Courtesy of University of Press California Courtesy of University PETER BOAG The Trouble with Cross- Dressers Researching and Writing the History of Sexual and Gender Transgressiveness in the Nineteenth-Century American West FOR NEARLY A DECADE, I have been researching and writing about women who dressed and lived as men and men who lived and dressed as women in the nineteenth-century American West. During that time, when people asked me about my work, my response was invariably met with a quizzical expression and then the inevitable question: “Were there really such people?” Newspapers document hundreds, in fact, and it is likely there were many more. Historians have been writing about cross-dressers for some time, and we know that such people have existed in all parts of the world and for about as long as we have recorded and remembered history.1 Nevertheless, in general, people do not associate cross-dressing, or at least certain elements of what it might imply, with the historic American West. Images of gun-toting, tobacco-chewing, buckskin-clad Calamity Jane may come to mind, but most people will not expect that women who actually thought themselves to be men and men who dressed and lived as women were present in the nineteenth-century West, a place and time that resonates with manly men and womanly women! Over the years, western historians have smashed such gendered stereotypes, laboring long and hard to produce a remarkably rich literature on the multi-faceted gendered lives of women in western history. Recently, historians have also started to critically dissect the Historian Peter Boag’s Re-Dressing America’s Frontier Past will be published this many nuances of western masculinity. That literature paints a considerably fall by the University of California Press. It is the outcome of his years of research on more complex gendered world of the Old West than do the standard stereo- the Old West’s men who dressed and lived as women and women who dressed and types. And yet, such literature has largely remained silent on the complicated lived as men. OHQ vol. 112, no. 3 © 011 Oregon Historical Society Boag, The Trouble with Cross-Dressers gender identities that cross-dressing have shown, for example, that in the not-too-distant past, people in western 189 , 1 might expose. civilization understood that there was only one sex and that male and female In October of this year, the Uni- simply occupied different gradations on a single scale. That at one time the , January , versity of California Press will release western world held to a one-sex or one-gender model, but later developed my book Re-Dressing America’s a two-sex or two-gender model, clearly shows that social conceptualization Frontier Past. It is a history of cross- of gender, sex, and even sexuality changes over time. This reveals a problem dressing, broadly conceived, from that confronts historians: it is anachronistic to impose our present-day terms roughly the time of the California and concepts for and about gender and sexuality — such as transgender — Gold Rush to just after the last of onto the past. Decatur, Illinois, Daily Review Illinois, Decatur, the western (continental) territories In Re-Dressing America’s Frontier Past, I therefore strove to avoid the term became states. It explores the lives of transgender as much as possible. It is central to my study, however, to show people who cross-dressed and did so that people in the nineteenth century had their own concepts and expres- for multiple reasons — some to com- sions for gender fluidity. By the end of the nineteenth century, for example, mit or escape detection for crimes; sexologists (medical doctors and scientists who study sex) had created the some, notably women, to more easily terms “sex invert” and “sexual inversion” to refer to people whose sexual and safely travel through the region; desires and gender presentations (that is, the way they walked and talked, some for matters related to gaining the clothing they wanted to wear, and so forth) did not, according to social employment; and some because they views, conform to what their physiological sex should “naturally” dictate. identified themselves as people of Sexologists and much of the public accepted that, for example, the sexual the other sex. I encountered a variety desire for a female, the longing to wear pants, and a certain manly swagger of troubles in producing this book: in the walk were all feelings and traits that sprang forth from the male body. deciding on appropriate terminol- If a man had sexual desires for another man — a feminine trait — he also (it ogy for the diversity of cross-dressers was supposed) wished to dress in women’s clothing and had other feminine Flora Quick, a native of the Ozark I uncovered, turning up records characteristics. The German jurist and sex reformer Karl Heinrich Ulrichs Mountains, became Tom King and about such people, and conceiving (1825–189), whose writings influenced sexologists of his day, described such terrorized Oklahoma Territory’s South Canadian River region for years. my project in what amounts to a people as males born with female souls. Apparently addicted to all sorts of historiographical vacuum on the Late-nineteenth-century sexologists applied “sexual inversion” broadly crimes, she was best known as a horse topic for the American West. These to people who, as the years passed, later became identified distinctly and thief. She turned to male clothing various issues, moreover, impinged separately as transgender, transsexual, transvestite, and homosexual. The for disguise; it often helped her elude on each other. word transsexual emerged during the 190s and 190s, as developments in authorities. Quick was a western A central argument of my book is medical technology allowed individuals who felt they had the wrong body cross-dresser whose life newspapers that many nineteenth-century west- to surgically change those bodies to comport with their feelings. Although sensationalized and, whether true or ern Americans who cross-dressed transsexual overlaps with transgender, transgender is somewhat more not, heterosexualized by linking her with a male lover who also turned did so to express their transgender comprehensive in scope; it includes people who may feel themselves to desperado. identity. Transgender is a term coined have a gender “opposite” of what their bodies might indicate but who are only during the last quarter of the unable, or simply do not want, to change their bodies. Transgender people twentieth century. It refers to people might also identify as neither female nor male. Transvestite typically refers who identify with the gender (female to someone who, for reasons unrelated to gender and sexual identity, gains or male) “opposite” of what society would typically assign to their bodies. emotional sustenance by dressing as the “opposite” sex; the concept began to I place “opposite” in quotation marks because the notion that female and emerge in the scientific literature during the first few years of the twentieth male are somehow diametric to each other is a historical creation; scholars century, but it took many years to catch on. The word homosexual appeared OHQ vol. 112, no. 3 Boag, The Trouble with Cross-Dressers 189 at the same time as did sex invert; believed such coexistence was possible. Likewise does the amalgamated , 8 through at least the first quarter of name “Samrah,” which papers even more derisively employed for Sam Pol- the twentieth century, the two terms lard when they learned that his given name was Sarah. This clearly shows, , October October , were used interchangeably. Slowly, moreover, that everyday people did not merely receive ideas about sexuality during the early twentieth century, and gender from sexologists. Rather, they had their own views and opinions homosexual came to relate specifically on these matters. These sometimes challenged, sometimes reinforced, and to sexual desire rather than, like sex sometimes altered scientific understandings. invert, to gender presentation and In Re-Dressing America’s Frontier Past, I explore the meaning, cogency, identity. Homosexual came to mean and usage of period terms such as queer, sex invert, man-woman, and What- that a woman, for example, who had is-it. But as with transgender, although for different reasons, I avoided Stockton, California, Evening Mail Evening California, Stockton, sexual desires for another woman consistently applying those terms to the subjects of my book; even though did not necessarily also have other they are accurate for the era, they have negative connotations. Many people “manly” traits; rather, she could be a who dressed as the “opposite” sex in the Old West, furthermore, did so for fully “feminine” woman in the eyes matters of expediency, safety, and employment and not because of identity; of society. therefore referring to them as sex inverts, for example, is simply inaccurate. The late-nineteenth-century sci- Instead, I chose the more neutral term cross-dresser. It is convenient for its ence concept of sex invert percolated capaciousness but useful only to a point. The term was not used in that exact down to broader society. Consider iteration during the nineteenth century; sources more commonly referred, Born Elvira Virginia Mugarietta the case of Eugene de Forest in Los rather, to a woman who was “dressed in male attire” and a man who was in San Francisco in 1869, Jack Angeles. By all reports, de Forest had “dressed in female attire.” Too, cross-dressing implies that when one does Garland (who the press sometimes the body of a woman, but he consid- dress and behave as a person of the “opposite” sex, that person is attempting affectionately called Babe Bean) lived in the Bay Area until his death ered himself to be a man, dressing and to cross (at least in appearance, if not in identity) from one sex and gender in 1936.