Parametrics of electromagnetic searches for axion dark matter Robert Lasenby∗ Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA (Dated: April 6, 2021) Light axion-like particles occur in many theories of beyond-Standard-Model physics, and may make up some or all of the universe's dark matter. One of the ways they can couple to the Standard µν Model is through the electromagnetic Fµν F~ portal, and there is a broad experimental program, covering many decades in mass range, aiming to search for axion dark matter via this coupling. In this paper, we derive limits on the absorbed power, and coupling sensitivity, for a broad class of such searches. We find that standard techniques, such as resonant cavities and dielectric haloscopes, can achieve O(1)-optimal axion-mass-averaged signal powers, for given volume and magnetic field. For low-mass (frequency GHz) axions, experiments using static background magnetic fields generally have suppressed sensitivity | we discuss the physics of this limitation, and propose experimental methods to avoid it, such as microwave up-conversion experiments. We also comment on the detec- tion of other forms of dark matter, including dark photons, as well as the detection of relativistic hidden sector particles. I. INTRODUCTION have suppressed sensitivity (compared to their scaling at higher frequencies), and point out that this suppres- Axion-like particles, in particular the QCD axion, are sion can be alleviated in a number of ways, potentially a well-motivated dark matter (DM) candidate. They oc- motivating new experimental concepts. In particular, cur in many models of beyond-Standard-Model physics, we point out that `up-conversion' experiments, using a and can naturally be light and weakly-coupled, allowing magnetic field oscillating at microwave frequencies, can them to be stable and difficult-to-detect. There are also a have parametrically better scaling for small axion masses, number of early-universe production mechanisms, which and discuss the experimental details in a companion pa- can produce them in the correct abundance to be the per [14]. DM [1{8]. Similar sensitivity analyses can be applied directly to A wide range of existing and proposed experiments other forms of DM that couple to the SM photon, e.g. aim to detect axion DM candidates. These span many dark photon DM with a kinetic mixing. Analogous ideas decades of mass range, and target a variety of possible can also be applied to other kinds of DM-SM couplings, couplings to the Standard Model (SM) [9]. In this pa- and beyond that, to the detection of general hidden- µν sector states. We comment on some of these extensions per, we will focus on the aFµν F~ axion-photon-photon coupling, and address the sensitivity limits on such exper- later in the paper, and in the conclusions. iments | how small a DM-SM coupling could we possi- bly detect, given the dimensions, timescales, sensors etc. µν available? We choose the aFµν F~ coupling partly be- A. Summary of results cause, for a generic QCD axion, this coupling must lie within a fairly narrow (logarithmic) range [4, 10]; it is also Here, we give a brief summary of our main results. a generic feature of many other axion-like-particle mod- Suppose that dark matter consists of an axion-like parti- els [11]. In addition, it represents a particularly easily- 1 ~µν cle a of mass ma, with a coupling L ⊃ − 4 gaγγ aFµν F analysed example of the kind of sensitivity limits we are to the SM. For non-relativistic axion DM, this acts as (a) interested in. an `effective current' J ' gaγγ aB_ , where B is the arXiv:1912.11467v5 [hep-ph] 2 Apr 2021 We derive bounds on the power absorbed by axion magnetic field. Suppose that we have some laboratory DM experiments, under fairly general assumptions, in system with which we will try to detect the axion DM. terms of the magnetic field energy maintained inside the If we want to search for axions over a mass range ∆m, experimental volume. We also derive related limits on then for gaγγ small enough that the target system is in the achievable sensitivity for such experiments, using the the linear response regime, the expected time-averaged tools of quantum measurement theory. These analyses absorbed power from the axion effective current, at the are analogous to those developed in the gravitational least favourable axion mass, satisfies (under assumptions wave detection literature (see e.g. [12, 13] and references that we will discuss) therein). 2 For low-mass (frequency GHz) axions, we re- g ρaU B P¯ ≤ π aγγ (1) view why static-background-field experiments generally ∆m where ρa is the energy density of the axion DM, and U B is the time-averaged magnetic field energy in the exper- ∗ [email protected] imental volume (ignoring magnetic fields on very small 2 spatial scales). Here, the expectation value includes in- at ∼ GHz frequencies in superconducting (SRF) cavi- tegrating over the unknown phases of the axion signal ties [29, 30]. (otherwise, there could be O(gaγγ ) components of the These field strengths were noted in [31], which pro- absorbed power). This bound applies to target systems posed a SRF up-conversion experiment.1 However, they for which the imaginary part of the response function is mainly considered νa ∼ GHz, for which static field ex- non-negative at positive frequencies | that is, the sys- periments do not encounter the quasi-static suppression. tem on average absorbs energy from the axion forcing, Consequently, the only benefit of an SRF experiment rather than emitting. As we discuss below, P¯ is, in many would be the higher cavity quality factor, which is un- circumstances, closely related to the detectability of an likely to overcome the disadvantages of smaller back- axion signal. The P¯ / 1=∆m behaviour corresponds to ground magnetic field, higher temperature (due to cool- the power vs bandwidth tradeoff that is a property of ing power requirements), and drive-related noise issues. many detection schemes; covering a broader axion mass However, as we point out here, for νa GHz, the lack range in the same integration time necessarily leads to of quasi-static suppression may make up-conversion more lower average signal power. competitive. We investigate this possibility in more de- In the νa & GHz regime (where νa = ma=(2π) is the tail in a companion paper [14] (see also [34]). frequency of the axion oscillation), cavity haloscopes (as initially proposed in [15]) such as ADMX [16, 17] and HAYSTAC [18, 19] can attain the bound in equation 1 1. Detectability to O(1). At higher frequencies (νa & 10 GHz), dielectric haloscope proposals [20, 21] can also achieve this, tak- ing the experimental volume to be that occupied by the In the above paragraphs, we discussed the average dielectric layers. power absorbed from the axion effective current. It is −1 obvious that, other things being equal, a higher absorbed However, for ma . L , where L is the length scale of the shielded experimental volume, the EM modes at power makes it easier to detect axion DM. However, in comparing different experiments, other things are often frequencies ∼ νa are naturally in the quasi-static regime. In that case, a static-background-field experiment has not equal, and more generally, it is useful to have quan- titative limits on how small a coupling can be detected. 2 By using quantum measurement techniques [35], we g ρaU B P¯ π aγγ (m L)2 (2) could in principle detect extremely small g , for a given . ∆m a aγγ U B. For example, by preparing a cavity mode in a large- number Fock state, we could Bose-enhance the absorp- This suppression affects low-frequency (νa GHz) axion DM detection proposals such as [22], ABRA- tion (and emission) of axions [36]. However, such tech- CADABRA [23], and DM Radio [24]. As discussed be- niques are often difficult to implement; in axion experi- low, the scaling of the detectability limit is similarly af- ments, the only similar measurement demonstrated so far is HAYSTAC's squeezed state receiver, which is planned fected, with the minimum detectable gaγγ increased by −1 to deliver a factor 2 scan rate improvement in the forth- ∼ (maL) . Our results agree parametrically with those of [24, 25], which analyse axion DM detection in the coming Phase II run [19]. quasi-static regime, using an inductive pickup and lin- To understand different signal detection techniques, we ear phase-invariant amplification. can consider splitting our laboratory system into a `tar- Even under the assumptions leading to equation 1, the get' part, which couples to the axion effective current, quasi-static suppression is not inevitable. To alleviate it and a separate `readout' part, which couples to the tar- for static background magnetic fields, we would need to get. One common technique used in readout schemes enhance the quantum fluctuations of the EM fields that is linear, phase-invariant amplification (in particular, it is employed by almost all existing and proposed axion couple to the axion effective current, at frequencies ∼ νa. One way to achieve this is for the field fluctuations to detection experiments at microwave frequencies and be- `borrow' energy from some other source, e.g. magnetisa- low). For different experimental setups, we can place tion energy in a material, or a circuit component with limits on the SNR obtained, in analogy to the absorbed negative differential resistance. The practicality of such power limit from equation 1. concepts requires further investigation. If a linear amplifier is employed in `op-amp' mode [35], The quasi-static suppression can also be alleviated by and is subject to the `Standard Quantum Limit' performing an `up-conversion' experiment, in which the (SQL) [37] (see appendix A), then the SNR obtained, av- background magnetic field is oscillating at a frequency eraged across a fractionally small axion mass range ∆m, −1 & L .