Hegel's Philosophy of Science in Light of the Question of Naturalism

Hegel's Philosophy of Science in Light of the Question of Naturalism

Metascience as Self-Knowledge: Hegel’s Philosophy of Science in Light of the Question of Naturalism von der Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften und Philosophie der Universität Leipzig genehmigte D I S S E R T A T I O N zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Philosophie Dr. phil. vorgelegt von M.A. Roi Bar geboren am 28.05.1978 in Aschkelon, Israel Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Neuser Tag der Verleihung: 21.07.2017 Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 7 1. IS THERE A PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE IN HEGEL’S ‘SYSTEM’? .............. 18 1.1 The formal hermeneutical problem ......................................................................... 19 1.1.1 The absence of an explicit ‘philosophy of science’ .......................................... 19 1.1.2 Two meanings of philosophy of science ........................................................... 21 1.2 The conceptual-historical problem .......................................................................... 26 1.2.1 The pseudoproblem of anachronism ................................................................. 26 1.2.2 The anti-Hegelian philosophy of science .......................................................... 29 1.3 The concrete research problem ............................................................................... 38 1.3.1 The young ‘anti-scientific’ Hegel ..................................................................... 39 1.3.2 Phenomenology of Spirit does not seem to be philosophy of science .............. 43 1.3.3 The Logic does not seem to be philosophy of science ...................................... 48 1.4. Transition: Hegel’s “theory of knowledge” and “science theory” ....................... 49 2. THE DEBATE ON HEGEL’S NATURALISM ....................................................... 54 2.1 Hegel’s ‘naturalistic turn’ ........................................................................................ 55 2.2 Hegel as a naturalist: nature lover and natural historian ..................................... 56 2.3 Refutation of naturalism in Hegel ........................................................................... 57 2.3.1 Ontological naturalism ...................................................................................... 58 2.3.2 Methodological naturalism ............................................................................... 62 2.3.3 Epistemological naturalism ............................................................................... 66 2.3.3.1 The psychologistic approach: science as a natural phenomenon (Quine) . 68 2.3.3.2 The behaviorist approach: knowledge as a natural kind (Kornblith) ........ 76 2.4 Naturalistic readings of Hegel and their deficiencies............................................. 84 2.4.1 Naturalism about the mental ............................................................................. 84 2.4.1.1 Spirit as “powers within nature” (Beiser) ................................................. 84 2.4.1.2 The “biological needs” of self-consciousness (Westphal) ........................ 88 3 2.4.1.3 “Disenchanted” naturalism: natural freedom of natural mind (Pinkard) .. 93 2.4.2 Social naturalism (Tesla) .................................................................................. 98 2.4.3 A note on Husserl’s critique of Hegel ............................................................. 102 2.5 Hegel’s non-naturalistic concept of nature ........................................................... 104 2.5.1 Nature as the idea ............................................................................................ 105 2.5.2 The natural as the initial and the common ...................................................... 110 2.5.3 Nature as a riddle ............................................................................................ 112 2.6 In between conclusions ........................................................................................... 115 2.7 What is not science? Transition to Hegel’s non-naturalistic concept of science through his critique of physiognomy and phrenology ............................................... 117 3. APPROACHING HEGEL’S CONCEPT OF SCIENCE ...................................... 120 3.1 What science is not .................................................................................................. 120 3.1.1 Science is not knowledge by acquaintance: the case of anatomy ................... 120 3.1.2 Science is not purely empirical: against Baconian and Humean empiricism . 127 3.1.3 Science is not rationalizing: alteration in Hegel’s concept of science ............ 131 3.2 Overcoming the Kantian concept of science ......................................................... 133 3.3 Science as Geist ........................................................................................................ 140 3.3.1 Science as the “crown of a world of Spirit” .................................................... 140 3.3.2 The twofold meaning of the science of Geist ................................................. 144 3.3.3 On the translation of Geist .............................................................................. 147 3.4 On the translation of Wissenschaft ........................................................................ 149 3.4.1 A preliminary note on the problem of translating Wissenschaft as science .... 149 3.4.2 The translation of Wissenschaft as Science in upper case............................... 151 3.4.3 The synecdoche of science: from ‘knowledge’ to ‘natural knowledge’ ......... 153 3.5 What is science? ...................................................................................................... 156 3.5.1 Self-knowledge ............................................................................................... 156 3.5.2 System ............................................................................................................. 160 3.5.3 Becoming ........................................................................................................ 162 3.5.4 Truth................................................................................................................ 166 3.5.5 Form of concept .............................................................................................. 169 3.5.6 Science of god? ............................................................................................... 174 3.6 How to begin in science? ......................................................................................... 177 4 3.6.1 No fear ............................................................................................................ 178 3.6.1 Antifoundationalism ....................................................................................... 183 3.6.3 The ladder ....................................................................................................... 190 3.7 On Hegel’s realism .................................................................................................. 193 3.8 Hegel’s possible response to Kuhn’s concept of science ..................................... 198 4. HEGEL’S TASK OF SCIENTIFYING PHILOSOPHY ....................................... 206 4.1 Hegel’s task: scientism? .......................................................................................... 206 4.2 On the origin of Hegel’s task: episteme as noesis noeseos .................................... 213 4.2.1 Scientifying philosophy begins in Plato ......................................................... 213 4.2.2 Scientifying philosophy is completed in Aristotle .......................................... 217 4.3 The triggers for the task ......................................................................................... 221 4.3.1 Fichte’s unsatisfactory “doctrine of science” .................................................. 224 4.3.2 Two romantic conceptions of knowledge ....................................................... 229 4.3.2.1 Jacobi’s faith in “immediate knowledge” ............................................... 229 4.3.2.2 Schelling’s “intellectual intuition” and his “Sunday’s children” ............ 234 4.4 On the realization of the task ................................................................................. 241 4.4.1 First realization: the renewed concept of phenomenology ............................. 241 4.4.2 Second realization: “pure” and “real” science ................................................ 247 4.5 Criticisms of Hegel’s task ....................................................................................... 249 4.5.1 Philosophy is not science ................................................................................ 250 4.5.2 Humanities is not science ................................................................................ 255 4.5.3 Some philosophers are not professors ............................................................. 258 4.5.4 Hegel’s Eurocentrism...................................................................................... 259 4.5.5 The death of philosophy.................................................................................. 262 5. FINAL THOUGHTS .................................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    285 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us