Male Incubation Feeding in Songbirds Responds Differently to Nest Predation Risk Across Hemispheres

Male Incubation Feeding in Songbirds Responds Differently to Nest Predation Risk Across Hemispheres

Animal Behaviour 82 (2011) 1347e1356 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Male incubation feeding in songbirds responds differently to nest predation risk across hemispheres Beata Matysioková a,*, Andrew Cockburn b,1, Vladimír Remes a a Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacký University b Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Australian National University article info Evolution of parental care behaviour has been of considerable interest to behavioural ecologists for Article history: a long time. Incubation feeding, where an individual incubating eggs is provisioned by another indi- Received 10 May 2011 vidual, is an important component of avian parental care. It may be critical for breeding success by Initial acceptance 1 July 2011 allowing the incubating bird to spend more time on the eggs. However, very little is known about Final acceptance 7 September 2011 environmental factors shaping incubation feeding, and incubation behaviour in general, of tropical and Available online 19 October 2011 southern hemisphere birds, and how this differs compared to northern hemisphere species. We MS. number: 11-00386 collated available data on the rate of incubation feeding in Australian, New Zealand and North American songbirds (78 species from 25 families). There was a strong positive relationship between Keywords: female incubation attentiveness and incubation feeding by males; however, female attentiveness was comparative analysis higher in North America than in Australia and New Zealand for the same intensity of male incubation incubation feeding feeding. Incubation feeding was not related to species body mass, social organization, geographical life history fi nest predation latitude or ambient temperature. It differed signi cantly between families, but overall was not different parental care between regions. Incubation feeding rate was related to nest predation rate, but differently in the two songbird regions. It increased with nest predation rate in Australia and New Zealand, but decreased with nest predation rate in North America. We suggest that this may be caused by different predatoreprey interactions in North America versus Australia and New Zealand, which could have shaped the evolution of incubation feeding differently. Ó 2011 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Understanding why species differ in patterns and intensity of be critical for maintaining female condition and incubation effort parental care is a major focus of evolutionary behavioural studies (von Haartman 1958; Røskaft 1983; Lyon & Montgomerie 1985). (Clutton-Brock 1991). One of the key components of parental care in Incubation feeding is widespread in birds (Kendeigh 1952), but egg-laying organisms is caring for eggs (Deeming 2002). In birds, species differ in the intensity of this behaviour (Martin & incubation of eggs is energetically demanding (Williams 1996; Ghalambor 1999). This interspecific variability could be related Thomson et al. 1998) and thus it can negatively influence condition to various environmental selective forces. For example, latitude is and/or survival of the incubating individual (de Heij et al. 2006). In a strong predictor of life history characteristics, including clutch bird species with uniparental incubation, the female is usually size and adult survival (Ghalambor & Martin 2001). Thus, given responsible for incubating the eggs (Deeming 2002). Hence, she faces that life history theory predicts a positive correlation between a trade-off between time- and energy-consuming incubation parental effort and adult mortality (Roff 1992), we might expect behaviour and foraging for self-maintenance (Drent 1975; Mertens higher incubation feeding rates in areas with low adult survival. 1977). Species breeding in thermally extreme environments must Males may feed the female during incubation (incubation protect their progeny from the negative effects of extreme feeding; Cottam 1941; Matysioková 2010), and this behaviour may temperatures. This effect could be even stronger during incuba- tion, because the developing embryo is sensitive to both very low (below 26 C) and very high (above 40.5 C) temperatures (Webb 1987; Conway & Martin 2000a). Thus, we might expect higher * Correspondence: B. Matysioková, Laboratory of Ornithology, Department of incubation feeding rates in species experiencing extreme ambient Zoology, Palacký University, Tr. Svobody 26, 77146 Olomouc, Czech Republic. temperatures. Species might differ in parental care on the basis of E-mail address: [email protected] (B. Matysioková). their social organization as well. Males in species with helpers 1 A. Cockburn is at the Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, could be able to provide incubating females with more food that Australia. those that breed in pairs. Alternatively, male breeders in social 0003-3472/$38.00 Ó 2011 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.018 1348 B. Matysioková et al. / Animal Behaviour 82 (2011) 1347e1356 species might take advantage of helping and decrease their own For data concerning incubation behaviour in Australia and rate of incubation feeding, so there is no overall difference New Zealand we started with the Handbook of Australian, between cooperative and pair-breeding species (Hatchwell 1999). New Zealand, and Antarctic Birds (HANZAB) volumes 5, 6 and 7 Finally, the risk of nest depredation might select for low activity (Higgins et al. 2001, 2006; Higgins & Peter 2002). We searched around the nest that could lure nest predators (Ghalambor & Web of Science in the same way we did for North American species. Martin 2001). Thus, we may expect a negative correlation Because the sample size obtained in this way was much lower between nest predation rate and incubation feeding intensity than that for North American passerines, we additionally exam- (Martin & Ghalambor 1999). ined all volumes of major local Australian and New Zealand Understanding factors shaping the occurrence and intensity of zoological journals (Australian Bird Watcher, Australian Field incubation feeding across species has been hindered by the Ornithology, Australian Journal of Zoology, Australian Zoologist, paucity of broadscale, interspecific studies focusing on potential Canberra Bird Notes, Corella, Notornis, Pacific Conservation Biology, environmental selective forces. Moreover, studies conducted so South Australian Ornithologist, Sunbird, VOGR Notes and Western far have focused on North American songbirds (Martin & Australian Naturalist published after 2000), many of which are not Ghalambor 1999; Conway & Martin 2000b; Fontaine et al. 2007), indexed in Web of Science. with the exception of Auer et al. (2007) who studied birds of Original studies often provided only qualitative, verbal subtropical Argentina. The only two studies dealing with quanti- descriptions of the intensity of incubation feeding, rather than tative estimates of actual rates of incubation feeding were field precise figures. These qualitative data were regarded as subjective studies and hence included only a limited number of species and not comparable across studies; thus we included only articles (N ¼ 19 species, Martin & Ghalambor 1999; N ¼ 13 species, that reported quantitative information (i.e. the number of feeds Fontaine et al. 2007). The remaining studies reported just pres- per hour of observation). To ensure comparability, we included ence or absence of incubation feeding (Auer et al. 2007), or cate- only species with female-only incubation. As most studies gorized the relative frequency of incubation feeding according to provided information on only the rate of incubation feeding of qualitative descriptions gained from the literature (Conway & females sitting on the nest, we excluded all studies where we Martin 2000b). could not distinguish between on- and off-nest incubation To advance our understanding of male parental effort during feeding, or studies describing only off-nest incubation feeding. We incubation in birds, we performed the first broadscale compara- also excluded those studies where we were not able to distinguish tive study of incubation feeding; moreover, we included both between the feeding having occurred before the incubation and northern hemisphere species and the generally less studied that occurring during incubation, as the former could be associ- southern hemisphere species of songbirds. We used all published ated with courtship. In order not to include species in which information to obtain the rate of incubation feeding in 78 species incubation feeding does not occur at all, we excluded studies of Australian, New Zealand and North American songbirds. We reporting zero rate of incubation feeding. investigated behavioural, life history and environmental corre- We obtained data on nest attentiveness and nest losses caused lates of incubation feeding across species using contemporary by nest predators from a comprehensive literature search similar phylogenetic hypotheses and phylogenetically informed statistical to that used for incubation feeding (B. Matysioková & V. Remes, approaches. We expected higher incubation feeding rates in unpublished data). Nest attentiveness was defined as the species living in areas indicative of low adult survival (northern percentage

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us