Information Note on the Court's Case-Law 217 (April 2018)

Information Note on the Court's Case-Law 217 (April 2018)

2018 INFORMATION NOTE 217 APRIL Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights English edition ISSN 1996-1545 Anyone wishing to reproduce and/or translate all or part of the Information Note in print, online or in any other format should contact [email protected] for further instructions. European Court of Human Rights (Council of Europe) 67075 Strasbourg Cedex France Tel: + 33 (0)3 88 41 20 18 Fax: + 33 (0)3 88 41 27 30 [email protected] www.echr.coe.int twitter.com/echrpublication Layout: Publications Unit Photographs: Council of Europe Cover: interior of the Human Rights Building (Architects: Richard Rogers Partnership and Atelier Claude Bucher) © Council of Europe – European Court of Human Rights, 2018 Table of contents ARTICLE 5 ARTICLE 5 § 1 Deprivation of liberty Application of domestic administrative escort, arrest and detention procedure: violations Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, 54381/08 et al., judgment 10.4.2018 [Section III] .................................... 6 ARTICLE 6 ARTICLE 6 § 1 (CIVIL) Access to court Alleged excessively formalistic interpretation of procedural rules (ratione valoris admissibility threshold): no violation Zubac v. Croatia, 40160/12, judgment 5.4.2018 [GC] ............................................................... 8 ARTICLE 6 § 1 (CRIMINAL) Fair hearing, equality of arms Lawyer not permitted to conduct his own defence in criminal proceedings: no violation Correia de Matos v. Portugal, 56402/12, judgment 4.4.2018 [GC] ...................................................10 Fair hearing, independent and impartial tribunal Legislative amendment enacted during trial extending limitation periods in respect of offences that had not become time-barred: no violation Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland, 36661/07 and 38433/07, judgment 12.4.2018 [Section I] .......................10 Fair hearing Summary reasoning in the Supreme Court’s dismissal of a request to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union: no violation Baydar v. the Netherlands, 55385/14, judgment 24.4.2018 [Section III] .............................................11 Impartial tribunal Refusal of change of venue for criminal trial despite pending civil action by accused impugning trial court’s conduct: violation Boyan Gospodinov v. Bulgaria, 28417/07, judgment 5.4.2018 [Section V] ..........................................12 ARTICLE 6 § 3 (c) Defence through legal assistance Lawyer not permitted to conduct his own defence in criminal proceedings: no violation Correia de Matos v. Portugal, 56402/12, judgment 4.4.2018 [GC] ...................................................13 ARTICLE 8 Respect for private and family life, positive obligations Burial of a victim of a criminal act without taking reasonable steps to inform his relatives: violation Lozovyye v. Russia, 4587/09, judgment 24.4.2018 [Section III] ......................................................15 Respect for private life Adoption of child without due consideration of his aunt’s interest in becoming his legal tutor: violation Lazoriva v. Ukraine, 6878/14, judgment 17.4.2018 [Section IV] ....................................................15 Police obtaining subscriber information associated with dynamic Internet Protocol (IP) address without a court order: violation Benedik v. Slovenia, 62357/14, judgment 24.4.2018 [Section IV] ...................................................16 Respect for private life, positive obligations Stateless migrant unable to regularise residence status following break-up of predecessor State, despite many years of tolerated stay: violation Hoti v. Croatia, 63311/14, judgment 26.4.2018 [Section I] .........................................................18 Respect for family life Decision by domestic authorities to allow adoption of psychologically vulnerable child by foster parents: case referred to the Grand Chamber Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway, 37283/13, judgment 30.11.2017 [Section V] .................................19 Exceptional circumstances justifying adoption of children, victims of domestic violence, by foster parents: no violation Mohamed Hasan v. Norway, 27496/15, judgment 26.4.2018 [Section V] ...........................................20 ARTICLE 10 Freedom of expression Defence counsel reprimanded for statement made to the press on leaving court after the verdict: violation Ottan v. France, 41841/12, judgment 19.4.2018 [Section V] .......................................................21 Conviction of blogger for publishing post using unconstitutional (Nazi) symbol: inadmissible Nix v. Germany, 35285/16, decision 13.3.2018 [Section V] .........................................................22 ARTICLE 13 Effective remedy New case-law making remedy effective in length-of-proceedings cases, but only recently made public: violation Brudan v. Romania, 75717/14, judgment 10.4.2018 [Section IV] ...................................................23 ARTICLE 14 Discrimination (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) Alleged discriminatory treatment in level of wages paid to prisoners: inadmissible Dobrowolski and Others v. Poland, 45651/11 et al., decision 13.3.2018 [Section I] ..................................24 ARTICLE 35 ARTICLE 35 § 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Judicial review to be exhausted in respect of decision refusing to grant stay on removal of seriously ill people: inadmissible Khaksar v. the United Kingdom, 2654/18, decision 3.4.2018 [Section I] .............................................25 ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Demand for retrospective repayment of welfare benefit mistakenly administered and constituting the applicant’s sole source of income: violation Čakarević v. Croatia, 48921/13, judgment 26.4.2018 [Section I] ....................................................26 ARTICLE 2 OF PROTOCOL No. 7 Right of appeal in criminal matters Appellate review only after sentence of administrative detention had been served in full: violation Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, 54381/08 et al., judgment 10.4.2018 [Section III] ...................................27 GRAND CHAMBER (PENDING) Referrals Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway, 37283/13, judgment 30.11.2017 [Section V] .................................27 OTHER JURISDICTIONS European Union – Court of Justice (CJEU) and General Court Need for effective judicial review to assess the necessity of making membership of a denomination a requirement for employment by the church Vera Egenberger v. Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung eV, C-414/16, judgment 17.4.2018 (CJEU, Grand Chamber) ........................................................................................................27 Eligibility criteria for subsidiary protection for a non-EU national suffering from the psychological after-effects of previous torture which might be aggravated if he were returned to his country of origin MP v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, C-353/16, judgment 24.4.2018 (CJEU, Grand Chamber) .........28 Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) State environmental obligations to ensure the right to life and personal integrity Advisory Opinion OC-23/17, Series A No. 23, opinion 15.11.2017 ...................................................30 COURT NEWS Elections ......................................................................................................31 Protocol No. 16 to the Convention .....................................................................31 New edition of the Rules of Court ......................................................................32 Copenhagen Declaration .................................................................................32 Rule 47 of the Rules of Court: new video 2018 René Cassin advocacy competition .............................................................33 RECENT PUBLICATIONS Practical Guide on Admissibility Criteria: 4th edition ..............................................33 New Case-Law Guide ......................................................................................33 Handbook on European non-discrimination law: 2018 edition .................................33 Factsheets: new translations .............................................................................34 Facts and figures by State: Czech Republic and Denmark ........................................34 Information documents: new translations ...........................................................34 Annual Report 2017 on the execution of judgments of the Court ..............................34 OTHER INFORMATION Commissioner for Human Rights .......................................................................34 Information Note 217 April 2018 Article 5 Page 6 ARTICLE 5 Convention proceedings, he argued that there had been no lawful grounds or exceptional circum- ARTICLE 5 § 1 stances for keeping him in detention. Deprivation of liberty Mr Dragomirov was arrested for being drunk and looking untidy in a public place and taken to the Application of domestic administrative escort, police station. He was subsequently convicted of an arrest and detention procedure: violations administrative offence and sentenced to five days’ Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, 54381/08 administrative detention. Upon appeal his convic- et al., judgment 10.4.2018 [Section III] tion was quashed owing to a serious defect in the Facts – The applicants were subject to the domes- prosecution evidence after he had already served tic administrative escort, arrest and detention

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    35 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us