Episodic and Semantic Components of Autobiographical Memories and Imagined Future Events in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Adam D

Episodic and Semantic Components of Autobiographical Memories and Imagined Future Events in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Adam D

This article was downloaded by: [Harvard Library] On: 03 June 2014, At: 13:23 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Memory Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/pmem20 Episodic and semantic components of autobiographical memories and imagined future events in post-traumatic stress disorder Adam D. Browna, Donna Rose Addisb, Tracy A. Romanoc, Charles R. Marmara, Richard A. Bryantd, William Hirste & Daniel L. Schacterf a Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, USA b School of Psychology, The University of Auckland, New Zealand c Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA d School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia e Department of Psychology, New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA f Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA Published online: 25 Jun 2013. To cite this article: Adam D. Brown, Donna Rose Addis, Tracy A. Romano, Charles R. Marmar, Richard A. Bryant, William Hirst & Daniel L. Schacter (2014) Episodic and semantic components of autobiographical memories and imagined future events in post-traumatic stress disorder, Memory, 22:6, 595-604, DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2013.807842 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.807842 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions Memory, 2014 Vol. 22, No. 6, 595Á604, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.807842 Episodic and semantic components of autobiographical memories and imagined future events in post-traumatic stress disorder Adam D. Brown1, Donna Rose Addis2, Tracy A. Romano3, Charles R. Marmar1, Richard A. Bryant4, William Hirst5, and Daniel L. Schacter6 1Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, USA 2School of Psychology, The University of Auckland, New Zealand 3Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA 4School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 5Department of Psychology, New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA 6Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA Individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) tend to retrieve autobiographical memories with less episodic specificity, referred to as overgeneralised autobiographical memory. In line with evidence that autobiographical memory overlaps with one’s capacity to imagine the future, recent work has also shown that individuals with PTSD also imagine themselves in the future with less episodic specificity. To date most studies quantify episodic specificity by the presence of a distinct event. However, this method does not distinguish between the numbers of internal (episodic) and external (semantic) details, which can provide additional insights into remembering the past and imagining the future. This study employed the Autobiographical Interview (AI) coding scheme to the autobiographical memory and imagined future event narratives generated by combat veterans with and without PTSD. Responses were coded for the number of internal and external details. Compared to combat veterans without PTSD, those with PTSD generated more external than internal details when recalling past or imagining future events, and fewer internal details were associated with greater symptom severity. The potential mechanisms underlying these bidirectional deficits and clinical implications are discussed. Downloaded by [Harvard Library] at 13:23 03 June 2014 Keywords: Post-traumatic stress disorder; PTSD; Autobiographical memory; Future thinking; Mental time travel; Memory. Among the many disorders classified in the of PTSD often focus their attention on memory as Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental a key factor in the pathogenesis of the disorder Disorders (DSM-IV-TR; American Psychiatric (e.g., Brewin, 2007; Conway & Pleydell-Pearce, Association, 2000), post-traumatic stress disorder 2000; McNally, 2003; Rubin, Berntsen, & Bohni, (PTSD) is somewhat distinct in that its diagnosis 2008). In addition to studies examining memory- is linked to a precipitating event. Since PTSD related symptoms in PTSD, such as intrusive symptoms often persist long after exposure to the memories, flashbacks, and amnesia (for a review stressor, researchers elucidating the mechanisms see McNally, 2003), there has been increasing Address correspondence to: Adam D. Brown, Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, 50 First Avenue, OBV-Bldg A, # A645, New York, NY 10016, USA. E-mail: [email protected] # 2013 Taylor & Francis 596 BROWN ET AL. awareness that PTSD represents, in part, a cesses as imagining and projecting one’s self into problem with the retrieval of autobiographical the future (for reviews, see Schacter, Addis, & memories (for a review see Moore & Zoellner, Buckner, 2008; Suddendorf & Corballis, 2007; 2007). When asked to recall an autobiographical Szpunar, 2010). According to the constructive memory, individuals with PTSD tend to exhibit episodic simulation hypothesis (Schacter & Addis, difficulties in recalling unique memories that took 2007), imagining future episodic events engages a place on a specific time and day, producing what constructive memory system that facilitates the is often referred to as ‘‘overgeneralised’’ auto- flexible recombination of elements from past biographical memories. events in order to project and simulate novel The phenomenon of greater overgenerality in events in to the future. In other words, imagining PTSD has been documented across multiple the future depends on remembering the past. trauma-exposed population including Vietnam From this perspective, individuals with PTSD may veterans (McNally, Lasko, Macklin, & Pitman, report overgeneralised episodic simulations be- 1995; McNally, Litz, Prassas, Shin, & Weathers, cause these future simulations are constructed 1994), cancer survivors (Kangas, Henry, & Bry- around overgeneralised recollections of past epi- ant, 2005), and injured individuals with acute sodes. The close link between overgenerality in stress disorder (Harvey, Bryant, & Dang, 1998). autobiographical memory and future thinking Overgenerality does not appear to be a conse- suggests that those with PTSD face a problem quence of trauma exposure alone (Moore & not only in remembering their past in specific Zoellner, 2007), is found independently of terms, but also in imagining an episodically rich depression (McNally et al., 1995), and does not future, a difficulty that may contribute to the seem to be a marker of overall psychopathology persistence of the disorder. (e.g., Wenzel, Jackson, & Holt, 2002; Wilhelm, Conway and Pleydell-Pearce (2000) propose a McNally, Baer, & Florin, 1997). Overgeneralised hierarchical representation of autobiographical autobiographical memory has been shown to be memory based on the temporal specificity of the an important predictor in the time course of memories, with event-specific knowledge (ESK; PTSD. A prospective study of firefighters identi- e.g., eating dinner in Montmartre while watching fied overgenerality as a risk factor for PTSD, as the sun set over Sacre´ Coeur) lower in the firefighters exhibiting greater overgenerality be- hierarchy than general events that are repeated fore trauma exposure were found to be at greater or ‘‘categorical’’ (e.g., commuting to a particular risk for developing PTSD following trauma ex- job) or extended (e.g., my trip to Paris) in time. posure (Bryant, Sutherland, & Guthrie, 2007). Within this hierarchy, retrieval of autobiogra- Overgenerality in PTSD has also been linked with phical memories typically begins at the general deficits in social problem solving, suggesting a event level, and from there ESKs are accessed role in symptom maintenance (Sutherland & (Haque & Conway, 2001). According to Williams Downloaded by [Harvard Library] at 13:23 03 June 2014 Bryant, 2008). Furthermore, a decline in over- et al. (2007), ruminative thinking at a categorical generalised memories may be a marker of recov- level, avoidance of the distressing affect asso- ery. For example, the remission of PTSD

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us