AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN OPERATIVE IN PART PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 42 (Private) Auckland Regional Landfill : Wayby Valley SUMMARY OF DECISIONS REQUESTED Enclosed: • Explanation • Summary of Decisions Requested Explanation • You may make a “further submission” to support or oppose any submission already received (see summaries that follow). • You should use Form 6. • Your further submission must be received by 3 September 2020. • Send a copy of your further submission to the original submitter as soon as possible after submitting it to the Council. Summary of Decisions Requested Plan Change 42 (Private) - Auckland Regional Landfill Wayby Valley Summary of Decisions Requested Sub Sub # Point Submitter Name Address for Service Summary 1 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn 2 2.1 Robyn Lorraine Brown [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 3 3.1 Richard Brown [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 4 4.1 Elizabeth Ann Foster [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 5 5.1 Lyn Morrison [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 6 6.1 Yvette Urlich [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 7 7.1 Mary-Jane and John Appleby [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification No Mega Landfill In Dome Valley facebook page 8 8.1 c/- Alton Crisp [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 9 9.1 Daniel Mohr [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 10 10.1 Gaylene Gaffney [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 11 11.1 Graham Conroy Harris [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 12 12.1 Stop the tip, save the dome c/- Jacquie Stokes [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 13 13.1 Richard Griffiths [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification Council should work to reduce sedimentation of the Hoteo River and Kaipara Harbour through land 13 13.2 Richard Griffiths [email protected] purchases, reforestation, and planting river banks. 14 14.1 Bins R Us c/- Richard Holt [email protected] Accept the Plan Modification Add criteria to I617.9 to ensure that any potential effects on the Kaipara Harbour (including sedimentation and lechate) are the matter of further research and reporting (including possible compensation or bond amounts) 15 15.1 Kaipara District Council [email protected] when considering a resource consent for a landfill. 1 of 40 Plan Change 42 (Private) - Auckland Regional Landfill Wayby Valley Summary of Decisions Requested Sub Sub # Point Submitter Name Address for Service Summary Add a condition to the Plan Change to require the preparation and implementation of a Construction Traffic Management Plan in relation to Crowther Rd and its 15 15.2 Kaipara District Council [email protected] intersection with SH1. Add criteria to I617.9 to require further information that assesses the potential ecnomic effects on the Kaipara economy - particularly transport of goods and services, road safety/congestion, and the potential clean up costs 15 15.3 Kaipara District Council [email protected] associated with a catastophic event. 16 16.1 Michael Gerard Sweetman [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 17 17.1 The Board Limited c/- Tony Edmonds [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 18 18.1 Debra Searchfield [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 19 19.1 David Cunningham [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 20 20.1 Kerry Allen [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 21 21.1 Bridget Moir [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 22 22.1 Sami Meyers [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 23 23.1 David Smith [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 24 24.1 William Foster [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification If the plan change is not declined, as alternative relief the plan change should be amended to provide fair and sufficient mitigation and compensation (as outlined in the 24 24.2 William Foster [email protected] submission) to communities in the proposed area. 25 25.1 Hans Peter Ottow [email protected] Accept the Plan Modification 2 of 40 Plan Change 42 (Private) - Auckland Regional Landfill Wayby Valley Summary of Decisions Requested Sub Sub # Point Submitter Name Address for Service Summary 26 26.1 James Isaacs [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 27 27.1 Thomas Ian Macfarlane [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 28 28.1 Wendy Sheffield [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 29 29.1 Matt Lomas [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 29 29.2 Matt Lomas [email protected] Convert the site to water reservoirs. 30 30.1 Julie Cook [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 31 31.1 Grant Agnew [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 32 32.1 Kenneth William Harcombe c/- Ken Harcombe [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 33 33.1 Kipi Sarich [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 34 34.1 Ruth Lois Minton [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification Environs Holding Ltd environmental subsidy of Te 35 35.1 Uri o Hau Settlement Trust c/- Fiona Kemp [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification If the plan change is not declined, as alternative relief the plan change should be amended to address the environmental effects (outlined in the submission) as Environs Holding Ltd environmental subsidy of Te well as cultural and environment mitigation, offsetting, 35 35.2 Uri o Hau Settlement Trust c/- Fiona Kemp [email protected] and compensation. 36 36.1 Colin Graham Minton [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 37 37.1 Lemon Tree Bay Partnership c/- Greg Martin [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification Waste Management NZ Limited 38 38.1 c/- Rachel Signal-Ross [email protected] Accept the Plan Modification 39 39.1 Susan Debra Thorne Speedy [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 40 40.1 Denise Civil & Ian Civil [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 41 41.1 Rohan Arlidge [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 42 42.1 Lisa Outwin [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 3 of 40 Plan Change 42 (Private) - Auckland Regional Landfill Wayby Valley Summary of Decisions Requested Sub Sub # Point Submitter Name Address for Service Summary 43 43.1 Kate Leslie [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification 44 44.1 Anna Ingham [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification Ngati Whatua Orakei c/- Renata Blair and [email protected] 45 45.1 c/- Andrew Brown [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification Provide Ngati Whatua Orakei the opportunity to co- create a partnership that will assist our communities to Ngati Whatua Orakei c/- Renata Blair and [email protected] manage waste in a way that puts Papatuanuku and our 45 45.2 c/- Andrew Brown [email protected] community at the centre of decision making. If the plan change is not declined, then substantial amendments to the description, objectives, policies, Ngati Whatua Orakei c/- Renata Blair and [email protected] methods, and rules to address adverse effects on the 45 45.3 c/- Andrew Brown [email protected] whenua and awa of the Kaipara Harbour. If the plan change is not declined, then substantial amendments to the description, objectives, policies, methods, and rules to address adverse effects on the Ngati Whatua Orakei c/- Renata Blair and [email protected] exercise of kaitiakitanga by mana whenua iwi, hapu and 45 45.4 c/- Andrew Brown [email protected] whanau. If the plan change is not declined, then substantial amendments to the description, objectives, policies, Ngati Whatua Orakei c/- Renata Blair and [email protected] methods, and rules to address adverse effects on future 45 45.5 c/- Andrew Brown [email protected] generations. If the plan change is not declined, then substantial amendments to the description, objectives, policies, methods, and rules to address adverse effects on the Ngati Whatua Orakei c/- Renata Blair and [email protected] exercise of rahui by mana whenua iwi, hapu and 45 45.6 c/- Andrew Brown [email protected] whenua. 4 of 40 Plan Change 42 (Private) - Auckland Regional Landfill Wayby Valley Summary of Decisions Requested Sub Sub # Point Submitter Name Address for Service Summary If the plan change is not declined, then substantial amendments to the description, objectives, policies, Ngati Whatua Orakei c/- Renata Blair and [email protected] methods, and rules to address adverse effects on the 45 45.7 c/- Andrew Brown [email protected] terrestrial, aquatic and esturarine environments. If the plan change is not declined, then substantial amendments to the description, objectives, policies, Ngati Whatua Orakei c/- Renata Blair and [email protected] methods, and rules to address adverse effects on 45 45.8 c/- Andrew Brown [email protected] climatic destruction. If the plan change is not declined, then substantial amendments to the description, objectives, policies, Ngati Whatua Orakei c/- Renata Blair and [email protected] methods, and rules to address adverse effects on 45 45.9 c/- Andrew Brown [email protected] natural character and landscape. If the plan change is not declined, then substantial amendments to the description, objectives, policies, methods, and rules to address adverse effects on Ngati Whatua Orakei c/- Renata Blair and [email protected] communities in close proximity to the landfill, in relation 45 45.10 c/- Andrew Brown [email protected] to traffic, amenity, odour and noise. 46 46.1 Jung Hee Kwak [email protected] Decline the Plan Modification