Physical Implementations of Quantum Computing

Physical Implementations of Quantum Computing

Physical implementations of quantum computing Andrew Daley Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Pittsburgh Overview (Review) Introduction • DiVincenzo Criteria • Characterising coherence times Survey of possible qubits and implementations • Neutral atoms • Trapped ions • Colour centres (e.g., NV-centers in diamond) • Electron spins (e.g,. quantum dots) • Superconducting qubits (charge, phase, flux) • NMR • Optical qubits • Topological qubits Back to the DiVincenzo Criteria: Requirements for the implementation of quantum computation 1. A scalable physical system with well characterized qubits 1 | i 0 | i 2. The ability to initialize the state of the qubits to a simple fiducial state, such as |000...⟩ 1 | i 0 | i 3. Long relevant decoherence times, much longer than the gate operation time 4. A “universal” set of quantum gates control target (single qubit rotations + C-Not / C-Phase / .... ) U U 5. A qubit-specific measurement capability D. P. DiVincenzo “The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation”, Fortschritte der Physik 48, p. 771 (2000) arXiv:quant-ph/0002077 Neutral atoms Advantages: • Production of large quantum registers • Massive parallelism in gate operations • Long coherence times (>20s) Difficulties: • Gates typically slower than other implementations (~ms for collisional gates) (Rydberg gates can be somewhat faster) • Individual addressing (but recently achieved) Quantum Register with neutral atoms in an optical lattice 0 1 | | Requirements: • Long lived storage of qubits • Addressing of individual qubits • Single and two-qubit gate operations • Array of singly occupied sites • Qubits encoded in long-lived internal states (alkali atoms - electronic states, e.g., hyperfine) • Single-qubit via laser/RF field coupling • Entanglement via Rydberg gates or via controlled collisions in a spin-dependent lattice Rb: Group II Atoms 87Sr (I=9/2): Extensively developed, 1 • P1 e.g., optical clocks 3 • Degenerate gases of Yb, Ca,... P2 3 • Stable lasers, especially for clock P1 transition frequency 3 P0 689nm 1 Key properties S0 • Metastable triplet states: 3 - P0 Lifetimes >150s (Fermions) 3 - P1 linewidth ~ kHz 3 - P2 lifetime >>150s • Many nuclear spin levels for fermionic isotopes • Nuclear spin states decoupled from electronic state on clock transition Quantum Computing with Alkaline Earth Atoms 87Sr (I=9/2): 1 Implementation of Quantum Computing: P1 • Nuclear spin states for qubit storage 3 P2 (insensitive to magnetic field fluctuations) 3 P1 D. Hayes, P. S. Julienne, and I. H. Deutsch, 3 PRL 98, 070501 (2007) P0 I. Reichenbach and I. H. Deutsch, PRL 99, 123001 (2007). 689nm • Electronic state for: - Access to qubits 1 S0 - Gate operations HERE: Via state-dependent lattices A. J. Daley, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 170504 (2008) AC Polarisability (AC-Stark Shift per intensity) for 87Sr Ye, Kimble, & Katori, Science 320, 1734 (2008). 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 2 3 4 2 3 to states in the long-lived P2 manifold. As shown schematically in Fig. 1, we would transfer qubit states 3 |0" and |1" to the P0 level (which can be done state- selectively in a large magnetic field due to the differ- 1 3 ential Zeeman shift of 109Hz/G between S0 and P0), and2 then selectively transfer them to additional readout 3 87 Polarizability and State-dependent lattices: levels |0x" and |1x" in the P2 level (e.g., for Sr we 3 3 to states in the long-lived P2 manifold. As showncould choose |0x"≡| P2,F =13/2,mF = −13/2" and 3 schematically in Fig. 1, we would transfer qubit states|1x"≡| P2,F =13/2,mF = −11/2", where F is the 3 total angular momentum and mF the magnetic sublevel, |0" and |1" to the P0 level (which can be done state- 3 and connect these states to the P0 level via off-resonant selectively in a large magnetic field due to the differ- 3 1 3 Raman coupling to a S1 level). The individual qubit se- ential Zeeman shift of 109Hz/G between S0 and P0), 3 lectivity can be based on a gradient magnetic field, as P2 and then selectively transfer them to additional readout 3 1 3 87 is much more sensitive to magnetic fields P0 or S0.A levels |0x" and |1x" in the P level (e.g., for Sr we2 2 gradient field of 100 G/cm will provide an energy gradient could choose |0x"≡|3P ,F =13/2,m = −13/2" and 2 3 F 3 to states in the long-lived P2 manifold. As shownof 410 MHz/cm for |0x" or an energy difference of about FIG.|1 2:x"≡ (a) Energy| P2,F level=13 diagram/2,mF showing= −11 how/2", independent where F is the schematically3P in Fig. 1, we would transfer qubit states 0 3 1 3 15kHz between atoms in neighbouring sites. In the same optical lattices can be|0 produced" and |1" to for the theP0 levelS0 (whichand canP0 belevels done state- total angular momentum and mF the magnetic sublevel,field the 3P level states will be shifted by −m × 1Hz in by finding wavelengthsselectively where the in polarisability a large3 magnetic of field each due of to th thee differ- 0 I and connect these states to the P0 level via o1ff-resonant3 ential Zeeman shift of 109Hz/G between S0 and P0neighbouring), sites, which again indicates the advantage levels is zero and the other1 non-zero.3 (b) AC Polarisability 1 Raman3 couplingand toS then a0 S selectively1 level). transfer The them individual to additional qubitreadout se- of S0 and P0 levels near 627nm. (c) AC polarisability3 of87 of storing qubits on the nuclear spin states. This selec- 1 3 levels |0x" and |1x" in the P2 level (e.g., for Sr3 we lectivity can be based on a gradient3 magnetic field, as P2 S0 and P0 levels nearcould 689nm. choose (d)|0x"≡ AC| P polarisability2,F =13/2,mF of= − dif-13/2" andtively can be used to transfer atoms site-dependently to 3 3 3 1 ferentism muchF sublevels more of sensitive| the1x"≡P| 2P, to2F,F magnetic=13=13//22,m hyperfineF fields= −11/2" levelP, where0 or forFSis0.A thethe transport lattice, or to read out qubits by transfer- π−polarisedgradient light field at of 627nm 100total G/cm angular and 689.2nm. momentum will provide and m anF the energy magnetic gradient sublevel, 3 3 ring only the |0" state to P2, then making fluorescence and connect these states to the P0 level via off-resonant 3 of 410 MHz/cmRaman for |0 couplingx" or an to a energyS1 level). di Thefference individual of qubit about se-measurements (e.g., using the cycling transition between FIG. 2: (a) Energy level diagram showing how independent lectivity can be based on a gradient magnetic field, as 3P 3 3 1 3 15kHz between atoms in neighbouring sites. In the samethe2 P2,F =13/2 and D3 manifold). optical lattices can be produced for the S0 and P0 levels 3 1 field the 3P levelis much states more will sensitive be shifted to magnetic by fields−mP30×or1HzS0.A in by finding wavelengths where the polarisability of each of thestorage lattice for0 qubits,gradient which field of 100 will G/cm not will a provideffect thean energyI P0 gradient A necessary requirement here is that our states |0x" 3 states.neighbouring Similarly, thesites,of 410polarizability which MHz/cm again for |0x of" indicatesor anP0 energyat 689.2nm the difference advantage of about levels is zero and the other non-zero.FIG. (b) 2: (a) AC Energy Polarisability level diagram showing how independent and |1x" are trapped in the combination of the storage 1 3 1 3 15kHz between atoms in neighbouring1 sites. In the same 0 0 optical lattices can be producedis for∼ theof1550a.u,S0 storingand P0 levels whereas qubits on the the3 polarisability nuclear spin of states.S0 is zero. This selec-and transport lattices (these will both provide AC-Stark of S and P levels near 627nm. (c) AC polarisability of field the P0 level states will be shifted by −mI × 1Hz in 1 3 by finding wavelengths where the polarisability of each of the 3 S0 and P0 levels near 689nm. (d) AClevels polarisability is zero and the other of non-zero. dif-This (b)tively is AC largely Polarisability can because be usedneighbouring of to the transfer near-resonant sites, which atoms again site-dependently indicates coupling the of advantageshifts to for the P2 level). In Fig. 2d we plot the polaris- 3 1 3 1 3 ferent mF sublevels of the P2, F =13of /S20 and hyperfineP0 levels level near 627nm. for (c) AC polarisability of of storing qubits on the nuclear spin states. This selec- 3 1 3 S0 totheP transport1, which is lattice, made or possible to read without out qubits large by spon- transfer-ability of all of the magnetic sublevels of P2, F =13/2 S0 and P0 levels near 689nm. (d) AC polarisability of dif- tively can be used to transfer atoms site-dependently to π−polarised light at 627nm and 689.2nm. 3 3 ferent mF sublevels of the P2, Ftaneous=13/ring2 hyperfine emission only level the for rates|0"thestate transportdue to to lattice, theP2, narrow then or to read making linewidth out qubits fluorescence by of transfer-at our lattice wavelengths, and the large tensor shifts π−polarised light at 627nm and 689.2nm.3 3 P1.measurements This lattice can (e.g.,ring be only using used the | for0 the" statetransport cycling to P2, then transition, and making atoms fluorescence betweenmake certain mF levels suitable for trapping at the same 3 measurements3 (e.g., using the cycling transition between in itthe willP not,F be=13 affected/2 and3 byD themanifold).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    39 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us