International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-1602-1731 ISSN: 2249-6645 Quantum Computer (Information) and Quantum Mechanical Behaviour - A Quid Pro Quo Model 1 2 3 Dr K N Prasanna Kumar, prof B S Kiranagi, Prof C S Bagewadi For (7), 36 ,37, 38,--39 Abstract: Perception may not be what you think it is. Perception is not just a collection of inputs from our sensory system. Instead, it is the brain's interpretation (positive, negative or neutral-no signature case) of stimuli which is based on an individual's genetics and past experiences. Perception is therefore produced by (e) brain‘s interpretation of stimuli .The universe actually a giant quantum computer? According to Seth Lloyd--professor of quantum-mechanical engineering at MIT and originator of the first technologically feasible design for a working quantum computer--the answer is yes. Interactions between particles in the universe, Lloyd explains, convey not only (- to+) energy but also information-- In brief, a quantum is the smallest unit of a physical quantity expressing (anagrammatic expression and representation) a property of matter having both a particle and wave nature. On the scale of atoms and molecules, matter (e&eb) behaves in a quantum manner. The idea that computation might be performed more efficiently by making clever use (e) of the fascinating properties of quantum mechanics is nothing other than the quantum computer. In actuality, everything that happens (either positive or negative e&eb) in our daily lives conforms (one that does not break the rules) (e (e)) to the principles of quantum mechanics if we were to observe them on a microscopic scale, that is, on the scale of atoms and molecules. But because a great many degrees of freedom (such as a huge number of atomic movements) contribute to phenomena that we as human beings can perceive, this quantum mechanical behavior is normally hidden (not perceived-e(e)) by us. That it is not in the visible field; We cannot see it let alone decipher the progressive movements and dynamics of the system. Yet, if we were to look into the world of individual atoms, we would find that an electron (+) moving about the atomic nucleus can only take on (e) energy having specific (discrete) values. In other words, an electron may enter only a fixed number of set states. It is like I can build house in my site; not on somebody‘s site or on corporation designated area for public utility; This resembles the way in which strings on a guitar can only resonate at set frequencies, and(e some light&eb some light ) reflects the wave nature of quantum states. This electron, moreover, may take on a "superposition state" that combines (e&eb) different energy states simultaneously. Superposition state is important concept in quantum computing. Applying a strong electric field to an atom can also (eb) make the electrons circulating around it tunnel through a wall created (eb) by strong nuclear binding energy and (eb or=) become unbound. Although the tunneling of say a soccer ball through a wall does not occur in reality, this kind of phenomenon can occur in the microscopic world. Such quantum mechanical behavior must be artificially (e&eb) controlled and measured to achieve (eb) a quantum computer. Quantum computer thus utilizes (e) Quantum mechanical behaviour that is artificially controlled. Quantum mechanical behavior in state one controls (e&eb) Quantum Mechanical behviour in state two. R. Schilling, M. Selecky, W. Baltensperger studied the influence (e&eb) of the hyperfine interaction ∼ Sn. In between the ionic and the nuclear spins at the site n on the Eigenvaluesof a 2-domain Heisenberg ferromagnetic with a 180% -domain wall. A level splitting is obtained even when 〈Sn〉 = 0 due (e) to quantum fluctuations The idea quantum states used for a computer first came about in the 1980s. In 1985, David.tsch, a professor at Oxford University and a proponent of quantum computers, wrote a paper titled "Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle, and the universal quantum computer" that touched upon the possibility of quantum computers. Frank Verstraete, Michael M. Wolf & J. Ignacio Cirac STUDIED THE EFFECTS OF QUANTUM MECHANICAL STATES ON QUANTUM KEYWORDS: Quantum mechanical states, Quantum computation, Decoherence, Quantum cryptography, Quantum simulation, Tunneling, nonadiabatic multiphonon process in the strong vibronic coupling limit, Schrodinger‘s Hamiltonian, Claude Shannon Theories of Redundancy and Noise, Kraus operators ,,a non-zero energy state,* I. INFORMATON The strongest adversary in quantum information science is decoherence, which (eb) arises owing to the coupling(e&eb) of a system with its environment. The induced dissipation tends to destroy and (e) wash out the interesting quantum affects that give (eb) rise to the power of quantum computation, cryptography and simulation. Whereas such a statement is true for many forms of dissipation, they showed that dissipation can also have exactly the opposite effect: it can be a fully fledged resource (eb) for universal quantum computation without any coherent dynamics needed to complement it. Universal Quantum Computation utilizes (e) decoherence. The coupling (e&eb) to the environment drives (eb) the system to a steady state where the outcome (eb) of the computation is encoded. In a similar vein, they showed that dissipation can be (e) used to engineer a large variety of strongly correlated states in steady state, including all stabilizer codes, matrix product states, and their generalization to higher dimensions. Words ―e‖ and ―eb‖ are used for better comprehension of the paper. They represent ‗encompasses‘ and ‗encompassed by‘. There are no other attributions or ascriptions for the same. For the system of Quantum entanglement and Quantum Information we discuss the stability analysis, solution behaviour and asymptotic stability in detail. Asymptotic stability is proved for the system in accord with the extant obtention of appositive factors in the system. www.ijmer.com 1602 | P a g e International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug 2012 pp-1602-1731 ISSN: 2249-6645 . II. Constitution,Composition And Outlay Of The Paper 1: Review Of the Literature: Under this head we take an intimate and hawk‘s look at the various aspectionalities and attributions in the literature available. Quantum Information and Quantum Mechanical behaviour is a subject which is not a rarefied and moribund field. Quantum Information and Quantum Mechanical behaviour and consummation, consolidation, concretization, consubstantiation is a field which is many a time attempted to. Piece de resistance of the work is to put the study the concatenated formulated equations which has not been done earlier on terra firma. Under this head, in consideration to the fact that there are some Gordian Knots, we point out the extant and existential problems thereof. This helps develop a two pronged strategy: one it helps the reader and author and academician alike to appreciate the generalized strain of rationalized consistency and cumulative choice of variables for the development of the model and second, provides the cognitive orientation towards the model built itself in the sense that aspects like Theory of Classification, Dissipation Coefficient formulation, Accentuation Coefficient induction which are cat hectic evaluative integrational necessary mechanisms so that qubits act as individual components and componential clusterings with a certain predefined set of specification. In case of randomness, the constraints under which Model holds well are stated. Evaluative motivational orientation for the development of a Quantum Computer, with variable integration and role differentiation is obtained so that it suits our model. It is important that this factor is to be borne in mind. Introduction is not just a brush up on the topic but also a breeding ground to fulfill and render conceptual soundness and system orientation and process orientation to the model. While engaging the attention, on the introductory aspects, we also point to the integrative function, model adequacy, instrumental applicable orientations, and the implications of functional imperatives of Technological change are also perceived and given a decent guess. In Quantum Computers, structural relational context of qubits like quantum entanglement and when such an entanglement would become disentangles; its functional exigencies and contingencies are also stated. They are done in order to see that the model is developed further so that it acts as a better tool for vindication of certain objectives for which it is applied. Gritty narrative brings out the subtleties and nuances of the subject in addition to the fact how it would help the formulation of the Model. Additionally, expatiation, enucleation, elucidation and exposition of the points that are necessary for the formulation of the present problem are also notified. Here we study the aging process, dissipatory mechanism, obliteration, obfuscation and abjuration of the Vacuum energy and Quantum Field, with thrust on the problem solving capacity and state sytemal and processual thinking on the subject matter. 2. Work Suggested/Done: Under this appellation, we enumerate the work done, namely the sole aim, primary objective and sum mum bonuum of the work done. In the extant case we give the formulation of the problem. Statement of governing equations for both Quantum Information and Quantum Mechanical