking which once was current among grown men and women, and which is stiU current wherever men remain in a savage condition. Tlie theories of the world wrought out by early priest-philosophers were iu great part made up of such grotesque notions ; and having become variously impHcated with ethical opinions as to the nature and consequences of right and wrong be- haviour, they acquired a kind of sanctity, so that any thinker who in the light of a wider experience ventured to alter or amend the primitive theory was likely to be vituperated as an irrehgious man or atheist. This sort of inference has not yet been whoUy abandoned, even in civilized communities. Even to-day books are written about " the conflict between religion and sci- ence," and other books are written with intent to recon- cile the two presumed antagonists. But when we look TEE UNSEEN WORLD. beneath the surface of things, we see that in reality there has never been any conflict between religion and science, nor is any reconciliation called for where harmony has always existed. The real historical conflict, which has been thus curiously misnamed, has been the conflict be- tween the more-crude opinions belonging to the science of an earlier age and the less-crude opinions belonging to the science of a later age. In the course of this con- test the more-crude opinions have usually been defended in the name of religion, and the less-crude opinions have invariably won the victory; but religion itself, wMch is not concerned with opinion, but with the aspiration which leads us to strive after a purer and holier hfe, has seldom or never been attacked. On the contrary, the scientific men who have conducted the battle on behalf of the less-crude opinions have generally been influenced by this religious aspiration quite as strongly as the apol- ogists of the more-crude opinions, and so far from relig- ious feeling having been weakened by their perennial series of victories, it has apparently been growing deeper and stronger aU the time. The rehgious sense is as yet too feebly developed in most of us ; but certainly in no preceding age have men taken up the work of life with more earnestness or with more real faith in the unseen than at the present day, when so much of what was once deemed all-important knowledge has been consigned to the limbo of mythology. The more-crude theories of early times are to be chiefly distinguished from the less-crude theories of to-day as being largely the products of random guesswork. Hy- pothesis, or guesswork, indeed, lies at the foundation of all scientific knowledge. The riddle of the universe, hke less important riddles, is unravelled only by approxima- tive trials, and the most brilliant discoverers have usually 4 THE UNSEEN WORLD. been the bravest guessers. Kepler's laws were the re- sult of indefatigable guessing, and so, in a somewhat dif- ferent sense, was the wave-theory of light. But the guess- work of scientific inquirers is very different now from what it was in older times. In the first place, we have slowly learned that a guess must be verified before it can be accepted as a sound theory; and, secondly, so many truths have been established beyond contraven- tion, that the latitude for hypothesis is much less than it once was. Nine tenths of the guesses which might have occurred to a mediaeval philosopher would now be ruled out as inadmissible, because they would not har- monize with the knowledge which has been acquired since the Middle Ages. There is one direction especially in which this continuous limitation of guesswork by ever- accumulating experience has manifested itself From first to last, all our speculative successes and failures have agreed in teaching us that the most general princi- ples of action which prevail to-day, and in our own cor- ner of the universe, have always prevailed throughout as much of the imiverse as is accessible to our research. They have taught us that for the deciphering of the past and the predicting of the future, no hypotheses are admissible which are not based upon the actual behaviour of things in the present. Once there was unlimited facility for guessing as to how the solar system might have come into existence ; now the origin of the sun and planets is adequately explained when we have unfolded all that is implied in the processes which are still going on in the solar system. Formerly appeals were made to all manner of violent agencies to account for the changes which the earth's surface has imdergone since our planet began its independent career ; now it is seen that the same slow working of rain and tide, of wind and wave THE UNSEEN WORLD. 5 and frost, ot secular contraction and of earthquake pulse, which is visible to-day, will account for the whole. It is not long since it was supposed that a species of animals or plants could be swept away only by some unusual catastrophe, while for the origination of new species something called an act of " special creation " was necessary; and as to the nature of such extraordinary events there was endless room for guesswork ; but the discovery of natural selection was the discovery of a process, going on perpetually under our very eyes, which must inevitably of itself extinguish some species and bring new ones into being.