Reference List

Reference List

Reference List J. Blustein May 21, 2011 Contents 1 Keywords iii 2 Selected Topics vi 2.1 Annotation . vi 2.2 Cognitive factors in HT . vi 2.2.1 Individual Differences . vii 2.2.2 Spatial Ability . vii 2.3 Navigation & Shape . vii 2.4 Collections . viii 2.4.1 Bibliographies . viii 2.4.2 Searchable Catalogues . viii 2.4.3 Journals to watch . viii 2.4.4 Special Journal Issues . viii 3 Classics, Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Surveys x 3.1 Hypertext . x 3.2 Annotation . x 3.3 Navigation & Shape . x 3.4 User Acceptance of Technology . x 3.5 Fisheye views . x 3.6 The vocabulary problem . x 3.7 Metrics and measures of hypertext structures . xi 3.8 Inter-linker consistency and well-trodden paths . xi 3.9 IR similarity measures . xi 3.10 Cognitive factors in HT . xi 3.10.1 Individual Differences . xi 3.10.2 Spatial Ability . xii 3.11 How to present experimental results . xii 3.12 The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model . xii 3.13 Browsing . xii 3.14 Cognitive walkthrough technique . xii 3.15 Link structures . xii 3.16 Probabilistic models in IR . xii i 3.17 HCI Handbooks . xii 4 Research and Writing Guides xiii Index 191 ii 1 Keywords 1. Hypertext 2. Fields related to HT • General Hypertext – General – General (Background) • collaboration (group) – HT Methodology – Intro – Definition • groupware – Justification – Review • database • HT Models – Dexter_Model • annotation – Amsterdam_Model – model:. • e-pubs – SGML • Links – taxonomy of link_types • hardware – link_structures – link_patterns ! link_structures – taxonomy 3. AI [as applied to HT] – theory – (see also Guided_Tour in AutoGen) • Automatic Generation of Hypertext – Auto (AI) • AI – AutoGen – AutoGen (Document Analysis) • AI (reasoning system) – AutoGen (IR/NLP) – Concept_Identification – phrase • NLP – Conversion – Guided_Tour • Neural_net • Writing/Authoring/Creating Hypertext – Authoring • Semantic_net – Authoring/Conversion – Design • – Design Decisions CYC – Indexing – Methodology • Misc (AI) 1suggested reading for CS 6606 2domain experts vs. novices 3read for GSLIS 861 iii 4. Human Factors 5. Information Retrieval • Evaluation/Testing • Baysian (probability) – Evaluation • Categorization – [HT] Metric[s] • correspondance_analysis – Testing • Clustering – Usability • Information_Filtering • Human-Computer Interaction • Information_Retrieval – HCI • LSI – task_analysis • MDS – mental/cognitive models • full_text – cultural_factors • probabilistic_IR 1 – 6606 • Ward’s_Method • CogPsych • weighting – indiv_diffs • spreading_activation – Spatial_Ability 6. Bloom_Filter – Reading – Expertise2 7. Miscellaneous – 8613 / menus • Classic • Interfaces • Misc (AI) – fisheye_view • Misc (Other field [non-HT]) – interface • Legal_Issues [in HT] 8. HT Systems • [HT] System Issues – Essence – MARS • System – EXPLICIT – MEDLARS – AIDA – gIBIS (group IBIS) – MICROCOSM – Andrew4 – HyperLaw – MUCH – browserware5 – HYPERLINE – Multivalent Document – CDWord – IBIS – NoteCards – CODER (AI) – Information Lens – NUDIST – CONCORDE – JANUS – OHS6 – CORE – KIM – QCIP – CYC (AI model) – LOCKE – SatTellite – DalText – MAESTRO – SemNet 4The keyword ‘Andrew’ refers to both the Andrew Toolkit & the Andrew File system. 5See also WWW [MB97] 6OHS=Open Hypertext Systems(s) iv – SFS – TOPIC (AI) – WordNet – SMART – TREC – WWW – SUE – VIBE – Xanadu – SuperBook – VISAR – Xtract – TEXTNET – WEBSs7 – XLibris 7WEBs=Woven Electronic Book System with scripts v 2 Selected Topics 2.1 Annotation • Cathy Marshall [Mar98b, Mar98a] • Campbell and Maglio [CM99] about annotation not interfering and sometimes helping • O’Hara and Sellen [OS97] • Ovsiannikov et al. from the Brain group in IJHCS [OAM99] • Price et al. about XLibris [PGS98, SPG98] • See also Digital Libraries and Mobility by Marshall et al. [MGP01] 2.2 Cognitive factors in HT • Nielsen’s The Matters That Matter [Nie89] • Bryce Allen’s 1991 ARIST chapter [All91] • Dillon and Gabbard [DG98] • Dillon (1996) user analysis in HCI [DW96] • Dillon Human factors in journal usage [DRM89] • Chen and Rada’s meta-analysis [CR96] • Rouet’s cog psych paper at HT91 [Rou92] • Charney’s chapter [Cha94] • Wright’s HT keynote [Wri91] • Wright’s To Jump or Not To Jump [Wri93] • Wright in NATO Conference [Wri90] • Nielsen’s (1995) chapter [Nie95b] • Dillon’s survey of reading from paper vs. screen [Dil92] J See also Section 3.10 vi 2.2.1 Individual Differences • Special Issue of JASIS (April 2001) [Cha00] • Dillon in IJHCS [DW96] • Dillon & Gabbard in Rev. Ed. Res. [DG98] • Chen & Rada [CR96] were surprised to find no differences except spatial ones • Does Bryce Allen’s ARIST chapter [All91] say anything about this? J See also Section 3.10.1 2.2.2 Spatial Ability • Bryce Allen in DL’98 [All98] • McDonald and Stevenson about disorientation [MS96] • Chen and Czerwinski [CC97] for an investigation and good background section • Chen and Rada [CR96] found an effect of spatial ability on performance in their meta-analysis • Trumbo [Tru98] in interactions • Others – McDonald and Stevenson [MS99] – Medyckyj-Scott in 1992 Geoforum [MS92b] – O’Hara and Sellen [OS97] – Edwards and Hardman [EH89] – Hofman and van Oostendorp [Hv99] 2.3 Navigation & Shape • Navigation Through Complex Information Spaces in Hypertext in Context [MDR91b] • A Framework for Navigation [Spe99] • Spatial-Semantics: How Users Derive Shape from Information Space [Dil00] • Effects of Text Structure and Prior Knowledge of the Learner on Navigation in Hypertext [MS98a] • Navigation in hyperspace: An evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext [MS98b] • Spatial Ability and Visual Navigation: An Empirical Study [CC97] • ‘Lost in Hyperspace’: Cognitive Mapping and Navigation in a Hypertext Environment [EH89] • Domain Knowledge, Interest, and Hypertext Navigation: A Study of Individual Differences [LK98] vii 2.4 Collections 2.4.1 Bibliographies • Appendices in Nielsen’s books [Nie90c, Nie95a] • Reviews of hypertext literature [Par93a, Par94] • Miscellaneous Bibliographies [Fra88, Kah90, LKS93] • Eastgate Compendium [Sys] 2.4.2 Searchable Catalogues • The HCI Bibliography [Per92] • Bowerbird [MM] is for hypertext theory • ACM DL [Ass] is for all ACM publications 2.4.3 Journals to watch • The New Review of HM & MM [The ] • JoDI [JoD] • Intl. J. of Human-Computer Studies [IJHb] • Intl. J. of Human-Computer Interaction [IJHa] • interactions [int ] • ACM TOCHI [ACM ] • ACM TOIS [ACMb] • Interacting with Computers [Inta] • Applied Ergonomics • Information Retrieval [Inf] • JASIS [Joub] 2.4.4 Special Journal Issues Computing Surveys December 1999 (Hypertext) [AS99] IEEE Computer January 1988 (Electronic Publishing Technologies) [IEE88] viii JASIS • April 2001 (Individual Differences In Virtual Environments) [Cha00] • May 1989 (Hypertext) (according to Nielsen [Nie90c, p. 205]) TOIS January 1989 (Hypertext) [OIS89] Byte October 1988 (Hypertext) [Byt88] Communications of the ACM • Jul. 1988 (Hypertext) [CAC88] • Feb. 1994 (Hypermedia) [CAC94] • Aug. 1995 (Designing Hypermedia Applications) [Mic95, Bie] • May 2001 and Apr. 1995 (Digital Libraries) [Edw01, Edw95] • Jul. 1989 (Interactive Technologies) • Jul. 1994 (Intelligent Agents) ACM Queue • April 2004 (Search engines) [Que04] • March 2003 (Web services) [Que03] SysAdmin • March 2003 (Security) [Sys03] • August 2002 (Intrusion detection) [Sys02] Ergonomics November 1998 (Task Analysis) [Ann98] International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS) July 2005 (HCI research in privacy and security) [Int05] ACM interactions May + June 2006 (HCI and security: A Contradiction in Terms?) [int06] ix 3 Classics, Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Surveys • Meta-analyses in general see Hedges & Olkin [HO85] 3.1 Hypertext • intro and survey of hypertext by Jeff Conklin [Con87, Con91] • Bush’s memex [Bus45] • view from 1988 about where HT has to go [Hal88] • Literary Machines [Nel90] • Galotti has some intro stuff about meta-analyses [Gal94b, pp. 423,431] 3.2 Annotation Annotation Technology [OAM99] contains a review 3.3 Navigation & Shape • A Framework for Navigation [Spe99] • Spatial-Semantics: How Users Derive Shape from Information Space [Dil00] • Navigation Through Complex Information Spaces in Hypertext in Context [MDR91b] 3.4 User Acceptance of Technology • Mahmood et al.’s meta-analysis [MBGJ00] • Nielsen & Levy’s preference vs. performance [NL94] • Dillon & Morris’s ARIST chapter [DM96] 3.5 Fisheye views • fisheye view paper [Fur86] is a good place to start • Kim and Hirtle [KH95] suggest type of interfaces, including fisheyes, to help with HT disori- entation 3.6 The vocabulary problem • Furnas et al. [FLGD87] • Krovetz & Croft [KC92] x 3.7 Metrics and measures of hypertext structures Botafogo et al. [BRS92] 3.8 Inter-linker consistency and well-trodden paths • Ellis et al. in J.Doc [EFHW94a] • Ellis et al. in JASIS [EFW96] • Ellis et al. in Comp. Surveys [FEW99] • Pausch and Detmer in EPodd [PD90] 3.9 IR similarity measures • Jones & Furnas’s Pictures of Relevance [JF87] • Ellis et al. [EFHW93] • Wong & Yao [WY92] • Zobel & Moffat [ZM98] • Korfhage and Yang’s A Cautionary Tale [KY91] 3.10 Cognitive factors in HT • Reading from paper vs. screens (Dillon, 1992) [Dil92] • Cognitive research in information science(Allen, ARIST 1991) [All91] • Review of education research (and crit. of Chen & Rada’s meta-analysis by Dillon and Gabbard in 1998) [DG98] • User analysis in HCI (Dilon, 1996) [DW96] • Chen & Rada’s meta-analysis [CR96] • Nielsen’s 1995 chapter about hypertext usability [Nie95b] • See also SuperBook experiences

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    208 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us