JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 63, 2017 (4): 153–160 doi: 10.17221/111/2016-JFS Impacts of Central Tire Inflation Systems application on forest transportation – Review Mohammad Reza GHAFFARIYAN* Forest Industries Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Australia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Ghaffariyan M.R. (2017): Impacts of Central Tire Inflation Systems application on forest transportation – Review. J. For. Sci., 63: 153–160. Central Tire Inflation Systems (CTIS) have been introduced to forestry transportation in the last 30 years to the point the forest industry is one of the biggest users of the technology (Pletts 2006). The benefits of operating with this CTIS technology mentioned in the literature include: (i) reduced road surfacing and/or base course requirements, (ii) reduced road maintenance, (iii) reduced driver fatigue and medical complaints, (iv) lower vehicle operation costs, (v) increased vehicle mobility, (vi) extended haul seasons (Bradley 1995). This paper presents a literature review of previous international studies on the impacts of CTIS. This document can assist the forest industry and research users to gain basic information on this transportation technology. Keywords: timber transportation; road maintenance; transportation cost; vehicle mobility; fuel consumption; safety Pletts (2006) described a brief history of the also been applied in Australia for the last 20 years Central Tire Inflation System (CTIS) which goes as one of the CTIS contactors has supplied it to the back to World War II when this type of technology transport industry in Eden, Bunbury, Kalgoorlie was developed to improve the mobility of transport and Mount Gambier. Operational experiences have on poor roads in the Soviet Union and Warsaw indicated that this technology has positive impacts Pact countries (Kaczmarek 1984). From the early on reducing the transport cost, improving the safe- 1980’s most of the military tactical vehicles pro- ty and reducing negative impacts on the road sur- duced in the USA were equipped with CTIS to im- faces (Cline 2016). prove the overall vehicle mobility (Adams 2002). The United States Department of Agriculture Pletts (2006) indicated that the South African (USDA) Forest Service started studying the impact sugar cane industry identified CTIS as a technology of low tire pressure on their forest road network in that could improve vehicle performance and reduce 1983 (Altunel, De Hoop 1998). One of the tech- the transport costs but he emphasized that nowa- nologies to assist this was CTIS. A CTIS is an on- days the largest application of CTIS is in the forest board, electromechanical system that permits the industry. Bradley (2009) indicated that road im- operator to vary a vehicle’s tire pressure from the pacts by CTIS were investigated by forestry related cab while driving. CTIS generally comprises five organizations (such as United States Forest Service, component assemblies including an air-compres- Skogforsk, Forest Engineering Research Institute of sor unit (auxiliary utility or brake system compres- Canada (FERIC) – currently called FPinnovations), sor), air control valves, air lines, rotary union hard- however this type of technology has attracted in- ware to transmit air into and out of rotating wheels, terest in highway and urban applications. CTIS has and a computerized control interface/panel for se- J. FOR. SCI., 63, 2017 (4): 153–160 153 lection of appropriate tire pressures with respect selected by the driver. If the system determines that to vehicle weight, road surface type and speed of inflation is needed, it first checks to make sure that travel. If the air brake compressor system is used, brake pressure reserves are where they should be; air priority valves are included to protect the brake if they are, it applies a slight pressure to the wheel system’s integrity, by allowing for tire inflation only valve to allow inflation. If the tires are overinflated, when the brake pressure is above a safe level. The the system applies a slight vacuum to the wheel truck speed is managed relative to the tire pres- valve. When the pneumatic control unit reads that sure and load, to prevent damage, and there is an the appropriate pressure is reached, the valve clos- override if design speed limit warnings are ignored es. In this illustration, there is a pathway that the air (Owende et al. 2001). Bradley (2009) described travels for inflation or deflation once it gets to the the configuration of the tire pressure control sys- wheel. The tubing runs from the vehicle’s air com- tems and stated that air for inflation and deflations pressor through the wheel hub and then to the tire is taken from the vehicle’s compressed air supply valve. The “quick disconnect fitting” allows the tire but only after the air brake system requirements to be separated from the CTIS system for removal are fully met. Air supply lines for each channel link or servicing (http://auto.howstuffworks.com/self- the valve control assembly to the associated tires. inflating-tire2.htm). Non-driven axles are all plumbed internally. Brad- There are two main manufacturers of the CTIS: ley (2009) described two types of suppliers of this U.S.-based Dana Corporation and France-based technology. The Dana Spicer Road ranger features Syegon. Dana Corporation has two versions, the entirely internal drive axle plumbing while the In- CTIS for military use (developed by PSI) and the ternational TIREBOSS has externally routed drive Tire Pressure Control System (TPCS) for commer- tire air supply lines. Steering axle tires on North cial, heavy machinery use (http://auto.howstuff- American trucks are not typically equipped with works.com/self-inflating-tire2.htm). There is an- this technology because their loading is relatively other small manufacturer called Air CTI which is heavy and constant and this limits the opportunity based in Australia (Victoria) and it has served the for pressure variation if the truck is equipped with customers in Australia and New Zealand. conventional tires (Bradley 2009). The reported benefits of operating with lower Figure 1 illustrates a CTIS at the wheel (Lynch tire pressures include: reduced road surfacing and/ Hummer 2006). The electronic control unit tells the or base course requirements; reduced road main- pneumatic control unit to check current pressure tenance, reduced driver fatigue and medical com- and either inflate or deflate the tire to the pressure plaints, lower vehicle operation costs because of less vibration-related vehicle operating costs be- cause of less vibration-related vehicle damage and fewer tire repairs, increased vehicle mobility and extended haul seasons (USDA Forest Service 1993; Bradley 1995). This paper presents the review of previous international studies conducted to inves- tigate the impacts of CTIS in forestry applications. The paper has created a compiled document which can assist the forest industry and research users to gain basic information on this transportation technology. IMPacts OF CTIS Road surface and truck mobility. A vehicle’s recommended tire inflation pressure may vary by 656 kPa in a single trip; reduced pressures (i.e., less than 483 kPa) are recommended for slower speeds and gravel/dirt roads. Most of the Canadian forestry trucks use a cold inflation pressure of approximately Fig. 1. Central Tire Inflation System at the wheel (Lynch 689.5 kPa (normal highway tire pressures). Vehicles Hummer 2006) lacking CTIS typically operate at a single high infla- 154 J. FOR. SCI., 63, 2017 (4): 153–160 tion pressure that may result in fuel savings but also soft sand conditions. Its results indicated that in- causes reduction of tire life, traction and ride quality creasing the ground contact area of the steer tire and increases road damage (Bradley 1995). by using a wider tire at reduced inflation pressures The USDA Forest Service started researching could improve the flotation to decrease the steer tire on CTIS with a study on road damage and set up ploughing. Reducing the tire pressures for tandem field trials in Idaho and Washington (Taylor 1987, drive tractor provided a noticeable improvement in 1988) and other studies in Alabama (Ashmore, traction. Despite 8,000 kg more Gross Combination Sirois 1987). Based on the results, road damage Weight, the tridem drive tractor configuration with decreased and vehicle performance improved un- low tire pressures demonstrated the best mobility der adverse conditions. while manoeuvring and required the least assistance On unpaved roads heavy truck traffic is one of the (Jokai, Webb 2001). Bulley and Blair (2001) de- major causes of road sedimentation (Foltz 1994). veloped a model to help increasing the gradeability of USDA Forest Service tested CTIS and it was found logging trucks [their simulation was based on stud- that reducing tire pressure from normal highway ies conducted by Sessions et al. (1986) and Gold- pressures to CTIS pressures could reduce sedi- sack (1988)] using reduced tire pressure on the mentation up to 38% (Foltz, Burroughs 1991). drive tires in British Colombia (Canada). Drive tire Moore and Sowa (1997) also mentioned that pressures were lowered from 690 to 410 kPa and no USDA Forest Service trials confirmed that reduc- incremental tire pressures were applied to the trucks ing tire pressures in light- and heavy-haul vehicles while they attempted to climb the adverse grade. by 40 to 60% (340 to 420 kPa) of standard highway By decreasing the tire pressure, the average length pressures significantly reduced rutting and erosion of the tire footprint increased from 28 to 38 cm. of gravel- and native-surfaced roads. Tests conduct- The trucks with reduced pressures on their drive ed by Sturos et al. (1995) on log trucks showed tires immediately benefited from the increased tire that reduced tire inflation pressures reduced the footprint and were able to climb the hill unassisted, average load measured in rolling resistance tests on while trucks operating at normal, high tire pressure loose sand roads by 45% and increased traction.