Petitioner's Brief, Albin Littell V. Steve Mullins and Mcdowell Co

Petitioner's Brief, Albin Littell V. Steve Mullins and Mcdowell Co

---- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIR( .~4u:-:~~~~:::-:~~:-::60::::~RT::::::RY'='lJF=i~=~:-LS-I ... OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT NO: 15-0364 ALBIN LITTELL, individually, and as TRUSTEE OF THE LITTELL COAL INTEREST TRUST PETITIONER/ APPELLANT V. STEVE MULLINS, and DONALD HICKS CLERK OF THE COUNT COMMISSION OF MCDOWELL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, RESPONDENTS/APPELLEES APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MCDOWELL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA (08-C-178) BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL PRESENTATION REQUESTED DERRICK W. LEFLER GIBSON, LEFLER & ASSOCIATES 1345 MERCER STREET PRINCETON, WV 24740 WV STATE BAR NO.: 5785 TELEPHONE: (304) 425-8276 FACSIMILE: (304) 487-1574 ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER/APPELLANT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF AUTHORITIES---------------------------------------------------- iii ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR-------------------------------------------------- 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE-------------------------------------------------- 2 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT-------------------------------------------------- 10 STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT IN DECISION-------------- 15 ARGUMENT------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 I. The Trial Court Erred in Failing to Set Aside the Deed Dated April 26, 2006 Based Upon Appellee, Steve Mullins' Failure to Comply With West Virginia Code §11A-3-19 ---- 17 II. The Trial Court Erred in Failing to Set Aside the Deed Dated April 26, 2006 Based on the Denial of Appellant's Rights to Due Process Under the Constitutions of Both United States and the State of West Virginia. --------- 21 III. The Trial Court Erred Failing to Set Aside the Deed Dated April 26, 2006 Based Upon the Lack of Notice to Appellant ---------------------------------------------- 27 CONCLUSION--------------------------------------------------------------- 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE --------------------------------------------------- 29 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page Chystal R.M. v. Charlie A. L.r 194 W.Va. 138,459 S.E 2d 415 (1995) ........................ 17 Cogar v. Lafferty, 693 S.E. 2d 835 (W.Va. 2006) ......................................................... 18 Cook v. Duncan, 301 S.E.2d 837 (W.Va. 1983) ............................................................ 18 Jones v. Flowers, 547 U.S. 220, 126 S.Ct. 1708, (2006) ........................................ 22, 23 Koontz v. Ball, 122 S.E. 461 (W.Va. 1924) .................................................................... 18 Lilly v. Duke, 375 S.E.2d 122 (W.Va 1988) .................................................................... 22 Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791, 103 S.Ct. 2706, L.Ed.2d 180 (1983) ......................................................................................................... 25 Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed 865 (1950) ......................................................................................................... 26 State ex. ReI. Morgan v. Miller 350 S.E 2d 724, 177 W.Va. 97 (1986) ....................18, 20 Plemons v. Gale, 396 F. 3d 569, (4th Cir. 2005) ................................................ 21, 22, 24 Rollyson v. Jordan, 518 S.E. 2d 372 (W.Va. 1999) ........................................................ 18 Shafer v. Mareve Oil Corp., 157 W.Va. 816, 204 S.E. 2d 404 (1974) ........................... 20 Tulsa Prof'l Collection Servs" Inc. v. Pope, 485 U.S. 478, 99 L.Ed.2d 565, 108 S.Ct. 1340 (1988)........................................................................... 21 Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 77 S.Ct. 200, 1. L.Ed.2d 178 (1956)........ 23 ii STATUTES & CONSTITUTIONS u.s. Const. Amend. V & XIV .................................................................................... 16, 21 West Virginia Code § 11A-1-9 ................................................................................. 18, 19 West Virginia Code § 11A-3-19 ..................................................................................... 17 West Virginia Code § 11A-3-19(a) .................................................................... 17, 18, 20 West Virginia Code § 11A-3-20 [former] .................................................................. 18, 20 West Virginia Code § 11A-3-21 & 22 ............................................................................. 18 West Virginia Code § 11A-3-23(a) ................................................................................... 18 West Virginia Code § 11A-4-1 ........................................................................................... 16 West Virginia Code § 11A-4-3, ................................................................................. 17, 20 West Virginia Code § 11A-4-4 ........................................................................................ 27 West Virginia Code § 11A-4-4(b) .................................................................................... 27 West Virginia Constitution, Art. 3, § 10 ..................................................................... 16, 21 West Virginia Constitution, Art. 13, § 6 ........................................................................... 16 iii ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR Appellant, Albin Littell, assigns the following errors from the proceedings before the Circuit Court of McDowell County, West Virginia. I. The Trial Court Erred in Failing to Set ASide the Deed Dated April 26, 2006 Based Upon Appellee, Steve Mullins' Failure to Comply With West Virginia Code §11A-3-19. II. The Trial Court Erred in Failing to Set Aside the Deed Dated April 26, 2006 Based on the Denial of Appellant's Rights to Due Process Under the Constitutions of Both United States and the State of West Virginia. III. The Trial Court Erred Failing to Set Aside the Deed Dated April 26, 2006 Based Upon the Lack of Notice to Appellant 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE The matter below was an action pursuant to West Virginia Code §11A-4-3, and West Virginia Code § 11A-4-4, to set aside a deed dated April 26, 2006, from Appellee, Donald Hicks, the Clerk of the County Commission of McDowell County, West Virginia, (hereinafter "Hicks''), to Appellee, Steve Mullins (hereinafter "Mullins'') pursuant to Mullins' purchase of a tax lien for 2003 ad valorem taxes on an undivided interest in 279 acres in the Big Creek District of McDowell County, at a November 16, 2004 tax sale conducted by the Sheriff of McDowell County. Following a bench trial, the trial court denied Appellant's request to have the April 26, 2006 deed set aside. Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court's decision, and requests the April 26, 2006 deed be set aside. The action before the trial court involved two parcels located in the Big Creek District of McDowell County. The properties, located on Slate Creek, in the Big Creek District of McDowell County, were assessed and taxed as Parcel 7 on Tax Map 286, and Parcel 5 on Tax Map 366. (Plaintiff's Exhibit 8) (App. 176). The Slate Creek properties are historically owned in multiple undivided fractional interests, by individual and entities with various family connections. The instant appeal concerns only Parcel 7, on Tax Map 286 of the Big Creek District of McDowell County. Up to 1998, the Slate Creek properties were taxed under a single ticket associated with Parcel 7 on Map No. 286. The stated acreage on such ticket was 643 acres. The parcels are not, however, contiguous to one another. (Plaintiff's Ex. 9). (App. 177). 2 In 1999, the tax ticket was split and the Slate Creek properties were taxed as the two parcels noted above. The split of the tax parcels in the 1999 tax year is displayed, by example, in the interests of Hall Mining Company, a co-owner holding an undivided interest in the parcels. Hall Mining was taxed on the parcel appearing on Map 386 at Parcel 7, described as 279 acres, and Parcel 5 on Tax Map 366 as 364 acres. (Plaintiff's Exhibit 8) (App. 176). After the split of the tax tickets, beginning in 1999, an entry also appeared in relation to Parcel 7 of Map 286 as an undivided interest in 279 acres in the name of "Nancy Doonan Est.", indicating the interest was that belonging to the estate of Nancy Doonan. In all, beginning with the 1999 tax year, there were 13 or 14 separate interests assessed separately on the 279 acres, which is Parcel 7 Map 286. (App. 120­ 21). Nancy Doonan died in approximately 1989. Plaintiff, Albin Littell, is the grandson of Nancy Doonan, and an heir to her interest in Parcel 7 of Map 386. Upon her death, the interest owned by Nancy Doonan in the Slate Creek properties passed to plaintiff, Albin E. Littell and his mother, who established the Littell Coal Interest Trust, in approximately 1999. The trust assumed control of the interest passed to Albin Littell and his mother by Nancy Doonan, although, there does not appear to have been a deed of conveyance specifically conveying the Slate Creek property to the Trust. (App. 53-54) (App. 185-86). Taxes on the Nancy Doonan Est. interest, assessed on Parcel 7 of Map 386, were paid through the 2002 tax year. However, taxes for the 2003 tax year on the Nancy 3 Doonan Est. interest in Parcel 7 on Map 386, went unpaid, and on November 16, 2004, Appellee Mullins purchased the tax lien for the undivided interest at the tax sale conducted by the Sheriff of McDowell County, West Virginia. The unpaid taxes were $34.10. Mullins paid $115.84 to purchase the tax lien at the sheriff's sale. (App. 159). Subsequent to the sheriff's sale in order to receive a deed and for the property purchased, Appellee Mullins was required,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    33 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us