Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation and Visible Light on the Development of Encapsulated Molluscan Embryos

Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation and Visible Light on the Development of Encapsulated Molluscan Embryos

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 268: 151–160, 2004 Published March 9 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Effects of ultraviolet radiation and visible light on the development of encapsulated molluscan embryos Rachel Przeslawski1,*, Andrew R. Davis1, Kirsten Benkendorff2 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia 2Department of Biological Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia ABSTRACT: Benthic egg masses laid in intertidal habitats are exposed to numerous environmental stresses including potentially damaging ultraviolet radiation (UVR). We sought to determine the developmental effects of UVR and visible light on molluscan embryos within egg masses from habi- tats with differential UVR exposure. Capsular and gelatinous egg masses from 23 marine gastropod species were collected from 3 intertidal habitats: (1) full sun, (2) partial shade, and (3) full shade. Egg masses were then divided among 4 spectral treatments: full spectrum, no UV-B, no UV, and dark. An ANOVA confirmed that a significant interaction between original habitat and spectral treatment affected mortality. Egg masses from full shade habitats showed significant vulnerability to UVR and visible light and had a higher overall mortality than other egg masses. Egg masses that were origi- nally partially shaded did not show any significant mortality differences among spectral treatments, but highest mortalities occurred in full spectrum treatments while lowest mortalities occurred in dark treatments. Egg masses from full sun habitats showed no significant mortality differences between spectral treatments, which is consistent with protection against the harmful effects of UVR. In addi- tion, the encapsulation period of egg masses in the dark was longer than the other 3 light treatments irrespective of habitat. KEY WORDS: Mollusc · Egg mass · Capsule · Ultraviolet radiation · Invertebrate reproduction Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION posed of an insoluble jelly matrix in which numerous eggs surrounded by vitelline capsules are embedded. Some intertidal organisms protect their offspring from Egg masses of some species may protect the embryos the harsh conditions of their environment by enclosing from various stresses (reviewed by Pechenik 1979 and them within benthic egg masses. Molluscs, in particular, Przeslawski 2004) such as predation (Rawlings 1990), often employ complex structures to contain their devel- bacterial infection (Benkendorff et al. 2001), desiccation oping offspring. Gastropod encapsulating structures can (Strathmann & Hess 1999), temperature variations be divided into 2 general categories: capsular and gelati- (Podolsky & Hoffmann 1998) and changes in salinity nous. Capsular egg masses have discrete capsules with (Pechenik 1982). Molluscan embryos are also potentially rigid external walls that encase embryos within an in- vulnerable to ultraviolet radiation from sunlight, but tracapsular fluid. These egg masses can be further sub- research on the effects of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on divided into those of neogastropods, which encase their molluscan egg masses is currently limited to a small offspring in a leathery walled capsule, and those of ner- number of species (e.g. Biermann et al. 1992, Rawlings itids, which encase their embryos in a rigid calcareous 1996) of which only Aplysia dactylomela shows evidence capsule. In contrast, gelatinous egg masses are com- of UVR protection (Carefoot et al. 1998). *Email: [email protected] © Inter-Research 2004 · www.int-res.com 152 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268: 151–160, 2004 UVR at the earth’s surface comprises UV-A (320 to Biologically harmful UVR can penetrate more than 400 nm) and UV-B (280 to 320 nm). UV-B is particularly 20 m below the ocean’s surface (Karentz & Lutze 1990, deleterious and can negatively affect reproduction, Booth & Morrow 1997). Thus, even submerged egg development, and behavior in many organisms includ- masses in the intertidal and subtidal zones can be sub- ing marine invertebrates (reviewed by Haeder et al. jected to potentially harmful levels of UVR. Marine 1998, Rodriguez et al. 2000, Kuffner 2001). Previous molluscs and other invertebrates may avoid exposure to studies indicate that in some encapsulated molluscan UVR by depositing egg masses in shaded habitats. embryos, UVR exposure can cause stunted develop- Many molluscs, particularly nudibranchs and neogas- ment, deformities, and death (Biermann 1992, Rawl- tropods, always lay their egg masses in habitats shaded ings 1996, Carefoot et al. 1998). Some species, how- from light including UVR (Biermann et al. 1992, Benk- ever, may be less susceptible to the negative effects of endorff & Davis 2003) (Table 1). Other species, particu- UVR. A surge of recent interest in declining amphibian larly many Aplysia spp. lay in both shaded habitats and populations has revealed a striking species-specific areas exposed to sunlight (authors’ pers. obs.). In turn, difference in the vulnerability of eggs and embryos to certain species consistently lay in areas exposed to full the harmful effects of UVR (e.g. Blaustein, 1994). In sunlight so their egg masses are barraged daily by UVR fact, population-specific vulnerability has recently (Creese 1980, Benkendorff & Davis 2003). Given the been documented in both terrestrial (Belden & thinning of the ozone layer and the potential negative Blaustein 2002) and subtidal marine organisms (Glea- effects of increased UVR, we sought to assess the vul- son & Wellington 1995) where populations in habitats nerability of those species laying in habitats with ele- with high levels of UVR showed decreased vulnerabil- vated UVR. Here, we use cut-off filters to modify the ity than populations occurring in environments with quality of the incident radiation and to examine effects low UVR. Our aim was to similarly examine the on embryonic mortality and encapsulation period for 23 response of organisms that lay in differentially UVR- molluscan species drawn from habitats exposed to full exposed habitats in the marine intertidal environment. sun, partial sun, and full shade. Table 1. Egg masses used in this study with number of replicate egg masses (n) used in the analyses for mortality and encapsu- lation period. –: hatching analysis does not include that species, because hatching in all spectral treatments did not occur for any replicate egg mass. Refer to ‘Introduction’ for classification definitions for habitat and type Superorder Order/infraorder Species n (mortality) n (hatching) Habitat Type Neritopsina Neritodoidea Nerita atramentosa 3 n/a Full sun Capsular Caenogastropoda Naticidea Conuber speciesa 77Full sun Gelatinous Naticid sand collar 5 5 Part shade Gelatinous Littorinimorpha Bembicium nanum 77Full sun Gelatinous Neogastropoda Agnewia tritoniformis 5–Shade Capsular Lepsiella reticulara 2–Shade Capsular Mitra carbonaria 6–Shade Capsular Heterobranchia Basommatophora Siphonaria denticulata 77Full sun Gelatinous Siphonaria zelandica 66Full sun Gelatinous Cephalaspidea Bullina lineata 55Part shade Gelatinous Hydatina physis 75Part shade Gelatinous Anaspidea Aplysia juliana 32Part shade Gelatinous Aplysia sydneyensis 32Part shade Gelatinous Bursatella leachii b 55Part shade Gelatinous Dolabrifera brazieri 66Shade Gelatinous Stylocheilus striatusb 65Part shade Gelatinous Notaspidea Pleurobranchus sp. 1 1 – Shade Gelatinous Pleurobranchus sp. 2 1 1 Shade Gelatinous Sacoglossa Oxynoe viridis 21Part shade Gelatinous Nudibranchia Austraeolis ornata 32Shade Gelatinous Dendrodoris fumata 3–Shade Gelatinous Hypselodoris obscurab 3–Shade Gelatinous Platyodoris galbanni 3–Shade Gelatinous aEgg masses are from Polinices sordidus, P. conicum, and/or P. melastomum which are indistinguishable from each other bEgg masses collected from adults held in aquaria Przeslawski et al.: UVR effects on molluscan embryos 153 MATERIALS AND METHODS different parental characteristics and developmental stages. Capsular masses were divided into 4 groups Egg mass collection. Egg masses from 23 marine each containing at least 2 discrete capsules. Many cap- gastropod species were collected from intertidal habi- sules abruptly changed colour soon after collection. tats along the Illawarra coast, New South Wales, Aus- These capsules were not used because such colour tralia, during the low spring tides of September 2001 to change indicates stress and possible impending death April 2002 (Table 1). All collection sites were rocky (Pechenik 1982, authors’ pers. obs.). Gelatinous masses intertidal reefs with the exception of 1 estuarine mud- were cut into 4 pieces, and weights were recorded flat. Most egg masses were identified according to pre- after gentle blotting. Preliminary studies revealed that vious research (Hurst 1967, Rose 1985, Smith et al. embryos at the edges of cut areas still developed nor- 1989), but with certain species, identification of a lay- mally. Each capsular group or gelatinous piece was ing adult was the only way to identify the egg mass to then placed within one of four 25 × 18.5 cm shallow species level. A few egg masses were obtained from plastic containers representing each spectral treatment adults that laid in laboratory aquaria within a week of by using spectral cut-off filters as lids (Fig. 1): (1) full captivity (Table 1). Many neogastropod and aplysiad spectrum control using no filter, (2) UV-B cut-off filter species communally

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us