Transitional Cell Carcinoma: Options Beyond Nsaids Julie Marie Gillem, DVM, DACVIM (Oncology) Overview

Transitional Cell Carcinoma: Options Beyond Nsaids Julie Marie Gillem, DVM, DACVIM (Oncology) Overview

Transitional Cell Carcinoma: Options Beyond NSAIDs Julie Marie Gillem, DVM, DACVIM (Oncology) Overview ✦ Background ✦ Surgical Options ✦ Pathology ✦ Medical Options ✦ Location and staging ✦ Radiation Therapy ✦ Behavior Options ✦ Etiology and risk factors ✦ Palliative care ✦ Work up and diagnosis ✦ What about cats? Objectives ✦ How do we determine when NSAIDs fail? ✦ When should we intervene with surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and additional palliative care? Pathology ✦ ~2% of canine cancer ✦ Invasive transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) most common ✦ Others: SCC, adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, fibroma, and other mesenchymal tumors Location and Staging ✦ TCC in dogs most often found in the trigone of the bladder ✦ Series of 102 dogs at PUVTH ✦ Urethra and bladder in 56% ✦ Prostate involvement in 29% male dogs ✦ Lymph node mets in 16% at diagnosis ✦ Distant mets in 14% at diagnosis ✦ Distant mets in 50% at death Location ✦ TCC in dogs most often is found in the trigone region of the bladder. ✦ In a series of dogs with TCC examined at the PUVTH, the tumor involved the urethra as well as the bladder in 57 of 102 dogs (56%), and it involved the prostate in 11 of 38 (29%) male dogs. WHO Staging ✦ 78% T2 tumors ✦ 20% T3 tumors Biological Behavior ✦ At diagnosis: ✦ Regional lymph node metastasis in 12-46 % (Norris et al 1992, Knapp et al 2000, Blackburn et al 2013) ✦ Distant metastasis in 16- 23% (Norris et al 1992, Blackburn et al 2013) ✦ Distant metastasis in 50% at death (Norris et al 1992, Knapp et al 2000,) ✦ Locally aggressive! Etiology and Risk factors ✦ Identified risk factors : ✦ Exposure to topical insecticides and herbicides (Glickman et al 1989, Glickman et al 2004) ✦ Obesity (Glickman et al 1989) ✦ Possibly cyclophosphamide (Weller et al 1979, Macy et al 1983) ✦ Female gender (Knapp et al 2000, Mustaers et al 2003) ✦ Certain breeds (Knapp et al 2000) ✦ Vegetables may decrease risk (Raghavan et al 2005) Work Up and Diagnosis ✦ Initial Diagnostics ✦ Abdominal ultrasound ✦ Positive, or double contrast cystourethogram ✦ Chest radiographs Diagnosis ✦ Free Catch Cytospin (Knapp 2000) ✦ Traumatic catheterization±US guidance (Lamb 1996) ✦ Cystoscopy and surgical biopsy(Childress 2011) ✦ V-BTA test (Borjesson 1999) ✦ CADET BRAF Mutation detection assay (Mochizuki 2015) Diagnosis ✦ Caution with FNA Surgical Options ✦ Total cystectomy with re-routing of the urinary system ✦ Severe Complications ✦ 9/10 neurologic dysfunction ✦ 5/10 hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis ✦ 5/10 pyelonephritis ✦ Survival 1-5 months (MST not given) Kudnig and Seguin 2010 ✦ Not recommended due to the complications ✦ Attempted 1-2 cm margins ✦ 4/11 had microscopic dirty margins ✦ 9/11 dogs had tumor recurrence ✦ MST not evaluated ✦ En-bloc resection of trigone and proximal urethra discouraged due to major potential complications (incontinence, bladder necrosis) ✦ Technique involving complete resection of bladder neck, including trigone and proximal urethra, but preserving neurovascular pedicles to bladder and urethra ✦ Preserves LUT function and maintains continence ✦ ST for two dogs was 280 and 580 days ✦ Recurrence noted in both patients ✦ Continence achieved in both patients ✦ 37 dogs with partial cystectomy +/- additional therapies ✦ 60% had microscopic dirty margins ✦ 76% dogs had tumor recurrence ✦ Abdominal wall seeding in 11% ✦ PFI 235 d and MST 348 d ✦ MST for partial cystectomy + daily piroxicam +/- chemo- 772 d ✦ Non-trigonal location and frequency of piroxicam prognostic Cyto-reductive surgery ✦ Incomplete removal of a tumor (planned or unplanned) or debulking ✦ Removing 99.9% of 1-cm tumor (one billion cells) still leaves one million cancer cells ✦ Theoretical indication to enhance efficacy of other treatments ✦ Chemotherapy ✦ Radiation therapy ✦ Cryotherapy ✦ Few well-controlled clinical trials have shown benefit in vet med Surgical Debulking in TCC ✦ Surgical cure virtually impossible with “debulking” ✦ Various studies evaluate survival with surgery alone: ✦ Norris et al 1992: ✦ Survival dependent on perceived amount of tumor removed ✦ Determined location was important for prognosis ✦ 100% - MST 365 days ✦ 50-99% - MST 120 days ✦ <50% - MST 75 days ✦ Helfand et al 1994: ✦ MST - 86 days ✦ Data from the PCOP tumor registry: ✦ MST - 106 days Cyto-reductive Surgery with adjunctive therapy ✦ Norris et al 1992: ✦ MST for dogs with cytoreductive surgery and RT- 105 days ✦ MST for dogs with cytoreductive surgery and chemo- 30 days ✦ Knapp et al 2000: 102 dogs with TCC ✦ MST with surgical debulking plus medical therapy (piroxicam or chemotherapy) was 272 days ✦ MST for surgery for biopsy only plus medical therapy- 195 days ✦ MST for medical therapy alone- 150 days ✦ Josel et al 2002: 122 dogs with TCC ✦ MST with surgical debulking and chemo- 350 days ✦ MST with medical therapy alone- 207 days Cyto-reduction with a MIS approach ✦ Liptak et al 2004: Transurethral resection ✦ Not recommended in female dogs ✦ Upton et al 2006: CO2 laser ablation ✦ MST- 299 days ✦ Cerf et al 2012: Endoscopically utilized Diode laser ✦ MST 380 days Medical Options Medical Treatment ✦ COX inhibitors, chemotherapy, or combo ✦ Goal is palliation ✦ Can obtain remission or SD ✦ Therapy continued as long as TCC is controlled, SEs are acceptable, and QOL is good NSAIDs ✦ Inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) ✦ Useful palliative treatment for dogs with TCC ✦ Watch for GI toxicities: vomiting, melena, anorexia ✦ COX-2 inhibitors (i.e. deracoxib) may be a little safer Uremicfrost.com Piroxicam ✦ 62 dogs at PUVTH w/ single agent piroxicam for TCC ✦ 18% ORR including 2 CRs via cystography ✦ MST 195 days ✦ 2 dogs with CR lived 2.1 and 3.3 years COX-2 Inhibitors • 17% ORR via ultrasonography w/ consistent degree of bladder distention • MST 323 days • 8 dogs had received prior tx with piroxicam and/ or chemotherapy How Do We Determine When NSAIDs Fail? ✦ Majority of treatment is palliative ✦ Response endpoints: ✦ Progression or development of clinical signs ✦ Objective increase in tumor measurements ✦ Urinary obstruction Tumor Measurements ✦ Traditional ultrasonography may not be most reliable measure of response Chemotherapy ✦ Many combos of single agent chemotherapy and NSAIDs used ✦ Mitoxantrone and piroxicam one of most common ✦ Benefit of multi-agent chemotherapy protocols not yet determined Zazzle.com Study Results re: Medical Therapy of Transitional Cell Carcinoma in Dogs Metastasis Drug Dogs (#) (%) ORR (%) CR (%) PR (%) SD (%) PD (%) PFI (days) MST (days) Single Arm Trials Piroxicam 34 23 18 6 12 53 29 NA 181 Deracoxib 26/24 15 17 0 17 71 12 133 323 Mitoxantrone/ piroxicam 55/48 11 35 2 33 46 19 (194) 160 (350) 291 Vinblastine 28 28 36 0 36 50 14 122 147 Cisplatin (40-50 mg/m2)/ piroxicam 14 7 7 0 7 36 57 78 307 Carboplatin 14/12 28 0 0 0 8 92 41 132 Carboplatin/ piroxicam 31/29 19 38 0 38 45 17 NA 161 Intravesical Mitomycin C 13/12 0 42 0 42 58 0 120 223 Gemcitabine/ piroxicam 38/37 11 27 5 22 51 22 NA 230 Metronomic chlorambucil 31/30 32 3 0 3 67 30 119 221 Vinblastine (1.6 mg/m2)/ tocerinib (2.5-2.75 mg/kg) 5/10 20 40 0 40 60 0 NA NA Randomized Trials Cisplatin (60 mg/m2) 8 12 0 0 0 50 50 84 300 Cisplatin (60 mg/m2)/ piroxicam 14 43 14 14 57 28 0 124 246 Cisplatin (60 mg/m2) 15 33 13 0 13 53 27 87 338 Firocoxib 15 53 20 0 20 33 27 105 152 Cisplatin (60 mg/m2)/ firocoxib 14 29 57 0 57 21 0 186 179 Mitoxantrone/ piroxicam 26 8 8 0 8 69 23 106 248 Carboplatin/ piroxicam 24 41 13 0 13 54 33 74 263 Vinblastine (2.5 mg/m2) 27 11 58 0 58 33 8 143 407 Vinblastine (2.5 mg/m2)/ piroxicam 24 4 22 0 22 70 4 199 299 Retrospective Studies Doxorubicin/ piroxicam 34/23 29 9 0 9 60.5 30.5 103 168 Vinorelbine 14/12 0 14 0 14 57 14 93 187 Cisplatin (60 mg/m2) 18/16 33 19 0 19 25 56 75 130 Cistplatin (50 mg/m2) 15/12 40 25 0 25 50 25 NA 105 ✦ Nonrandomized one armed prospective clinical trial with 55 dogs ✦ 34.5% ORR via cystosonography ✦ Subjective improvement in 75% via owner observation ✦ PFI 194/ 160 days ✦ MST 350/ 291 days ✦ 9% ORR via cystosonography ✦ 1 dog had subjective response based on CSs and QOL, but no imaging ✦ PFI 103 days ✦ MST 168 days ✦ Well tolerated but modest response rates ✦ OS significantly improved in patients who underwent cytoreductive sx Platinums ✦ Cisplatin ✦ Higher reported remission rates (50-70%), but limited by renal damage ✦ ORR 57% with combination via cystography (13% for cisplatin alone and 20% for firocoxib alone) ✦ Renal and GI toxicosis common ✦ Carboplatin ✦ 38% ORR via cystography and cystosonography ✦ MST 161 days ✦ GI and hematologic toxicities; no renal toxicity ✦ No response difference between groups ✦ Mitoxantrone group (26): 8% PR and 69% SD ✦ Carboplatin group (24): 13% PR and 54% SD ✦ 106 d PFI for mitoxantrone versus 73.5 d PFI for carboplatin- not sign ✦ Prostatic involvement- shorter MST- 109 d vs 300 d (urethral), 190 d (trigonal), and 645 d (apical) ✦ 38 dogs evaluated ✦ 27% ORR via ultrasonography w/ consistent bladder distension and single ultrasonographer ✦ MST 230 days ✦ Limited adverse effects ✦ Prospective clinical trial of 28 dogs ✦ 18 dogs had tx prior to trial ✦ 36% ORR via ultrasonography w/ single ultrasonographer ✦ MST 147 days ✦ Maj. (27/28) did not have clinically relevant adverse effects ✦ Prospective and retrospective clinical trial with 14 dogs (13 relapsed, 1 naïve) ✦ 14% ORR via ultrasonography ✦ Subjective improvement in CSs in 11/14 ✦ Mild adverse effects ✦ PFI 93 days ✦ MST 187 days ✦ Dogs receiving dose reduction had MST of 130 d vs 222 d ✦ 8 dogs received additional tx after, but no

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    76 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us