Robbins Et Al.Fm

Robbins Et Al.Fm

ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 15: 173–200, 2004 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society AVIFAUNA OF THE GUYANA SOUTHERN RUPUNUNI, WITH COMPARISONS TO OTHER SAVANNAS OF NORTHERN SOUTH AMERICA Mark B. Robbins1, Michael J. Braun2 & Davis W. Finch3 1Division of Birds, University of Kansas Natural History Museum, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Systematic Biology & Laboratory of Analytical Biology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Rd., Suitland, Maryland 20746, USA. 3WINGS, 1643 North Alvernon Way, Suite 105, Tucson, AZ 85712, USA. Resumen. – Avifauna del Rupununi del Sur, Guyana, con comparaciones con otras sabanas del norte de Sudamérica. – Inventarios en cinco sitios de la sabana del Rupununi del Sur en Guyana generaron gran cantidad de información acerca de la composición, abundancia relativa y estatus reproductivo de la avifauna de esta región tan poco conocida. Registros notables de esos inventarios incluyeron el descubrimiento de una población del Cardenalito de Venezuela (Carduelis cucullata), y una especie críptica no descrita de atrapamoscas. La comparación de nuestros resultados con listas de especies de las principales sabanas en el norte de Sudamérica apoyan la idea de que la avifauna de Roraima- Rupununi es más similar a la de la contigua gran sabana de Venezuela, mientras que la avifauna de la sabana Sipaliwini del sur de Surinam es más similar a la del Amapá del noreste de Brasil. Se presentan comentarios detallados para 30 especies, de las cuales 10 son nuevas para Guyana. Abstract. – Surveys of five sites in the southern Rupununi savanna of Guyana contribute considerably to our knowledge of the species composition, relative abundance, and breeding status of the avifauna of this poorly known region. Highlights from these surveys include the discovery of a previously unknown popu- lation of the endangered Red Siskin (Carduelis cucullata), and an unrecognized cryptic species of flycatcher. Comparison of our Rupununi results with species lists for several major savannas in northern South Amer- ica further supports the conclusion that the avifauna of the Roraima-Rupununi is most similar to the con- tiguous “Gran Sabana” of Venezuela, whereas the Sipaliwini savanna avifauna of southern Suriname is most similar to the Amapá of northeastern Brazil. Details are presented for 30 species, including 10 new for Guyana. Accepted 18 October 2003. Key words: Avifauna, biogeography, savanna, Guyana, southern Rupununi. INTRODUCTION 1996). Nevertheless, very little has been pub- lished on the avifauna of the extensive The status and distribution of Neotropical Roraima-Rupununi savannas which cover c. avifaunas in savanna woodland and savanna 54,000 km2 of extreme northern Brazil and grassland are considered to be well under- southwestern Guyana (Fig. 1). Aside from stood because of the relatively low species Pinto’s (1966) avifaunal catalog of the Brazil- diversity coupled with the accessibility of ian territory of Roraima and the work of these habitats (Silva 1995a, 1995b, Stotz et al. Moskovits et al. (1985) and Silva (1998) on the 173 ROBBINS ET AL. FIG. 1. Regional map of northern South America with major savanna regions shaded. Inset quadrangle outlines map of Figure 2. Smaller coastal savannas also exist in northern Guyana, Suriname, French Gui- ana and on Marajó Island at the mouth of the Amazon (not shown). Maps drawn with ArcMap 8.2 (ESRI Corp. 2002). Savanna distributions from World Wildlife Fund Ecoregions data, available in ArcMap. Ilha de Maracá, only general comments on avifaunal work on the south Rupununi is that savanna birds in this region are included in of Mees & Mees-Balchin (1990) and Mees Snyder (1966) and Sick (1993). Oren & Albu- (2000), who spent a total of about three querque (1991) identified much of the months in the region in 1989 and 1992. Roraima savanna in Brazil as one of the high- The savanna woodland/grassland com- est priority areas in need of new ornithologi- munity is one of the most impacted biomes in cal collections. Indeed, their update of South America (Silva 1995c, Stotz et al. 1996). Haffer’s (1974) catalog of collecting localities Fortunately, the Roraima-Rupununi region for this region of Brazil did not include a sin- has not yet experienced the devastating con- gle new site. version of grassland to cropland that has The adjoining Rupununi savanna of Guy- occurred over such broad areas of Brazil ana is divided into northern and southern (Cavalcanti 1988, Klink et al. 1993). However, subregions by the western extension of the the extensive, annual use of fire during the Kanuku Mountains (Figs 1 and 2). Virtually dry season has undoubtedly had a negative all ornithological collecting localities are in impact on a number of grassland and forest the north Rupununi (see p. 97 in Stephens & edge species in this region. Traylor 1985), and only a few of these locali- Here we present results from five inten- ties are represented by more than a handful of sively surveyed sites in the southern Rupu- 19th century specimens. The only published nuni of Guyana, list noteworthy observations 174 AVIFAUNA OF THE GUYANA SOUTHERN RUPUNUNI FIG. 2. Map of study area in southwestern Guyana with savannas shaded light gray, mountains dark gray. Triangles indicate main study sites. Circles mark other localities mentioned in text. Savanna distributions from World Wildlife Fund Ecoregions data, available in Huber et al. (1995). of several species elsewhere in the Guyana 1976). The savanna extends for many kilome- Rupununi, and compare the southern Rupu- ters to the west in the Brazilian state of nuni with other savannas of northern South Roraima, where it is known as the Rio Branco America. Highlights include the discovery of a savanna. Indeed, the total area of savanna previously unknown population of the endan- there is considerably greater than in Guyana gered Red Siskin (Carduelis cucullata; Robbins et (Eden 1964, Cole 1986). The rolling plains are al. 2003), and an unrecognized cryptic species covered by grasses, dominated by the peren- of flycatcher (in prep.). These discoveries nial bunch grass Trachypogon plumosus along with a number of other surprises, con- (Poaceae), interspersed with the dominant tribute considerably to the ornithological savanna tree, Curatella americana (Dilleniaceae; interest of this region. known in Guyana by the Brazilian name “caimbé” or as “sandpaper tree”). Scattered STUDY AREA AND METHODS throughout the southern Rupununi, and con- tinuing in adjacent Brazil, are isolated granite The Rupununi savanna of southwestern Guy- mountains that range from small dome-like ana is a vast low-lying plain, 100–200 m in ele- hills with sparse semi-humid vegetation to rel- vation and c. 13,000 km2 in extent (Hills atively tall mountains such as Kusad (800 m) 175 ROBBINS ET AL. that cover several square kilometers with January, and late March/April; Hills 1976). more mesic forest. Within the savanna are This fire frequency continues today (D. isolated patches of forest ranging in size from deFreitas pers. com.; pers. observ.). several square meters to a few square kilome- We surveyed four sites intensively during ters, and known as “bush islands”. Most 2000 (see below; Fig. 2; Appendix 1), with stream courses are also lined with bush general observations made throughout much and/or stands of the moriche or ité palm of this region between 17 March–22 April (Mauritia flexuosa). Numerous small ponds and and 14 October–13 November. In addition, marshes dot low-lying areas. The entire fringe Finch made 10 trips to Dadanawa Ranch, of the savanna interdigitates with extensive which we treat as a fifth study site (Appendix humid forest. Eden (1973) provides details on 1). Rupununi savanna geomorphology and vege- tation. Karaudanawa. This camp was located along the A prolonged dry season typically begins in upper reaches of the Rupununi River September and continues into April. The (02o22’N, 59o27’W), c. 4 km south of the vil- rainy season extends from late April through lage of Karaudanawa, and was surveyed from August (83% of the annual rainfall occurs 18 to 27 March 2000. We worked the narrow during this period; Eden 1973) and routinely riparian corridor and the adjacent savanna. floods much of the savanna from June When we arrived the river was no more than a through early September. Not surprisingly, few meters across and was quite shallow very little ornithological work has been con- except for a few deeper pools. However, on ducted during this period. Average rainfall at 22 March, heavy rains fell and the river rose Dadanawa (02o49’N, 59o31’W) for 1984–1995 rapidly and became impassable for three days. was 1475 mm (Welle & Jansen-Jacobs 1995) Several shallow ponds were present just to the and, just to the north at St. Ignatius (near east of camp. Mauritia palms dominated along Lethem 03o23’N, 59o48’W), average rainfall low-lying areas and pond edges. Primarily as a was 1621 mm (Eden 1973). result of burning, the grass was short With the arrival of humans, presumably throughout the area and there was an abrupt thousands of years before present, the fre- interface between savanna and woodland. quency of fire in this region increased. In There was very little topographical relief at 1842, the Schomburgks (Roth 1922–1923) this site. From 20 to 25 12-m mist-nets were noted extensive fires set by Amerindians opened from dawn until mid-morning in throughout the Rupununi. Fires have become riparian vegetation and bush islands. ever more frequent with the dramatic increase in cattle ranching in the late 1800s coupled Parabara Savanna. Our camp was at the north with an increase in the human population end of this isolated savanna (02o12’N, from c. 5000 to 15,000 since 1950 (Hills 1976, 59o22’W), just inside a belt of humid forest. Bureau of Statistics 1993).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    28 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us